Hubble is an integrated suite of performance management apps from insightsoftware.com. This solution offers reporting, analytics and planning.
N/A
Prophix
Score 8.2 out of 10
Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
Prophix One, a Financial Performance Platform, is used to improve the speed and accuracy of decision-making within a harmonized user experience. To reduce complexity and uncertainty, the software offers automated insights and planning, budgeting, forecasting, reporting, and consolidation functionalities.
N/A
Vena
Score 8.1 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
Vena Solutions provides a financial process automation solution to automate Corporate Performance Management, accounting and budgeting, Regulatory & Compliance, and other finance-related processes. It is scaled for medium to large-sized organizations.
N/A
Pricing
Hubble
Prophix
Vena
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Professional
N/A
Complete
N/A
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Hubble
Prophix
Vena
Free Trial
Yes
Yes
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
Yes
Yes
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
Optional
Optional
Additional Details
—
—
The Professional Plan is the most flexible way to get started quickly and can be added onto as a company grows. The plan includes: Vena Platform, Customer Success Manager, Standard Support and Customer Portal.
Complete Plan includes everything in Professional, plus: Vena Insights, Premium Support, Sandbox Environment, and Expert Managed Services.
For a limited time, new customers who use Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central (Online) as their primary ERP can get a free year of Vena and 40% off implementation costs.
Vena also offers special pricing for not for profit organizations. To learn more, speak to an expert.
Vena and Prophix are designed to target similar markets. In the end the ability to support globally in multiple locations, time zones and languages lead us to choose Prophix. We carried out reviews of demo environments of both systems and felt that Prophix was focused more on …
We ultimately chose Prophix for its stronger automation features and direct relationship with CMiC. While Vena offers a similar set of capabilities, we found Prophix to be more intuitive, especially when it comes to creating and managing reports without heavy reliance on Excel. …
Verified User
C-Level Executive
Chose Prophix
We thought it was the best for our use, all were good with Vena being very close
Again, the ease of use and product adoption of the solution has been wonderful. This is because it is an easy to use and intuitive system. The Fiserv System was very complex to use and processing time when changes were made was time consuming. The axiom solution was also very …
Verified User
Employee
Chose Prophix
Prophix is significantly better than these two products and at a better price. We tried implementing DataRails and it just didn't work for us as the struggled mightily with implementation. The Prophix implementation was very smooth and the support team was an absolute pleasure …
We found Prophix to be more flexible than the other solutions. It proved to have less of an implementation timeframe, and we felt more comfortable supporting the system ourselves post-implementation. We were also surprised to find that Prophix's pricing was more competitive …
We chose Prophix based on the desire to make a paradigm shift away from Excel and towards a more fully-featured web-based SaaS solution that would still allow for the utilization of Excel where it made sense. Prophix does this through an Excel add-on, while more comprehensive …
Our company used Vena for our budgeting and forecasting process, but it never ended up working correctly for our organization. Once we switched to Prophix, we have had a much better experience from the start. Prophix's implementation team helped us design everything very well …
The company was looking for a robust tool and during the demo sessions the key budget contributors were satisfied with the user friendliness and positive outlook on the success of Prophix.
The main contender with Vena was Prophix. Most of the other products we looked at were not capable of the complexity we needed. We chose Vena because the Excel templates made it look like the budget we were working with. We were able to use syntax we were familiar with for …
Verified User
Director
Chose Vena
Vena is easier to use than Prophix but Prophix has a personnel module and more flexible ad-hoc reporting capabilities.
Vena's unique format and excel add in are far superior to Hubble for running reports that are readily customizable and user friendly. While my experience with Hubble was limited to exporting live data from JDE, I have been able to create queries that are both simple and complex …
We had Prophix (old version) for planning and budgeting and it was way less user-friendly and flexible than Vena. We always had to go back to Excel to build more complex reports and share them. And we extended the use of Vena to monthly reporting, which could not have been done …
Prophix is powerful, and structures data on the back-end in a very similar way with multiple data models, and I have used it before. But the learning curve is steep. Building complex rules, e.g. for a union personnel model, was much harder than designing the same logic in …
When looking at other tools, we were concerned about end user adoption and Vena stood out because of the use of Excel. It is a familiar format and provides almost endless flexibility when considering business processes that can be added. At first, Adapative was a front runner …
Ultimately we decided on Vena because of the Excel interface which we knew would improve adoption. We also like the platform agnostic integration and easy-to-use web interface. The OLAP cube was also appealing to allow for a variety of pivoted reports.
Vena allowed for the most customization that made everything easy for us with our complicated system of managing allocations across products and time by employees.
