Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
JAMS
Score 9.2 out of 10
N/A
JAMS is a centralized workload automation and job scheduling solution that runs, monitors, and manages jobs and workflows. Reliably orchestrate the critical IT processes that run your business from a single pane of glass.
$9,996
per year
Laserfiche
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
Laserfiche has two main editions: Rio and Avante: Laserfiche Rio is designed to meet the needs of large organizations that have more than 100 users. It combines content management functionality with business process management (BPM), security and auditing, unlimited servers and a thin-client interface. Add-ons include records management functionality, public Web portals and production-level document capture and processing. Laserfiche Avante is an ECM suite for small to medium organizations with…
$540
per year per user
Pricing
JAMSLaserfiche
Editions & Modules
Core
9,996.00
per year
Advanced
Customized Pricing
per year
Starter
$540
per year per user
Starter
$600
per year per user
Professional
$710
per year per user (starts at 10 users)
Professional
$830
per year per user (starting at 5 users)
Business
$830
per year per user (starts at 25 users)
Business
$950
per year per user (starting at 25 users)
Enterprise
Custom
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
JAMSLaserfiche
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details- Core: For small teams getting started with automation. Core Integrations: PowerShell, SQL, Azure Data Factory, Python, 20+ others. - Advanced: Comprehensive solution for large-scale operations. Core Integrations: SAP, JDE, Ellucian Banner, Informatica, Mainframe and Power Systems.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
JAMSLaserfiche
Considered Both Products
JAMS
Chose JAMS
Being company is already using Global Scape, another product from the same company, so licensing to start using JAMS was easy.
Chose JAMS
We use both in the organization, with JAMS more focused on internal file transfers and Axway MFT used for combination of both internal/external.
Key difference I noted is the alerting feature is better in JAMS compared to Axway MFT, however Axway SaaS (cloud platform) allows for …
Chose JAMS
JAMS is the legacy product in our on-premises environment. Accenture has recently implemented MyWizard, the preferred platform for future operations, which is expected to progressively replace JAMS as part of our broader cloud migration strategy. Given this
Chose JAMS
Only used the Task Scheduler on Microsoft servers, which accurately started jobs on time.
Chose JAMS
I wasn't involved in selecting JAMS; it was pushed down by the architecture team.
Chose JAMS
JAMS is more flexible and easy to configure than Control-M.
Chose JAMS
We base usage of JAMS for the particular business use cases.
Chose JAMS
JAMS overall costs are significantly lower, and support is better overall. If you have a halfway decent technical team, any small to medium business will benefit from JAMS over the rest of the schedulers out there.

The UI is so much cleaner than every competitor we've sampled.
Chose JAMS
We were already experienced with JAMS at a previous company. JAMS was already decided prior to my employment.
Chose JAMS
JAMS fulfilled the same automation functionality at a far less cost and in a simplified licensing model.
Chose JAMS
We chose JAMS because it was the best solution for our business needs, a major factor being the licensing model and the simplicity of the app. We needed to migrate things fast too and this was simply plug and play without too much headache
Chose JAMS
We migrated to JAMS from a previous application that was sunsetted. We were aware that JAMS was more than a like for like replacement for the incumbent application, and in fact was more powerful and flexible. We did consider other solutions, some of which appeared to be more …
Chose JAMS
JAMS is more specialized in Scheduled execution of Jobs with less complexity that B2B. We have been very happy with JAMS in respect to B2B.
Chose JAMS
I was not involved in the selection process.
Chose JAMS
Our developers found it easier to get going with JAMS and there seemed to be better calendar and scheduling options available in JAMS. JAMS also supported legacy OS versions that were unsupported and did not work in Automic. This was a vital requirement in selecting a solution …
Chose JAMS
I have not researched other workload automation products.
Chose JAMS
JAMS is WAY more advanced, it isn't a fair comparison. The history is easy to get through. It is easy to get alerts of complete to failed and with a log. Adding jobs is extremely easy that even my teammates who do not manange the software are able to set them up. With the …
Chose JAMS
Tidal is a very good scheduler but very expensive and customers can't budget for this. REvScheduler is a lot cheaper but the interface isn't very aesthetics and functionality is lacking compared to JAMS. Out of all of them I'd recommend JAMS.
Chose JAMS
In my opinion, while JAMS is useful for point and click like developers, Astro is more useful for software developers, whole like to see "scheduling as code". in the long run, I think Astro might overtake JAMS in terms of usage and use cases that it satisfies across the tech …
Chose JAMS
JAMS was much more cost-effective and easier to use. JAMS allowed us to centralize our job scheduling more fully. Converting from our previous, very limited scheduler to JAMS would be far more accessible than Automox.
