TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Microsoft Dynamics GP vs. Sage 50 vs. Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Microsoft Dynamics GP

    Score5.5 out of 10
    N/AMicrosoft Dynamics GP is an ERP software with accounting capabilities. It includes various packs for customizability and features tailored to specific industries’ needs. GP is offered as a perpetual license or subscription.N/A

    Sage 50

    Score7.7 out of 10
    Small Businesses (1-50 employees)
    Sage 50cloud Accounting (formerly Sage 50 Accounting) is accounting software designed for small businesses. Sage 50cloud Accounting (formerly Sage 50, and formerly Peachtree) lets businesses invoice customers, pay bills, manage inventory, control costs, and pay employees. The solution includes high-level dashboards and in-depth reports.

    $61.92

    per month per user

    Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik

    Score8.5 out of 10
    N/ATagetik is a corporate performance management solution that unifies budgeting, financial planning, consolidation and management reporting. Tagetik is offered as SaaS, on a private cloud, or on-premise, and can migrate between deployments as needed.N/A
    Pricing
    Microsoft Dynamics GPSage 50Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    Sage 50 Pro Accounting
    $61.92
    per month
    Sage 50 Premium Accounting
    $103.92
    per month per user
    Sage 50 Quantum Accounting 3 User
    $177.17
    per month per user
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Microsoft Dynamics GPSage 50Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    Free Trial
    NoYesNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoYesYes
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional DetailsAnnual billing plans also available for all products.
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Microsoft Dynamics GPSage 50Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    Considered Multiple Products
    Microsoft
    Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
    Cannot provide comparison
    Incentivized
    Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
    I have used Peachtree, Lawson, Quickbooks, MAS90, and Oracle. I would take GP over those every day of the week. Honestly, if you choose to go with GP you will not go wrong.
    Incentivized
    Sage
    No answer on this topic
    Wolters Kluwer
    Chose Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    Are all very different. CCH Tagetik was more flexible and diverse and has the ability to grow with future unforeseen business issues.
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    33%
    Would buy again
    2 Answers
    100%
    Would buy again
    15 Answers
    100%
    Would buy again
    18 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    83%
    Delivers good value for the price
    5 Answers
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    10 Answers
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    18 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    83%
    Happy with the feature set
    5 Answers
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    15 Answers
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    18 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    10 Answers
    89%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    8 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    10 Answers
    91%
    Implementation went as expected
    10 Answers
    Features
    Microsoft Dynamics GPSage 50Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    Payroll Management
    Comparison of Payroll Management features of Microsoft Dynamics GP and Sage 50 and Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    Feature
    Microsoft Dynamics GP
    6.4
    20 Ratings
    17% below category average
    Sage 50
    8.5
    19 Ratings
    12% above category average
    Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    -
    Ratings
    Pay calculation6.219 Ratings8.318 Ratings00 Ratings
    Benefit plan administration5.815 Ratings8.013 Ratings00 Ratings
    Direct deposit files7.518 Ratings10.014 Ratings00 Ratings
    Salary revision and increment management6.517 Ratings8.014 Ratings00 Ratings
    Reimbursement management6.016 Ratings8.014 Ratings00 Ratings
    Customization
    Comparison of Customization features of Microsoft Dynamics GP and Sage 50 and Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    Feature
    Microsoft Dynamics GP
    4.3
    27 Ratings
    55% below category average
    Sage 50
