Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Microsoft Power Automate
Score 8.6 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft Power Automate is an advanced automation platform offering a range of features, including AI-powered automation, robotic process automation (RPA), business process automation (BPA), digital process automation (DPA), and process/task mining. The platform aims to empower organizations to securely automate their operations at scale by leveraging low-code and AI technologies.
$15
per month per user
Nintex
Score 8.1 out of 10
N/A
Nintex offers a platform that helps companies discover, automate, and optimize business processes.
$480
Minimum 1,000 users per user
Pega Platform
Score 8.6 out of 10
N/A
Pega Platform is a combined business process management and robotic process automation (RPA) platform with advanced workforce analytics from Pegasystems.
$0.45
one-time fee per case**
Pricing
Microsoft Power AutomateNintexPega Platform
Editions & Modules
Power Automate Premium
$15
per month per user
Power Automate Process
$150
per month per bot
Hosted RPA add-on
$215
per month per bot
Process Mining add-on
$5,000
per month per tenant
Enterprise - Process Platform
$480
Minimum 1,000 users per user
Low-code Factory Edition
$0.45
one-time fee per case**
Standard Edition
$0.80
one-time fee per case**
Enterprise Edition
Custom Quote
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Microsoft Power AutomateNintexPega Platform
Free Trial
YesYesYes
Free/Freemium Version
YesNoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptionalNo setup fee
Additional Details**350,000 cases / year minimum. Additional cases available in blocks of 150,000.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Microsoft Power AutomateNintexPega Platform
Considered Multiple Products
Microsoft Power Automate
Chose Microsoft Power Automate
Microsoft Power Automate is defintitely more business user friendly and citizen developer friendly. It doesn't require knowledge of Javascript, etc. Just simple drag and drop interface.
Chose Microsoft Power Automate
I have evaluated Microsoft Power Automate against other workflow automation options, including Nintex, Joget, and custom-built solutions. Overall, Power Automate provided the best balance of integration, cost, speed, and governance for our needs. Power Automate is Low-code, …
Chose Microsoft Power Automate
We are using Microsoft Power Automate alongside other tools, always judging the automation scenario, necessities and limitations. Compared to UiPath e. g. Microsoft Power Automate does not offer the same customizing abilities. However it is much more advanced considering the …
Chose Microsoft Power Automate
In our experience, Microsoft Power Automate fails with throttling and became unusable to meet our client deadlines. Nintex did not experience throttling issues for us.
Chose Microsoft Power Automate
Power Automate can do many things that most platforms can't do as a 'citizen-developer' with no access to coding tools and deployment. It allows you to develop and deploy low/no-cost automation flows quickly. The blocks in Powert Automate do the API work for you, where you only …
Chose Microsoft Power Automate
Power Automate don't require additional license like Nintex. Also, plenty of connectors in Power Automate connect external systems and applications.
Chose Microsoft Power Automate
We preferred PowerAutomate due to its integration and security within the M365 suite which our business was already using.
Chose Microsoft Power Automate
SharePoint Designer was discontinued and was limited in functionality, being as old as it was. Nintex was powerful, but at the time we were using it, it was primarilly tied to SharePoint, and we wanted to do more outside of SharePoint as well. And Tibco Integration (Scribe) was …
Chose Microsoft Power Automate
Firstly, it came with organizational license, so it was available to everyone, for some of the automations that we're not able to do so when we took license for other tools it was more difficult and tedious to do hence, we had to shift back to Microsoft Power Automate. License …
Chose Microsoft Power Automate
Microsoft Power Automate is worlds ahead of Zapier in so many ways. The looping, DOM access, and flow controls are much better. I feel that accessing different data within previous connectors used in a flow is much easier in Microsoft Power Automate as well.