Chose JAMS
N/A. I don't have any experience with different Job Management Software. Since JAMS is capable of doing most of our daily operations, we didn't look for other software. I can say that JAMS perfectly fits with us and with our clients. I've only heard about Direct M, which, based …
Laserfiche
Chose Laserfiche
Laserfiche and Skyward are two very different systems and resources, however, they are not complex and have a very basic design, format and layout. They both are easy to use, efficient and help with organization while not being overwhelming after learning the systems. The …
Chose Laserfiche
Primarily, the ease of the user comes for our colleagues as not losing time is our priority. Besides, comfortable administration is also striking to benefit from using Laserfiche. The form creation of Laserfiche in contrast to DocuWare is doing great that provides amazing …
Chose Laserfiche
Laserfiche is a much more focused product that simply and accurately fills our need for routine reporting and record keeping. By taking time to work on the design of the form you can anticipate the user's needs and possible areas where further explanation may be required. By …
Chose Laserfiche
I have not used any other product other than Laserfiche. As a user, am completely happy with the product and will keep on using the same. I am a happy customer, their product has been very very useful for my organization. I would like to give Kudos to Laserfiche Team. Keep …
Chose Laserfiche
The Laserfiche interface is very easy to use. It is very similar to uploading files on your Windows computer. With close to no training and less implementation time, it was a clear choice. Like other systems, Laserfiche does not have fancy designs or interface. This makes it …
Chose Laserfiche
Laserfiche is the best electronic repository system i have used. The search option is unlike any system ive seen. The indexing is fantastic as well.
Chose Laserfiche
I would pick Laserfiche over Procore in a heart beat. Procore claims to be documents storage and user friendly but they are complete opposite software.
Chose Laserfiche
Alaris is efficient for scanning and editing, but does not provide all of the advanced capabilities that Laserfiche offers. Laserfiche also provides top-notch training to users. Alaris is a more simple software that can be easily self-taught. Laserfiche has more than just …
Chose Laserfiche
The price compared with others was the best. It was user-friendly and had full functionality, even exceeded when comparing with other functions from similar applications.
Chose Laserfiche
The core infrastructure of Laserfiche, and the end user experience, is vastly superior. OnBase has a TERRIBLE UI and administration console by comparison. The core architecture of OnBase is also more scattered, while all Laserfiche processes go through a single service. …
Chose Laserfiche
Document capture from multiple sources (scanning, web form, email, shared folder, etc.) is easier to manage and set up in Laserfiche. Integrating with third party software for document retrieval is easier in Laserfiche. Online form creation is possible with Laserfiche. The …
Chose Laserfiche
Laserfiche is much simpler to implement and use. Its interface much more friendly, allowing our implementation time was much shorter. Hyland OnBase is much more complex and requires a much greater investment in the cost of licenses and hardware requirements.
Chose Laserfiche
Laserfiche was already being used when I started using it many years ago, there are no benefits that the competition has that would make switching a benefit. I have used dropbox and sharefile in several situations, neither has capabilities that outweigh laserfiche.
Chose Laserfiche
I was not involved in the choice of Laserfische, I was the person in charge of the implementation of LF
Chose Laserfiche
I did not compare Laserfiche against other products because the City of Roanoke, Virginia had already purchased Laserfiche 6 years prior. Once I learned how to use Laserfiche and the benefits, I decided that we needed to upgrade to Laserfiche RIO to be able to use some of the …
Chose Laserfiche
Laserfiche is priced better and is easier to use.
Chose Laserfiche
Laserfiche is the leader in the ECM industry, and I believe will stand toe to toe with any competitor on the market. Not only is it on of the most advanced systems for an enterprise wide solution, but the cost is also very competitive. I also do not believe there is any …
Chose Laserfiche
Laserfiche is by far the leader in workflows and end user interfaces.