Vena is much faster than other such software which is available in market. If we talking about pricing $$$ so Vena is affordable to smaller companies also. it's help us quicker integrations with other software and User Interface is much better than other software. Vena gives …
I really like Vena for organizations with smaller finance teams. Excel is at the heart of Vena so there is a less new technology for them to learn. All three solutions have strengths that make them appropriate for specific organizations.
We were using Dynamic Budgets before we moved over to Vena and researched many, many, many other products before settling on Vena in the end. One of the things that quickly knocked out other vendors was our unique fiscal calendar. We have 13 periods (4 weeks each) and that …
We spent about a year and a half in the selection process for our budgeting system. The issue that we kept coming across was speed, flexibility, and a lack of understanding of our process during the sales cycle. Most of these other products wanted us to change our budgeting …
Features
Hubble
Prophix
Vena
Budgeting, Planning, and Forecasting
Comparison of Budgeting, Planning, and Forecasting features of Product A and Product B
Hubble
8.5
2 Ratings
4% above category average
Prophix
9.7
220 Ratings
17% above category average
Vena
8.4
298 Ratings
3% above category average
Long-term financial planning
8.01 Ratings
9.8186 Ratings
8.7272 Ratings
Financial budgeting
8.02 Ratings
9.8215 Ratings
8.8290 Ratings
Forecasting
9.02 Ratings
9.6206 Ratings
8.5280 Ratings
Management reporting
9.02 Ratings
9.8210 Ratings
8.3280 Ratings
Scenario modeling
00 Ratings
9.6170 Ratings
8.0253 Ratings
Consolidation and Close
Comparison of Consolidation and Close features of Product A and Product B
Hubble
8.6
3 Ratings
10% above category average
Prophix
8.6
178 Ratings
10% above category average
Vena
7.2
261 Ratings
7% below category average
Financial data consolidation
9.02 Ratings
9.7144 Ratings
7.5230 Ratings
Journal entries and reports
8.03 Ratings
9.788 Ratings
6.9177 Ratings
Multi-currency management
8.22 Ratings
7.372 Ratings
6.6165 Ratings
Intercompany Eliminations
9.11 Ratings
7.586 Ratings
7.6163 Ratings
Local and consolidated reporting
8.21 Ratings
9.9124 Ratings
7.3202 Ratings
Detailed Audit Trails
9.01 Ratings
8.8108 Ratings
8.5229 Ratings
Minority Ownership
00 Ratings
7.135 Ratings
5.9121 Ratings
Financial Reporting and Compliance
Comparison of Financial Reporting and Compliance features of Product A and Product B
Hubble
8.6
3 Ratings
9% above category average
Prophix
8.7
209 Ratings
10% above category average
Vena
8.3
283 Ratings
5% above category average
Financial Statement Reporting
8.03 Ratings
9.8191 Ratings
8.5254 Ratings
Management Reporting
8.72 Ratings
9.8202 Ratings
8.4267 Ratings
Excel-based Reporting
9.02 Ratings
8.8184 Ratings
9.3273 Ratings
Automated board and financial reporting
00 Ratings
9.8160 Ratings
8.6214 Ratings
XBRL support for regulatory filing
00 Ratings
5.510 Ratings
6.996 Ratings
Analytics and Reporting
Comparison of Analytics and Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Hubble
9.0
1 Ratings
11% above category average
Prophix
8.9
185 Ratings
9% above category average
Vena
8.3
228 Ratings
2% above category average
Personalized dashboards
9.01 Ratings
8.8172 Ratings
8.4199 Ratings
Color-coded scorecards
00 Ratings
8.8125 Ratings
9.2153 Ratings
KPIs
00 Ratings
8.7137 Ratings
8.4175 Ratings
Cost and profitability analysis
00 Ratings
9.6134 Ratings
8.0190 Ratings
Key Performance Indicator setting
00 Ratings
8.8110 Ratings
8.2171 Ratings
Benchmarking with external data
00 Ratings
8.875 Ratings
7.8135 Ratings
Integration
Comparison of Integration features of Product A and Product B
Hubble
9.0
2 Ratings
9% above category average
Prophix
9.7
206 Ratings
16% above category average
Vena
8.3
276 Ratings
1% above category average
Excel data integration
10.02 Ratings
9.8182 Ratings
9.2258 Ratings
Direct links to 3rd-party data sources
8.01 Ratings
9.5157 Ratings
7.8211 Ratings
Flat file integration
00 Ratings
9.8167 Ratings
7.8228 Ratings
BI Standard Reporting
Comparison of BI Standard Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Hubble
-
Ratings
Prophix
6.0
27 Ratings
22% below category average
Vena
7.9
153 Ratings
5% above category average
Pixel Perfect reports
00 Ratings
5.310 Ratings
8.0103 Ratings
Customizable dashboards
00 Ratings
6.126 Ratings
8.2139 Ratings
Report Formatting Templates
00 Ratings
6.526 Ratings
7.5145 Ratings
Ad-hoc Reporting
Comparison of Ad-hoc Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Hubble
-
Ratings
Prophix
9.4
121 Ratings
18% above category average
Vena
8.0
251 Ratings
2% above category average
Drill-down analysis
00 Ratings
9.8120 Ratings
8.4238 Ratings
Formatting capabilities
00 Ratings
8.8115 Ratings
8.4238 Ratings
Report sharing and collaboration
00 Ratings
9.7113 Ratings
8.1214 Ratings
Integration with R or other statistical packages
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
7.299 Ratings
Report Output and Scheduling
Comparison of Report Output and Scheduling features of Product A and Product B
Hubble
-
Ratings