The custom …
Chose Microsoft Power Automate
The Microsoft Power Automate have the browser based access which doesn't require any tool installation separately. Whereas for the Uipath, many dependencies are needed for the flows. We need to purchase the separate License for the UiPath but in case of the Power Automate, it …
Chose Microsoft Power Automate
I have only used Microsoft Power Automate as our organization is using microsoft ecosystem and i can access its features easily. With new features it is sufficient enough for my use as if now. I would recommend it for those who are in microsoft ecosystem to use it is capable …
Chose Microsoft Power Automate
I have many years of experience with Nintex applications and it stands up very well against Microsoft Power Automate. I hope Microsoft Power Automate can become the better workflow application. With the Integrated AI builder and continuous updates I expect they can become the …
Chose Microsoft Power Automate
We migrated from Flow. They only other we have used is Sharepoint workflows and Power Automate is miles ahead of that.
Chose Microsoft Power Automate
easy to use, easy to adopt
Chose Microsoft Power Automate
earlier we have used UiPath Automation Platform .Later we have used Microsoft Power Automate for below reasons
1.Accessibility
2.Microsoft Integration
Chose Microsoft Power Automate
  1. Power Automate beats UiPath basically from a costing perspective. I prefer Power Automate over UiPath because of its different costing segments that make it way cheaper than UiPath.
  2. SmartSheet provides a number of functions when it comes to dealing with and showcasing tabular …
Chose Microsoft Power Automate
User Interface and Ease of Use, Integration Capabilities, Bot Development, Cognitive Services and AI Integration, Scalability, Pricing, Community and Support. The most thing that Power Automate stands out from others is the Pricing models as it is way more cheap than Automation …
Chose Microsoft Power Automate
UIPath allows for automation of saving email attachments but the time required to create this automation is a great deal longer than Microsoft Power Automate.
Chose Microsoft Power Automate
Microsoft Power Automate is a Low-Code,No-Code approach making it easy for a beginner to learn and understand. The integration with microsoft ecosystem is an advantage. The cost is less when compared to uipath. There are pre built templates available and the AI integration is …
Chose Microsoft Power Automate
Microsoft Power Automate is the platform we can say very user friendly You need not to know the coding and programme you just need to enter the flow you wanted and you are set . You no need lengthy program and eventually no time is required. Very productive tool we are using …
Nintex
Chose Nintex
I was not part of selecting Nintex, but I think Nintex does a better job of generating linear flowcharts vs. Microsoft Visio because it automates the majority of the process of creating process maps. (Microsoft Visio is better for creating flowcharts that are not linear. …
Chose Nintex
Nintex is easier than Visual Studio and richer than SharePoint Designer, chosen for accessibility, scalability, and faster business process automation.
Chose Nintex
Nintex is great! It works well with these applications. We can build profiles to give the bot the ability to use the applications like an employee. This gives us the ability to automate tasks inside our applications. As stated earlier, some of the applications are web-based. …
Chose Nintex
No evaluation has been done to date. Implemented Nintex based on my past experience with Promapp (10 years plus).
Chose Nintex
Nintex licensing is very suitable for our needs and solutions built are embedded and is adding a lot of value with the added benefit of being easy to maintain. The time to production for building some complex solutions versus other low code platforms is significantly less …
Chose Nintex
We were originally using Skuid, which was purchased by Nintex, and they have done a good job with upkeep and adding new features.
Chose Nintex
We like having a single-source of truth to access current maps.
Chose Nintex
Ability to integrate with salesforce, Ability to use in flows, apex, API support. Allows multiple signers and dynamic signers.
Chose Nintex
We selected Nintex because Process Manager is a purpose designed platform for knowledge management. However, what we discovered is that there are significant limitations, which has lead us to now explore developing a knowledge management platoform in sharepoint. this is a much …
Chose Nintex
The feasibility of Nintex K2, combined with its integration capabilities and process development flexibility, was the key factor.
Chose Nintex
Microsoft environment does not have the scalability of Nintex; it is perfect for small and medium-sized companies, especially in environments where Microsoft environment is almost entirely used. Although Microsoft offers options to connect to other applications, its platform …
Chose Nintex
Nintex Process Platform is a great tool for automatic tasks and creating forms in SharePoint Online. For automating using other applications, including third party, Power Automate has more usage.
