Constant Contact is a full-featured email marketing solution with capabilities such as social media integration, drag-and-drop editing, and real-time reporting. It is a bulk email tool designed for SMB customers. Since 2019, Constant Contact also offers marketing automation features, a website and landing page builder, and other tools to support midsize businesses.
$12
per month
Contentstack
Score 8.1 out of 10
N/A
Contentstack headquartered in San Francisco offers an API-first headless CMS. From desktops to smart phones, from kiosks to smart watches, from billboards to jumbotrons, from dashboards to VR headsets – content is delivered with the push of a button and optimized for every screen, device and channel.
N/A
Pricing
Constant Contact
Contentstack
Editions & Modules
Lite
Starting at $12.00
per month
Standard
Starting at $35.00
per month
Premium
Starting at $80.00
per month
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Constant Contact
Contentstack
Free Trial
Yes
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
Yes
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
Optional
Additional Details
The SMS Marketing tool can be added to any Standard or Premium Constant Contact account. SMS is only available in the US for Standard and Premium paid plans. SMS can be added when logged in to an account after purchase. Plans start at $10/month for up to 500 messages.
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Constant Contact
Contentstack
Features
Constant Contact
Contentstack
Email & Online Marketing
Comparison of Email & Online Marketing features of Product A and Product B
Constant Contact
8.7
120 Ratings
8% above category average
Contentstack
-
Ratings
WYSIWYG email editor
9.2102 Ratings
00 Ratings
Dynamic content
9.2104 Ratings
00 Ratings
Ability to test dynamic content
8.582 Ratings
00 Ratings
Landing pages
8.978 Ratings
00 Ratings
A/B testing
8.073 Ratings
00 Ratings
Mobile optimization
8.686 Ratings
00 Ratings
Email deliverability reporting
9.6116 Ratings
00 Ratings
List management
9.0118 Ratings
00 Ratings
Triggered drip sequences
7.862 Ratings
00 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Constant Contact
8.4
117 Ratings
9% above category average
Contentstack
-
Ratings
Dashboards
8.488 Ratings
00 Ratings
Standard reports
9.3115 Ratings
00 Ratings
Custom reports
7.558 Ratings
00 Ratings
Pre-Send Testing
Comparison of Pre-Send Testing features of Product A and Product B
Constant Contact
8.3
69 Ratings
3% above category average
Contentstack
-
Ratings
URL Validation
8.231 Ratings
00 Ratings
Link Tracking
7.934 Ratings
00 Ratings
Image Validation
8.932 Ratings
00 Ratings
Inbox Display
8.635 Ratings
00 Ratings
Email Accessibility Tools
7.928 Ratings
00 Ratings
Spelling and Grammar Check
9.356 Ratings
00 Ratings
Spam Testing
6.026 Ratings
00 Ratings
Email Previews
9.768 Ratings
00 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
Constant Contact
-
Ratings
Contentstack
7.4
11 Ratings
10% below category average
Role-based user permissions
00 Ratings
7.411 Ratings
Platform & Infrastructure
Comparison of Platform & Infrastructure features of Product A and Product B
Constant Contact
-
Ratings
Contentstack
7.5
10 Ratings
3% below category average
API
00 Ratings
8.19 Ratings
Internationalization / multi-language
00 Ratings
6.98 Ratings
Web Content Creation
Comparison of Web Content Creation features of Product A and Product B
Constant Contact
-
Ratings
Contentstack
8.1
12 Ratings
4% above category average
WYSIWYG editor
00 Ratings
8.12 Ratings
Code quality / cleanliness
00 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Admin section
00 Ratings
7.712 Ratings
Page templates
00 Ratings
7.68 Ratings
Library of website themes
00 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Mobile optimization / responsive design
00 Ratings
6.69 Ratings
Publishing workflow
00 Ratings
6.910 Ratings
Web Content Management
Comparison of Web Content Management features of Product A and Product B
Constant Contact is an excellent tool for sending out flyers and newsletters. However, I feel the content's appearance is typically all the same. When I receive an email from Constant Contact, I can immediately identify it - the templates usually all look the same. When sending out communications with images, it is easy to use Constant Contact and link webpages. However, the email layout is always vertical and can get very lengthy. I prefer a more flip-book approach with options to flip the page.
