Confluence is a collaboration and content sharing platform used primarily by customers who are already using Atlassian's Jira project tracking product. The product appeals particularly to IT users.
$6.40
per month per user
RWS Tridion Sites
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
RWS Tridion Sites provides web content management capabilities, connecting people, processes, and information across teams, brands, and markets, to deliver impactful online experiences globally. RWS Tridion Sites' DPX platform enables the use of either traditional or headless publishing. It includes advanced features such as automated personalization, multilingual capabilities and Semantic AI. The BluePrinting® technology at the core of RWS Tridion Sites simplifies reuse and…
N/A
Pricing
Atlassian Confluence
RWS Tridion Sites
Editions & Modules
Free
$0
Free for 10 Users
Standard
$6.40
per month per user
Premium
$12.30
per month per user
Data Center
220,000.00
40,001+ Users - Annually
Enterprise
Contact Sales
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Confluence
RWS Tridion Sites
Free Trial
Yes
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
Prices shown here reflect prices for deployments with 100 users or less. The prices decrease wien the user base surpasses 100.
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Atlassian Confluence
RWS Tridion Sites
Features
Atlassian Confluence
RWS Tridion Sites
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Product A and Product B
Atlassian Confluence
7.1
158 Ratings
9% below category average
RWS Tridion Sites
-
Ratings
Task Management
7.2126 Ratings
00 Ratings
Gantt Charts
7.912 Ratings
00 Ratings
Scheduling
7.221 Ratings
00 Ratings
Workflow Automation
6.490 Ratings
00 Ratings
Mobile Access
6.8117 Ratings
00 Ratings
Search
6.9156 Ratings
00 Ratings
Visual planning tools
7.2126 Ratings
00 Ratings
Communication
Comparison of Communication features of Product A and Product B
Atlassian Confluence
7.9
158 Ratings
1% below category average
RWS Tridion Sites
-
Ratings
Chat
6.415 Ratings
00 Ratings
Notifications
8.2155 Ratings
00 Ratings
Discussions
7.8148 Ratings
00 Ratings
Surveys
7.015 Ratings
00 Ratings
Internal knowledgebase
9.0149 Ratings
00 Ratings
Integrates with GoToMeeting
6.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Integrates with Gmail and Google Hangouts
9.37 Ratings
00 Ratings
Integrates with Outlook
9.610 Ratings
00 Ratings
File Sharing & Management
Comparison of File Sharing & Management features of Product A and Product B
Atlassian Confluence
7.7
157 Ratings
4% below category average
RWS Tridion Sites
-
Ratings
Versioning
8.2136 Ratings
00 Ratings
Video files
6.8104 Ratings
00 Ratings
Audio files
6.896 Ratings
00 Ratings
Document collaboration
8.4152 Ratings
00 Ratings
Access control
8.7147 Ratings
00 Ratings
Advanced security features
8.3114 Ratings
00 Ratings
Integrates with Google Drive
5.947 Ratings
00 Ratings
Device sync
8.485 Ratings
00 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
Atlassian Confluence
-
Ratings
RWS Tridion Sites
9.0
9 Ratings
9% above category average
Role-based user permissions
00 Ratings
9.09 Ratings
Platform & Infrastructure
Comparison of Platform & Infrastructure features of Product A and Product B
Atlassian Confluence
-
Ratings
RWS Tridion Sites
9.1
8 Ratings
16% above category average
API
00 Ratings
8.36 Ratings
Internationalization / multi-language
00 Ratings
10.07 Ratings
Web Content Creation
Comparison of Web Content Creation features of Product A and Product B
Atlassian Confluence
-
Ratings
RWS Tridion Sites
8.5
8 Ratings
8% above category average
WYSIWYG editor
00 Ratings
8.08 Ratings
Code quality / cleanliness
00 Ratings
8.07 Ratings
Admin section
00 Ratings
9.08 Ratings
Page templates
00 Ratings
9.08 Ratings
Library of website themes
00 Ratings
8.24 Ratings
Mobile optimization / responsive design
00 Ratings
9.07 Ratings
Publishing workflow
00 Ratings
9.08 Ratings
Form generator
00 Ratings
8.33 Ratings
Web Content Management
Comparison of Web Content Management features of Product A and Product B
It is well suited due to the below reasons 1. Easy collaboration between teams 2. Strong integration with other applications 3. Centralized documentation among teams and within the organisation 4. Project planning and report sharing 5. Employee onboarding is easier and maintain HR policies very well. Less appropriate in below scenarios When this is being used as a main tool for communication rather than its purpose of collaboration.