Chose Nintex
Xmind was great for mind mapping, but when I tried to use it as a process mapper, I found it was rather lacking. It has its uses, but process mapping (at least for us in our stage and phase of mapping) was not up to the task, unfortunately. We didn't have any other software we …
Chose Nintex
I would say Power Automate at the moment leads the category for all round toolset and useability
Chose Nintex
I'm not aware of using or evaluating any other products.
Chose Nintex
We use Outsystems for other processes in our operation but we see that this platform is not able to indentify processes when drawed. Besides that OutSystems requires some basic development knowledge to use it. This makes it not really useable for business units.
Chose Nintex
Nintex is easier to use and manage, it looks way better and is a lot cheaper if you have a lot of workflow runs.
Chose Nintex
Fast automations, ability to adopt custom script
Pega Platform
Chose Pega Platform
Good Support from Pega Technical Team, Continuous Improvement of the Platform and faster innovation and inclusion of new features
Chose Pega Platform
Pega Platform has more functionality that is relevant for our business such as templates, categories and an audit trail that helps us better manage our knowledge base. Ultimately these added features and the ability to also manage workflow within the same tool made it a no …
Chose Pega Platform
Appian and Acoustic Campaign (formerly IBM Watson Campaign Automation)
Chose Pega Platform
  • It is having solid product functionality and performance.
  • strong customer-oriented.
  • Data modeling and SOA support.
Chose Pega Platform
Pega have standards platform for developers to develop components quickly compare to others products.
Chose Pega Platform
We did the POC of both UiPath and Pega RPA. As we already have a PEGA platform, we selected PEGA RPA for ease of integration and setup.
Chose Pega Platform
Salesforce is much faster, but you can’t complete the same things in it. Pega does work well with Salesforce though and can track cases. Pega requires a lot more setup and training than Salesforce, at least at my company. I don’t even know if Salesforce offers the same thing as …
Chose Pega Platform
Pega was by far the best one on leveraging AI and BPM to drive 1-1 personalization. Pega Next-Best-Action capabilities were definitely what made us choose them among the competition. Moreover, Pega has a robust community of users that made us feel we were making the right …
Chose Pega Platform
Easy to build applications with quality delivery.
Chose Pega Platform
Pega RPA and UIPath both are tools for Robotic process automation. In our projects we were dealing with Pega applications which are easily coupled with Pega RPA. It is better in a multi-threading environment as separate features are provided in Pega RPA. In UIPath, one needs to …
Chose Pega Platform
Our business needs have a lot of dealing wherein case management is of utmost importance. We had to have a concrete structure of cases, child cases, and their binding cases. Also, data appropriation and its synchronization in these particular cases also play a very important …
Chose Pega Platform
It has less cost compared to other also good products. Very good support of the visual studio.
Chose Pega Platform
Pega is a browser portal verses with Oracle you get an installed console and BUI
Pega is Java base. If you need software you can manage with not coding, Pega is a good option however you can still do so much with the OSC without any coding. JIRA would be better for service desk …
Chose Pega Platform
Pega Platform provided me the many OOTB features like SLA, Workflow, Reports, which are very much needed for my application development with very minimal or no changes. Even customization is very simple and robust. Business rule management is very much needed in my application, …
Chose Pega Platform
Pega was who we first chose, but due to the high learning curve and really needing developers who knew CODE, we were forced to look at other solutions like UiPath.
Chose Pega Platform
I can only compare it to our legacy ticketing system we were using previously (based in Remedy) and Pega far outfunctions that system. It provides us the ability to customize intake forms, business rules, and reporting that far outperforms Remedy. We can also intergrate Pega …
Chose Pega Platform
We used Salesforce.com and Orcle CRM. Later, after creating a couple of mock applications, we found Pega was best suited to our customer business process.