    6.8
    14 Ratings
    11% below category average
    Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    -
    Ratings
    API for custom integration2.526 Ratings7.311 Ratings00 Ratings
    Plug-ins6.021 Ratings6.313 Ratings00 Ratings
    Security
    Comparison of Security features of Microsoft Dynamics GP and Sage 50 and Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    Feature
    Microsoft Dynamics GP
    6.8
    40 Ratings
    18% below category average
    Sage 50
    7.8
    29 Ratings
    5% below category average
    Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    -
    Ratings
    Single sign-on capability5.532 Ratings6.924 Ratings00 Ratings
    Role-based user permissions8.140 Ratings8.626 Ratings00 Ratings
    Reporting & Analytics
    Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Microsoft Dynamics GP and Sage 50 and Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    Feature
    Microsoft Dynamics GP
    5.3
    41 Ratings
    38% below category average
    Sage 50
    8.2
    32 Ratings
    5% above category average
    Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    -
    Ratings
    Dashboards3.429 Ratings8.430 Ratings00 Ratings
    Standard reports6.139 Ratings8.932 Ratings00 Ratings
    Custom reports6.439 Ratings7.231 Ratings00 Ratings
    General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
    Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Microsoft Dynamics GP and Sage 50 and Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    Feature
    Microsoft Dynamics GP
    5.0
    48 Ratings
    42% below category average
    Sage 50
    7.3
    35 Ratings
    4% below category average
    Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    -
    Ratings
    Accounts payable6.345 Ratings8.934 Ratings00 Ratings
    Accounts receivable5.736 Ratings8.633 Ratings00 Ratings
    Cash management6.336 Ratings7.933 Ratings00 Ratings
    Bank reconciliation5.541 Ratings8.433 Ratings00 Ratings
    Expense management4.431 Ratings8.531 Ratings00 Ratings
    Time tracking8.014 Ratings7.115 Ratings00 Ratings
    Fixed asset management4.428 Ratings7.122 Ratings00 Ratings
    Multi-currency support2.619 Ratings4.012 Ratings00 Ratings
    Multi-division support3.026 Ratings5.816 Ratings00 Ratings
    Regulations compliance3.214 Ratings6.215 Ratings00 Ratings
    Electronic tax filing9.012 Ratings8.218 Ratings00 Ratings
    Self-service portal7.012 Ratings5.513 Ratings00 Ratings
    Global Financial Support6.07 Ratings5.76 Ratings00 Ratings
    Primary and Secondary Ledgers4.721 Ratings6.89 Ratings00 Ratings
    Intercompany Accounting3.618 Ratings7.610 Ratings00 Ratings
    Localizations4.513 Ratings7.58 Ratings00 Ratings
    Journals and Reconciliations4.526 Ratings8.822 Ratings00 Ratings
    Enterprise Accounting2.616 Ratings7.69 Ratings00 Ratings
    Configurable Accounting3.517 Ratings8.111 Ratings00 Ratings
    Centralized Rules Framework3.214 Ratings6.67 Ratings00 Ratings
    Standardized Processes6.119 Ratings7.916 Ratings00 Ratings
    Inventory Management
    Comparison of Inventory Management features of Microsoft Dynamics GP and Sage 50 and Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    Feature
    Microsoft Dynamics GP
    4.2
    26 Ratings
    54% below category average
    Sage 50
    8.4
    21 Ratings
    14% above category average
    Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    -
    Ratings
    Inventory tracking5.524 Ratings8.121 Ratings00 Ratings
    Automatic reordering1.013 Ratings7.912 Ratings00 Ratings
    Location management4.018 Ratings8.010 Ratings00 Ratings
    Manufacturing module3.515 Ratings9.09 Ratings00 Ratings
    Order Management
    Comparison of Order Management features of Microsoft Dynamics GP and Sage 50 and Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    Feature
    Microsoft Dynamics GP
    3.6
    25 Ratings
    69% below category average
    Sage 50
    7.5
    25 Ratings
    1% above category average
    Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    -
    Ratings
    Pricing3.718 Ratings8.420 Ratings00 Ratings
    Order entry3.721 Ratings8.422 Ratings00 Ratings
    Credit card processing1.012 Ratings7.014 Ratings00 Ratings
    Cost of goods sold5.025 Ratings7.421 Ratings00 Ratings
    Order Orchestration4.99 Ratings7.58 Ratings00 Ratings
    End-to-end order visibility3.312 Ratings6.69 Ratings00 Ratings
    Order exception Resolution3.37 Ratings7.28 Ratings00 Ratings
    BI Standard Reporting
    Comparison of BI Standard Reporting features of Microsoft Dynamics GP and Sage 50 and Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    Feature
