Board vs. QuotaPath

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Board
Score 9.0 out of 10
Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
Board is presented as an enterprise planning platform, offered as a solution to accelerate business performance and enable continuous planning with greater forecast accuracy to drive confident, aligned decisions.N/A
QuotaPath
Score 8.5 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
QuotaPath automates the commission process, helping revenue teams manage and track variable pay. Teams that use QuotaPath gain real-time visibility into commissions and forecasted earnings.
$25
per month (billed annually) per user
Pricing
BoardQuotaPath
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Essential
$25
per month (billed annually) per user
Growth
$35
per month (billed annually) per user
Premium
$50
per month (billed annually) per user
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
BoardQuotaPath
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsQuotaPath has three pricing editions, each with a platform fee that includes the all-in cost of QuotaPath for teams with up to five users. (This includes user access, ongoing support, integration implementations, and is billed annually. Any users beyond the first five have a per-seat cost relative to their associated tier.) The Growth tier offers a free trial.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
BoardQuotaPath
Considered Both Products
Board
Chose Board
Business problems that Board addresses are & how Board stacks up against them :Difficulty in managing and tracking multiple projects and tasks at the same timeInefficient communication and coordination among team membersLack of visibility into team performance and …
Chose Board
Board platform giving all the services from the lastest update according to our own business requirement. Even It's pricing model is very lower than other platform. We are getting lots of digital data maintaining, reporting, publishing without any kind of highly training course.
Chose Board
We earlier used Planful, which was also a good product but not as good as Board. The backend reporting and analysis of data are top-notch. The reports generated are quick and accurate. Board also offers to learn to upskill the team so that they can use the tool effectively and …
Chose Board
The features and the haslle free UI where any first time user can understand the esay navigation and achieving their business goal. To be brief, the features are very unique and most promising compared to the other application. Providing custom & tailored solutions of business …
Chose Board
Board has been more complete when compared to Anaplan. Although I didn't participate in the buying decision of any of those products I have used both and by far Board just has more features. It's more than a CPM, it's BI and CPM put together. If I had to make a choice now it …
Chose Board
Board is much much easier to setup than compared to Azure Power BI. Power BI also has a lot of challenges around data refresh with their web interface. While talking to support, we were made aware that for full feature-set, we should use the desktop version. Clearly something …
Chose Board
Board is useful in running all under one platform which is advance analytics, creating workflows and allowing users to create customizable dashboard once and using them for longitudinal tracking of Key performance indicators. It can provide tools and applications required to …
Chose Board
Based on your budget and what your inclination is to brand/service reputation, you can always find a different platform that can do more/better for the same/less cost, based on how you seek to find the metrics you want analyzed. It also depends on how your forecasting and …
Chose Board
We selected Board over similar alternatives for its integrated business intelligence and corporate management capabilities. Furthermore, the ability to generate customized real-time reports, benchmark data, and trends were the primary reasons for implementing Board in our …
Chose Board
We felt that Board has better integration. This is purely from the POC call that we had with both the teams. I personally have not evaluated the tool.
Chose Board
We check previous reviews of the product and used a trial run of both products in a trial period. Most of our users voted for Board because of the features so our organization chose Board.
Chose Board
1) One of the main reasons we went for Board is that the consultant we hired was confident that it would be a game-changer in terms of financial analytics. He proved to be right.
2) Board has a great user community, so help is something that is always available even if their …
Chose Board
Board is a non-traditional reporting tool. It uses the latest data sciences advances to organize data. Board’s advanced In-memory Server Cluster architecture allows Board server workloads to be shared on a virtually unlimited number of nodes. This functionality ensures full …
Chose Board
We can not say that IBM system is not good, it is at par with Board. Selection is based on [the] best bid only. While we have used IBM also in [another] place.
Chose Board
Board has a number of flexible and easy tools which are not complicated to get their full performance concepts. Board interface can be customized by all users, Cloud deployment basics are also very simple to any user, and the data insights collection capability which Board …
Chose Board
The Cloud tools and the easy setting of all the Board functionalities via the Cloud deployment are amazing and easy to train on the Board features performance concepts. Board has straightforward business solutions generation capabilities and its intelligent functions are more …
Chose Board
These tools are handled for different purposed across the Product Groups however Board has an edge on the getting the best things upfront rather than becoming the jack of all trades. It has highly specific use cases for better Business Analytics and Decision making.
Chose Board
Board tools are well arranged and very accessible by the user. Board capabilities that enable effective Cloud marketing of various business or products are effective and also its data analytics is the best. Board allows reports creation and easy reports distribution among …
Chose Board
The flexibility of the Board features and the [ease] of customization make everything amazing and the ability to model new data models and also the new business is the greatest capability. Board can manage multiple contents through the Cloud and also export different reports …
QuotaPath
Chose QuotaPath
We also evaluated Concert but I'm not seeing that as an option. We selected QuotaPath over all others because of the stunning UI/UX, the self serve option at the beginning, and the streamlined onboarding process.
