Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Loopio
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
Loopio is a Toronto-based RFP response software provider that helps companies streamline their process for RFPs, DDQs, and Security Questionnaires. Loopio’s RFP response software is for RFIs, Security Questionnaires, DDQs, and sales proposals.N/A
Lusha
Score 8.3 out of 10
N/A
Lusha is a sales intelligence platform designed to help businesses get their next customers. The platform provides access to a compliant global database of companies and decision-makers, powered by insights from over 1.5 million users.
$0
(for 50 emails and 5 phones for 1 user)
Responsive
Score 8.9 out of 10
N/A
Responsive (formerly RFPIO), headquartered in Beaverton, offers their proposal management and automation software, featuring import and export, proposal knowledgebase and answer library, evaluation intake forms, and project management tools (e.g. Gantt chart) associated to proposal tracking.N/A
Pricing
LoopioLushaResponsive
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Free
$0
50 emails and 5 phones for 1 user
Pro
$49
per month per user
Premium
$79
per month per user
Scale
Custom Pricing
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
LoopioLushaResponsive
Free Trial
NoYesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoYesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNoYes
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details25% discount for annual pricing.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
LoopioLushaResponsive
Considered Multiple Products
Loopio
Chose Loopio
At the time we evaluated both tools Loopio had a better pricing structure and the "magic" functionality was one of the main reasons we went with it.
Lusha

No answer on this topic

Responsive
Chose Responsive
  • RFP360 - We used this tool for three years and it was a great first step/upgrade from a searchable Google doc. We decided to start evaluating other systems for a couple of reasons:
    • RFP360 is an end-to-end tool for RFP requestors and responders. We felt they were more focused on …
Chose Responsive
At the time, three years ago, we evaluated Loopio as an alternative to RFPIO. Loopio didn't have the same resources as far as dynamic branding, content segmentation ability and was less price competitive than RFPIO. RFPIO also has an unlimited user model where you are not …
Chose Responsive
Loopio is proposal management "lite" and seems to spend more on marketing than product upgrades.
Chose Responsive
Responsive is integral to how we work, replacing it was never an option due to how embedded we are with the platform.
Chose Responsive
We are a small proposal team, with a large group of resources who support our responses. Responsive is easy to use for internal and external users, doesn't require extensive onboarding for new users, and is constantly adding new capabilities and enhancements to make the product …
Chose Responsive
Responsive has better UI and pricing
Chose Responsive
RFPIO has outstanding, responsive, helpful customer support located in the US in Oregon. Support techs go the extra mile to help with basic issues and functionality training. Same-day support response and problem resolution are the norms. The system is also very user-friendly …
Chose Responsive
RFPIO's licensing model is a bit different from others which worked better for our organization. Rather than licensing by a number of users, it's licensed by the active project. This allows us to add multiple users that are responsible for reviewing and updating content without …
Features
LoopioLushaResponsive
Proposal Creation & Organization
Comparison of Proposal Creation & Organization features of Product A and Product B
Loopio
8.6
6 Ratings
9% above category average
Lusha
-
Ratings
Responsive
7.5
28 Ratings
4% below category average
Proposal branding8.46 Ratings00 Ratings7.515 Ratings
Proposal templates7.96 Ratings00 Ratings7.322 Ratings
Proposal content library updates9.26 Ratings00 Ratings6.728 Ratings
Guided proposal creation8.25 Ratings00 Ratings8.816 Ratings
Searchable proposal database9.46 Ratings00 Ratings7.026 Ratings
Proposal Collaboration & Workflow
Comparison of Proposal Collaboration & Workflow features of Product A and Product B
Loopio
8.3
6 Ratings
6% above category average
Lusha
-
Ratings
Responsive
7.8
27 Ratings
1% below category average
RFP management & response9.26 Ratings00 Ratings8.527 Ratings
