DemandScience vs. LinkedIn Sales Navigator

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
DemandScience
Score 7.7 out of 10
N/A
DemandScience is a data-driven marketing platform that offers lead generation and data services that accelerate the technology sales process by identifying intent among technology buyers. Founded in 2009, DemandScience helps marketers meet the ever-changing demands of B2B sales.N/A
LinkedIn Sales Navigator
Score 8.5 out of 10
N/A
LinkedIn Sales Navigator is a sales intelligence software solution offered by LinkedIn.
$79.99
per month
Pricing
DemandScienceLinkedIn Sales Navigator
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Professional
$79.99
per month
Team
$134.99
per license
Enterprise
Contact sales team
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
DemandScienceLinkedIn Sales Navigator
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
DemandScienceLinkedIn Sales Navigator
Considered Both Products
DemandScience
Chose DemandScience
6sense uses the market leader for a data intent engine called Bombora along with paid advertising and content syndication. They also have their own intent keywords you can use. ZoomInfo outperforms in contact information and on all the data you need to know about companies you …
LinkedIn Sales Navigator

No answer on this topic

Top Pros

No answers on this topic

Top Cons

No answers on this topic

Features
DemandScienceLinkedIn Sales Navigator
Content Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Content Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
DemandScience
7.6
17 Ratings
3% below category average
LinkedIn Sales Navigator
-
Ratings
Audience profiling and targeting8.317 Ratings00 Ratings
Content performance analytics7.614 Ratings00 Ratings
Campaign optimization dashboard6.910 Ratings00 Ratings
Prospecting
Comparison of Prospecting features of Product A and Product B
DemandScience
-
Ratings
LinkedIn Sales Navigator
8.1
174 Ratings
7% above category average
Advanced search00 Ratings8.4174 Ratings
Identification of new leads00 Ratings8.3172 Ratings
List quality00 Ratings8.3168 Ratings
List upload/download00 Ratings7.8114 Ratings
Ideal customer targeting00 Ratings8.1167 Ratings
Load time/data access00 Ratings7.8154 Ratings
Sales Intelligence Data Standards
Comparison of Sales Intelligence Data Standards features of Product A and Product B
DemandScience
-
Ratings
LinkedIn Sales Navigator
8.0
172 Ratings
6% above category average
Contact information00 Ratings7.8151 Ratings
Company information00 Ratings8.0172 Ratings
Industry information00 Ratings8.2167 Ratings
Data Augmentation & Lead Qualification
Comparison of Data Augmentation & Lead Qualification features of Product A and Product B
DemandScience
-
Ratings
LinkedIn Sales Navigator
8.0
169 Ratings
8% above category average
Lead qualification process00 Ratings8.0128 Ratings
Smart lists and recommendations00 Ratings8.4151 Ratings
Salesforce integration00 Ratings7.4124 Ratings
Company/business profiles00 Ratings8.3165 Ratings
Alerts and reminders00 Ratings7.9147 Ratings
Data hygiene00 Ratings7.9147 Ratings
Automatic data refresh00 Ratings7.8127 Ratings
Tags00 Ratings8.2122 Ratings
Filters and segmentation00 Ratings8.2156 Ratings
Sales Intelligence Email Features
Comparison of Sales Intelligence Email Features features of Product A and Product B
DemandScience
-
Ratings
LinkedIn Sales Navigator
7.8
73 Ratings
3% above category average
Sales email templates00 Ratings7.766 Ratings
Append emails to records00 Ratings7.963 Ratings
Best Alternatives
DemandScienceLinkedIn Sales Navigator
Small Businesses
Vyond
Vyond
Score 8.7 out of 10
Lead411
Lead411
Score 9.1 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Vyond
Vyond
Score 8.7 out of 10
Lead411
Lead411
Score 9.1 out of 10
Enterprises
Vyond
Vyond
Score 8.7 out of 10
D&B Hoovers
D&B Hoovers
Score 8.8 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
DemandScienceLinkedIn Sales Navigator
Likelihood to Recommend
7.6
(75 ratings)
8.3
(175 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
6.0
(2 ratings)
8.0
(3 ratings)
Usability
6.2
(3 ratings)
7.5
(5 ratings)
Support Rating
6.8
(69 ratings)
9.0
(3 ratings)
Implementation Rating
4.3
(3 ratings)
8.0
(2 ratings)
User Testimonials
DemandScienceLinkedIn Sales Navigator
Likelihood to Recommend
DemandScience
Demand Science did deliver the quantity of leads without issue. The data for a few was not accurate (bounced when following up). But they agreed to make good by providing substitute leads to meet the quota. Towards the end of my project, they lost a few folks, and so the end of my campaign got a little rough as they were taking over some assignments midway. But we ultimately completed the SOW. I will say that the leads did not perform well in our email cadence - none converted. However, this was a test of the concept for us. Content syndication had a lower cost per qualified lead than some other tactics, so we tested it. Your results may vary, based on your follow-up and your market.
Read full review
LinkedIn
Flexible Saved Searches: I love how we can save a very complex search created for future use so that we don't have to repeat it again and again. The cherry on the top is that you can even share this saved search with your other colleagues having the LinkedIn Sales Navigator license. Access to Decision Makers: With a single click, I can filter out decision-makers in any company. This is again a time saver in many ways. Alerts and Reminders: which can be set custom-based covering specific use cases. For example - if prospect A changes companies today, I can get an alert for it on my email (the only drawback being I need to manually save this prospect in a list first).
Read full review
Pros
DemandScience
  • The initial pitch and contact from Mason used "show me you know me" well, which we felt was a good sign of company culture and approach to database marketing.
  • Delivery of leads was ahead of schedule.