Chose QuotaPath
I have looked at the integrated tools for CRMs such as Copper which tries to handle a leaderboard. This tool is not useful at all and does not motivate sales teams to perform. It does not consider sales quota and individual compensation in a relevant way. CRMs are primarily …
Chose QuotaPath
My favorite thing and main reason we went with QuotaPath was their teams willingness to work with us. They have a comp consultant who helped us develop new plans, as well as a strong onboarding and support staff willing to field and help on any questions or concerns that I had
Chose QuotaPath
QuotaPath is fairly easy to use and integrate and use, but the only problem is the fact that it is very difficult to manage a very large data case with different incentive structure on QuotaPath, hence it is good for small organisations. Also QuotaPath is really affordable if …
Chose QuotaPath
Salesforce is better for more extensive and sales-focused companies with more nuances, but it also comes with a hefty price tag. QuotaPath is excellent for smaller teams kicking things off. I would recommend it as a beginner solution or an excellent lightweight solution for …
Chose QuotaPath
QuotaPath was the had the best ease of use for my end users, and the right price point
Chose QuotaPath
CaptivateIQ operates in more of a spreadsheet fashion. I appreciated its extreme customizability but it isn't for everyone.
Chose QuotaPath
Xactly Incent was very difficult to configure. And UI wasn't very friendly. Spiff and CaptivateIQ had a good UI but the learning and coding required was going to be too much for the short window of time before implementation was due. QuotaPath was able to build our comp plans …
Chose QuotaPath
QuotaPath is incredibly user friendly, and integrates with CRM so easily. Eliminates much of the back and forth that exists with other competitors.
Chose QuotaPath
QuotaPath is much more user friendly and admin friendly. Not as difficult to set up and much more flexible.
Chose QuotaPath
Way too cumbersome to setup, high implementation costs, not built for our size business
Chose QuotaPath
I haven't used CaptivateIQ but got a demo of it and its pricing. QuotaPath is much more affordable and allows me to be more hands-on with it. CaptivateIQ has a platform fee and the cost per seat is much higher. It does allow for more customization over QuotaPath but our plans …
Chose QuotaPath
Simplicity and streamlined implementation
Chose QuotaPath
QP was the most affordable and transparent with their pricing.
Features
BoardQuotaPath
BI Standard Reporting
Comparison of BI Standard Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Board
6.8
Ratings
11% below category average
QuotaPath
-
Ratings
Pixel Perfect reports6.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Customizable dashboards6.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Report Formatting Templates6.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Ad-hoc Reporting
Comparison of Ad-hoc Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Board
6.9
Ratings
12% below category average
QuotaPath
-
Ratings
Drill-down analysis6.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Formatting capabilities6.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Integration with R or other statistical packages6.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Report sharing and collaboration7.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Report Output and Scheduling
Comparison of Report Output and Scheduling features of Product A and Product B
Board
7.1
Ratings
12% below category average
QuotaPath
-
Ratings
Publish to Web6.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Publish to PDF7.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Report Versioning6.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Report Delivery Scheduling7.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Data Discovery and Visualization
Comparison of Data Discovery and Visualization features of Product A and Product B
Board
7.3
Ratings
2% below category average
QuotaPath
-
Ratings
Pre-built visualization formats (heatmaps, scatter plots etc.)6.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Location Analytics / Geographic Visualization7.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Predictive Analytics7.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Pattern Recognition and Data Mining7.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Access Control and Security
Comparison of Access Control and Security features of Product A and Product B
Board
7.5
Ratings
11% below category average
QuotaPath
-
Ratings
Multi-User Support (named login)7.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Role-Based Security Model7.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Multiple Access Permission Levels (Create, Read, Delete)6.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Single Sign-On (SSO)8.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile Capabilities
Comparison of Mobile Capabilities features of Product A and Product B
Board
6.9
Ratings
7% below category average
QuotaPath
-
Ratings
Responsive Design for Web Access6.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile Application6.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Dashboard / Report / Visualization Interactivity on Mobile6.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Budgeting, Planning, and Forecasting
Comparison of Budgeting, Planning, and Forecasting features of Product A and Product B
Board
7.5
Ratings
8% below category average
QuotaPath
-
Ratings
Long-term financial planning7.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Financial budgeting7.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Forecasting6.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Scenario modeling8.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Management reporting7.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Consolidation and Close
Comparison of Consolidation and Close features of Product A and Product B
Board
7.3
Ratings
6% below category average
QuotaPath
-
Ratings
Financial data consolidation8.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Journal entries and reports6.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Multi-currency management7.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Intercompany Eliminations7.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Minority Ownership7.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Local and consolidated reporting6.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Detailed Audit Trails6.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Financial Reporting and Compliance
