Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Celoxis
Score 8.8 out of 10
Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
Celoxis is a Enterprise online project management solution for midsize to large businesses to help them plan and manage complex and diverse project portfolios. The collective suite includes modules for resource management, budgeting, revenue forecasting, time and expense tracking, reporting and team collaboration. Celoxis includes features such as advanced scheduling, which combines real-world conditions, such as resource time off, multi-time zone, part-time resources, working weekends etc.,…N/A
Wrike
Score 8.3 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
Wrike is a project management and collaboration software. This solution connects tasks, discussions, and emails to the user’s project plan. Wrike is optimized for agile workflows and aims to help resolve data silos, poor visibility into work status, and missed deadlines and project failures.
$240
per year 2 users (minimum)
Pricing
CeloxisWrike
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Wrike Free
$0
per month per user
Wrike Team
$10
per month (billed annually) per user (2-15 users)
Wrike Business
$25
per month (billed annually) per user (5-200 users)
Wrike Enterprise
Request a quote
per month per user
Pinnacle
Request a quote
per month per user
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
CeloxisWrike
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
YesYes
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsEvery premium plan begins with a 14-day trial period.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
CeloxisWrike
Features
CeloxisWrike
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Product A and Product B
Celoxis
8.3
4 Ratings
9% above category average
Wrike
7.8
810 Ratings
2% above category average
Task Management9.34 Ratings8.8803 Ratings
Resource Management7.74 Ratings7.9683 Ratings
Gantt Charts7.74 Ratings8.1570 Ratings
Scheduling8.53 Ratings7.9703 Ratings
Workflow Automation7.53 Ratings7.5691 Ratings
Team Collaboration7.44 Ratings8.6802 Ratings
Support for Agile Methodology9.01 Ratings7.5427 Ratings
Support for Waterfall Methodology10.01 Ratings8.2381 Ratings
Document Management8.02 Ratings7.4670 Ratings
Email integration9.02 Ratings7.0607 Ratings
Mobile Access6.01 Ratings7.5584 Ratings
Timesheet Tracking8.53 Ratings7.8369 Ratings
Change request and Case Management9.02 Ratings7.723 Ratings
Budget and Expense Management8.03 Ratings7.9283 Ratings
Professional Services Automation
Comparison of Professional Services Automation features of Product A and Product B
Celoxis
8.3
4 Ratings
9% above category average
Wrike
7.7
286 Ratings
2% above category average
Quotes/estimates8.53 Ratings8.21 Ratings
Invoicing7.02 Ratings7.31 Ratings
Project & financial reporting7.53 Ratings7.5282 Ratings
Integration with accounting software10.01 Ratings7.7167 Ratings
Best Alternatives
CeloxisWrike
Small Businesses
Stackby
Stackby
Score 9.1 out of 10
Stackby
Stackby
Score 9.1 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
InEight
InEight
Score 9.5 out of 10
InEight
InEight
Score 9.5 out of 10
Enterprises
InEight
InEight
Score 9.5 out of 10
InEight
InEight
Score 9.5 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
CeloxisWrike
Likelihood to Recommend
8.7
(4 ratings)
8.4
(841 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(103 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
8.3
(176 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(24 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
6.9
(21 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(90 ratings)
In-Person Training
-
(0 ratings)
8.1
(5 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
8.1
(13 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.8
(31 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
7.6
(12 ratings)
Contract Terms and Pricing Model
-
(0 ratings)
7.1
(4 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
6.8
(7 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
7.9
(15 ratings)
Professional Services
-
(0 ratings)
6.8
(3 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(7 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
6.5
(8 ratings)
User Testimonials
CeloxisWrike
Likelihood to Recommend
Celoxis
Celoxis is a great option if you are looking for an affordable, easy to use, easy to integrate project manegement solution. It is very powerful for waterfall project management. I evaluated more than 15 platforms and could not find any with a close evaluation in terms of cost-benefit to Celoxis. Of course there are more powerfull tools, for 10 times the price. So far, for project management, there hasn't been a requirement I haven't been able to solve with some work. It really lacks features for Agile methodologies, even if it provides a Kanban view, so far it doesn't provide and additional agile artifacts. If an organization has already reached a very mature project management practice and needs to improve on program and portfolio management, Celoxis won't provide any useful feature. If the organization has the resources (skills and time mostly) to develop some workflows and customization, it might work but with a limit. Hopefully Celoxis addresses these features in the near future.
Read full review
Wrike
Any company that has a lot of moving pieces could benefit from using Wrike or a project management tool. I find it even more necessary if a company is having trouble staying organized and finds tasks falling through the cracks. I would say that Wrike or another project management tool is unnecessary if you aren't constantly creating new tasks. If you are a company that might have only a handful of tasks, a project management tool like Wrike may not be necessary. If this company has plans to grow and finds that its task list is growing, a tool like Wrike would be beneficial.
Read full review
Pros
Celoxis
  • Project planning
  • Time log
  • Efforts analysis vs plan
Read full review
Wrike
  • It's user-friendly for anyone familiar with project management and scrum methodologies, making it easy to navigate and understand Wrike at a high level.
  • Wrike offers features tailored to various business use cases, including project management, agile, scrum, workflows, visualizations, folder structures, blueprints, customization, and integrations.
  • Tasks provide a comprehensive history in one place.
  • There are multiple visualization options to view the Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) hierarchy, such as Gantt charts, Kanban boards, and table views.
Read full review
Cons
Celoxis
  • Support is at times slow to respond.
