JumpCloud vs. ManageEngine Endpoint Central

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
JumpCloud
Score 9.2 out of 10
N/A
JumpCloud® delivers a unified open directory platform used to securely manage identities, devices, and access across an organization. With JumpCloud, IT teams and MSPs enable users to work securely from anywhere and manage their Windows, Apple, Linux, and Android devices from a single platform.
$11
per month per user
ManageEngine Endpoint Central
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
Desktop Central from ManageEngine is a client desktop management with patching, remote control, and configuration.N/A
Pricing
JumpCloudManageEngine Endpoint Central
Editions & Modules
Device Management
$11
per month per user
SSO
$13
per month per user
Device Management + Identity
$15
per month per user
Core Directory
$15
per month per user
JumpCloud Platform
$22
per month per user
JumpCloud Platform Prime
$27
per month per user
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
JumpCloudManageEngine Endpoint Central
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details18% discount for annual pricing.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
JumpCloudManageEngine Endpoint Central
Considered Both Products
JumpCloud
Chose JumpCloud
The Okta Identity Cloud and OneLogin
Chose JumpCloud
JumpCloud had better pricing, and since we currently need it for single sign-on only, we chose it.
ManageEngine Endpoint Central
Chose ManageEngine Endpoint Central
The price is more affordable and in range. Also came with all the features that company wanted. User friendly interface than the others make more easier to navigate all the features inside. Provide support as well as the others. Also, well-known products when it comes to …
Chose ManageEngine Endpoint Central
We have selected Endpoint Central especially for the presence of OS deployment module and for the maturity of other components; moreover, NinjaOne doesn't offer an onprem installation, and some customer needed it. However, NinjaOne appears to be more 'modern' in the dashboard …
Chose ManageEngine Endpoint Central
We selected Endpoint Central because we couldn't manage our patching with SCCM anymore; we noticed it was inconsistent and not working properly. Also, it wouldn't work out-of-network, which is an important factor for us. These products all helped us improve the quality of our …
Chose ManageEngine Endpoint Central
Endpoint Central has a lot more functionality than PDQ. We've used PDQ for years, but we no longer see the cost as worth it since Endpoint Central handles inventory and software deployment just as well. Having everything in a single interface is also useful.
Chose ManageEngine Endpoint Central
KACE SMA was beginning to feel quite dated and complicated. Some things started requiring advanced SQL queries to get sorted, and many of our old scripts stopped working because the SQL schema changed over the years. So far in ManageEngine Endpoint Central, I have not needed to …
Chose ManageEngine Endpoint Central
The other applications perform limited activities such as vulnerability scanning management, but not mitigation in the case of Nessus; Intune controls device access and key management, but does not patch, does not provide remote support, and does not manage access to USB and …
Chose ManageEngine Endpoint Central
ManageEngine was a lot easier of setup, and is easier to use than what Landesk provides.
Chose ManageEngine Endpoint Central
For me, Endpoint Central belongs to the big three (WS1, Intune, Endpoint Central), so it's better in its own third-party app repo, Vulnerabilities report, Script deployment, OS Management, and Communication between the server and the endpoint. Is no worse than WS1 in Endpoint …
Chose ManageEngine Endpoint Central
We were using Microsoft WSUS and SCCM but they lack reporting depth that ManageEngine Endpoint Central has and also they lack automation features. ManageEngine Endpoint Central complexity is mush less than SCCM and WSUS.
Chose ManageEngine Endpoint Central
I was not a part of the initial selection process, but I understand the issue was related to cost per endpoint. As a user of the other solutions I would say that the other solutions do have other strengths that ManageEngine is missing. The remote access tools are superior but …
Chose ManageEngine Endpoint Central
As previously mentioned, I was looking for a solution to replace Microsoft Intune and ManageEndpoint Central to exceed my initial needs.
Chose ManageEngine Endpoint Central
Similar to Microsoft Intune, but Microsoft Intune is more Microsoft-based. Zoho Assist isn't as robust.