    Microsoft Dynamics GP
    -
    Ratings
    Sage 50
    -
    Ratings
    Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    8.1
    10 Ratings
    7% above category average
    Pixel Perfect reports00 Ratings00 Ratings8.07 Ratings
    Customizable dashboards00 Ratings00 Ratings8.58 Ratings
    Report Formatting Templates00 Ratings00 Ratings8.09 Ratings
    Ad-hoc Reporting
    Comparison of Ad-hoc Reporting features of Microsoft Dynamics GP and Sage 50 and Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    Feature
    Microsoft Dynamics GP
    -
    Ratings
    Sage 50
    -
    Ratings
    Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    7.4
    24 Ratings
    5% below category average
    Drill-down analysis00 Ratings00 Ratings6.623 Ratings
    Formatting capabilities00 Ratings00 Ratings7.123 Ratings
    Integration with R or other statistical packages00 Ratings00 Ratings7.17 Ratings
    Report sharing and collaboration00 Ratings00 Ratings8.716 Ratings
    Report Output and Scheduling
    Comparison of Report Output and Scheduling features of Microsoft Dynamics GP and Sage 50 and Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    Feature
    Microsoft Dynamics GP
    -
    Ratings
    Sage 50
    -
    Ratings
    Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    9.4
    15 Ratings
    17% above category average
    Publish to Web00 Ratings00 Ratings9.910 Ratings
    Publish to PDF00 Ratings00 Ratings9.913 Ratings
    Report Versioning00 Ratings00 Ratings7.712 Ratings
    Report Delivery Scheduling00 Ratings00 Ratings9.911 Ratings
    Data Discovery and Visualization
    Comparison of Data Discovery and Visualization features of Microsoft Dynamics GP and Sage 50 and Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    Feature
    Microsoft Dynamics GP
    -
    Ratings
    Sage 50
    -
    Ratings
    Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    8.5
    8 Ratings
    15% above category average
    Pre-built visualization formats (heatmaps, scatter plots etc.)00 Ratings00 Ratings8.07 Ratings
    Location Analytics / Geographic Visualization00 Ratings00 Ratings8.04 Ratings
    Predictive Analytics00 Ratings00 Ratings9.06 Ratings
    Pattern Recognition and Data Mining00 Ratings00 Ratings9.11 Ratings
    Access Control and Security
    Comparison of Access Control and Security features of Microsoft Dynamics GP and Sage 50 and Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    Feature
    Microsoft Dynamics GP
    -
    Ratings
    Sage 50
    -
    Ratings
    Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    9.8
    23 Ratings
    16% above category average
    Multi-User Support (named login)00 Ratings00 Ratings9.923 Ratings
    Role-Based Security Model00 Ratings00 Ratings9.922 Ratings
    Multiple Access Permission Levels (Create, Read, Delete)00 Ratings00 Ratings9.923 Ratings
    Report-Level Access Control00 Ratings00 Ratings9.94 Ratings
    Single Sign-On (SSO)00 Ratings00 Ratings9.216 Ratings
    Mobile Capabilities
    Comparison of Mobile Capabilities features of Microsoft Dynamics GP and Sage 50 and Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    Feature
    Microsoft Dynamics GP
    -
    Ratings
    Sage 50
    -
    Ratings
    Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    6.1
    9 Ratings
    18% below category average
    Responsive Design for Web Access00 Ratings00 Ratings5.08 Ratings
    Dashboard / Report / Visualization Interactivity on Mobile00 Ratings00 Ratings7.16 Ratings
    Budgeting, Planning, and Forecasting
    Comparison of Budgeting, Planning, and Forecasting features of Microsoft Dynamics GP and Sage 50 and Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    Feature
    Microsoft Dynamics GP
    -
    Ratings
    Sage 50
    -
    Ratings
    Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    8.4
    49 Ratings
    4% above category average
    Long-term financial planning00 Ratings00 Ratings8.235 Ratings
    Financial budgeting00 Ratings00 Ratings8.143 Ratings
    Forecasting00 Ratings00 Ratings8.240 Ratings
    Scenario modeling00 Ratings00 Ratings8.634 Ratings
    Management reporting00 Ratings00 Ratings9.046 Ratings
    Consolidation and Close
    Comparison of Consolidation and Close features of Microsoft Dynamics GP and Sage 50 and Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    Feature
    Microsoft Dynamics GP
    -
    Ratings
    Sage 50
    -
    Ratings
    Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    8.8
    46 Ratings
    12% above category average