Chose Pega Platform
Pega Platform is the best BPM tool with more modularity, scalability and the best case management features. Very suitable for Banking, health insurance, and finance projects. The platform is used by analysts, developers and a number of other roles within a single Pega …
Chose Pega Platform
We did evaluate multiple products offerings with Pega Platform capabilities and observed that Pega PRPC rules engine and case management capabilities are better over so many BPM Tools. We also conducted a detailed study with developers to identify the best products out of Suite …
Chose Pega Platform
Pega offers a business-friendly toolkit for defining applications. Unlike traditional BPM tools, there is much fewer complications, the technical syntax to handle in modeling processes and hardly any hard-coded programming. A well-trained business user can be trusted to create …
Chose Pega Platform
Cheaper than TIBCO and has a better front-end as compared to TIBCO.
Cheaper than Salesforce when the target audience is the internal customers like call center agents and claim specialists.
Features
Microsoft Power AutomateNintexPega Platform
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Power Automate
-
Ratings
Nintex
6.7
Ratings
14% below category average
Pega Platform
5.3
Ratings
37% below category average
Dashboards00 Ratings6.70 Ratings4.00 Ratings
Standard reports00 Ratings6.90 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Custom reports00 Ratings6.50 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Process Engine
Comparison of Process Engine features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Power Automate
-
Ratings
Nintex
7.1
Ratings
16% below category average
Pega Platform
8.0
Ratings
4% below category average
Process designer00 Ratings7.70 Ratings8.90 Ratings
Process simulation00 Ratings5.00 Ratings7.90 Ratings
Business rules engine00 Ratings7.50 Ratings9.90 Ratings
SOA support00 Ratings7.00 Ratings7.10 Ratings
Process player00 Ratings7.40 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Support for modeling languages00 Ratings6.00 Ratings5.40 Ratings
Form builder00 Ratings7.90 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Model execution00 Ratings7.90 Ratings8.80 Ratings
Collaboration
Comparison of Collaboration features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Power Automate
-
Ratings
Nintex
9.0
Ratings
8% above category average
Pega Platform
9.0
Ratings
8% above category average
Social collaboration tools00 Ratings9.00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Content Management Capabilties
Comparison of Content Management Capabilties features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Power Automate
-
Ratings
Nintex
10.0
Ratings
21% above category average
Pega Platform
4.4
Ratings
59% below category average
Content management00 Ratings10.00 Ratings4.40 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Microsoft Power AutomateNintexPega Platform
Small Businesses
Stackby
Stackby
Score 8.9 out of 10
Square 9 Softworks
Square 9 Softworks
Score 9.3 out of 10
Square 9 Softworks
Square 9 Softworks
Score 9.3 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
CMW Platform
CMW Platform
Score 9.5 out of 10
Square 9 Softworks
Square 9 Softworks
Score 9.3 out of 10
Square 9 Softworks
Square 9 Softworks
Score 9.3 out of 10
Enterprises
CMW Platform
CMW Platform
Score 9.5 out of 10
CMW Platform
CMW Platform
Score 9.5 out of 10
CMW Platform
CMW Platform
Score 9.5 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Microsoft Power AutomateNintexPega Platform
Likelihood to Recommend
8.5
(0 ratings)
7.6
(0 ratings)
7.9
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.3
(0 ratings)
2.7
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
9.0
(0 ratings)
7.7
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
8.9
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
9.7
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
7.9
(0 ratings)
8.7
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
In-Person Training
9.0
(0 ratings)
7.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Online Training
8.9
(0 ratings)
8.8
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
8.2
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Configurability
9.0
(0 ratings)
8.8
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
8.5
(0 ratings)
9.8
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
9.8
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
9.0
(0 ratings)
9.7
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
10.0
(0 ratings)
9.7
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Microsoft Power AutomateNintexPega Platform
Likelihood to Recommend
Very useful RPA tools for automating processes with minimal coding and drag-and-drop functionality, with a wide variety of triggers, including scheduled time-based triggers and activity-based triggers, such as modifying a file/list in SharePoint to run a Power Automate flow. Very easy-to-use UI with native integration with every Microsoft product, and a very low automation failure rate for deployed workflows.
Read full review
We use Nintex to automate fundraising outreach at scale. It helps us send personalized emails to a large contact list, and we’d also like to automate follow-ups when there’s no reply.
