TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

IBM Targetprocess vs. Sauce Labs vs. TestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest)

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    IBM Targetprocess

    Score8.5 out of 10
    N/AIBM Targetprocess is a Strategic Portfolio Management (SPM) SaaS that connects strategy, funding, and execution. It helps enterprises prioritize work, dynamically allocate resources, and continuously adapt plans. With real-time visibility and financial insights, organizations can deliver faster, clearer business outcomes.N/A

    Sauce Labs

    Score6.8 out of 10
    N/ASauce Labs is a cloud-based platform for automated testing of desktop and mobile applications. It is designed to be instantly scalable, since it is optimized for continuous integration workflows. (The vendor says that when tests are automated and run in parallel on multiple virtual machines across many different browser, platform and device combinations, testing time is reduced and developer time is freed up from managing infrastructure.) The Sauce Labs testing cloud is intended to be paired…

    $19

    per month

    TestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest)

    Score8.9 out of 10
    Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
    TestMu AI (formerly LambdaTest) is a full-stack, AI-native quality engineering platform that lets teams plan, author, execute and analyse software quality in one place, across web, mobile and AI applications. Performance and load testing: TestMu AI runs JMeter .jmx plans and Gatling simulations unchanged, at protocol level, on managed cloud load generators that are provisioned for each run across six regions and removed when it ends, so there is no load…