Proposal collaboration & approval8.26 Ratings00 Ratings8.026 Ratings
User permissions/proposal editing controls8.86 Ratings00 Ratings8.125 Ratings
Sales proposal workflow6.75 Ratings00 Ratings7.919 Ratings
Proposal automation user interface8.45 Ratings00 Ratings6.523 Ratings
Proposal Delivery
Comparison of Proposal Delivery features of Product A and Product B
Loopio
7.3
4 Ratings
8% below category average
Lusha
-
Ratings
Responsive
8.2
20 Ratings
4% above category average
Proposal distribution7.94 Ratings00 Ratings8.014 Ratings
Interactive proposals7.24 Ratings00 Ratings8.07 Ratings
Proposal content tracking6.94 Ratings00 Ratings8.518 Ratings
Prospecting
Comparison of Prospecting features of Product A and Product B
Loopio
-
Ratings
Lusha
8.7
113 Ratings
12% above category average
Responsive
-
Ratings
Advanced search00 Ratings8.833 Ratings00 Ratings
Identification of new leads00 Ratings8.5109 Ratings00 Ratings
List quality00 Ratings8.235 Ratings00 Ratings
List upload/download00 Ratings8.9106 Ratings00 Ratings
Ideal customer targeting00 Ratings8.633 Ratings00 Ratings
Load time/data access00 Ratings9.24 Ratings00 Ratings
Sales Intelligence Data Standards
Comparison of Sales Intelligence Data Standards features of Product A and Product B
Loopio
-
Ratings
Lusha
8.5
122 Ratings
9% above category average
Responsive
-
Ratings
Contact information00 Ratings8.5121 Ratings00 Ratings
Company information00 Ratings8.4117 Ratings00 Ratings
Industry information00 Ratings8.5113 Ratings00 Ratings
Data Augmentation & Lead Qualification
Comparison of Data Augmentation & Lead Qualification features of Product A and Product B
Loopio
-
Ratings
Lusha
8.6
114 Ratings
14% above category average
Responsive
-
Ratings
Lead qualification process00 Ratings8.897 Ratings00 Ratings
Smart lists and recommendations00 Ratings8.728 Ratings00 Ratings
Salesforce integration00 Ratings9.247 Ratings00 Ratings
Company/business profiles00 Ratings8.2102 Ratings00 Ratings
Alerts and reminders00 Ratings7.947 Ratings00 Ratings
Data hygiene00 Ratings8.435 Ratings00 Ratings
Automatic data refresh00 Ratings8.9101 Ratings00 Ratings
Tags00 Ratings8.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Filters and segmentation00 Ratings8.939 Ratings00 Ratings
Sales Intelligence Email Features
Comparison of Sales Intelligence Email Features features of Product A and Product B
Loopio
-
Ratings
Lusha
8.2
25 Ratings
10% above category average
Responsive
-
Ratings
Sales email templates00 Ratings8.624 Ratings00 Ratings
Append emails to records00 Ratings7.82 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
LoopioLushaResponsive
Small Businesses
QuoteWerks
QuoteWerks
Score 9.7 out of 10
Lead411
Lead411
Score 8.2 out of 10
QuoteWerks
QuoteWerks
Score 9.7 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
QuoteWerks
QuoteWerks
Score 9.7 out of 10
Lead411
Lead411
Score 8.2 out of 10
QuoteWerks
QuoteWerks
Score 9.7 out of 10
Enterprises
Conga CLM
Conga CLM
Score 8.8 out of 10
TechTarget Priority Engine
TechTarget Priority Engine
Score 10.0 out of 10
Conga CLM
Conga CLM
Score 8.8 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
LoopioLushaResponsive
Likelihood to Recommend
9.4
(7 ratings)
8.7
(121 ratings)
9.3
(21 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
8.1
(6 ratings)
8.7
(16 ratings)
Usability
8.2
(2 ratings)
8.9
(5 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.4
(2 ratings)
9.1
(5 ratings)
9.8
(17 ratings)
In-Person Training
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.4
(105 ratings)
10.0
(2 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Contract Terms and Pricing Model
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Professional Services
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
LoopioLushaResponsive
Likelihood to Recommend
Loopio Inc.
I use Loopio specifically for RFP's mostly. I think it is a great and adequate tool for this and much of what I think that needs to improve are not large needle movers for me since the software as a whole is fantastic. It is very easy to upload an RFP into Loopio and begin answering those questions or pulling from previously answered questions. I also will use Loopio for large client proposals and I often use the "search functionality within Loopio to see if I can find answers to clients questions. I like that I can also pull images from Loopio as well and often use those visualizations in my proposals.