  • They set expectations, and then delivered what they said they would.
  • The leads matched our criteria as agreed.
  • Regular check ins and catch ups, and patience when thing were taking a bit of time to get sorted here.
Read full review
LinkedIn
  • Lists - Very intuitive, simple, way to create and track prospects for campaign purposes
  • InMails - The ability to send direct messages to prospects via InMails can be a differentiator for some reps
  • News Feed - Stay up to date on organizations you are targeting to send relevant messages that resonate
Read full review
Cons
DemandScience
  • We would like to see more proactive communication on what's working and what's not without requiring a meeting - regular reporting cadence to assess asset quality
  • A dashboard view might be nice as well, again, so we can look at an asset and see how it's performing (or if it isn't) without having to wait on a rep to pull a report or schedule a walkthrough
Read full review
LinkedIn
  • LinkedIn Sales Navigator is very powerful, but not super well documented.
  • The tool does not allow for the export of list names, which is disappointing for a tool at this price.
  • LinkedIn's search is loosey goosey, you'll find that it includes names that just barely fit the criteria.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
DemandScience
Our executives decided to not renew because we were not seeing the ROI they were looking for. However, our executives did not make the best decisions on the data Demand Science provided.
Read full review
LinkedIn
This question is a no-brainer. The tool is the industry standard for anyone tied to sales and marketing. The name "LinkedIn Sales Navigator" is synonymous with streamlining relevant customer and account data in an easy to use format that is actionable and intelligent. The focus on continuous improvement and richer means of communicating with customers and prospects is evident each time new features are rolled out. The social component of the tool even includes a gamification component to ensure that peers remain relevant among each other, which is refreshing and enjoyable for those who engage the tool on a daily basis.
Read full review
Usability
DemandScience
The leads were pretty straight forward. However, their appointment setting did not integrate well into our system and many of the meetings didn't occur. I had to chase a lot of prospects and many times Demand Science didn't provide direct dials.
Read full review
LinkedIn
It lets you pull people with specific titles in specific areas and with the criteria you choose--job changes, mutual connections based on schools, roles, and companies, etc. It is easy to upload these lists into other software or download and save them to a drive.
Read full review
Support Rating
DemandScience
Our rep is always available and quickly responds to any question we have. I haven't worked with other partners who are as proactive and excited to help us as our DemandScience rep is. He reaches out with new ideas and suggestions frequently. They are happy to make any changes needed to the campaigns and make those changes quickly and efficiently. They work well with our execution agency, but are also happy to meet with us directly to provide insights and support.
Read full review
LinkedIn
The tool speaks for itself, but the support is definitely a significant portion of why we use the tool. The company cares about their customer's success and it shows. We do not have to wait for long periods of time for the support team to respond; they do so in a timely manner, and virtually always with relevant insights and solutions.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
DemandScience
They did extremely well. However, our executives did a poor job in defining our ICP so we didn't get the maximum benefit out of it.
Read full review
LinkedIn
I am unsure of the rollout, as I was not involved. I was an early adopter, and I have had a lot of success with the tool personally at multiple organizations, but I have no idea whether the implementation process encountered any errors. I can personally say that it works, and that I have not encountered significant issues with the tool since adoption, although a few issues like messages showing up as being unread even though they have been opened have been an on-again/off-again issues throughout the past few years. Overall, the company is doing a great job, and our implementation seems to have been effective.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
DemandScience
I've not used another content syndication company, and I probably won't after the lack of results we've had. I have used direct email organizations, and they are stronger but also more expensive, so you have to weigh your priorities. I could see if you were selling a specific product or software and how this could be beneficial, but I'd steer away from it for services.
Read full review
LinkedIn
linkedin has way better data cleanup and relevant contact information. It provides a great insight into how to target personally your prospects, and gives great engagement highlights. ZoomInfo is sometimes outdated, the prospect has moved companies or is no longer employed there-- alot of filtering through the weeds can be hard if you are trying to hit high metrics and make your time valuable
Read full review
Return on Investment
DemandScience
  • We have been able to grow our lead numbers with high quality leads at a reasonable cost
  • We have been able to generate just the leads we want to support our Business Development team
  • We have been able to get our content in front of our specific TAL
Read full review
LinkedIn
  • Helped warm up a few leads that I was having trouble getting in touch with via phone and email
  • Allowed me to better identify the key stakeholders at companies I was targeting
  • Kept me up to date on what was happening with my prospects and their companies.
Read full review
ScreenShots