Prophix
9.1
109 Ratings
12% above category average
Vena
8.0
202 Ratings
0% below category average
Publish to PDF
00 Ratings
9.8104 Ratings
8.2155 Ratings
Report Versioning
00 Ratings
7.881 Ratings
8.1169 Ratings
Report Delivery Scheduling
00 Ratings
9.895 Ratings
8.1154 Ratings
Publish to Web
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
7.6117 Ratings
Data Discovery and Visualization
Comparison of Data Discovery and Visualization features of Product A and Product B
I like the real time aspect of the Hubble reporting. I can have checks run and then immediately go into Hubble and run a check backup report, import it to Excel and send off to people who need it right away. It's great to be able to have updated records at the touch of button.
If the budgeting is done with Excel spreadsheets, and your company is small to medium in size, Prophix is the system for you! Additionally, if your company is also doing monthly forecasting in Excel, Prophix will save you time and reduce errors. There are also many other worthwhile features, such as Account Reconciliation and consolidations.
Vena is great for managing data and putting all of your information in one easy-to-locate spot. It also makes finding data faster and easier. It is also great for tracking project performance and budgeting. It is fairly user-friendly and easy to use from an admin side.
Reporting - single report that can be opened by multiple users, each will see only aspect specific to them based on their security access.
Budgeting - workflow driven budget data collection, visibility of its current status, ability to take action to ensure timely completion. Ability to snapshot budget data at a point in time. Ability to perform what-if scenarios.
Forecasting - as above with added benefit of either reusing budget level of grain or forecasting at high level.
Granular planning - ability to create unlimited number of subsidiary models to assist with the planning process. Non-financial data collected during budget/forecast process help with operation planning and variance analysis.
Prophix could improve on its dashboarding capability - it is very basic and we always present our graphs/visuals in Excel.
We would love it if Prophix could improve its line item detail reports. They are not great right after downloading and require a lot of manipulation in Excel.
It would be awesome if we could fully integrate our invoicing software with Prophix. This would allow us to view invoices within Prophix rather than having to go into another tool.
Preparing forecasts under different scenarios can be challenging. Your input templates need to be set up to toggle between the various scenarios. We found that certain templates, particularly workforce were not able to easily switch between different scenarios.
Connection to Bamboo - initial testing of this resulted in the history being deleted and only showing the current employees. For us it was important to have the history in Vena.
No native connection to Tableau - while a CSV upload is a way around would be great to have this since you already have a Power BI connection.
The system works well for us, and meets all of our needs. All of our future plans can and will be achieved within Prophix, so there is no need to pursue another product. Prophix has continuously proven to improve their product over the years, which provides an even higher level of confidence in this tool, and future developments
Vena has been a huge win for us as an organization, as it vastly improved our budgeting process by removing manual consolidation that was incredibly time consuming, and it allows us to see a multi-year view of our organizational budget across all of our funding sources. We've seen Vena's platform grow over the years and we've not yet fully adopted some of them so it feels like there's still potential to get even more value out of the platform.
I have used other reporting software over the years and so far this has been the simplest to set up, the most flexible to use and we have not yet used Prophix to its full capacity. Over the next year or so I can see us extending our use of Prophix to include any number of other functions.
I would rate Vena's overall usability as an 8 out of 10. Vena offers a user-friendly interface, especially for those familiar with Excel, making it relatively easy to use. Most features are intuitive. However, some advanced functionalities may require more training or time to master, so it's not a perfect score. Overall, Vena provides a solid user experience that supports efficient financial planning.
The availability in Prophix is relatively good. We have occurred random outages in different versions that wipe out data, which can be brought back. Or we have ran into system wide slowness that impacts all users in the system, but we have been able to get more capacity to supply our performance.
Vena has been available and running. There are notifications well ahead of scheduled maintenance and so far, scheduled maintenance has been occurring during off hours and fortunately has not occurred during a time that is crucial for us to be actively using.
