Engagedly is a cloud-based talent management platform that unifies performance, engagement, learning, growth, and recognition into a single connected experience. With Marissa, its Agentic AI agent, Engagedly aims to turn strategic intent into intelligent actions. Organizations can also use Engagedly to boost engagement, improve retention, and develop high performing teams. Founded in 2015, Engagedly is headquartered in St. Louis, Missouri.
$8,500
per year per installation
Halogen TalentSpace (discontinued)
Score 7.2 out of 10
Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
Halogen Software offered the TalentSpace talent management solution which was acquired by Saba in 2017 and that is no longer for sale.
N/A
PeopleFluent
Score 7.9 out of 10
Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
PeopleFluent includes modules for recruiting, performance management, compensation, learning, succession, and vendor management, as well as workforce planning and diversity. These modules can be purchased separately or bundled, and integrate with other HR systems.
N/A
Pricing
Engagedly
Halogen TalentSpace (discontinued)
PeopleFluent
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Engagedly
Halogen TalentSpace (discontinued)
PeopleFluent
Free Trial
Yes
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
Yes
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Yes
Yes
Yes
Entry-level Setup Fee
$1,000 one-time fee per installation (starting cost)
Required
No setup fee
Additional Details
Pricing is customized based on the suite/modules implemented and the size of the organization
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Engagedly
Halogen TalentSpace (discontinued)
PeopleFluent
Features
Engagedly
Halogen TalentSpace (discontinued)
PeopleFluent
Performance and Goals
Comparison of Performance and Goals features of Product A and Product B
Engagedly
8.1
16 Ratings
10% above category average
Halogen TalentSpace (discontinued)
5.1
33 Ratings
36% below category average
PeopleFluent
8.2
11 Ratings
11% above category average
Corporate goal setting
8.715 Ratings
3.528 Ratings
9.07 Ratings
Subordinate goal setting
7.713 Ratings
3.628 Ratings
9.06 Ratings
Individual goal setting
7.015 Ratings
7.232 Ratings
9.09 Ratings
Line-of sight-visibility
8.010 Ratings
4.929 Ratings
7.09 Ratings
Performance tracking
9.015 Ratings
6.432 Ratings
7.09 Ratings
Performance Management
Comparison of Performance Management features of Product A and Product B
Engagedly
8.0
16 Ratings
15% above category average
Halogen TalentSpace (discontinued)
6.1
32 Ratings
12% below category average
PeopleFluent
6.5
11 Ratings
5% below category average
Performance plans
9.015 Ratings
4.628 Ratings
7.07 Ratings
Plan weighting
8.010 Ratings
8.75 Ratings
4.06 Ratings
Manager note taking
7.315 Ratings
6.012 Ratings
7.04 Ratings
Performance improvement plans
6.713 Ratings
3.625 Ratings
7.05 Ratings
Review status tracking
7.714 Ratings
5.430 Ratings
7.07 Ratings
Rater nomination workflow
8.09 Ratings
7.85 Ratings
7.05 Ratings
Review reminders
8.315 Ratings
6.332 Ratings
7.05 Ratings
Workflow restrictions
9.011 Ratings
8.15 Ratings
5.06 Ratings
Multiple review frequency
9.012 Ratings
7.024 Ratings
7.07 Ratings
Reporting
7.014 Ratings
3.130 Ratings
7.08 Ratings
Onboarding
Comparison of Onboarding features of Product A and Product B
Engagedly
-
Ratings
Halogen TalentSpace (discontinued)
7.8
8 Ratings
7% above category average
PeopleFluent
8.0
11 Ratings
10% above category average
New hire portal
00 Ratings
7.76 Ratings
7.07 Ratings
Manager tracking tools
00 Ratings
7.68 Ratings
9.011 Ratings
Compliance tracking and reporting
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
8.08 Ratings
Succession Planning
Comparison of Succession Planning features of Product A and Product B
Engagedly
-
Ratings
Halogen TalentSpace (discontinued)
7.8
5 Ratings
14% above category average
PeopleFluent
6.3
8 Ratings
7% below category average
Create succession plans/pools
00 Ratings
7.63 Ratings
7.05 Ratings
Candidate ranking
00 Ratings
7.63 Ratings
6.05 Ratings
Candidate search
00 Ratings
8.04 Ratings
6.08 Ratings
Candidate development
00 Ratings
8.04 Ratings
6.06 Ratings
Recruiting / ATS
Comparison of Recruiting / ATS features of Product A and Product B
Engagedly
-
Ratings
Halogen TalentSpace (discontinued)
-
Ratings
PeopleFluent
9.5
8 Ratings
29% above category average
Job Requisition Management
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
10.06 Ratings
Company Website Posting
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
10.06 Ratings