    Financial data consolidation00 Ratings00 Ratings8.940 Ratings
    Journal entries and reports00 Ratings00 Ratings8.337 Ratings
    Multi-currency management00 Ratings00 Ratings8.334 Ratings
    Intercompany Eliminations00 Ratings00 Ratings9.337 Ratings
    Minority Ownership00 Ratings00 Ratings8.630 Ratings
    Local and consolidated reporting00 Ratings00 Ratings9.944 Ratings
    Detailed Audit Trails00 Ratings00 Ratings8.236 Ratings
    Financial Reporting and Compliance
    Comparison of Financial Reporting and Compliance features of Microsoft Dynamics GP and Sage 50 and Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    Feature
    Microsoft Dynamics GP
    -
    Ratings
    Sage 50
    -
    Ratings
    Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    9.0
    50 Ratings
    10% above category average
    Financial Statement Reporting00 Ratings00 Ratings9.042 Ratings
    Management Reporting00 Ratings00 Ratings8.947 Ratings
    Excel-based Reporting00 Ratings00 Ratings8.150 Ratings
    Automated board and financial reporting00 Ratings00 Ratings9.035 Ratings
    XBRL support for regulatory filing00 Ratings00 Ratings9.920 Ratings
    Analytics and Reporting
    Comparison of Analytics and Reporting features of Microsoft Dynamics GP and Sage 50 and Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    Feature
    Microsoft Dynamics GP
    -
    Ratings
    Sage 50
    -
    Ratings
    Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    8.2
    31 Ratings
    8% above category average
    Personalized dashboards00 Ratings00 Ratings8.426 Ratings
    Color-coded scorecards00 Ratings00 Ratings8.020 Ratings
    KPIs00 Ratings00 Ratings8.624 Ratings
    Cost and profitability analysis00 Ratings00 Ratings8.322 Ratings
    Key Performance Indicator setting00 Ratings00 Ratings8.022 Ratings
    Benchmarking with external data00 Ratings00 Ratings8.014 Ratings
    Integration
    Comparison of Integration features of Microsoft Dynamics GP and Sage 50 and Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    Feature
    Microsoft Dynamics GP
    -
    Ratings
    Sage 50
    -
    Ratings
    Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    9.2
    47 Ratings
    13% above category average
    Flat file integration00 Ratings00 Ratings9.339 Ratings
    Excel data integration00 Ratings00 Ratings9.145 Ratings
    Direct links to 3rd-party data sources00 Ratings00 Ratings9.231 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    Microsoft Dynamics GPSage 50Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    Small Businesses
    QuickBooks Self-Employed (discontinued)
    Score4.3 out of 10
    QuickBooks Self-Employed (discontinued)
    Score4.3 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    Medium-sized Companies
    MYOB
    Score8.3 out of 10
    MYOB
    Score8.3 out of 10
    IBM Planning Analytics
    Score8.5 out of 10
    Enterprises
    No answers on this topic
    Microsoft Dynamics GP
    Score5.5 out of 10
    Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
    Score7.2 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Microsoft Dynamics GPSage 50Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    Likelihood to Recommend
    4.0
    (54 ratings)
    8.4
    (45 ratings)
    9.0
    (50 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    9.9
    (7 ratings)
    9.1
    (14 ratings)
    9.1
    (11 ratings)
    Usability
    5.4
    (10 ratings)
    8.6
    (15 ratings)
    8.7
    (18 ratings)
    Availability
    10.0
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.3
    (2 ratings)
    Performance
    7.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.1
    (2 ratings)
    Support Rating
    7.0
    (5 ratings)
    10.0
    (7 ratings)
    9.1
    (6 ratings)
    In-Person Training
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (3 ratings)
    Online Training
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.1
    (2 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    8.2
    (3 ratings)
    9.1
    (5 ratings)
    5.5
    (3 ratings)
    Configurability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.1
    (2 ratings)
    CPA Rating
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    8.2
    (4 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    9.1
    (1 ratings)
    9.1
    (1 ratings)
    9.1
    (2 ratings)
    Vendor post-sale
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.3
    (2 ratings)
    Vendor pre-sale
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.2