Chose Laserfiche
Laserfiche solved our original government document retention concerns. Collin County has integrated Laserfiche retention rules with our Criminal Integrated Justice System for closed cases. We have also integrated Laserfiche with our Property Tax System. We are able to process …
Chose Laserfiche
Laserfiche is much faster and the optical character recognition is more accurate than Adobe Acrobat Capture. It took approximately 4 times as long to scan and store a document in Acrobat Capture as in Laserfiche. Reviewing every scan was essential in Adobe Acrobat Capture …
Features
JAMSLaserfiche
Workload Automation
Comparison of Workload Automation features of Product A and Product B
JAMS
7.4
Ratings
11% below category average
Laserfiche
-
Ratings
Multi-platform scheduling8.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Central monitoring7.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Logging7.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Alerts and notifications8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Analysis and visualization6.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Application integration6.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Enterprise Content Management
Comparison of Enterprise Content Management features of Product A and Product B
JAMS
-
Ratings
Laserfiche
8.5
Ratings
5% above category average
Content capture & imaging00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
File sync, storage & archiving00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Document management00 Ratings8.50 Ratings
Records management00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Content search & retrieval00 Ratings8.50 Ratings
Enterprise content collaboration00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Content publishing & creation00 Ratings8.50 Ratings
Security, risk management & information governance00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Contract lifecycle management00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Automated workflows00 Ratings8.50 Ratings
Mobile support00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Integration00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
JAMSLaserfiche
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

Square 9 Softworks
Square 9 Softworks
Score 9.3 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Apache Airflow
Apache Airflow
Score 8.7 out of 10
MediaValet
MediaValet
Score 8.8 out of 10
Enterprises
Redwood RunMyJobs
Redwood RunMyJobs
Score 9.7 out of 10
MediaValet
MediaValet
Score 8.8 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
JAMSLaserfiche
Likelihood to Recommend
7.8
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
8.8
(0 ratings)
8.6
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.5
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Availability
8.6
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Performance
8.6
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.0
(0 ratings)
9.4
(0 ratings)
In-Person Training
7.3
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
8.2
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Configurability
8.1
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
8.6
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
7.5
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
8.6
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
8.6
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
JAMSLaserfiche
Likelihood to Recommend
It's currently one of the best of the lower entry cost options out there, as it currently is a set license cost, not based on the number of jobs executed. In the hands of a good script writer and users with workflow experience, it's a powerful tool to accomplish just about any process that you have a need to complete.
Read full review
Laserfiche is perfect for businesses that need a place to appropriately store their documents digitally and want an environment to grow from. Adding Laserfiche Forms helps grow a business' ability to process their work and reach their customers easier. Laserfiche could be used for all sizes of businesses but may not be as worth it for very small businesses.
Read full review
Pros
  • The Activity Monitor clearly shows the Running Jobs, and Jobs that are to run soon. Successful Jobs can be viewed as well. The Refresh of this monitor is completely customizable to your liking.
  • Job Definitions are very well organized by use of Folders. This simplifies the structure of how to best Implement JAMS Jobs, including the ability to provide specific properties on each folder - whereby Jobs will inherit these properties.
  • Connectivity to servers is well thought out by having Shortcuts to include Credentials and Connection Store for server information.
  • JAMS Jobs can be controlled via System Resources. This is very powerful and is a very useful configuration found in JAMS.
Read full review
  • It's very good at giving a wide range of options for importing and exporting data, the Windows Client software alone can pull files from a windows folder, has a software printer to print documents into Laserfiche instead of to paper, has Office integration, the ability to pull photos from cameras, and has a scanner component.
  • Laserfiche Workflow is an automation tool that is very flexible and powerful, and allows a wide range of options for automating document flows and procedures.
  • Laserfiche is very good at communicating with other systems, though some systems, like big iron minicomputers, take some extra work and effort. Setting up integrations with SQL server databases are as simple as any complex IT procedure can get.
Read full review
Cons
  • Would love to see JAMS become a SaaS type of product instead of needing to be hosted by ourselves
  • having lots of jobs in the monitor area can lead to performance issues when running the client locally
  • dashboard and reporting tools could be more user friendly and provide more functionality to help monitoring teams spot recurring issues easily
Read full review
  • The could have better options for read only users, the minimum option for read only users is 200.
  • More competitive material of why Laserfiche is better than the other products out there.
  • They could use a more robust capture engine that could be used for unstructured documents.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
We have built JAMS into our scheduling process. Its a great scheduling tool. I'm not 100% on the execution side as we have had issues with what i'll refer to as compatibility issues with ssis variables, but it executes sql agent jobs perfectly, so when i have an issue i create a sql agent job and have JAMS execute the sql agent job on the schedule from JAMS
Read full review
We plan on renewing Laserfiche for the coming year but also have been considering a scanning and document management solution that can be purchased from our new accounting system company, we are implementing the accounting system this year. It will be a couple years before we make a decision to stay with Laserfiche or change.
Read full review
Usability
9/10 as there are so many features I have not tried as of yet. It is easy to get started but as jobs become more complex you tend to employ more and more features - Some of which can be complicated at first. This all comes down to experience using the system. Out first setup and current setup are vastly different as we learn how to use the full power.