Publish to Social Media
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
10.03 Ratings
Job Search Site Posting
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
10.05 Ratings
Customized Application Form
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
10.06 Ratings
Resume Management
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
9.05 Ratings
Duplicate Candidate Prevention
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
6.05 Ratings
Candidate Search
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
9.05 Ratings
Applicant Tracking
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
10.06 Ratings
Collaboration
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
10.04 Ratings
Task Creation and Delegation
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
10.03 Ratings
Email Templates
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
10.05 Ratings
User Permissions
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
9.06 Ratings
Notifications and Alerts
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
9.06 Ratings
Reporting
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
10.05 Ratings
Learning Management
Comparison of Learning Management features of Product A and Product B
Engagedly has a huge range of possibilities and we chose it because of all the functionalities it offers. I'm not marking my rating a 9 or 10 because of the UI. If you're an active user (e.g. in the people department) then you get used to the UI fast enough. However, if you only use it twice per year (like all our other users) it can be difficult to find what you need. That being said, Engagedly offers a truly broad range of HR-related functionalities and we're very happy about that!
I think it's a good platform for tracking and monitoring goals, feedback, and development. We don't use the 1:1 meeting feature, however, I can see how that would be valuable for many organizations. I do like that it is very customizable, however, that also presents problems in that sometimes forms and/or processes can be a bit challenging to create easily and quickly.
PeopleFluent has eliminated the use of paper reviews. It is also eliminated the use of scanning, emailing or interoffice mail. It is a great tool for communication and I highly recommend it. However, in some ways, the product can be improved. Some processes are tied to each other and could function in tandem. For example, while completing the self-review, the employee has to capture multi-raters. If self-review is submitted without listing multi-rater names then multi-rater review has to be captured separately on paper. In my opinion, these two processes can be different. Multi-raters should be added/removed/modified after submitting self-review.
1:1 agendas are easy to create, add comments to and prompt excellent conversation flow on the topics that truly matter to the manager and the employee.
The system can be easily customized to reflect your company's language and culture. We did this in several areas of the platform (goals, development, learning), and it made a world of difference in the understanding and adaptation of our users. One example is that in each learning module, we added 3 questions in the course description so that managers would be automatically prompted to ask to follow up / learning transfer questions when their employees enroll and take a learning course.
Halogen support is outstanding. Any question I have had has been answered upon the first contact or within 24 hours.
It was very easy to go through resumes, choose the people you wanted to interview and set up the interviews.
It is great at keeping track of people that have come through hiring process in the past so you do not waste time on those that have already been declined or are sent in by multiple vendors.
The handling of time sheets and expense reports is very easy to manage.
My organization does not use all of the functions/modules that Halogen offers, but I find that those modules still appear on the Halogen main page. I think a great area for improvement is to hide these functions so as not to confuse employees.
The interface is a little confusing. I'm not sure if it's something that can be fixed in implementations, or if it's inherent to PeopleFluent, but there are almost too many tabs asking for too much information. A lot of it can be repetitive as well.
Changing your password/resetting your password seems to be nightmarish. It requires an organization ID as well as security questions, and forces you to reset your password far too often. I really dislike that feature.