    (2 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Microsoft Dynamics GPSage 50Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Microsoft
    Microsoft Dynamics GP is well-suited for our environment, as we pay a diverse group of employees, including on-the-road drivers, shop employees (some in other locations), and office employees. It easily tracks time off, taxes, pay, etc. The reporting allows us to verify with our drivers how they are paid each week, whether it be through mileage or stop-offs.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Sage
    Sage 50 Accounts is well-suited for small to medium-sized enterprises, where there is a moderate number of expenses and invoices that need processing, typically by a company with a smaller finance team. Sage 50 is probably less suitable for a large organisation that needs to handle a higher volume of transactions and manage significant stock levels.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Wolters Kluwer
    Scenarios where CCH Tagetik is suitable is when a company have large amounts of data and want to transform, consolidate, store and produce reporting in different year, period etc with complex calculations and allocation. Tagetik is the tool for you in this case and it's very flexible in terms of creating your own business rule, calculation and reporting options with a user friendly interface. I have not thought about scenarios where it is not appropriate to use tagetik yet as the tool covers small and large business financial needs
    Read full review
    Pros
    Microsoft
    • Great Plains started as back office/accounting, and that is still it's strong suit.
    • SQL and the GP programming language, Dexterity, provide a robust, scalable, and stable platform with well documented maintenance and repair procedures. Relatively easy to manage, tune, and support.
    • Microsoft support for GP verges on "particularly well". Doesn't quite get there but good enough once you know what you're doing
    • Strong partner network, including the GP User Group (GPUG)
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Sage
    • We can build "templates" for recurrent charges/invoices. This saves some time and also ensures that we always use the right accounting rubric.
    • A lot of additional information can be filled out such as client information (name, address, ...) which makes the software a little more complete.
    • If you don't need an updated version every year (my case) then the software is not too expensive. The pro version that I'm using was just a little over $300.
    • I really like the banking statement consolidation which allows you to ensure you got the right information registered.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Wolters Kluwer
    • Processes are clearly described in CCH Tagetik ; users can easily find where they are and which action they have to make
    • Interaction with Excel is really fluid ; the Excel add-in is easy to deploy and to updgrade, in the hand of users. It is reliable provided the internet connection is fast.
    • Managing hierachies is obvious in CCH Tagetik. Hierarchies are fundamental for a good reporting ; CCH Tagetik has obviously a deep experience of this feature.
    • SaaS : our experience with CCH Tagetik is of only 1 year, but it technically performs well, the system is reponsive, no shut-down, and updates (every quarter) do not disturb production.
    • AIH seems to be able to manage very large quantity of data, and to provide advanced analysis functionalities. We did not have time to explore them.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Microsoft
    • With respect to the allocations, once the expense is entered into the allocation account, you lose the ability to run any detail on just the total of the expense. It would be nice if you could run a trial balance on the allocation accounts the same way you can with regular accounts.
    • I've always thought security set up could be a bit simpler. It actually has gotten better through the years. Specifically, with eight separate entities, it would be nice to have a "master" setup where you could call up one group entity, assign the users rights, and then be finished. Currently, whenever I have a new user, I have to call up each individual entity and select all of the features I want the user to have. That means I have to do eight steps for each user.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Sage
    • Sage 50 could use some improvement in the Invoicing Module to allow for more flexibility in the design of the Invoice fields. The report customization tools could use some upgrading for easier use.
