IBM WebSphere Hybrid Edition vs. Microsoft Application Server (deprecated) vs. SAP Business Technology Platform

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
IBM WebSphere Hybrid Edition
Score 7.4 out of 10
N/A
WebSphere Hybrid Edition from IBM is a collection of WebSphere application runtimes and modernization tools that provides support for on-premise and major public cloud deployments, in virtual machines, containers and Kubernetes. The user can choose any WebSphere edition and deploy Liberty and application modernization tools to help move to a cloud-native architecture, modernize existing applications and support an existing WebSphere estate.
$88.50
per month
Microsoft Application Server (deprecated)
Score 7.3 out of 10
N/A
Application Server is an expanded server role in the Windows Server® 2008 operating system. It provided an integrated environment for deploying and running custom, server-based business applications. These applications respond to requests that arrive over the network from remote client computers or from other applications. Application Server is deprecated.N/A
SAP Business Technology Platform
Score 8.5 out of 10
N/A
SAP Business Technology Platform (SAP BTP) is the company's Platform-as-a-Service (PaaS) offering, that brings together intelligent enterprise applications with database and data management, analytics, integration and extension capabilities into one platform for both cloud and hybrid environments, including hundreds of pre-built integrations for SAP and third-party applications.N/A
Pricing
IBM WebSphere Hybrid EditionMicrosoft Application Server (deprecated)SAP Business Technology Platform
Editions & Modules
Application Server
$88.50
per month
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
IBM WebSphere Hybrid EditionMicrosoft Application Server (deprecated)SAP Business Technology Platform
Free Trial
NoNoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNoYes
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
IBM WebSphere Hybrid EditionMicrosoft Application Server (deprecated)SAP Business Technology Platform
Considered Multiple Products
IBM WebSphere Hybrid Edition

No answer on this topic

Microsoft Application Server (deprecated)
Chose Microsoft Application Server (deprecated)
We did choose because of its dependability, speed, complex environment support, and ease of use. Microsoft Application Server is cheaper than IBM WebSphere Application Server and faster than WebSphere. Microsoft Application Server is a close competitor in terms of features, but …
Chose Microsoft Application Server (deprecated)
Microsoft Application Server was cheaper then what IBM WebSphere Application Server would have cost us. Also, our legacy applications run much faster on MS Application Server.
Chose Microsoft Application Server (deprecated)
It has a similar feature to what Microsoft Application Server has but at a greater cost and also having to deal with another vendor when we could use a full Microsoft Stack for better training and support.
SAP Business Technology Platform