    $19

    per month per user

    Pricing
    IBM TargetprocessSauce LabsTestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest)
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    Live Testing
    $19.00
    per month
    Virtual Cloud
    $149.00
    per month
    Virtual Live
    $19
    per month Parallel Test
    Real Device Plus Live
    $49
    per month 1 parallel test
    Test Manager
    $59
    per month per seat
    Web Automation on Desktop
    $99
    per month Parallel Test
    Virtual Automation Cloud
    $159
    per month Parallel Test
    HyperExecute Cloud (Multi OS)
    $199
    per month Parallel Test
    Real Device + Automation Cloud
    $249
    per month Parallel Test
    SmartUI Visual Regression
    $269
    per month Parallel Test
    Kane AI (Mobile + Web)
    $349
    per month Parallel Test
    Enterprise
    Custom Pricing
    Parallel Test
    HyperExecute On-Premise
    Custom Pricing
    per parallel test
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    IBM TargetprocessSauce LabsTestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest)
    Free Trial
    YesYesYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoYesYes
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    YesYesNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeRequiredOptionalNo setup fee
    Additional Details—Free service available for Open Source projects.Discount available for annual pricing.
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    IBM TargetprocessSauce LabsTestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest)
    Considered Multiple Products
    Apptio an IBM Company
    No answer on this topic
    Sauce Labs
    Chose Sauce Labs
    Customer service, security settings and availability were differentiators for Saucelabs
    Incentivized
    TestMu AI
    Chose TestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest)
    We chose LambdaTest over BrowserStack and Sauce Labs because it offers a cost-effective, easy-to-use, and efficient cloud-based testing solution. While BrowserStack has better real-device support and Sauce Labs excels in enterprise automation, LambdaTest balances affordability, …
    Incentivized
    Chose TestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest)
    LambdaTest offers me a large number of real-time mobile devices and browsers for testing, as well as debugging tools like Screenshot Testing and Issue Tracker. This is what I like the most about LambdaTest and prefer it over Sauce Labs. Additionally, my team has reported faster …
    Incentivized
    Chose TestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest)
    After evaluating tools like BrowserStack and Sauce Labs, we made the decision to stick with LambdaTest. They have the neat and clean UI, their pricing is really the cheapest in the market, and they provide faster service than BrowserStack or Sauce Labs.
    Incentivized
    Chose TestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest)
    One of the major reason was pricing, though it was decided by upper level management to get partnered with LambdaTest
    Incentivized
    Chose TestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest)
    Performance,ease of use and features
    Incentivized
    Chose TestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest)
    I feel that the UI and UX of BrowserStack are not on par with LambdaTest.
    Incentivized
    Chose TestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest)
    It's 50 % cheaper and better then the alternatives and gets the job done!
    Incentivized
    Chose TestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest)
    1.Automated testing
    2.intigration
    Incentivized
    Chose TestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest)
    LambdaTest stands out among its competitors in a few key areas as observed which major includes:-1) Real-Time Browser Testing with Advanced Features 2) Automated Testing with Grid 3) Live Interactive Testing and Parallel Test Execution 4) Customer Support & Documentation 5) …
    Incentivized
    Chose TestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest)
    1. Ease of use
    2. Cost effective
    Incentivized
    Chose TestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest)
    The test runs are faster in Lambdatest, Integration of lambdatest is easier and lambdatest is less expensive compared to other products like BrowserStack or saucelabs
    Incentivized
    Chose TestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest)
    LambdaTest stands out from its competitors due to its affordable pricing model, intuitive user interface, and comprehensive set of features. Its real-time testing feature allows users to test their websites on a range of devices and browsers in real-time, enabling quick issue …
    Incentivized
    Chose TestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest)
    Pricing and User friendly
    Incentivized
    Chose TestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest)
    • LambdaTest is affordable
    • It has easier IU
    • Faster and many times feels more stable than competitors
    Incentivized
    Chose TestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest)
    When we were comparing LambdaTest with its competitor tools, we found:
    • It has more browsers to run the tests.
    • It is faster than other tools.
    Incentivized
    Chose TestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest)
    For my manual testing needs, pricing was much cheaper than BS or SL also speed was much enhanced than these.
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    92%
    Would buy again
    49 Answers
    90%
    Would buy again
    19 Answers
    98%
    Would buy again
    105 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    98%
    Delivers good value for the price
    40 Answers
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    19 Answers
    98%
    Delivers good value for the price
    99 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    94%
    Happy with the feature set
    50 Answers
    95%
    Happy with the feature set
    20 Answers
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    107 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    90%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    35 Answers
    100%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    11 Answers
    97%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    75 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    86%
    Implementation went as expected
    38 Answers
    90%
    Implementation went as expected
    18 Answers
    97%
    Implementation went as expected
    89 Answers
    Features
    IBM TargetprocessSauce LabsTestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest)
    Project Management
    Comparison of Project Management features of IBM Targetprocess and Sauce Labs and TestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest)
    Feature
    IBM Targetprocess
    6.8
    41 Ratings
    9% below category average
    Sauce Labs
    -
    Ratings
    TestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest)
    -
    Ratings
    Task Management7.040 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Resource Management7.638 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Gantt Charts6.929 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Scheduling6.532 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Support for Agile Methodology8.141 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Support for Waterfall Methodology5.236 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Document Management7.329 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Email integration7.430 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Mobile Access7.122 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Timesheet Tracking7.826 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Change request and Case Management6.126 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Budget and Expense Management7.028 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Search5.137 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Visual planning tools6.438 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Agile Development
    Comparison of Agile Development features of IBM Targetprocess and Sauce Labs and TestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest)
    Feature
    IBM Targetprocess
    6.4
    42 Ratings
    18% below category average