    • Fixed assets management module needs to be included with unlimited number of fixed assets.
    Read full review
    Wolters Kluwer
    • Online help and manual is a bonus but could be improved e.g. the clarity of English explanations.
    • Improved Excel compatibility e.g. formula driven reporting and dash boarding.
    • Mobile phone connectivity e.g. launching a consolidation from a Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik app.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Microsoft
    Due the economic challenges that Puerto Rico is having, the company has had to merge some companies in order to be more efficient. It has been easy in GP to process those merges, even thought we had to spend days to accomplish that the process was smooth and accurate. In addition we were able to streamline the purchasing and sales process and the organization is confident to keep renewing GP for the future versions.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Sage
    I use this rating simply because I have a thriving Sage 50 consulting practice and will continue to keep my expertise in the product. I have consulted on both Sage 50 and QuickBooks for over 25 years so I have to maintain expertise in the solution as well as accounting and verticals.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Wolters Kluwer
    Because in my oppinion Wolters Kluwer CCH Tagetik is one of the most usable tools for consolidation, planning (controlling) and reporting. Its usability is quite easy and innovative. I like the data entry method for the customers with its workflow and tasks, quite easy way to implement a co pilot. And i like the reporting tool, with a lot of customization opportunities.
    Read full review
    Usability
    Microsoft
    Though it is a basic accounting package, I believe some users do not find the old style menus and navigation options intuitive. There is also a great lack of training resources in the market, so users have to learn the product without guidance a lot, resulting in inefficient workflows and misuse or misunderstanding of many features.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Sage
    I think Sage 50 is a trusted product and is reliable from a product delivery and support perspective. They have deep domain expertise in the non-profit space and should be a consideration for new non-profit startups or existing non-profits looking to migrate from other platforms. Overall, I believe that Sage 50 does many things well with few limitations.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Wolters Kluwer
    Surprisingly, this platform is a powerhouse ERP system. However, given time, when more and more organization is able to identify how powerful this tool can be, CCH Tagetik is able to stand as a competitive advantage to many of the Financial industry of today. Although, it needs time to understand the logic behind how CCH Tagetik is formed and setup, once it is known to the user, it is an easy day to day operations with minimal maintenance.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Reliability and Availability
    Microsoft
    No answers on this topic
    Sage
    No answers on this topic
    Wolters Kluwer
    CCH Tagetik has alwyas been there in case we need help. In almost 20 years of commercial relationship, I have no evidence of times in which they were not available to answer a question or to solve an issue linked to their products, timely and efficiently.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Performance
    Microsoft
    No answers on this topic
    Sage
    No answers on this topic
    Wolters Kluwer
    As you can see, speed depends on the applications but also on the hardware that runs them. As far as CCH Tagetik improved, we saw the benefit of a cloud-based solution which could solve many speed performance issues.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Microsoft
    The rating is directed to the thrid party serive provider that we use. I do not now how good the Microsoft direct support is.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Sage
    They were very knowledgeable of the product, understood my timeline was limited for a software issue and allowed me to get back to my day to day work. The dial into your computer is great so you can monitor what they are doing and learn some tricks yourself
    Read full review
    Wolters Kluwer
    I got very quick respons. After very little mail iterations, they decided to have online meeting to look together with me to the issue. They tried to solve it during the meeting. I had the impression that the customer care person really knew the system and was able to ask help from other colleagues when needed
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    In-Person Training
    Microsoft
    No answers on this topic
    Sage
    No answers on this topic
    Wolters Kluwer
    At the official deployment of the original product Controlling and Accounting teams went to Lucca and were walked through the product, Excel usage, Design, ETL run
    Read full review
    Online Training
    Microsoft
    No answers on this topic
    Sage
    No answers on this topic
    Wolters Kluwer
    several times since the deployment of the product in 2013 we got on-line training on new functions or on very specific questions/issues (e.g. ETL customisation), followed by the usage of the Learning Hub since 2025
    Read full review
    Implementation Rating