If you need highly customized solutions or clean, fully controllable code, I wouldn’t recommend Nintex. It has many features, but it’s not the same as building your own system from scratch. That said, it can save a lot of time for standard automation workflows.
Read full review
Pega [RPA] is good to address a specific business function requirement with not too many bots or automation processes. It takes time and effort to set it up. Though once done, it is very easy to configure and use. One should also run a POC to verify if this product meets the scalability requirements.
Read full review
Pros
  • Sending confirmation email to clients and user once the flow is triggered.
  • Fetching or Dumping files from one location to another if the flow is triggered.
  • Schedule flow helps to send alerts and triggers the flow at a specific interval of time to carry out the required task.
  • Power Automate also be used to convert any file format to a specific file format and save it to the required location
Read full review
  • Integrations with other services using various secure authentication methods, along with the seamless integration with SharePoint, are the icing on the cake. This makes it superior to other BPM tools available in the market.
  • Flexibility in application development - The diverse configurable properties offer multiple ways to utilise the controls and events, affording the flexibility to expand your scope and enabling the creation and use of processes in a myriad of ways.
  • The streamlined and efficient deployment process significantly accelerates release management, allowing for faster and smoother implementation of updates and new features.
  • The user interface of the pages offers a more refined and appealing look and feel compared to most other BPM tools.
Read full review
  • Reusability
  • Pega’s Situational layer cake architecture is capable of organizing application to suit enterprise needs. An enterprise can have a complex organization structure located around the globe. Because of Situational layer cake architecture reusing common policies and procedures is easy while allowing for differences between products, regions, channels and customer segments.Whereas with some application development platforms, separate copies of the application should be created to suite different business context.
  • Faster application delivery
  • With Pega developers can reuse common policies and procedures, replicate functions and industry specific frameworks and utilize pega UI elements to develop applications. IT is easy to deploy.Therefore developers are capable of delivering application earlier compared to some application development platforms. Pega reduces time taken to deliver an outcome.
  • Pega upgrades
  • Pega platform is upddated to adapt and work with latest technologies.
  • Proprietary users support and maintain Pega platform continuously. Pega customer support is always willing to enhance product support.
Read full review
Cons
  • Steep learning curve.
  • It can be slow to develop simple solutions compared to other automation platforms such as Smarsheet.
  • Troubleshooting and developing can be frustrating without proper access to edit the code directly.
  • Only able to edit through the GUI and with expressions.
  • Many ways to do the same thing can be frustrating when you need to rework your flow.
Read full review
  • New Responsive Form does not allow to create a custom button anywhere we want. It will be useful to allow to add the button control anywhere within the form that can trigger the click event rule.
  • It will be useful to allow CSS in New Responsive Form.
  • Found HTML Table tag does not work properly in New Responsive Form.
  • More functionalities related to HTML, CSS and JavaScript in New Responsive Form will be very helpful.
Read full review
  • Reporting is not extensive in Pega. Because of this higher management is not able to get the reports which will give them insights into a different area. So Reporting functionality can be improved in Pega.
  • Organizations that want to fully use all the features of the Pega 7 platform must follow Pega’s solution development methodology which may not be aligned fully with the organization objectives.
  • During upgrades, some of the rules which are deprecated have to be changed to new available rules. This becomes a problem as one has to understand all the functionality and then change a lot of things.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Power Automate is a great product that has a vast array of options on how to use it. Your imagination is the only hurdle with using Power Automate as there is no limit to what can be done with the system. It has brought a lot of value to our business through the use of custom systems, connectors, and streamlining processes.
Read full review
Renewal is mainly on the fact that Nintex is so widely used and it would be impossible to migrate all of these existing workflows to another engine. Third-party lock-in within SharePoint is pretty strong, which makes it difficult to move to something else. Our Nintex database is well-over 100 GBs. Nintex email support is very good, and I've been impressed. The Community however is non-existent and filled with unanswered questions.