Chose ManageEngine Endpoint Central
ManageEngine Endpoint Central is an on-premise unified system. All modules are integrated into one central interface and detailed reporting capability. It’s possible to manage all devices regardless of their OS
Chose ManageEngine Endpoint Central
ManageEngine Endpoint Central is better than these products because of user experience and easy functionality. When I evaluated other products, I faced difficulty in exploring their features and there were too many things to do before a simple deployment unlike ManageEngine …
Chose ManageEngine Endpoint Central
We evaluated multiple endpoint management solutions before selecting ManageEngine Endpoint Central, and the main reason for choosing it was its strong patch management capabilities combined with centralized endpoint control at a competitive cost. Compared to other solutions, …
Chose ManageEngine Endpoint Central
Manage Engine is in a different league if I have to compare. Also, I am very secure, as most of what we do is very Security-oriented. It's not just a ticketing and remote support system; it's a Global Systems Monitoring, Updating, Securing, and Remote Support System that makes …
Chose ManageEngine Endpoint Central
ManageEngine provides budget friendly tools and easy to integrate with other tools and software
Chose ManageEngine Endpoint Central
ManageEngine Endpoint Central can do Linux servers which is a big plus.
Chose ManageEngine Endpoint Central
This product for me is much complete than competitors.
Chose ManageEngine Endpoint Central
Remote Access Plus Cloud is a native cloud solution, lightweight agent and very competively priced. It supports both entra-joined and cloud-joined devices and has a comprehensive set of basic featues that I need. Though spotty, the system manager is fantastic, when it works and …
Features
JumpCloudManageEngine Endpoint Central
Identity Management
Comparison of Identity Management features of Product A and Product B
JumpCloud
8.2
Ratings
0% below category average
ManageEngine Endpoint Central
-
Ratings
ID-Management Access Control8.50 Ratings00 Ratings
ID Management Single-Sign On (SSO)8.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Multi-Factor Authentication8.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Password Management8.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Account Provisioning and De-provisioning7.50 Ratings00 Ratings
ID Management Workflow Automation7.50 Ratings00 Ratings
ID Risk Management8.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
JumpCloudManageEngine Endpoint Central
Small Businesses
1Password
1Password
Score 9.3 out of 10
Avast CloudCare
Avast CloudCare
Score 10.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
RSA Access Manager (Discontinued)
RSA Access Manager (Discontinued)
Score 10.0 out of 10
KACE Systems Management Appliance
KACE Systems Management Appliance
Score 8.5 out of 10
Enterprises
RSA Access Manager (Discontinued)
RSA Access Manager (Discontinued)
Score 10.0 out of 10
KACE Systems Management Appliance
KACE Systems Management Appliance
Score 8.5 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
JumpCloudManageEngine Endpoint Central
Likelihood to Recommend
8.5
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.1
(0 ratings)
9.3
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.0
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
7.4
(0 ratings)
7.1
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
9.1
(0 ratings)
7.8
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
1.8
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
1.8
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
JumpCloudManageEngine Endpoint Central
Likelihood to Recommend
JumpCloud is least suited in situations where you have few devices, but lots of users. JumpCloud heavily focuses on the "One-User-One-Device" type of use, and does lack some of the features things like Active Directory is better suited for when having multiple users accessing one machine. Their Powershell APIs are fantastic and getting only more powerful. Lots of features are hidden behind these APIs, so admins not as familiar with Powershell would have more issues leveraging these tools. BYOD deployments are amazing, especially for macOS devices that are using Apple Business Manager and can leverage Zero Touch deployments. It is especially good at handling mixed systems, whereas other options, such as Jamf, are really suiting only for macOS, or Intune is more suited for Windows; JumpCloud managed to handle both systems well.
Read full review
I think most scenarios are well-suited to Endpoint Central. Keep third-party applications upgraded, OS Deployment, Report Endpoint with vulnerabilities, check compliance with CIS, but it is much more, internal app deployment, much more compliance policy, Integration with Office 365 Conditional Access, Endpoint Configuration, Works fine with custom script even when you don't know any scripts, there are plenty of templates.