Comparison of Financial Reporting and Compliance features of Product A and Product B
Board
7.2
Ratings
9% below category average
QuotaPath
-
Ratings
Financial Statement Reporting7.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Management Reporting6.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Excel-based Reporting6.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Automated board and financial reporting7.60 Ratings00 Ratings
XBRL support for regulatory filing6.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Analytics and Reporting
Comparison of Analytics and Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Board
7.4
Ratings
9% below category average
QuotaPath
-
Ratings
Personalized dashboards7.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Color-coded scorecards7.60 Ratings00 Ratings
KPIs6.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Cost and profitability analysis7.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Key Performance Indicator setting7.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Benchmarking with external data7.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Integration
Comparison of Integration features of Product A and Product B
Board
7.4
Ratings
9% below category average
QuotaPath
-
Ratings
Flat file integration7.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Excel data integration7.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Direct links to 3rd-party data sources7.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Sales ICM
Comparison of Sales ICM features of Product A and Product B
Board
-
Ratings
QuotaPath
9.6
Ratings
20% above category average
Sales compensation plan creation00 Ratings9.80 Ratings
Complex sales crediting00 Ratings9.70 Ratings
Sales compensation process automation00 Ratings9.90 Ratings
Incentive auditing/regulation compliance00 Ratings9.40 Ratings
Sales compensation dashboards & forecasting00 Ratings9.80 Ratings
Incentive modeling00 Ratings9.40 Ratings
Agile incentive strategy00 Ratings9.50 Ratings
ICM mobile visibility00 Ratings9.20 Ratings
Best Alternatives
BoardQuotaPath
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
Centage
Centage
Score 9.4 out of 10
Everstage
Everstage
Score 9.1 out of 10
Enterprises
OneStream
OneStream
Score 8.8 out of 10
Everstage
Everstage
Score 9.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
BoardQuotaPath
Likelihood to Recommend
6.2
(0 ratings)
9.8
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.1
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
7.7
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Availability
9.1
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
9.1
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.0
(0 ratings)
9.8
(0 ratings)
In-Person Training
7.3
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
7.2
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Configurability
9.1
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
9.1
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
9.1
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
9.1
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
9.1
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
BoardQuotaPath
Likelihood to Recommend
It's been very good when all departments of the company had to pitch in data/information for a specific business decision. My company had to have input from Marketing, Sales, Engineering, Customer Support, and accounting in order to decide on what kind of development was next needed for our platform.
Read full review
It's really an all-in-one solution for tracking the success of a sales team. You can establish unique earning paths per sales rep (user) to allow for flexible commission structures, bonus payouts for going above and beyond, and more. I think it's a great solution for anyone looking to get more insight into their sales team's productivity - and to expand an existing sales force.
Read full review
Pros
  • Board makes data summary easy - It makes comprehensive reports with great visuals.
  • Board makes navigation is easy for users - it has abundant training materials to help you get started.
  • With Board security is easy to set up and maintain for the organization - the support staff also provides great assistance for implementation and resolves other issues.
Read full review
  • We don’t have to calculate commissions in Excel anymore! It takes a fraction of the time it used to calculate commissions. Saves about 1-2 days on month end close. I like that it is easy for me and reps to drill down and see the calculations of their payouts. Reps can see calcs all month long instead of having to wait until the end of the month, so acts as a motivator. Sales managers can manage their direct reports better.
  • When I first started using QP, I was not thrilled with the quota attainment reporting for dollars, percent, and team management. I’m glad that they added leaderboards and are working on better reporting. I like the UX and UI of the whole software.
  • I like being able to export the following easily to Excel – resolved payouts for all payouts, payouts by rep, and Ledger (ASC 606) info.
  • Admins can request that reps acknowledge their plans through QP, which helps with compliance and ensures we are in agreement with calculations. I like that they are adding a docusign feature.
  • You can easily adjust earnings if a correction is needed, even after the month is closed. Just make sure you reverse from the end of the process (i.e. undo in ledger, undo the resolved payout, delete the unresolved payout, un-approve the deal).
Read full review
Cons
  • Board BI tool has a steep learning curve and can be challenging for a new user to reach to board's full capacity.
  • We have to use a windows scheduler to schedule data import tasks; it would be great if Board could provide its own scheduler.
Read full review
  • More workspace roles with the ability to customize what each user is able to do. Currently, there's only member and team manager. The team manager currently has too much power and we want to remove some of the things they're able to do like approve deals.