Honestly, PeopleFluent itself looks pretty outdated. I feel as though the entire application really needs a facelift to be more current.
Implementing a new system and process company wide is never an easy task. We moved so quickly in such a short period of time that we were able to learn quickly but also have the opportunity to improve the Halogen experience. We will more than likely will renew our use of Halogen as we already are seeing a small impact which hopefully in the long run will lead to a greater impact
PeopleFluent continues to develop an already high quality product and works to continually improve the user experience. The different modules integrate well, and the administrative functions are easy to understand and perform resulting in less time spent with KTLO functions. They provide world class customer service and work hard to keep you engaged as a customer.
The amount of features available is a lot, but they are hard to navigate due to the UI not being on par with them. Still if used properly, Engagedly is useful to keep track of multiple individuals and their personal goals.
Halogen is very intuitive and provides very clean work-space ... lots of white space and modern layouts. There is more than one way to accomplish your action, too!
PeopleFluent seems to have all the functionality one would need, but it can be a bit overwhelming. Depending on the client implementation, it can be downright confusing and not intuitive. My 6 rating comes from the fact that it seems like the system can be configured to actually be confusing and not make sense. I think a VMS should be set up not to allow a customer to configure it in such a way as to not really work, or to allow users to circumvent steps. I also really don't like the "organization key" that needs to be entered every time you log in. Why is a login and password good enough for 99% of the systems out there, but PeopleFluent requires an extra field?
Absolutely! We love engagedly because we haven't faced any kind of lagging or such issues in website. It also has a convenient app through which you can access everything. They are very polite and address to each and every query relating to software which may cause hinderence in the process.
We only purchased the appraisal module and without the other modules offered, you are really limited in what you can do and the process becomes much more involved with needing to maintain information across multiple platforms. We found that they charge for everything and call it "consulting." We poured so much money and time into a system that was just overkill for what we really needed.
I would rate this ATS system a 9 as there's some room for improvement as mentioned prior. I really love the design and its functionality buttons and the way I can integrate it with other systems. I would really love to see a more detailed reporting metrics long with super candidate filters when searching profiles.
We used SharePoint Forms to make customized forms for ourselves but it did not work well. Our IT needed to build a system from scratch with a help of an external developer team and they were simply not capable of creating something that complicated. Engagedly already has a great platform and it was a life saver for us that we can just start using after the streamlined implementation period for a brief period of time. With SharePoint, we kept having weekly meetings for over 1.5 years to fix bugs, add necessary functions, etc. after the implementation.
I have used other systems in the past and I like that Halogen provides everything in one space. I would like to see a more developed way to report training, not in the LMS, but I think that for the most part that Halogen is a robust system that is superior to its competition.
Its great, its very versatile and stacks up very well against the competition. In terms of usability and ease of use, anyone can quickly learn how to use PeopleFluent. Again, the faults against the system would be when a client who is running the tool customizes it to their liking. Not to mention it's a very popular tool that i have had the pleasure of working in twice now with two different organizations.
We haven't used it long enough to calculate ROI (YET), but - we've had EEs who never engaged with performance management before who are excited to use the program
It has already provided a better framework to set up goals for our teams
Neg impact - limited feed of info from HRIS - requires some manual data to uploaded.
We are able to get our reviews done in a quicker amount of time. Instead of 4-8 weeks we were able to get it done under a month.
Halogen has gotten better at given us a heads up when the system will be down. Most patches are done overnight so we can at least verify it was done, but their success rate of a patch not breaking something is not at 99%. So we do lose productivity when the system is down.
The tool is easier to do so there are fewer questions from users outside the core team.
I do believe that goal setting and the workflow of following up, going through the process yearly is as good as you make it. If you set good goals, or help your team make good goals then the experience can go well. Otherwise it's just another thing that an employee is doing to make their manager happy.
I am not sure the cost of the product, but if it is really expensive I am not sure that we are getting fully what we should be for what the product offers. Make sure you are using what is offered.