Read full review
Lusha
I find that Lusha is well suited as a secondary data source. It doesn't seem to have a developed enough database to be your primary data enrichment tool, so if a sales team was looking to only utilise one data tool, I wouldn't suggest Lusha as that first. However when being used in a supplementary fashion it is perfectly suited, I often find it has some niche contact details that I haven't been able to find elsewhere. The AI tools for searching and list building are well developed too, it is also great for teams to use on a bit-part basis as they often free credits per month as a starting point.
Read full review
Responsive (formerly RFPIO)
1. RFPIO is perfect for searching for specific information when you are responding to an RFP. Search engine is powerful. We narrow our search using several customized filters and know we are getting a thorough search. 2. Excel responses work very well in RFPIO. 3. Typical RFPs that are formatted in Word are challenging to run via RFPIO. We struggle with this. 4. We have yet to master the template.
Read full review
Pros
Loopio Inc.
  • Ease of use - a few minutes' tutorial is enough for a newcomer to start using the tool.
  • Handy options - i.e. support in searching for the right answer
  • Often meaningful & useful releases
Read full review
Lusha
  • Identify prospect from Linkedin/Sales Navigator pages
  • Show email ID and phone numbers of the prospect
  • Reflect the correct/complete name of the prospect
  • Suggest contacts from similar profiles
  • Copy/edit option available for better user friendliness
  • It shows relevant information of the prospect's company as well
Read full review
Responsive (formerly RFPIO)
  • Live collaboration - the ability for multiple experts to simultaneously work on the same RFP.
  • Artificial intelligence - the ability for the product to continually learn what the best answers are and serve them up to our teams.
  • Dynamic branding - the ability for custom brand different templates by vertical, line of business, local branding, etc. with seamless transition.
  • Content review & moderation - the ability for our national content team to bulk review, edit and share content with our teams in a methodical way.
Read full review
Cons
Loopio Inc.
  • Adding new answers to the library was easier and better with the "close the loop" functionality. Now, it seems like it is easier to miss questions to add to the library.
Read full review
Lusha
  • It would be nice to have a general idea of how many contacts it has information for on a particular account at the very start before scrolling through the different pages.
  • It would be great to also have the titles of individuals on the list, so it's quicker to sift who to keep in or exclude prior to revealing details.
  • No product is perfect! Some of the information generated can be inaccurate or generic, e.g., a phone number for a persona may not be direct for that individual but could be a general customer service number for the company and could be the same number listed for multiple prospects.
Read full review
Responsive (formerly RFPIO)
  • Reporting and Analytics is basic, you can purchase advanced analytics though
  • It would have been nice to have a set structure in mind or a example/case study to structure our responses in the most appropriate way, but we are working through that with their stellar support team
  • Really great new features, but expensive
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Loopio Inc.
No answers on this topic
Lusha
It suits our requirements perfectly and fits well within our budget
Read full review
Responsive (formerly RFPIO)
This tool has been fantastic as we have revamped our RFP process. We are much faster and far more efficient.Our win rate is up, but I am not 100% sure this is the cause, but I love to see it. The customer support and training are also fantastic. Thumbs up!
Read full review
Usability
Loopio Inc.
Usability is good but falls short of excellent. The interface is clean and well organized. They clearly spent some time working on the UI and took some feedback from focus groups to help keep it tidy. On a few occasions, we have experienced a little bit of lag while updating the question database. I'd like to see just a little faster response time on a consistent basis.
Read full review
Lusha
Simple, clean efficient. No lags and gets us the exact data that we need. No unnecessary terminologies, and it works like a charm every time. From prospecting to lead generation, and intent searching, Lusha is our go to tool and it has stayed ever since we started using it. i would highly recommend.
Read full review
Responsive (formerly RFPIO)
Very easy to navigate and use. Very intuitive user interface
Read full review
Support Rating
Loopio Inc.
They're very supportive and reply in a timely manner. Whenever I contacted the support I received a helpful reply that actually solved my issue. Quite often when my team suggested an improvement that would simplify and speed up our work it happened not long after which is perfect for us.