    Sauce Labs
    -
    Ratings
    TestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest)
    -
    Ratings
    DevOps Tool Integrations7.534 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Code Review6.724 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Code Collaboration6.723 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Velocity Calculation5.235 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Dependencies and Blockers5.741 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    IBM TargetprocessSauce LabsTestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest)
    Small Businesses
    monday dev
    Score9.2 out of 10
    TestComplete
    Score8 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    Medium-sized Companies
    Planview AgilePlace
    Score7.5 out of 10
    OpenText UFT One
    Score8 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    Enterprises
    Planview AgilePlace
    Score7.5 out of 10
    SoapUI Open Source
    Score8.3 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    IBM TargetprocessSauce LabsTestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest)
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.6
    (49 ratings)
    5.6
    (158 ratings)
    9.0
    (118 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    10.0
    (2 ratings)
    9.3
    (20 ratings)
    8.7
    (7 ratings)
    Usability
    6.3
    (12 ratings)
    8.4
    (20 ratings)
    9.1
    (70 ratings)
    Availability
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    10.0
    (4 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    Performance
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    8.0
    (4 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    Support Rating
    9.0
    (4 ratings)
    8.3
    (15 ratings)
    10.0
    (7 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    7.0
    (1 ratings)
    7.5
    (6 ratings)
    9.0
    (2 ratings)
    Configurability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.2
    (3 ratings)
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    Contract Terms and Pricing Model
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    Ease of integration
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.1
    (2 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    10.0
    (4 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    Vendor post-sale
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (4 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    Vendor pre-sale
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (4 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    IBM TargetprocessSauce LabsTestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest)
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Apptio an IBM Company
    Apptio Targetprocess is well suited to track work and progress of that work. In addition it is easy to tie that work to OKRs. Cost and hours rollup across the work hierarchy works well. Our users like the flexibility of Targetprocess and the ability to develop their own views and reports Scenarios where it is less appropriate is to do executive level reporting and develop reports that can pull in all of our time data since there is a 300k record limit
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Sauce Labs
    Having used some of the competitor's tools over the year I would say that SauceLabs provides a lot of value for money if you plan to run long sets of tests with high frequencies. Paying for a single slot means you can run tests whenever you want without creeping costs but it does make running tests in parallel require an extra slot. Currently, our test suite takes over three hours to run and at the moment it is cost prohibitive to purchase an extra slot. However, having access to live testing and integration with Appium is great.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    TestMu AI
    One day, I needed to test a specific issue that was occurring only on Pixel phones. I turned to LambdaTest, quickly identified the problem, and was able to fix it. There hasn't been a situation where I felt LambdaTest didn't help, it's my go-to solution for testing, as it solves many problems.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Apptio an IBM Company
    • Extremely flexible: We are able to setup work for different groups in ways that work best for them.
    • Fantastic support group: They are extremely knowledgeable and helpful. I enjoy working with them.
    • Automation: Their automation capabilities have saved us a lot of time.
    • Customizing screens: We can go into code for the different entities, move fields around or hide them, add tabs or additional sections as needed to make for a streamlined user experience.
    • Reporting: Their reporting is flexible and phenomenal. There are so many different ways to pull data and the interface is easy to use.
    • Their user guide is well built and extremely helpful.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Sauce Labs
    • Provides a comprehensive selection of browser and platform versions for test automation and CI/CD pipeline support
    • Provides a rich selection of browser/platform availability for customer issue reproduction
    • Provides a comprehensive set of virtual mobile device configurations for automation and availability
    • Sauce Labs' SaaS and self service tools work and perform well
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    TestMu AI
    • Very accessible as multiple users can be added in each subscription
    • Very reliable as it is very close to the actual device when it comes to operating system and version behavior
    • There are a lot of options for devices and browsers that users can choose from when it comes to emulating and testing
    Read full review
    Cons
    Apptio an IBM Company
    • The UI is bit complex for new users who never used it. i think this can be sorted out by providing the steps to access?
    • dashboards with large datasets can cause performance lags or timeouts
    • Introduce more flexible, template-based RBAC configurations.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Sauce Labs
    • I've had four changes in account managers over the past couple of years. They ranged from super experienced/advocate to some that seems relatively junior/a bit removed. I understand this happens but clarity on what I can expect with these partnerships would be valuable. What I've gotten in the end has varied dramatically.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    TestMu AI
    • More real devices should be added like I have Samsung mobile but it was not in the list
    • It takes time in checking the link on LambdaTest if we compare with real mobiles
    • Sometimes exact results are not matching as from real mobiles
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Apptio an IBM Company
    Targetprocess is the most flexible application for tracking work among teams that we have found. This power comes from near limitless ability to customize your views on the work tracked in the system, and from the myriad reporting options to draw metrics and stats out of the data there. Custom fields, processes, and mashups all add to this flexibility and appeal.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Sauce Labs
    As we currently know, there's nothing on the market with a big feature set like saucelabs at their current price point. Along with the business not having to learn a whole new tool to use again and the ability to refresh our private devices and the continuously growing number of public devices available and features.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    TestMu AI
    The reason i have given the 10 points becasue the problem LambdaTest solves is providing access to all devices in one place, allowing developers to identify the same errors they would encounter on real devices. This makes life much easier, especially for developers who regularly face cross-device functionality issues. It's a big plus point that positions LambdaTest as an all-in-one solution.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Apptio an IBM Company
    Overall Targetprocess's usability is good. the tool is easy to use and has features which most BUs and organizations can use. Additional features like AI integration would help the tool and its overall usability. providing additional dashboards for specific roles and executives within the tool would benefit Targetprocess with its scale
