Microsoft Dynamics GP is an ERP software with accounting capabilities. It includes various packs for customizability and features tailored to specific industries’ needs. GP is offered as a perpetual license or subscription.
N/A
Workday Adaptive Planning
Score 7.8 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
Workday Adaptive Planning streamlines planning workflows, using AI and real-time data integration to improve collaboration and provide predictive forecasts for better strategic analysis.
We did not go through a full-blown software selection process, nor have I used other products in the past. Previous to Adaptive, we used Management Reporter (formerly FRx, now part of Microsoft Dynamics GP) for our financial statements, and Excel for our budgeting. Adaptive …
Adaptive Suite gave us what we needed and fit our use case perfectly. We did short list Host Analytics and they were neck and neck with Adaptive and it was a win/win for us and we would have been successful with either tool. My familiarity with Adaptive, the simplicity of …
Verified User
Manager
Chose Workday Adaptive Planning
Cognos - capabilities are very similar. Cognos does allow a "push-down" (e.g. current rollup of Outside Services is $600k, enter $1mm at the highest level and the additional $400k is spread to the lowest level based on the existing spread).
We also looked at A3 Solutions, Budget …
Features
Microsoft Dynamics GP
Workday Adaptive Planning
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
6.4
20 Ratings
17% below category average
Workday Adaptive Planning
-
Ratings
Pay calculation
6.219 Ratings
00 Ratings
Benefit plan administration
5.915 Ratings
00 Ratings
Direct deposit files
7.518 Ratings
00 Ratings
Salary revision and increment management
6.517 Ratings
00 Ratings
Reimbursement management
6.016 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
4.3
27 Ratings
55% below category average
Workday Adaptive Planning
-
Ratings
API for custom integration
2.526 Ratings
00 Ratings
Plug-ins
6.021 Ratings
00 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
7.0
40 Ratings
16% below category average
Workday Adaptive Planning
-
Ratings
Single sign-on capability
5.732 Ratings
00 Ratings
Role-based user permissions
8.240 Ratings
00 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
5.4
41 Ratings
37% below category average
Workday Adaptive Planning
-
Ratings
Dashboards
3.529 Ratings
00 Ratings
Standard reports
6.239 Ratings
00 Ratings
Custom reports
6.539 Ratings
00 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
5.1
48 Ratings
40% below category average
Workday Adaptive Planning
-
Ratings
Accounts payable
6.445 Ratings
00 Ratings
Accounts receivable
5.836 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cash management
6.436 Ratings
00 Ratings
Bank reconciliation
5.641 Ratings
00 Ratings
Expense management
4.531 Ratings
00 Ratings
Time tracking
8.014 Ratings
00 Ratings
Fixed asset management
4.528 Ratings
00 Ratings
Multi-currency support
2.819 Ratings
00 Ratings
Multi-division support
3.026 Ratings
00 Ratings
Regulations compliance
3.214 Ratings
00 Ratings
Electronic tax filing
9.012 Ratings
00 Ratings
Self-service portal
7.012 Ratings
00 Ratings
Global Financial Support
6.07 Ratings
00 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers
4.721 Ratings
00 Ratings
Intercompany Accounting
3.818 Ratings
00 Ratings
Localizations
4.513 Ratings
00 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations
4.626 Ratings
00 Ratings
Enterprise Accounting
2.816 Ratings
00 Ratings
Configurable Accounting
3.817 Ratings
00 Ratings
Centralized Rules Framework
3.614 Ratings
00 Ratings
Standardized Processes
6.219 Ratings
00 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
4.4
26 Ratings
50% below category average
Workday Adaptive Planning
-
Ratings
Inventory tracking
6.024 Ratings
00 Ratings
Automatic reordering
1.013 Ratings
00 Ratings
Location management
4.018 Ratings
00 Ratings
Manufacturing module
4.115 Ratings
00 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
3.6
25 Ratings
70% below category average
Workday Adaptive Planning
-
Ratings
Pricing
3.618 Ratings
00 Ratings
Order entry
3.621 Ratings
00 Ratings
Credit card processing
1.012 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cost of goods sold
5.125 Ratings
00 Ratings
Order Orchestration
5.29 Ratings
00 Ratings
End-to-end order visibility
3.612 Ratings
00 Ratings
Order exception Resolution
3.47 Ratings
00 Ratings
BI Standard Reporting
Comparison of BI Standard Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Workday Adaptive Planning
9.3
1 Ratings
19% above category average
Pixel Perfect reports
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Customizable dashboards
00 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Report Formatting Templates
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Ad-hoc Reporting
Comparison of Ad-hoc Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Workday Adaptive Planning
8.0
1 Ratings
3% above category average
Drill-down analysis
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Formatting capabilities
00 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
Integration with R or other statistical packages
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Report sharing and collaboration
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Report Output and Scheduling
Comparison of Report Output and Scheduling features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Workday Adaptive Planning
8.0
1 Ratings
0% below category average
Publish to PDF
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Report Versioning
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Report Delivery Scheduling
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Data Discovery and Visualization
Comparison of Data Discovery and Visualization features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP is well-suited for our environment, as we pay a diverse group of employees, including on-the-road drivers, shop employees (some in other locations), and office employees. It easily tracks time off, taxes, pay, etc. The reporting allows us to verify with our drivers how they are paid each week, whether it be through mileage or stop-offs.
If your company requires headcount and enterprise initiative planning across departments, it really helps to see the impacts at the company level. It is well-suited for conducting what-if scenarios and beneficial if you already have Workday HCM with position management. It may not be well-suited to companies that require custom dashboards.
Great Plains started as back office/accounting, and that is still it's strong suit.