No answer on this topic

Features
IBM WebSphere Hybrid EditionMicrosoft Application Server (deprecated)SAP Business Technology Platform
Application Servers
Comparison of Application Servers features of Product A and Product B
IBM WebSphere Hybrid Edition
7.3
31 Ratings
9% below category average
Microsoft Application Server (deprecated)
8.0
9 Ratings
0% above category average
SAP Business Technology Platform
-
Ratings
IDE support5.626 Ratings9.09 Ratings00 Ratings
Security management8.231 Ratings9.09 Ratings00 Ratings
Administration and management7.731 Ratings7.09 Ratings00 Ratings
Application server performance8.131 Ratings9.09 Ratings00 Ratings
Installation7.530 Ratings7.09 Ratings00 Ratings
Open-source standards compliance6.726 Ratings7.08 Ratings00 Ratings
Platform-as-a-Service
Comparison of Platform-as-a-Service features of Product A and Product B
IBM WebSphere Hybrid Edition
-
Ratings
Microsoft Application Server (deprecated)
-
Ratings
SAP Business Technology Platform
7.5
820 Ratings
3% below category average
Ease of building user interfaces00 Ratings00 Ratings7.9784 Ratings
Scalability00 Ratings00 Ratings8.0781 Ratings
Platform management overhead00 Ratings00 Ratings7.3740 Ratings
Workflow engine capability00 Ratings00 Ratings7.5656 Ratings
Platform access control00 Ratings00 Ratings7.5750 Ratings
Services-enabled integration00 Ratings00 Ratings7.9736 Ratings
Development environment creation00 Ratings00 Ratings7.8725 Ratings
Development environment replication00 Ratings00 Ratings7.5633 Ratings
Issue monitoring and notification00 Ratings00 Ratings7.0716 Ratings
Issue recovery00 Ratings00 Ratings6.8635 Ratings
Upgrades and platform fixes00 Ratings00 Ratings7.4679 Ratings
Best Alternatives
IBM WebSphere Hybrid EditionMicrosoft Application Server (deprecated)SAP Business Technology Platform
Small Businesses
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.2 out of 10
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.2 out of 10
AWS Lambda
AWS Lambda
Score 8.3 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.2 out of 10
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.2 out of 10
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.2 out of 10
Enterprises
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.2 out of 10
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.2 out of 10
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.2 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
IBM WebSphere Hybrid EditionMicrosoft Application Server (deprecated)SAP Business Technology Platform
Likelihood to Recommend
8.2
(33 ratings)
9.0
(9 ratings)
8.4
(675 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
8.5
(4 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
8.9
(24 ratings)
Usability
8.0
(6 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
7.8
(660 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
7.8
(3 ratings)
Performance
8.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
5.0
(3 ratings)
Support Rating
8.7
(4 ratings)
9.0
(5 ratings)
7.4
(455 ratings)
In-Person Training
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
7.3
(1 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
7.4
(2 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
7.4
(11 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
5.6
(3 ratings)
Contract Terms and Pricing Model
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
4.9
(3 ratings)
Ease of integration
8.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(3 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
6.0
(3 ratings)
Professional Services
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
3.7
(2 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
3.2
(2 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
3.6
(2 ratings)
User Testimonials
IBM WebSphere Hybrid EditionMicrosoft Application Server (deprecated)SAP Business Technology Platform
Likelihood to Recommend
IBM
IBM WebSphere Hybrid edition is well-suited for the development and deployment of large enterprise-level applications such as Electronic Health Records that are used in our organization. IBM WebSphere is appropriate for organizations that require strong security and compliance as it provides a high level of security and compliance features. This works well with organizations that are subject to strict regulatory requirements, such as hospitals.
Read full review
Discontinued Products
Microsoft Application Server has been incredible this past year during COVID. Previously I would have said that we could go without it, but after this past season, I’m glad we have utilized it. Without having this software set up prior to COVID, we would have been in a tough situation. I mention COVID a lot because we were able to continue our work almost seamlessly this entire year.
Read full review
SAP
If you want to use a well-designed SAP technology to shift into the cloud, you will be more than satisfied with the BTP services overall. There are some improvements for beginners to help them get a better overview of what to do and how to start with their account. My recommendation is to take a foundation training course from the SAP learning hub to prepare for the first steps.
Read full review
Pros
IBM
  • IBM WebSphere Hybrid Edition has done marvelous in building and deploying Java Enterprise applications.
  • It also does well in automating deployment and scaling. This has made it easier for our organization to deploy updates to our applications.
  • IBM WebSphere Hybrid Edition does well in security by providing features that protect enterprise applications.
Read full review
Discontinued Products
  • Microsoft Application Server has proven to be highly reliable and effective at deploying to all of its clients.
  • Application performance is surprisingly good and responsive even in bandwidth-constrained environments and generally very reliable.
  • All software programs are manageable from a single location, even when bandwidth is limited.
Read full review
SAP
  • It is very easy to use.
  • All the documentation around it is geared towards the enterprise use case, unlike some other hyperscalers' platforms.
  • The SAP Business Technology Platform is very good because it's got the SAP customer and their business processes in mind. Probably my favorite thing about it is how easy it is to get up and running with a new use case and how well it natively connects to an SAP solution.
Read full review
Cons
IBM
  • Ease of use in terms of deployment, give simple interface to do simple stuff like Tomcat, JBoss or GlassFish.
  • Takes long time to start the server.
  • The Liferay wars need to be decorated and then deployed. Perhaps we could simplify that.
  • Some of the concepts are good for complexity that WAS can handle but could be simplified and better documented, like concepts of well and profile, context, etc.
  • A Liferay war file created using Liferay Developer studio runs fine in Tomcat, however that may not run in WAS 7.x because it needs to be decorated. I had one war for a Liferay portlet with a simple cron job, and had hard time running to WAS server. It was running on the latest free download done on my friends m/c. Other times I have seen that there are issues running a war file that runs on Tomcat but runs on WAS after lot of customization for WAS.
  • The corporations like this however, the product may need better vibrant community of users where issues can be discussed.
Read full review
Discontinued Products