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Sauce Labs
    It is an incredibly easy service to use for what its primary intention is. The only reason a point is deducted is because more feature enrichment can be done around the Sauce Connect Proxy utility and the Jenkins Sauce OnDemand plugin. User Account administration also needs more work, such as the addition of user groups, rather than a simple hierarchy of users.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    TestMu AI
    Because of the ease of use of the platform, we just save a lot of time and effort with this as its a feature rich solution, we just need to upload app binary once and for everytime we need to test on a different device we can just directly install that binary on the device without the pain of reupload.
    Read full review
    Reliability and Availability
    Apptio an IBM Company
    Some minor outages are experienced, though these tend to pass within an hour usually and work can continue
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Sauce Labs
    Yes, Sauce labs is always there, and it is easy to troubleshoot when you are having any connectivity issue, they always keep you informed when they plan to perform any type of maintenance window on their side in advance, so you can plan and will not affect your current work. I do not recall any outage.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    TestMu AI
    yes always available
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Performance
    Apptio an IBM Company
    Reports are fast loading, considering they can refresh in a second or less and we have 7 years of work tracked in over 40k entities. Pages can load slowly when the views are very busy, but not frustratingly. I am a console user most of my career and generally prefer it over webUI interfaces, but Targetprocess won me over from the beginning and I spend half my day using it now.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Sauce Labs
    The time where they acquired TestObject and were trying to integrate their services would probably be the most annoying time. Annoying as features were in two separate places (websites) for example. But since the introduction of their unified platform, we haven't run into any issues as of yet and we've used them for at least 5-6 years now.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    TestMu AI
    haven't found any glitch while using this
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Apptio an IBM Company
    TargetProcess' support is one of its strengths. The support team is very responsive and helpful when there is a problem but they're also proactive in providing good release notes and engaging with the community through a voting scheme to influence the priority of new features.
    The team also releases new versions frequently with new features but with no knock-ons to currently working features.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Sauce Labs
    The people here are just so friendly and personable. For instance, Tristan Lombard answered every single email with a very cheery tone and not only did he diagnose my issue, he also made sure to ask how my day was going. Keep it up
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    TestMu AI
    The customer support team is very active and cooperative. Once, I contacted them in their off timings because of an issue, I got an instant reply from the executive and he resolved the issue very efficiently. This is why we have been using LambdaTest for more than two years. It is best suited for us.
    Read full review
    Implementation Rating
    Apptio an IBM Company
    You should take some time to get everyone to agree how the system should be setup before work starts being tracked in Targetprocess, this avoids difficult and disruptive changes to processes or plugins later when everyone relies on it daily.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Sauce Labs
    I am not sure if it's my company that makes getting Sauce Labs integrated into the team difficult or is it Sauce Labs. The process for getting Sauce Labs for a project is quite a tedious process and the information for using Sauce Labs initially is quite lacking. There is little support for getting started
    Read full review
    TestMu AI
    Implementation of Lambdatest was very easy for different project requirements.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Apptio an IBM Company
    I would say TargetProcess is an incredibly wonderful tool. As compare to JIRA Software, it is a fully featured product. It fulfills all my business needs. Tracking efficiency of this application is quite favorable
    in order to track all the details from a certain project in just a few minutes.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Sauce Labs
    We have also tested out Browser Stack, which at the time was more geared towards manual testing. Although it appeared to support more mobile devices/browsers, we also wanted something that can plugin in easily with our existing Selenium test scripts. Sauce Labs was definitely more geared towards our goals at the moment which were to automation functional/regression testing and build it into our release pipeline.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    TestMu AI
    While BrowserStack is also a well-established platform, we found LambdaTest to offer similar and even better features at reasonable pricing. LambdaTest is more cost-effective than BrowserStack. LambdaTest provides a free forever plan, while BrowserStack does not. Even manual testing plans are better priced than BrowserStack’s. In terms of UI and onboarding, we found LambdaTest more user-friendly as well.
    Read full review
    Scalability
    Apptio an IBM Company
    We use the hosted version of Targetprocess and have never run into limitations or degraded performance due to scalability. Excellent performance over 7 years!
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Sauce Labs
    With private devices, you have full reign over usage of them, so no complaints there. Public devices are available if no one else is using it, which is understandable. Browser VMs are based on number of open sessions and Saucelabs give you a certain number depending on what you need. If you need more, then you pay for more. It is as simple as that. You need more devices, then you can pay for more private ones too. A workaround for public devices is to pick the first available one and not be too picky, that's if you are able to of course.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    TestMu AI
    not all department, but we're using for our clients
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Apptio an IBM Company
    • No direct positive business ROI has caused executive leadership to play down use of the tool
    • We are hoping to use this to track progress of OKRs and business strategy, but don't have but in from executives on the value of this yet.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Sauce Labs
    • Eh... Negligible? Being on AWS West makes it quite a few hops for us, so the process times out every now and again. That is frustrating.
    • I can't really speak to the dollars, as I am not privy to the information.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    TestMu AI
    • Automation testing has a bit of a learning curve
    • Lack of real device keep that bug in your head if not on the website.
    • Need to wait for a while for a new OS or browser version on the contrary of immediate availability in case of owning a lab
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    IBM Targetprocess Screenshots

    Screenshot of Resource Management: Reduces risk by dynamically managing resources, capacity, and demandScreenshot of Program Management: To deliver value throughout a strategic portfolioScreenshot of Portfolio Budgeting: Shifting from project to product fundingScreenshot of Strategic Planning: Continuously links work, labor, and investments to business strategyScreenshot of Workforce ManagementScreenshot of Work

    Sauce Labs Screenshots

    Screenshot of Sauce Labs UI optimized for continuous integration workflows.

    TestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest) Screenshots

    Screenshot of An automated screenshot.Screenshot of Mobile-browser-testingScreenshot of Automation testing on LambdatestScreenshot of Some of the available integrations.Screenshot of Real-time testingScreenshot of Responsive testing