Authorize.net is a payment gateway software solution offered by Visa featuring secure data processing and fraud protection.
$25
monthly gateway
Checkout.com
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
Checkout.com headquartered in London enables businesses with technology designed to make payments seamless. Checkout.com boasts the fastest, most reliable payments in more than 150 currencies, with in-country acquiring, fraud filters and reporting through one API. Checkout.com can accept all major international credit and debit cards, as well as popular alternative and local payment methods. The company launched in 2012 and now has a team of over 1100 people across 18 offices worldwide.
N/A
Pricing
Authorize.net
Checkout.com
Editions & Modules
All-in-One Option
25 & 2.9% + $0.30
monthly gateway/per transaction
Payment Gateway Only
$25
monthly gateway
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Authorize.net
Checkout.com
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Authorize.net
Checkout.com
Considered Both Products
Authorize.net
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose Authorize.net
If you need a fast, reliable integration, Authorize.Net is the perfect starting solution because it has everything you need to start your business. As you grow, however, or if the kind of product you are selling requires specific payments solution (like recurring payments to …
I selected Authorize.net for online card processing as my client was strongly recommending it. On the recommendation from their on-site payment provider. This also means that he has the same customer service rep to call for online and for retail. It seems pretty similar to …
Authoize.Net is the best solution for small businesses. Flat rate pricing with no setup charges. Online customer support and has a huge knowledge database. Recurring billing was a big plus for us.
Our donor database, Bloomerang, partners with Stripe for donation forms. This has made Stripe a more user-friendly and viable option for donation processing. We are currently planning to switch over to Stripe, but at this time use PayPal to process donations.
I have found a similar feature on Authorize.net like PayPal, that's why I have shifted here. Few things are even better than Paypal. Authorize.net offers your customers a variety of payment options online. Authorize.net accepts payments from customers using mobile devices. …
We were unfamiliar with other products like Authorize.Net having used Stripe for so long. One of our e-commerce customers wanted to use Stripe as a payment platform on their website. Stripe seems okay, we looked at it, but the support was not as good as the system we have now.
We had previously used SAGE and Transaction Express. We've also explored Stripe, Amazon Pay, and Apple Pay as parallel payment options. In every situation, Authnet has better rates with fewer strings attached. It has also proven to have a significantly rich API which is a …
Authorize.net is a reliable and affordable payment processing service that offers more robust security than other services, such as Stripe or PayPal with their monthly fees at $25 dollars month lot of people may be turned off by these high prices but you get what you pay for - …
Authorize.net in a pure e-commerce environment is a very good choice for small to medium/small e-commerce businesses. It is not a good solution for brick-and-mortar businesses or relatively large e-commerce retailers.
We used Authorize.net when we signed up with our processor. It's interesting because every processor we talked to used authorize.net. I think there are a couple other big players in this space but it seemed like authorize.net was the leader by far. I haven't compared them to …
Stripe's platform doesn't seem to offer a lot in the way of customer service. I felt Authorize.Net's customer service was far superior. I didn't like that PayPal's platform redirected you to their site and then back into our site. It seemed confusing to the user and I'd rather …
We did not select authorize.net, it came with the software package with our catering system Spoonfed. I would prefer either Toast or LevelUp as a payment processor over authorize.net—those two are easier to use from a manager perspective and process refunds. My experience with …
The slightly better rates and the recommendation of our bank are probably the only reasons we use it. There aren't any features that blew us away or are enough to make us diehards. If another option presents itself, we may very well switch.
Square is very bare-bones and does not offer a lot of the options that Authorize.Net does. With Square, you do not get the benefit of the added security features to get protection against chargebacks and fraud. The reporting features are also less helpful with Square. Square is …
Authorize.net is often on the more complex end to implement (at least for custom implementations). Stripe and Braintree are somewhat more developer-friendly and also have more intuitive user interfaces (for management and day-to-day use).
While other gateways (like Braintree) are a little fresher and more innovative than Authorize.Net, no one has the track record that AuthNet has. Plus you have to consider that if you want to use the Braintree gateway (or many others) without using their payment processing, you …
Authorize.net does not stack up well against Stripe. Stripe is much simpler and easy to maintain. Stripe's recurring payment platform allows the manager to easily associate subscriptions with customers. Where Authorize.net takes about 4 hours to learn, Stripe takes about 1 …
The Authorize.net API is more robust than the competitors' that we tested. The one drawback is that there is no hosted SSL protected JS library, which is a great feature that Stripe offers. We chose Authorize.net for situations where the solution needed a very customizable …
My core market being the Middle East, Checkout.com has the advantage of being the most trusted and performing partner in the region. The others are behind and regional players by definition cannot support [...] globally.