Love the product and I really like how we use it for public sites. The only negative aspect is that it is just hard to find Tridion devs that understand the tool, grasp .net, react, and understand the blueprint, etc.
Cross product linking - If you use other Atlassian products then Atlassian Confluence is a no-brainer for your source of documentation, knowledge management etc. You can show previews of the linked asset natively E.g. showing a preview of a JIRA ticket in a Atlassian Confluence page.
Simple editing - Though the features available may not be super complex right now, this does come with the benefit of making it easy to edit and create documents. Some documentation editors can be overwhelming, Atlassian Confluence is simple and intuitive.
Native marketplace - If you want to install add-ons to your Atlassian Confluence space it's really easy. Admins can explore the Atlassian marketplace natively and install them to your instance in a few clicks. You can customise your Atlassian Confluence instance in many different ways using add-ons.
UI Design is very simplistic and basic could make use of more visually interesting colour choices, layout choices, etc.
Under the 'Content' menu, it defaults to having a landing page for all L1 and L2 category pages. Meaning as long as the broader content category has a sub-category, it still creates a separate landing page. In my team's case, this often creates blank pages, as we only fill out the page at the lowest sub-category (L3).
Hyperlinks are traditionally shown as blue, however, this results into very monotonously blue pages in cases where a lot of information is being linked.
Tridion is complicated in enough ways that it makes it difficult to train new users. Therefore, we have to limit the number of people with access to the system since we have not yet implemented Workflow.
When something goes wrong (items fail to publish, or there is unexpected behavior with components), there is little explanation provided that would point us in the right direction to troubleshoot. As a result, content Authors and Editors have to frequently ask for IT assistance.
I am confident that Atlassian can come with additional and innovative macros and functions to add value to Confluence. In 6 months, Atlassian transformed a good collaborative tools into a more comprehensive system that can help manage projects and processes, as well as "talk" with other Atlassian products like Jira. We are in fact learning more about Jira to evaluate a possible fit to complement our tool box.
I am giving this a semi-high rating because we have already got Tridion up and running and we are still in the process of moving the sites over to Tridion. It is unlikely we will be moving things to a new CMS AGAIN in the near future as the cost to get Tridion was high.
Atlassian Confluence is a great tool for project management, especially for internal documentation. It has a minimum governance requirement to use its full power. Also, it is a little pricy to unlock its full power as well, so it is not recommended for companies with a low budget in my opinion.
The editor user interface is very user friendly and in-site editing makes simple updates fast and easy. The extensibility of Tridion is a big plus and the ability to add our own options into the default Tridion interface helps us integrate with external systems. Finally, the user permissions and security system helps us deploy it within our large organization.
We never worked against the tide while using Confluence. Everything loads considerably fast, even media components like videos (hosted on the platform or embed external videos from Youtube, for example). We are not using heavy media components a lot, but in the rare occasion we happen to use one we have no problems whatsoever.
This rating is specifically for Atlassian's self-help documentation on their website. Often times, it is not robust enough to cover a complex usage of one of their features. Frequently, you can find an answer on the web, but not from Atlassian. Instead, it is usually at a power user group elsewhere on the net.
We chose Atlassian Confluence over SharePoint because it's much more user-friendly and intuitive. Atlassian Confluence makes collaboration and knowledge sharing easier with its simpler interface and better search. While SharePoint can be powerful, it often feels clunky and complex, making it harder for our team to actually use it.
It is a nuclear missile compared to the other handguns and knives on the market today. But it also requires nuclear technicians and expertise that a handgun doesn't require. Do you need to decimate your competition and you have the investment capabilities necessary to put a nuclear missile into the sky? Then definitely do it. Especially if you need a very good multi-lingual blueprint provider like Tridion.
We totally rely on this tool since a decade now and despite being so much transition in our company it has served us well in those transitions
Many times, during security audits we are asked to showcase our readiness for various compliance points and confluence helps us a lot in maintaining that
Talking about Confluence in front of clients and customers gives us an upper hand that we are up to date with latest trend and technologies and tools for our RnD planning and management