Read full review
Lusha
Shani Segev is a rockstar. She has always been there to help us overcome any challenges we encounter while using Lusha.
Read full review
Responsive (formerly RFPIO)
The team at RFPIO is extremely responsive. If I email our account manager or report a bug, I usually hear back within two hours. Additionally, they are quick to make software adjustments based on customer requests and needs. We had a really complicated Excel sheet that their team ended up having to upload for me because of the amount of manual work I was doing. Based on that, they updated the software within two release cycles to make the process more automated, so that future Excel uploads would be more streamlined. I have also had several suggestions implemented rather quickly, and they don't hesitate to reach out for clarification when needed.
Read full review
In-Person Training
Loopio Inc.
No answers on this topic
Lusha
Issues solving
Read full review
Responsive (formerly RFPIO)
No answers on this topic
Online Training
Loopio Inc.
No answers on this topic
Lusha
Fast responding
Read full review
Responsive (formerly RFPIO)
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
Loopio Inc.
No answers on this topic
Lusha
Lusha is intuitive and highly accurate, streamlining the process of tracking and extracting multiple leads simultaneously. This significantly boosts efficiency and ensures a quick adoption. It's a massive time-saver and remarkably easy to pick up. Lusha's prospecting feature empowers users to deep-dive into specific industries or niches and extract data in a structured manner, thereby increasing outreach frequency and conversion rates.
Read full review
Responsive (formerly RFPIO)
We were able to complete an RFP during our free trial. We were already leaning toward RFPIO but that pushed us over the edge.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Loopio Inc.
  • User friendly--very simple
  • Reviews of libraries can be assigned
  • Non-named user licenses can be used by various people
  • Close Loop--changes can be added to library with just a few clicks
  • View text in library and can copy content
  • Reporting on reviews and usage and projects
  • Help center and assigned representative
  • Library duplicates functionality
Read full review
Lusha
I used a lot of tools, but Lusha is the most accurate and precise data. Other may have a better user experience inside the platform, but it doesn't really matter if the data generated doesn't convert into sales. Lusha also provides phone numbers, which is fantastic, and most of the tools delivers only emails adresses.
Read full review
Responsive (formerly RFPIO)
I was not involved in the process of selecting RFP360 for our firm, so I am largely unfamiliar with competitors. I am, however, quite pleased with RFP360 as a user, and am confident that my colleagues who were responsible for making the decision were thorough and discerning.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Loopio Inc.
  • I have saved hundreds of hours working in Loopio instead of answering RFP's on my own. This has allowed me to spend other hours elsewhere. Having an RFP management tool has been an incredible timesaver
  • The creation and management of questions has also saved me hours of time in searching out tough questions to answer and has also saved my colleagues time as well since we don't need to collaborate to find answers.
  • Have had some issues with downloading the proposal in a readable format for clients to view. I've sometimes had to go back and figure out what went wrong when exporting which can be frustrating- especially when dealing with very tight deadlines.
Read full review
Lusha
  • More time Selling, Less Time Searching: B2B selling today is all about how fast you can reach your prospects. Searching for contact information was daunting and painful a few years back. With 1-click imports, integrations and hunts: tools like Lusha are a massive benefit in terms of saving time in the ever laborious task of List Building.
  • Better Phone Numbers: Especially in regions like EU and APAC, where mobile numbers are not available with tools like ZoomInfo and Apollo, Lusha comes as a saviour.
Read full review
Responsive (formerly RFPIO)
  • Library Health Dashboard is helpful in reducing time to clean up content but could use additional improvement by showing more granular data instead of a global assessment like good, poor, moderate.
  • ROI is reduced for us because of additional cost for using AI
  • Overall, Responsive has significantly improved our proposal process.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Lusha Screenshots

Screenshot of Discover leads with AlScreenshot of Never-ending pipelineScreenshot of Timely alerts for sales opportunities

Responsive Screenshots

Screenshot of a view of the platformScreenshot of an AI generated responseScreenshot of some of the available customer resourcesScreenshot of some of the available integrationsScreenshot of a promotional flyerScreenshot of an example of the AI augmented content management feature