Carbonite by OpenText vs. OpenText Core Endpoint Backup

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Carbonite by OpenText
Score 7.6 out of 10
N/A
Carbonite by OpenText (also replacing the former EVault products acquired from Seagate in 2016) is a cloud backup solution for small business. Designed to recover anything from a single file to an entire system with the click of a button, Carbonite users can protect virtually any type of file.N/A
OpenText Core Endpoint Backup
Score 8.4 out of 10
N/A
OpenText Core Endpoint Backup, formerly Carbonite Endpoint, provides an enterprise-grade backup solution for all endpoints, including mobile devices or devices spread across a distributed enterprise network.
$24
per month
Pricing
Carbonite by OpenTextOpenText Core Endpoint Backup
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Basic Computer Backup
$24
per month
Advanced Endpoint Protection
$34
per month
Basic Server Backup
$50
per month
Basic Backup
$55
per month
Advanced Server Protection
$147
per month
Advanced Protection
$199
per month
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Carbonite by OpenTextOpenText Core Endpoint Backup
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
YesNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Carbonite by OpenTextOpenText Core Endpoint Backup
Considered Both Products
Carbonite by OpenText
Chose Carbonite by OpenText
We use Symantec Backup Exec which backs up to an external hard drive. We wanted a secondary, offsite backup and chose Carbonite as it was reasonably priced and it suited our business needs at this time.
Chose Carbonite by OpenText
Carbonite felt it was much better for us to be on Server Backup incase our server went down.
Chose Carbonite by OpenText
They don't really compare as we use them in different ways.
Chose Carbonite by OpenText
Carbonite sever backup is easy to set up and configure. Cost per byte is reasonable.
Chose Carbonite by OpenText
Honestly the first use I had of this product was because I had inherited it. My first interaction came from a new client who was utilizing the software, this was a few years ago. Since that first interaction I've become more impressed with the software over the years, and when …
Chose Carbonite by OpenText
Much easier, I love how easy it is to verify my backups. With some other products, I did not really know how they were doing because it was too time-consuming to verify the backup. With carbonite, I get email reports every day with any issues and with successes! That is going …
Chose Carbonite by OpenText
We used Symantec many years ago, so I don't know that I can compare the two fairly. Backup Exec was hard to use and we backed up on tapes, rather than in the cloud. I feel much more confident in the backups that we have with Carbonite.
Chose Carbonite by OpenText
N/A - since I've always used Carbonite (in lieu of thumb drive backups).
Chose Carbonite by OpenText
Netbak is a great product but we also had a secondary issue of having to backup several PC's on site and at remote locations. Carbonite helped with both and gave us one central admin console to be able to check the progress of all our backups, where netbak would have required …
Chose Carbonite by OpenText
We need a license for each server to backup to tape and then had to run it all at once here its not tied to key but to the amount of space I use ... more space, more money etc. I also don't have to worry about a license not registering, and I can run the backups all at once or …
Chose Carbonite by OpenText
I use Carbonite to backup our desktops and laptops before adding our server. Adding the server helped save time and money. Carbonite has always been highly rated.
Chose Carbonite by OpenText
Carbonite Server Backup performs exceptionally well versus Barracuda Backup. One of the best features is the cost savings of not having to buy expensive equipment to keep in our office building. Plus, the ease of mind knowing our backup is being handled off site. Though …
OpenText Core Endpoint Backup