SQL and the GP programming language, Dexterity, provide a robust, scalable, and stable platform with well documented maintenance and repair procedures. Relatively easy to manage, tune, and support.
Microsoft support for GP verges on "particularly well". Doesn't quite get there but good enough once you know what you're doing
Strong partner network, including the GP User Group (GPUG)
It helps create dynamic plans for finances, operations and various functional units in an organization all under one platform
It helps in scenario modeling to help analyze various business events and report by any number of business dimensions including channel, customer or product
It can be integrated with any system including ERP, BI or CRM
With respect to the allocations, once the expense is entered into the allocation account, you lose the ability to run any detail on just the total of the expense. It would be nice if you could run a trial balance on the allocation accounts the same way you can with regular accounts.
I've always thought security set up could be a bit simpler. It actually has gotten better through the years. Specifically, with eight separate entities, it would be nice to have a "master" setup where you could call up one group entity, assign the users rights, and then be finished. Currently, whenever I have a new user, I have to call up each individual entity and select all of the features I want the user to have. That means I have to do eight steps for each user.
Expense reporting aspects are repetitive and hard to fully optimize.
Finance tracking is limited to basic reports with multiple levels or drill-down...hard to fully grasp without exporting data and massaging in something else (like Excel).
Due the economic challenges that Puerto Rico is having, the company has had to merge some companies in order to be more efficient. It has been easy in GP to process those merges, even thought we had to spend days to accomplish that the process was smooth and accurate. In addition we were able to streamline the purchasing and sales process and the organization is confident to keep renewing GP for the future versions.
For one we're in way too deep to not move forward with Adaptive. We're integrated with Workday, we do a ton of reporting with Adaptive, and it's working very well for planning and forecasting. No reason to look back or change course.
Though it is a basic accounting package, I believe some users do not find the old style menus and navigation options intuitive. There is also a great lack of training resources in the market, so users have to learn the product without guidance a lot, resulting in inefficient workflows and misuse or misunderstanding of many features.
Love, love, love, love the OfficeConnect interface as well as the Planning tab within Excel. OfficeConnect is so flexible, gets immediate updated data (after integrations are run). No need to recreate workbooks every month, just refresh the data. This really is the lifeblood for my CFO and leadership team. The Planning tab in Excel allows us to look at a Sheet with many, many rows and perform analysis, even sending it back to Workday Adaptive Planning.
There haven't been any lately. The only one issue I can think of is when there was an update in Adaptive that altered our reports. Before I realized there was an issue, Adaptive reached out to let me know, so that it could be fixed.
All aspects of Adaptive Insights perform well. One area that I wish was quicker was integration. When importing data from Intacct our accounting ERP platform, it can sometimes take 4 hours for the import to process. The earlier imports are done, the quicker they complete. My estimate for a quick upload is about two hours.
Whenever we have had any questions, issues, or concerns, the support has been quick and thorough. [This] allow[s] us to be able to fully resolve any issues, or be connected with the right group quickly to attain the result we were after; be it from simple formatting to adding new detailed reporting.
This was extremely helpful so that they could walk you through the model and teach you more about the complexity of various areas. It is most helpful when it is specific to your organization's model. The larger in-person trainings were helpful but they tended to be more generic and entry level. The trainings that are more tailored to your specific needs are the most helpful.
They often times tended to be way too generic or entry level. They would also become sales pitches to upgrade or get new Adaptive Planning products. The questions in the training would be very niche and specific to other organizations. They were rarely helpful to the group at large.
Basically the challenge with this implementation was the Business Portal, too many errors and even the aplication is up and running the users are still having issues. We will start planning the migraton to GP 2015 soon.
Trust the expertise of very strong 3rd party implementers. Having deployed Adaptive at a separate company before, I thought I knew it all (hubris, I know). Fortunately, I began to (very quickly) trust the judgment of our Carlson implementation team, and they provided invaluable insights and best-in-class processes that have benefitted me and my team greatly.
I come from a strong background of using SAP. SAP doesn't have the flexibility of GP, an example would be SAP doesn't allow core mods, if they catch you, you lose support. Microsoft doesn't really care about mods, but they will be quick to have the vendor you used support your issue if it is caused by those mods. With SAP your company adapts to the software, where with GP you adapt the software to you.
Workday became our choice because it is fully web-based and easily integrates with other systems. The learning curve for Workday was shorter than that of Dynamics. The reporting tools in Workday are more user-friendly than that of Dynamics. However Workday did not have Check Printing tools which are available in Dynamics. The organization started a project to digitize all financial transactions so it was not a priority feature. When it comes to scaling up the functionalities of Workday it was much easier than Dynamics.
We went from 2 users to 70+ users over a 2 year period of time. The application scaled wonderfully. 65 of those users were non-finance users so they were able to quickly learn the software and prepare budgets quickly and efficiently. That is the power of Adaptive and its ability to scale
Microsoft Dynamics GP allows my clients to move from a paper or spreadsheet based company to an integrated, electronic, streamlined business. I love being able to help clients gain efficiencies through the use of Microsoft Dynamics GP.
Microsoft Dynamics GP allows for better customer service because everything is at our fingertips. If someone calls questioning an invoice, we can easily look it up. If someone calls stating they paid an invoice with a certain check number, we can quickly run a query to find that particular check number to see where it was applied.
Having everything on a single platform provides ease of use for upgrades, backups and end user training. There is only one software to learn!
It's facilitated a better financial literacy and management by the non-financial managers in the company, giving them a much better ability to see what they're spending, control it, and plan better in the future.
It's hard to quantify the ease of model and version management, but we could never do what we're doing now with our current staff. It would take a small army to replicate anything close to what Adaptive pulls off using Excel, if it's even possible.