Contentstack has flexible functionality which opens up a lot of possibilities for businesses with proactive web development teams to create their own website builder app to compete with 3rd party agencies. This is especially useful in a large enterprise where non-technical teams often turn to expensive outside agencies which cost more in the long run than an up-front investment into an in-house application.
Market segmentation is great: my main segmentation is by region because that's how our sales team is divided.
Lists: making customized email lists is easy and intuitive; the custom fields allow some flexibility in case our fields don't exactly line up with Constant Contact's.
Campaigns: creating campaigns is quick and simple. I especially appreciate the 'resend to non-openers' option. I am constantly using this feature.
Subject line generator: I like using the recommended subject lines. I'm able to plug in their recommended ideas, or sometimes, this feature helps me generate my own ideas.
It would be nice if we had more customizable options for emails - like moving around pictures and text boxes, rather than a set spot for everything to go.
I would like it if multiple people could work on a document at one time. So if I'm in charge of graphics, I can get those updated while someone else is entering content, etc.
In my opinion it's not very intuitive. I've found its difficult to understand how to best structure entries, especially if they are related
In my experience, entries can get difficult to understand if weren't the creator. It would be helpful to have some meta data around the entry itself and the fields within them in my opinion.
Integration with an A/B testing platform would be nice.
There is no doubt that we are going to renew Constant Contact. We have not just invested a lot of time in learning and creating a great looking product but we have developed a strong database of information that allows us to track how we are doing for each newsletter. This supports our goals of creating products that residents desire and are excited to receive.
There is always room for improvement. I don't know how they test their systems, but they should invite not-so computer savvy people to test it. If I, as an expert have problems, they need to think like the technophobe. Since I've used Constant Contact in the past as part of my former employment, I have not viewed any of the tutorials and just jumped in to work on my client's newsletter. With that said, I found some areas easy and some a bit cumbersome
The system seemed quite slow sometimes. Specifically, there was sometimes a delay in sends if it was during a high traffic period. There were time-outs when uploading new code for an email, and a lag in reporting analytics which was sometimes as long as 72 hours
I think the overall support for Constant Contact has always been incredible; I have nothing negative to say. Our customer support representative was attentive, easy to understand, and very knowledgeable. I never felt like I wasn't a priority of his and my issues, while very small, were fixed in a very short time frame.
They have an in-app chat with their support team, who is always quick to respond and provide helpful answers. I've never walked away from an interaction without my issue being solved quickly and easily. They're also very communicative over email and are sure to follow up after any changes are made to ensure we're seeing the desired result. They are always very professional and easy to work with.
Implementation is very easy for someone who wants to send out the “batch and blast” type newsletters. If you want to use their templates with no customizations, the product works fine. However, the more customizations you get into involving link color, etc, that’s where things can get tricky for someone who may not be familiar with coding
Constant Contact is much more intuitive for people who are not tech-savvy. Also, while sendgrid offered more options in it's drag and drop interface, it displayed differently across different email clients, which made it very cumbersome to use. It also took much longer to upload contact lists and it was harder to manage existing contacts. Performance in sendgrid was much slower as well, and the Preview feature was quite buggy. Our team initially chose sendgrid because of the integration options that it's API offered, but we ultimately switched to Constant Contact because it was much easier to build campaigns and better suited our requirements.
Contentstack has better international hosting support then Contentful and we found the presales and sales support people were MUCH more responsive than Contentful. The Sitecore sales process was very very slow and overly complex. We felt Sitecore had many features that were not valuable and the cost to benefit ratio was much lower compared to ContentStack
Very reliable in sending email campaigns and controlling the recipients so that no contact is sent the same email more than once, even if they are on a resent list
I have had nothing but positive impacts from using Constant Contact.
The church is large, and there are many subgroups and axillary groups within the church. Setting up specific groups based on responsibility, interest, member goals, and service needs allows me to send information quickly, saving valuable time for other tasks.
Constant Contact allows leadership to stay personally engaged with the members I work with, without over-taxing my time. It feels so seamless.