Read full review
It has an intuitive design that feels very natural to any user that has ever used Outlook or Windows Explorer. There are multiple ways to perform every action in order to help users with various software experiences find the shortcuts and actions they seek quickly and effectively.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
We didnt really encounter any downtime, no issues encountered during 2 years of use of JAMs also our client barely raise an issue with JAMS, mostly the issues is on the batch jobs that jams executes. So I would gave it a perfect 10, very reliable hardly encounters any error and bug
Read full review
I am very satisfied with Laserfiche. I have found that certain larger jobs may are slow. This may also be related to our infrastructure environment. We have been able to tune Laserfiche to increase performance on larger jobs.
Read full review
Performance
JAMS performance is very great, there are no issues raised with the performance, it just like nothing happens on the job after integration it gives you this monitoring capability, no reports and bugs raised on the performance, we didnt do integration with other software only database and with use of JAMS agent to different servers
Read full review
Performance, of course, is largely dependent on the underlying environment. Laserfiche does its part with multi-threading, taking advantage of multi-core servers on scanning, workflows, and bots. A SQL-Server back-end is suitable for small to medium-sized company, but may not scale to large, where Oracle would be the better choice. Workflows can be poorly written and perform recursive work slowing down the system. It's better to run batch type workflows at night when possible.
Read full review
Support Rating
I am giving support an 11, the turn around time is insane. At times I get a reply in minutes. The directions to fix are precise and easy to follow. They are personable and friendly and never treat me less than they would a fortune 500 company (which I am not one of).
Read full review
I have never had to wait for help from Laserfiche. If I cannot find the answer online, I can easily send an email to a customer support representative. I have always been helped the same day and my questions have always been resolved. The Empower conference is always a great learning opportunity and the online resources and webinars are top-notch.
Read full review
In-Person Training
People that were involved in the POC found the training a lot easier to follow. I think most people would have preferred to just get the training material and run through themselves.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Online Training
No answers on this topic
Easily accessible 24/7 so am able to complete courseware whenever time allows: Commute to work; waiting for friends or family; at night while relaxing [with a delicious glass of wine!]; whenever and wherever time and circumstances permit. Courseware is well written and presented in an easy to follow and understand format.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
I Was not part of the original Implementation, and the persons did that are no longer with the Organization. But I was part of the recent Upgrade process a year ago and I am the JAMS admin and was very pleased
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
JAMS is the legacy product in our
on-premises environment. Accenture has recently implemented MyWizard, the preferred platform for future operations, which is expected to progressively
replace JAMS as part of our broader cloud migration strategy. Given this
direction, it is currently unclear whether JAMS will remain a viable long-term
option, and ongoing development is primarily focused on MyWizard.
Read full review
Laserfiche is a much more focused product that simply and accurately fills our need for routine reporting and record keeping. By taking time to work on the design of the form you can anticipate the user's needs and possible areas where further explanation may be required. By prefilling the most likely/desired report responses you can greatly reduce the amount of time a user spends completing each report.
Read full review
Scalability
The product is quite flexible. There are a number of features and functions that we use on a daily basis, and there are many features that are available that we have not yet needed or explored (like setting up jobs with the ability to do FTP or Sftp file transfers).
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • SOX auditing has been part automated saving days of work for the people involved.
  • The ability for jobs to react to different failure values has enabled us to do away with overnight human monitoring ultimately contributing to saving us in the 6 figures.
Read full review
  • The centralized repository of digitized documents allows users from different departments to collaborate and use the same documents, effortlessly and seamlessly. This has been a tremendous value to organizational efficiency and accuracy.
  • Business Process Automation has increased the capacity of a fixed workforce. By reducing the workload of individuals on repetitive tasks, it allows them to work on higher-value tasks.
  • Business Process Automation increases accuracy as well by defining a clear process with forms, emails, and document routing on each step. This leads to greater worker productivity.
Read full review
ScreenShots

JAMS Screenshots

Screenshot of the Centralized Job Repository - here users store job definitions, schedules, and parameters in one central database.Screenshot of the Job Monitor - this displays the status of jobs and workloads from one central monitoring console. Viewers can drill down on individual jobs to diagnose failures, dependencies, and expected completion times.Screenshot of a Dashboard - Here, users can create data-rich visuals to monitor critical batch jobs and workflows running on various agents and on different business applications.Screenshot of the Centralized Job Repository - Stores job definitions, schedules, and parameters in a central database.Screenshot of the Visual Job Editor - a drag and drop editor for tasks is used to build multistep workflows that include dependencies, user input, parallel processes, and triggers.

Laserfiche Screenshots

Screenshot of Laserfiche Records ManagementScreenshot of Change of Major/Minor Request created with Laserfiche FormsScreenshot of Student Information Sheet created with Laserfiche FormsScreenshot of Laserfiche Quick Fields ScanningScreenshot of Laserfiche Quick Fields ScanningScreenshot of Laserfiche Mobile Repository