No answer on this topic

Features
Carbonite by OpenTextOpenText Core Endpoint Backup
Data Center Backup
Comparison of Data Center Backup features of Product A and Product B
Carbonite by OpenText
8.9
24 Ratings
3% above category average
OpenText Core Endpoint Backup
5.6
1 Ratings
43% below category average
Universal recovery10.09 Ratings00 Ratings
Instant recovery3.811 Ratings8.01 Ratings
Recovery verification9.79 Ratings4.01 Ratings
Business application protection9.015 Ratings00 Ratings
Multiple backup destinations10.016 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Incremental backup identification9.721 Ratings5.01 Ratings
Backup to the cloud9.623 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Deduplication and file compression9.013 Ratings4.01 Ratings
Snapshots10.011 Ratings00 Ratings
Flexible deployment8.912 Ratings4.01 Ratings
Management dashboard8.912 Ratings6.01 Ratings
Platform support8.913 Ratings4.01 Ratings
Retention options6.714 Ratings4.01 Ratings
Encryption9.814 Ratings4.01 Ratings
Enterprise Backup
Comparison of Enterprise Backup features of Product A and Product B
Carbonite by OpenText
8.6
3 Ratings
1% above category average
OpenText Core Endpoint Backup
6.5
1 Ratings
26% below category average
Continuous data protection8.73 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Replication8.62 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Operational reporting and analytics7.23 Ratings4.01 Ratings
Malware protection9.01 Ratings4.01 Ratings
Multi-location capabilities8.32 Ratings8.01 Ratings
Ransomware Recovery10.02 Ratings4.01 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Carbonite by OpenTextOpenText Core Endpoint Backup
Small Businesses
Cove Data Protection
Cove Data Protection
Score 9.7 out of 10
Cove Data Protection
Cove Data Protection
Score 9.7 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Bacula Enterprise
Bacula Enterprise
Score 9.6 out of 10
Bacula Enterprise
Bacula Enterprise
Score 9.6 out of 10
Enterprises
Bacula Enterprise
Bacula Enterprise
Score 9.6 out of 10
Bacula Enterprise
Bacula Enterprise
Score 9.6 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Carbonite by OpenTextOpenText Core Endpoint Backup
Likelihood to Recommend
9.1
(49 ratings)
7.0
(23 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
5.0
(8 ratings)
1.0
(1 ratings)
Usability
8.9
(3 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.2
(3 ratings)
9.7
(6 ratings)
Implementation Rating
6.4
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Carbonite by OpenTextOpenText Core Endpoint Backup
Likelihood to Recommend
OpenText
More than enough for small companies with several on-prem servers. In 2021, it wouldn't be wise to pit all important data to a single backup service. Carbonite Server is solid, but it's not 100% reliable so I'd definitely recommend having multiple backup services either on the cloud in conjunction with other backup services so the user has multiple safety nets in case of disaster and failed granular restorations.
Read full review
OpenText
Carbonite Endpoint 360 is a great solution for any organization with compliance needs. Office 365 defaults to a 30 day backup of all data. Carbonite Endpoint 360 extends this well beyond 30 days and provides an all-inclusive source for retention for data in Office 365. Any small to medium business would greatly benefit from this solution as they can design their entire infrastructure in Office 365 and ensure it's all backed up.
Read full review
Pros
OpenText
  • Simple administrative web interface - It's easy to provision users, look at data usage stats, disable users, and update policies to control what folders users are allowed to backup, and what options they can access
  • Easy client installation - Installing and updating clients was very simple. The client would notify the user when a new update was approved by the site admins, and they typically went very smoothly.
  • Good performance - Backups went fairly fast, and were generally invisible to the user, other than the icon updating on files to indicate whether the current version of a file was backed up or not.
Read full review
OpenText
  • It is excellent at automating your backups. You don't need to manually do it, just set it up once and let it run in the background.
  • It's pretty simple to set up and use. It will automatically suggest the best options that work for most people and you can be up and running pretty quickly.
  • It's safe and reliable. We have been using it for a couple of years now and had no major issues.
  • Their phone support is excellent.
  • It's also really easy to maintain your backed up data to reduce redundancy.
Read full review
Cons
OpenText
  • While overall file restoration is easy to do, obtaining earlier versions is not as user friendly as it could be. You need to enter a date and click search to bring up the latest versions as of the date entered. That’s fine, but what is missing is the ability to see all versions of an individual file. If I am looking for a past file version I want to be able to view the file history as a subset of that file (in other words I should be able to click a + sign and expand to see past versions of the file). Otherwise I am just guessing which dates the file was changed in the past. Sometimes that’s OK, but Mozy needs to build in this enhanced, but necessary feature.
  • A couple of years ago, for non enterprise users, Mozy made radical storage and pricing changes forcing myself and many users off their system, as the price for the same storage was going up significantly. So be careful when using Mozy as past experience has shown they are willing to make major changes regardless of the negative impact on their users.
Read full review
OpenText
  • To be honest not so impressed with the amount of time it has taken to get data backed up to the cloud.
  • I have not had to do a restore at this time so I cannot comment on the restore process.
  • I was not aware at time of procurement that the upload process would take so long since we were not procuring their hardware. Sales rep mad it seem like upload would only take a day or two and we are now starting week 7 hoping to be done by week 8 for 1.5 TBs of data.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
OpenText
Carbonite Server Backup does not integrate or support any reporting; it is not good at it. We required monthly and quarterly reports for audit. If we fail in that we get fined or we have to pay a certain amount of money to customer. It does not support cloud instances and we are using N2WS for the cloud instances. This is an additional burden for customers.
Read full review
OpenText
I found their alerting to be very poor. I missed several days of backups without knowledge of this, until I signed into the portal. I would get daily emails reporting backups were in progress or done, but nothing indicating that a backup had been stuck or paused for 3 days. For this reason alone, I did not renew.
Read full review
Usability
OpenText
Out of all the vendor we deal with they are one of the best when it comes to customers service. Reliable,you can reach them by telephone easily, Great overall can not say anything to the contrary. Usibility is excellent. I recommend them highly whether you need a simple backup ofr more complex for servers etc.
Read full review
OpenText
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
OpenText
I usually find what I need to know by looking in the Carbonite knowledge base online. We haven't had any major problems, usually we just need clarification on a point or more details about a feature so we look it up. We haven't had to call in for help in quite awhile.
Read full review
OpenText
Does what it needs to do quietly and efficiently in the background without interrupting the workflow. It offers instant automated back-ups without troubling the end user. As it is such an automated system, once it is up and running, there is little or no support needed from the service provider. From what I understand the support from Carbonite during the setup and implementation was absolutely fine.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
OpenText
We had appliance and we just needed to setup the Director Console which was straight forward and easy.
Read full review
OpenText
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
OpenText
Netbak is a great product but we also had a secondary issue of having to backup several PC's on site and at remote locations. Carbonite helped with both and gave us one central admin console to be able to check the progress of all our backups, where netbak would have required us to setup a tunnel or use the internet to move data back to our main office.
Read full review
OpenText
We have also used Mozy Pro and Dropbox. They are all pretty similar in functionality/features of backing up data (not system state or databases as I don't think any of the 3 are well suited for that). To me, it comes down to personal preference and choosing a product that is universal for multiple users, for ease of management.
Read full review
Return on Investment
OpenText
  • We have a safety net that we didn't have before.
  • Key players are now backed up through an automated system that was easy to silently install.
  • The resources used impacted our exchange server negatively and slowed email until it was disabled.
Read full review
OpenText
  • Carbonite Endpoint has demonstrated value in its ability to easily restore seemingly lost files for remote users.
  • While we haven't yet had to exercise it, knowing we have the option of remotely wiping endpoints containing sensitive data has brought confidence to our management team that we can mitigate data breaches through preventable means.
  • The privacy issue around device tracking is costing the company in terms of employee trust and morale and needs to be mitigated with appropriate messaging and/or disabling of this feature.
Read full review
ScreenShots