  • Some security hotfixes and general release updates require restarts.
  • We wish it supported more applications out of the box.
  • Thin client support would be great for MS Application Server.
Read full review
SAP
  • The Automation Integration service has some outdated workflows
  • New services should be available as entitlements as soon as they are released for a particular region without having to buy them from SAP for zero dollars
  • Any subaccount should be able to change the IAS tenant. Currently, if you set it up for a particular IAS, you cannot change to another tenant and are required to recreate the services in a new subaccount.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
IBM
Mostly we will be renewing unless the strategic direction changes drastically or there are other complelling external circumstances. We've been on a multi year project to modernize our legacy applications and that effort will continue for the foreseeable future.
Read full review
Discontinued Products
No answers on this topic
SAP
Seamless integration with external system and dashboard to monitor the data flow and analysis are very essential for the business. The way the product is designed and modelled lead to minimum business disruptions. Adopting to the new and modern technology was easy. Keeping the central system as clean and adopting project bases development are advantages.
Read full review
Usability
IBM
WebSphere Application Server is used across our organization. Most projects use this for Java products and applications. Being robust and scalable makes it even more usable. We love using WebSphere Application Server due to its configuration management ability made simple and vast across all java related parameters. It is dependent on the features and upgrades and IBM releases some great upgrades to WebSphere Application Server.
Read full review
Discontinued Products
I have found Microsoft Application Server to be incredibly easy to use. I have used dozens of similar programs and have always struggled to navigate through all the functions. So far I have been able to adapt and learn this software with ease. I rarely run into a problem that I wasn’t easily able to move forward on with a few tips.
Read full review
SAP
Okay, so the content that we have built on the platform is limited to specific testing on the iFlows within integration suite. The visualization layer is nice to use and helps with the design elements, however with developers that are more used to markup languages, it doesn't have the same CLI type feel when you want it. Perhaps the majority of users are that deep, but other platforms have a better CLI type developer experience.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
IBM
No answers on this topic
Discontinued Products
No answers on this topic
SAP
Services are generally available
Read full review
Performance
IBM
Deploys fairly quick enough and like the roll-out update feature decreasing the downtime and also plays well with other integration tools as well.
Read full review
Discontinued Products
No answers on this topic
SAP
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
IBM
IBM was quick to respond when we had an issue with our specific infrastructure. We raised a PMR, which they picked up quickly and updated us about every step of the way. We had an appropriate fix for quite a business critical issue within a fortnight, which was impressive!
Read full review
Discontinued Products
Stability is one of the first things we consider when evaluating software. MS Application Server has been rock solid and has reduced the time that our IT staff dedicates to maintaining our legacy applications.
Read full review
SAP
The biggest problem we ran into was communication between SAP Business Technology Platform and onsite resources. Unfortunately our SAP Business Technology Platform and Cloud systems are under different customer numbers. I constantly had to open tickets under each customer number because I was unsure of where the issue lied. And having to create a dummy ticket for our ECC systems to open the ECC connections for another ticket under the Cloud customer is a pain.
Read full review
Online Training
IBM
No answers on this topic
Discontinued Products
No answers on this topic
SAP
Training material in Developers Community or from Learning hub are really good... also most of the time we route through Discovery center... so materials provided by SAP is really good.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
IBM
No answers on this topic
Discontinued Products
No answers on this topic
SAP
Having a full cloud native environment for devlopment of microservices and digitals solutions while having standardized access to our core data on SAP via cloud connector is one of the main benefits of using BTP over others hypervisors. BTP is the standard hyperscaler as soon as something relies on data from SAP systems in our company now
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
IBM
Cleo Integration Clould has many bells and whistles; however, when we added more maps and trading partners, it really slowed down. We found that the Cleo support was very slow to respond and there was a language barrier. IBM Websphere had better customer support and its processing was much faster than Cleo Integration Cloud
Read full review
Discontinued Products
It has a similar feature to what Microsoft Application Server has but at a greater cost and also having to deal with another vendor when we could use a full Microsoft Stack for better training and support.
Read full review
SAP
SAP Concur allows our staff to book, reimburse and remain spend audit compliant. Our Concur system takes feed from Workday and interacts with Credit card vendor. It also makes posting to Accounting and does clearing. SAP Business Technology Platform helped in establishing connection with all these different tools in real time. It helps in getting paid to the card service provider through our Bank through interface, which is built on SAP Business Technology Platform.
Read full review
Scalability
IBM
No answers on this topic
Discontinued Products
No answers on this topic
SAP
It's scalable
Read full review
Return on Investment
IBM
  • Continuous uptime of the business applications we manage
  • It's now much simpler for me to build and deploy cloud-native applications.
  • Because it can offload for me management and maintenance of the application server to IBM I can focus on the development, deployment and testing of the applications which is more important
Read full review
Discontinued Products
  • Our ROI has been great since it has enabled our IT staff to have a central location to perform application updates which enables us to save time and money.
  • Deployment is very easy since the internal applications that required constant updating are now updated in one central location.
  • It's a lot easier to be within compliance protocols requirements.
Read full review
SAP
  • Infusing Generative AI capabilities easily into our solutions with existing talent with minimal learning curve, has been very impactful. We have been able resolve several challenges for our clients with AI capabilities, that we could not, previously.
  • Integration Suite is quite extensive in capabilities for bringing together the IT landscape into a single ecosystem.
Read full review
ScreenShots

SAP Business Technology Platform Screenshots

Screenshot of SAP Build Process Automation, an SAP BTP service