Conceptboard is a collaboration software built for teams of any size. Its primary features are project management, team whiteboards, integration into business workflows, and real-time collaboration.
N/A
Miro
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
Miro provides a visual workspace for innovation that enables distributed teams of any size to dream, design, and build the future together. Today, Miro counts more than 60 million users in 200,000 organizations who use Miro to improve product development collaboration, to speed up time to market, and to make sure that new products and services deliver on customer needs.
$8
per month per user
Pricing
Conceptboard
Miro
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
1. Free - To discover what Miro can do. Always free
$0
2. Starter - Unlimited and private boards with essential features
$8
per month per user
3. Business - Scales collaboration with advanced features and security
$16
per month per user
4. Enterprise - For work across the entire organization, with support, security and control, to scale
Miro is a superior product with more capabilities and better suited for advanced users. We selected Conceptboard as a short-term solution that was low-cost compared to Miro but allowed users to create boards. Once users are versed in Conceptboard, they are better off using Miro …
Conceptboard provides an easy whiteboard with multi-functions, that aren't lagging while more people are working on it and that is easy to self-explain, while I faced lagging while using Miro. Conceptboard is just easy compatible in any business situation (in-office, Zoom …
I like ConceptBoard better than Miro. Miro also offers a similar virtual "whiteboard" but Conceptboard has a better UX and is easier (and more fun) to use.
I've used Figma extensively, and still do, for UX planning and design but have moved away from them for brainstorming. Figma…
Conceptboard has a very simple interface design. and stands out with a successful UX/UI design. can offer a rapid adaptation process for volatile employees and customers. While it has many features compared to its competitors, its interface is not complicated. However, some of …
Verified User
Consultant
Chose Conceptboard
ConceptBoard is a very solid solution that has been around since a long time. It allows to handle easily collaborative workshops and design sessions.
Conceptboard does not lag as compared to its other competitors. It is fast and easy to use and is very much considerable from the pricing point of view as well because of low cost monthly plans. It is simple and right on point with the latest updated tools which is what makes …
Initially, we selected Conceptboard due to its quick TAT with respect to integration and implementation. Also, it is a quite cheaper option as compared to its direct competitors. The main reason to select Conceptboard was - 1. The infinite canvas really helped with longer …
Conceptboard's user interface is a lot more intuitive, flexible, and easy to use. Real-time monitoring down to cursor movements is also something that Conceptboard has an edge on, as well as allowing for file attachments to which you can annotate or comment directly on the …
I never compared them specifically as I was invited to those as participants a while back.....but from what I can recall Conceptboard seems less UX and UI friendly. The mural is probably a closer alternative for me if I were to pay for the service myself, their platform felt …
I like Miro more due to the ease of it and also the lag is nowhere as bad. Conceptboard is more used in my university, but towards the end of covid we solely started to move away from Conceptboard and more into Miro and it was a change that most studios did.
At the beginning of the pandemic, we had to quickly find a remote alternative to face-to-face workshops, especially for our agile teams. Due to the feature set, Miro and Mural quickly became the clear favorites. In retrospect, I can no longer say what ultimately tipped the …
Miro offers more features that help me improve the user experience for remote trainings. I perceive a faster speed of delivery of new features or improvement of existing ones.
Much easier to use, slicker, and much more features and options to work with. Easier to export/import frames and boards, which makes sit easier to use and collaborate on a daily basis.
Miro is light years ahead of the competitors, in almost all of the categories. It is effective, attractive, and easy to use. It does the very thing it sets out to do. Provide purposeful collaboration.
Miro has single sign in. Miro has much more integrations into emojis, stickers, image search etc which was way more powerful than competitors. Miro navigation is a bit less user friendly initially but you get used to it.
Both products don't have a UI system as flexible as Miro. And they also don't offer as many options of customization, nor as many templates. Visio even has an annoying bug where the arrowheads on flowcharts at specific zoom-in levels turn in the opposite direction and make …
I also use Mural, but Miro is giving me more opportunities for the design of the whiteboard and it also has the app for mobile phones - here it is definitively better than Mural.
I think Miro is the best collaborative whiteboard space. I advocated for it, and would again. I did a detailed breakdown against Illustrator in my last comments. Illustrator is still my favorite but it's just not collaborative. Get me more photo editing features, please.
Integration with Zoom and MS Teams is a plus. It is visually attractive and quite intuitive to work with. My design student picked it up as her preferred way of working so I am learning as we go along.
The concept board does not have enough interactive tools like Miro. And makes it more difficult to draw or quickly communicate changes. Miro’s tools allow the user to better interact with the platform and the content that you have put on the board.