    Microsoft
    Basically the challenge with this implementation was the Business Portal, too many errors and even the aplication is up and running the users are still having issues. We will start planning the migraton to GP 2015 soon.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Sage
    We implemented Sage 50 Premium Accounting in house, not using any third party or professional service. It was a relatively trouble free process, but can be tricky. Just read all instructions carefully, especially if you need to load the program on a network with more than one user
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Wolters Kluwer
    we did it in a coaching model. This allowed us to have 2 key advantages: we got to know the system very well and managed to save on the implementation cost. This worked well, was maybe a bit slower since we had to do this in our spare time. Nevertheless I strongly recommand
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Microsoft
    I come from a strong background of using SAP. SAP doesn't have the flexibility of GP, an example would be SAP doesn't allow core mods, if they catch you, you lose support. Microsoft doesn't really care about mods, but they will be quick to have the vendor you used support your issue if it is caused by those mods. With SAP your company adapts to the software, where with GP you adapt the software to you.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Sage
    As we did the conversion almost 10 years ago it is hard to answer this question. At the time it was the ease of being able to produce both cash and accrual financial statements and reporting that led us to pick Sage
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Wolters Kluwer
    I found the Excel piece of IBM Cognos TM1 to be easier to use than CCH Tagetik. It was much easier to customize the data being pulled and the feel of the reports because of that. Other than that, CCH Tagetik has been more user friendly than IBM Cognos TM1. Navigating within the application is much easier. IBM Cognos TM1 had a lot of issues with certain modules that could not be open concurrently; this would often lead to phantom data being entered in the system. I have not had these issues with CCH Tagetik.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Scalability
    Microsoft
    The functionality that GP and related ISV solutions offer and the ease of integration of GP to other systems makes it an extremely scalable solution
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Sage
    I define scalable from two perspectives; 1) the scalability to handle more bookkeepers/accountants using the product, and 2) the scalability to handle increasing customer/vendor/employee and transactional data. Sage 50 does a good job on both fronts. From the single users operating a micro-business accounting for customer invoices and bill payments only, to the multi-staff, multi-location, multi-departmental complex transactional operation. Although Sage 50 is quite expensive for that smallest user, it is quite inexpensive for the larger business entity. So, for the new enterprise expecting rapid growth, Sage 50 is the application of choice.
    Read full review
    Wolters Kluwer
    A good and performing scalability both on a geographical and a legal entity scale. The link with MS Office suite allows an easy deployment of the application, especially for contributors.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Microsoft
    • Microsoft Dynamics GP allows my clients to move from a paper or spreadsheet based company to an integrated, electronic, streamlined business. I love being able to help clients gain efficiencies through the use of Microsoft Dynamics GP.
    • Microsoft Dynamics GP allows for better customer service because everything is at our fingertips. If someone calls questioning an invoice, we can easily look it up. If someone calls stating they paid an invoice with a certain check number, we can quickly run a query to find that particular check number to see where it was applied.
    • Having everything on a single platform provides ease of use for upgrades, backups and end user training. There is only one software to learn!
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Sage
    • Sage definitely needs to do a better job with customer service. I have had to use them only a handful of times and it was not a great experience but not the worse I've seen. They didn't make us a priority and I felt that they didn't have a sense of urgency. They did address my lack of satisfaction and I can see that they are at least aware of the issues and they are trying to correct them.
    • Sage is exactly what we need in my current organization and I wouldn't change it for another system. I have used quite a few in my lifetime and I would say that it fits our needs.
    Read full review
    Wolters Kluwer
    • Gave us a tool that can absolutely grow with us to help multi phase implementations.
    • A significant time savings in terms of the amount of time we used to spend running reports vs. the time we spend now. Unbelievable improvement.
    • Gives us the option to use CCH Tagetik to solve business problems that perhaps we didn't have when we implemented CCH Tagetik. It gives us options without the possibility of implementing a whole other software package.
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik Screenshots

    Screenshot of Homepage