  • When you sync a deal from the CRM, you can override the earnings but you cannot override the field value you're syncing over. It would be great if that was possible.
  • When you want to exclude a deal, you have to go in the filters and add a rule to exclude the ID. It would be better if there's an option to reject deals in certain paths as an approver.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Board is a fantastic product for swift BI solution delivery when compared with its peers. Ease of use, support and integration with Microsoft Office Addin open a wide horizon of opportunities for further enhancements to solutions. Easy bespoke app development capabilities make it a winner for us. BOARD is just like a white canvas, it lets you explore your creative side while designing and delivering a solution
Read full review
I don't have buying decision but we have input on the software or solutions we use and this has been a game changer to review our commissions. Quota Path makes it very easy to ensure we are on target. Saves us a lot of time compared to using spreadsheets
Read full review
Usability
Overall, Board is easy to use and develop for. Users can quickly get up to speed and begin using with only a small amount of training. Generally, it takes longer to explain the data structure (our customization) than it does to explain the tool itself. The most consistent challenge we run into is hierarchy management. New members have to be mapped to each level of an entity. While there is a "normalization" process, it often fails to map correctly or in rare cases can change custom mapping that was previously set up.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Performance
very fast and no integration problems
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
The only time I needed assistance was due to a problem in
the prints: the colors of the brochures as they were on the screen were not
reproduced in the print, but a series of standard colors were reproduced. This
fact made colored numbers on a colored background illegible. From the
assistance they confirmed that it was a problem of version 10.2 that occurred
when leaving the brochures with the default colors proposed by Board. To obtain
the desired colors, they had to be personalized ... I didn't like the solution
very much and the technician who recommended it didn't like me either, but they
would have solved the problem with the following versions. In any case, the
assistance was quick and effective even if not exactly efficient.
Read full review
We got a dedicated CSM to help with bugs, troubleshooting, and redesign of comp plans. When we ran into issues with the calculations, the CSM was able to assist identifying the root case so that we could fix it. CSM was also very receptive of product roadmap ideas and willing to engage quarterly or more often.
Read full review
In-Person Training
Board is fairly simple and straight forward. Advance training on workflows and procedures is a good one but the training content only touches through the interesting areas. training content needs to cover a few areas more in-depth
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
The problem of user profiling in our context is certainly
quite complex. The complexity is given by the fact that the company is divided
territorially into logistic points of sale, but at the same time they are
virtually divided into divisions (or specific implementation areas) and points
of sale of competence. The same operator can have access to data at different
logistic sales points, sales points of competence and divisions.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
We earlier used Planful, which was also a good product but not as good as Board. The backend reporting and analysis of data are top-notch. The reports generated are quick and accurate. Board also offers to learn to upskill the team so that they can use the tool effectively and collaborate.
Read full review
Salesforce is better for more extensive and sales-focused companies with more nuances, but it also comes with a hefty price tag. QuotaPath is excellent for smaller teams kicking things off. I would recommend it as a beginner solution or an excellent lightweight solution for sales transparency and payouts to your team.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • With effective financial analysis and planning and using Board, we were able to see a +18% QoQ revenue increase consistently for seven months straight
  • Using Board Dashboards, the senior management was able to better & clearly understand the financial position of the company at a given time and take better strategic decisions
Read full review
  • I can't quantify the time/money saved but we reduced the amount of time finance spent manually updating spreadsheets for comp statements.
  • We reduced the amount of disputes and issues people had with their earnings and payouts
  • We had 0 errors with deals being missed and not paid out to reps.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Board Screenshots

Screenshot of PlanningScreenshot of Sales PlanningScreenshot of ProfitabilityScreenshot of GeomapScreenshot of ForecastScreenshot of Financial Plan

QuotaPath Screenshots

Screenshot of the scalable team workflows that automate commission management, with task prioritization and success insights.Screenshot of the home experience for reps to create ownership for their compensation, where they can see updates from the last time they logged in (including deals with commissions earned), understand how they are performing, and forecast earnings based on their pipeline.Screenshot of quota attainment tracking and forecasting, to understand how individual reps and teams are pacing toward goals, with leaderboards to motivate teams with friendly competition.Screenshot of payout schedules for earned amounts, with the option to split commissions into multiple payouts with installments, and explanations of clawbacks to catch overpayments. Reps can cross-reference their earnings and know exactly what will be on their paycheck.Screenshot of the AI-Powered Plan Builder, which enables quick setups and adjustments to build and execute your comp plans in QuotaPath. Describe your plan in a few words, or upload a PDF of your plan, and allow AI to configure it for QuotaPath.Screenshot of the self-serve integrations to connect data, with CRM connections like HubSpot and Salesforce and invoicing systems like Quickbooks and Stripe.