We selected Checkout.com for their vast payment knowledge and experience as well as their global coverage and variety of payment methods supported. We also chose them for their very prompt production support and customer engagement, they stood out above other vendors we have …
The settlements are daily in Checkout.com. However, the fees could have been lower. 3DS documentation is clear in Checkout.com, which is why we only activated Apple Pay through the Checkout.com payment gateway. The dashboard is easy to use for setting fraud rules. Analysis …
We still use all the above, but checkout was selected to be included within them because of their current stability, their future-looking approach, and our interest in how they would develop. It's fair to say they are keeping to that initial evaluation and going from strength …
Stripe is good in many ways, too, but it falls short of Checkout in its capacity to do pre-arbitration and arbitration on Chargebacks. Overall, Worldpay was pretty mid-range.
With other card provider, we have not been able to gain the same level support. With other provider, we have not been advised much about anything relating to our questions to them involving a project for instance. With other provider, the backoffice has not been as smooth …
Checkout.com offers services that are in line with competitors and the payment industry. What they have more than others is proactivity; they have an internal infrastructure that works very well because their account managers can provide quick responses to our needs. We have …
As I've mentioned earlier, Stripe is good for small startups but if you're fast growing startup or midmarket player, their sales machine is a blackhole and they have been struggling to keep up. Adyen on the other hand is great but it's only focused on large enterprise and their …
Other PSPs like: ZEN.COM; Finaro (Credorax) CKO has better support, API options, report options, clear documentation (regularly updated with features and changes!), supported payment methods with regions and currencies, and easy flow to integrate.
We are not using only checkout.com; however, while choosing the 2nd provider, we made a choice for Checkout.com because: a. all needed basic features available, b. good pricing, c. developing company, d. teams who ask what the merchant wants and, after that - implement what the …
Authorize.net is reliable and I feel confident that customers' information is protected. The security protocols used by Authorize.net appear to be as good, and probably better than many credit card payment processors. However, the initial setup process was very difficult. I distinctly recall getting up and running as being very cumbersome and time-consuming. I also was disappointed with how the processing and deposit of payments were not consistent. I distinctly remember regretting the decision to go with Authorize.net. However, as mentioned before, with the time and effort required to get the account set up and running, I refused to go through the process again and try a different provider.
Checkout offers great service and expertise and stands above its peers in full-service offering, integration, and ongoing support. However, Checkout is not suitable in a scenario where Paysend is fully licensed and a direct acquirer of the scheme. In this scenario, Paysend can perform the full value chain in-house.
Account management: bi-weekly calls and follow up by email or slack, good understanding of our needs and high engagement
Technical account manager: as above, high engagement with us and sharing Checkout.com technical roadmap
Performance: with the recent enhancement in intelligent acceptance,
Mix of own and third party acquiring: this is much appreciated for a merchant like us to be able to process locally via third party acquiring when Checkout.com does not have its own
Authorize.net has been a useful system for our Chamber. We appreciate the ease of use and access to our Main Frame. Connecting Authorize.net to our system for membership, event and other payment ease has been excellent and we have experienced no problems whatsoever.
In the last 3 years that I have been working with Checkout.com, they had an unplanned outage that lasted less than a few minutes. Their uptime is amazing. If they have maintenance, unlike banks, they don't have downtime during this time. We frequently require their support and Checkout.com responds to us within minutes. When we have important rollouts, I schedule calls with our merchant support manager to monitor the rollout/perform tests, etc. It is always easy to find time lost even with short notice.
Checkout.com performance as an acquirer and a PSP is excellent. We have too many transactions per day, therefore reports take some time to generate before they are available for downloading. But it indeed takes reasonable time. We use native/h2h integration therefore, there is no redirection issue, all pages load quickly on our side. Based on my experience, Checkout.com will never never integrate with software or systems that will slow them down. Amongst all payment methods they offer, all are processed immediately, without delays.
Support has been top-notch. I've been with 3 different payment processors in the past and they did not provide any support with regards to failed payments, regular calls to optimize our acceptance rating. Checkout.com has been in constant communication with us since Day 1, explaining trends and providing us with data and explaining to us how we can improve to get the most out of Checkout.com.
We had previously used SAGE and Transaction Express. We've also explored Stripe, Amazon Pay, and Apple Pay as parallel payment options. In every situation, Authnet has better rates with fewer strings attached. It has also proven to have a significantly rich API which is a must-have for any solution we implement.
We still use all the above, but checkout was selected to be included within them because of their current stability, their future-looking approach, and our interest in how they would develop. It's fair to say they are keeping to that initial evaluation and going from strength to strength.
Our tech team implemented payments API to process payments online. Analytics team receives transaction repots that we use to build our own performance dashboards and help to reconcile transactions. API is indeed flexible - we don't use all features but if required we can easily implement them. When Checkout.com adds new features or functionalities, some of them can be used even on an older API version which saved us tech resources and implementation time. We use the same API to expand into new markets - technically we don't need to change anything when we want to launch payments in a new country.
Lets us charge cards so we can get paid on time, every time.
It was very difficult to setup the DocuSign integration the first time, but after we got it setup, it's made the onboarding process very easy. That probably saves about 30 minutes every time we get a new client.