  • Not new user-friendly.
  • Not able to pull in closer or zoom the interface.
Read full review
Wrike
  • I would like to see the ability to “upgrade” or “downgrade” projects to tasks or tasks to projects.
  • A more thorough training upon contract activation. Showing me what (based on my organization’s workflow and needs) suggestions Wrike would have for me and how to implement them.
  • The cost for Wrike is high compared to competitors. Either a lower price point or more seats/functionalities for the price I’m paying.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Celoxis
No answers on this topic
Wrike
I wish that Wrike had more drag and drop functionality that would be connected to assignee and also I wish that the finish date of a task would update to the date where you checked completed. It does not do that. Also finishing a task doesn't move the start date of the next task it "protects your time in that way", but our management team wants us to quickly see what we have down the pipeline rather than having to scroll down the list of upcoming tasks.
Read full review
Usability
Celoxis
No answers on this topic
Wrike
As mentioned earlier, I have used other platforms like Workfront, Jira, and Slack for project and task management. However, I would definitely go for Wrike because it makes things easier for marketers, stakeholders, and users. I love it. You are doing amazing work. Continue building on that, and I am sure you will be one of the best project management tools on the market.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Celoxis
No answers on this topic
Wrike
Over two years of (almost) daily usage without outages. Don't remember any errors. I give it 9 only because some Wrike plugins (for online document edit) are based on NPAPI architecture. These types of plugins are being phased out in new browsers, and NPAPI plugins are disabled by default in recent versions of Chrome so you have to do some browser adjustments when you switch browsers or move to another computer.
Read full review
Performance
Celoxis
No answers on this topic
Wrike
Wrike tasks loads fine, but I hate clicking files and wait for a bit of time since it is powerpoint or word, Wrike assumes I want to open those on Wrike. My suggestion is to link it to office 365 so we do not need Wrike based decoder for PPTX and DOCX
Read full review
Support Rating
Celoxis
No answers on this topic
Wrike
During my learning phase with Wrike, I initially struggled with setting up automation rules and request forms. However, Wrike support was always my go-to, resolving issues within seconds or minutes. Their assistance made the learning process much easier. My best experience was receiving step-by-step screenshots to follow, with the support team on standby until I was completely satisfied.
Read full review
In-Person Training
Celoxis
No answers on this topic
Wrike
We had staff in person provide some training
Read full review
Online Training
Celoxis
No answers on this topic
Wrike
I love the Wrike training options. Wrike Discover has tons of courses, learning plans, certifications, etc. This is an area where Wrike definitely shines! I wish these resources were more in your face for new people, because it seems like a lot of coworkers didn't know all of this training was available to them.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Celoxis
No answers on this topic
Wrike
There are a lot of bells and whistles in Wrike, and not all of it is easy or intuitive to understand once it's plopped in your lap. It's easier when there are a few choice people who understand Wrike as a platform and articulate it in such a way where it makes it easy to pass it along to others in the group
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Celoxis
I used an evalaution matrix built with input of several stakeholders in the company. In the end the matrix included 100 features (non of them was price related). The matrix was heavily focused on waterfall project management, agile related features were only 5 out of 100 features. Features were labeled as mandatory, required or optional. Products which lacked a mandatory feature (like providing technical support) were disqualified. Then a price vs features evaluation was made and only the products with the best combination were seleced to continue: Celoxis, ITM Platform and Mission Control. A final technical evaluation was made comparing the full evaluation but also the evaluation of only the 40 required features. Overall, Celoxis was the better evaluated (76% vs 65% of the second place), for the 40 required features, Celoxis got 91% against 78% of number 2. In the end we chose Celoxis even when it had higher licensing cost.
Read full review
Wrike
Neither Jira nor Asana are user-friendly. There are too many layers without visualizing the broader relationship among tasks. I did not actively want to engage with either of these tools. However, I don't view project management as a burden with Wrike. It makes my job more manageable instead of further complicating it.
Read full review
Contract Terms and Pricing Model
Celoxis
No answers on this topic
Wrike
company purchase
Read full review
Scalability
Celoxis
No answers on this topic
Wrike
The sky is the limit for what can be done in Wrike. We started with 1 use case and within 5 months we migrated several key business practices over to Wrike because they were easier to manage. Use cases so far: process improvement, management review, corrective actions, maintenance requests, month-end financial closing, and document management. As we grow, it's easy to imagine putting even more into Wrike where it becomes a cornerstone for how we do business
Read full review
Professional Services
Celoxis
No answers on this topic
Wrike
I do not use professional services.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Celoxis
  • Positive in most cases
Read full review
Wrike
  • We have been able to use Wrike to prioritize tasks for departments. Some departments are overwhelmed with other tasks and being able to save the staff some time by prioritizing their tasks has been helpful.
  • Collaboration and communication have improved between the project teams.
  • Wrike made it easier to access past information to reference for future preparation or to help clarify.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Celoxis Screenshots

Screenshot of Celoxis DashboardScreenshot of Gantt chartScreenshot of WorkloadScreenshot of TimesheetScreenshot of Resource ManagementScreenshot of

Wrike Screenshots

Screenshot of DashboardsScreenshot of DashboardsScreenshot of DashboardsScreenshot of DashboardsScreenshot of Space workflowsScreenshot of Space workflows