Prophix has always performed consistently. We are using on-premise so many factors can contribute to slower than desired performance, most having nothing to do with Prophix itself. If we move to the web-client cloud based solution I believe performance will even be better.
Vena Solutions pages load quickly and only a few times does it get a bit slow, only when there are many integrations and the reports are long. But in general it is always fast and honestly I am very satisfied with the speed in the generation of statistical reports and the pages
The Prophix staff is very helpful and quick to respond. I like that they teach me instead of doing it for me when possible, so I don't have to contact them as often! Never talked to anyone at Prophix that I didn't respect or think highly of! Very professional, great customer service!
They are very quick to respond when you submit a ticket and typically fix issues quickly as well. I only didn't give this a 10 because there is still an open issue with our Salesforce connection that we've been waiting on now for a few months.
Training is essential for this software to be successful for any company. We unfortunately had a bad implementation and training manager so I can say with confidence that if we had the CSM we have now - we would be light years ahead of our knowledge of the system. I highly suggest taking all training opportunities and not rushing the implementation training
Our initial in person training was a little rough b/c I felt like our trainer wanted to focus on maximizing Vena rather than understanding what we were needing for our organization. He was very responsive and added insights, but could have worked to understand our needs a little better.
We used our system and created a test cube to work with our own data. We ran through the different functions of Prophix and covered alot of material. We did two sessions a week, with homework tasks assigned. We were able to ask questions and cover any questions during the followup sessions.
The training was structured as a group training to learn the basics of creating a data model and mapping a template. While we had nearly 10 participants, I was the only actual implementer so we probably didn't actually need the training and could have just learned the initial skills from the implementation consultant. Two years later, when we hired a new team member, they completed several modules in Vena Academy (a self paced learning course) which allowed them to get up to speed on the basics with just a bit of supplemental guidance from me as our existing admin.
Prophix Consulting should bring, in house, chargeable expertise in Oracle EBS table access for Drill Across and provide reasonable limits on dimension member combinations so there are no unreasonable expectations about the application of multi dimensional cubes to detail, such as revenue by product and customer.
The Vena consultant had great knowledge of both the Vena solution and Excel and Excel functions. He was able to help suggest ways to build our templates that met our requirements using Excel functions we had not previously considered using. And we have been able to use the Excel information he provided in other ways outside of Vena. He was very patient and flexible as we learned the Vena tool and created templates
We felt Prophix was much more flexible than Briq and offered a more solid financial reporting and budgeting package. Briq is more custom built solution-focused. They build solutions to fit your specific needs. The primary reason we went with Prophix is that we wanted something we could tweak and design on our own after the initial build-out of the solution.
Vena is a strong fit for teams that want to keep working in Excel while adding structure, workflows, and a centralized database. Vena emphasizes its native Excel experience, along with planning templates, workflow automation, and integrations for budgeting/forecasting.
Planful is more positioned as an end-to-end financial performance platform, with a broader emphasis on planning, budgeting, forecasting, reporting, AI/ML-driven forecasting support, real-time collaboration, and enterprise-scale (including multi-entity/multi-currency environments). It also supports Microsoft 365 reporting via Spotlight. We selected Vena because it was a better fit for our current use case and team setup:
Our Operations and FP&A teams primarily use it for budgeting and forecasting, so the Excel-based workflow made adoption easier.
It was easier to implement and simpler for users to learn and operate day-to-day.
It fit well with our need to improve planning structure without forcing a major process change.
I gave Prophix a 10 on scalability because we currently deploy the solution to department heads across our entire organization and never have any issues with those individuals using or accessing the system to look at their financial information within premade templates . They currently enter budgets and review reports within the system currently. The only issue is they cannot typically use the ad hoc functionality because that would require higher level licenses that cost more and it is not worth it to give them more costly licenses since they really aren't working in the system quite like the robust finance users
Vena solutios is a software that provides robust tools that help different departments in their statistics and we can visualize a lot of promising and visually attractive data. Vena Solutions' level of scalability is high and sustainable over time thanks to the fabulous technical support that is ready to help us at all times
Prophix has made it possible to move away from some Excel reporting we were doing, which allows for 50% quicker reporting on a monthly basis.
Although it has saved us time, an improved PowerPoint feature that automatically updates our decks would save an additional 75% on top of what we already do.
Our Board Reporting has improved by 10 hours by moving our reports fully into Prophix.
Automated monthly financial statements saves us 3 hours a month.
Moving reporting away from IT has begun to save hours of IT involvement, which will only grow as we shift more reports to Vena. This frees up IT to work on more important IT initiatives.
Using budget templates saved hours of copy and paste time when gathering inputs from each department.