Read full review
Pros
  • User Management - The ability to control our users and set password/polices is made easy in the JC console
  • Device Management - Using JC each user is assigned to their own device with only the rights to do their job - When elevated rights are required, this is done simply via the JC console for the period of time required
  • SSO - Using JC's SAML SSO integrations we are building out our SSO offering and this is making for a much simpler daily user experience
Read full review
  • We set alerts when a devices gets low on disk space. That is automatic and creates a ticket in ME SDP. We are then able to Add space to a VM Desktop, and then go thru ManageEngine Endpoint Central to extend the drives so the entire process can be done without interruption to the end user.
  • Using the patch scans we can easily see what patches have been installed for all manufacturers not just Microsoft, without having to physically go to the device. It also allows us to choose which patches we want to push out and automate the process so we can be hands off, freeing up out time for other things.
  • Remote access to devices. This allows us to remotely make changes, not just via remote control but also make registry changes and clean up space without going to the device and without interruption to the end user.
  • Alerts. We have set up to get email alerts when new hardware is plugged into any computers. This lets us know if someone is bringing in un-authorized equipment (thumb drives, hubs, etc) to better manage what is/is not on our network.
Read full review
Cons
  • SSO via OpenID - Opening up their SSO from just SAML to including OpenID (OAuth) would allow us to make more use of the service and to also incorporate it into some internal testing suites
  • Time Limited User Elevation - The ability to time limit a users elevation of privileges would be a great addition
  • Extending device management to include LPA - Least Privilege Access is becoming a bigger ask from our external auditors - Being able to do this via JC would be amazing
Read full review
  • Prioritizing the flow between package deployments and updates. In my case, application packages must take priority over updates.
  • Reconnecting the remote control port after restarting the computer.
  • In dynamic groups, the first parameter is always "OR", which can cause problems when selecting the remote desktop.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
No answers on this topic
It has been a staple tool for maintaining the environment and as we grow it will be needed more. While trying to configure the system to allow us to access and support systems that are in locations outside of the primary network EndPoint Central will be crucial in facilitating that needed connection.
Read full review
Usability
It's simple. I like how JumpCloud keeps things simple. Similar to Apple's ecosystem, they give you what you want with some extra features and bells and whistles but it doesn't take a large instruction manual to use it. They have the support system and KB articles to back up their product and learn about a feature and how to implement it
Read full review
The product is really easy to set up and use. The web interface is relatively easy to use depending on the feature you are trying to use. The search features for inventory for both software and hardware are really good. You might get lost trying to navigate the file managers for endpoints because while the web interface is extremely easy to use, the feature set is very limited
Read full review
Support Rating
We have their premium support. Not only is the support great, but our SAM / Account manager directs any questions or updates to the proper channels and gets us the needed info and solution quickly. Due to this, we find JumpCloud to exceed our expectations and puts us at ease that our Foundation Tech Solution is VERY reliable.
Read full review
The immediate chat support is great and very helpful. However, if you need escalated support or have a deeper need that the chat tool can't help with, you will experience significant wait times and slow responses. The time zone difference becomes painful to the point of often just giving up.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Being responsible for choosing the product after a POC and pilot we found the process to be simple and effective
Read full review
It seems that the services offered with the purchase change from what is covered to what is an additional cost. Somethings I thought we had ended up requiring an additional purchase if we wanted to continue using the feature.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Read full review
We selected Endpoint Central because we couldn't manage our patching with SCCM anymore; we noticed it was inconsistent and not working properly. Also, it wouldn't work out-of-network, which is an important factor for us. These products all helped us improve the quality of our work and efficiency.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Very easily add, or disable employee logins
  • Reduce "password fatigue" by being able to reduce password expiration requirements, and having single sign on
  • Higher security and visibility of security issues
  • Reduced onboarding time from days to minutes
  • Enabled easy reassignment of user accounts to another user via groups when employees leave
  • Quick securing of terminated users, or otherwise compromised accounts
  • Reduced user disablement time from previous manual methods requiring days, to literal minutes
Read full review
  • It had a positive impact on our environment, now we need less workforce to deploy patches and install softwares
  • It also does the mitigation part so there we save the cost too
  • It helps in achieving compliance which is net positive to get more projects
Read full review
ScreenShots

ManageEngine Endpoint Central Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of