Read full review
Pegasystems has continued to demonstrate a strong partnership with our organization and investment in their product that aligns with our overall vision and need. Pegasystems has engaged us at every level, with the assistance of minor defects to the overall roadmap planning and alignment of our goals
Read full review
Usability
Power Automate features a clean and intuitive user interface that allows users to create, manage, and monitor workflows easily. The UI is designed to be accessible to both technical and non-technical users, with drag-and-drop functionality for building workflows. Power Automate supports integration with a wide range of Microsoft and third-party applications. This flexibility in integration allows users to automate workflows across various systems, enhancing overall productivity and efficiency.
Read full review
Nintex Workflow does exactly what it is advertised to do: make workflow development fast and easy. It doesn't provide very much new functionality, but it isn't really supposed to. When I am working with a client on a SharePoint project, I am always happy if I hear that they use Nintex Workflow, as it makes workflows much easier.
Read full review
Pega Platform is enhancing its product and launching new features day by day which help to achieve customers needs. If I talk about the earlier version of Pega Platform (i.e. pega v5 and 6.3) there were many numbers of limitations in Pega Platform and if we need to do some customization then needed to write custom java and jave scripts to achieve the functionally. Now I can say Pega Platform is running with market trends and demand. Pega Platform is giving all the options which support the current technologies like decisioning capabilities, real time processing, mashup, process fabrics etc..
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
No answers on this topic
The Nintex Process Platform has never crashed or had any availability issues during my usage. However there was an issue that was of my own making that caused a slowdown of the system. I had set up a process to run once a day and check for employees on a list that had certain parameters selected, and for some reason that I had to troubleshoot, the process instead ran constantly, which filled the cache quickly. I ended up having to dismantle that process so the system didn't crash.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Performance
No answers on this topic
Unlike any other process automation product out there. Not only is it a low-code, easy to use tool for building processes in environments like SharePoint or Salesforce, they have really started to expand their tool-set by offering tools to manage other things like process mapping, RPA, mobile,etc.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
both Community support and Microsoft official support typically respond to (and resolve) reported issues in a VERY expedient manner, usually going above and beyond for education and bugfixing. I have been thoroughly impressed with the level of support I had been provided in the past.
Read full review
The support team works as fast as they can and they are usually fast to solver the issues. Sometimes they need more time to solve one of them because our workflows and so on are more complex than usual clients.
Read full review
It’s very slow sometimes, but that may be our servers. Also the Knowledge Library needs some work - again, not sure if it’s our setup or what- but I’m unable to search the body of an article for content, so I have to be very intentional with tagging, but it’s not ideal.
Read full review
In-Person Training
after reviewing the main features of Power Automate, the Microsoft trainer focused on some of our real life use cases implementation, from simple to more advanced.
Read full review
The trainer addressed the smallest queries in a friendly and timely manner; He walked us through all the necessary products we were using
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Online Training
although it was productive, it is more difficult to stay focused and in a 7 hours a day online training (including screen share issues and the fact that the trainer just can't precisely show the exact location of your mistake)
Read full review
I used the Nintex training software, it was easy to watch and follow along. It didn't go too fast and was descriptive enough to understand what the steps needed were in order to produce efficient workflows and user friendly forms.
Read full review
The online training is an excellent one, but still it is missing hands on development.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
I was part of the migration of classic SharePoint workflows and Nintex workflows. We didn't spend much time learning the new platform because of its user-friendly interface and intuitive drag-and-drop functionality. We have mostly O365 E1 and E3 licensed users, so they can participate in our Citizen Development program and utilize Power Automate to build day-to-day business processes.
Read full review
1.Start with Simple Workflows: Begin with basic workflows to gain user confidence before tackling complex processes.
2.Involve Stakeholders Early: Engage business users and IT early to align workflows with real business needs.
3.Comprehensive Training: Invest in user training to ensure smooth adoption and reduce resistance.
4.Leverage Prebuilt Templates: Use Nintex’s templates to speed up implementation and maintain consistency.
5.Iterate and Optimize: Continuously improve workflows based on user feedback and performance metrics.
Read full review
Implementation is totally depend up on the requirement
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
I have evaluated Microsoft Power Automate against other workflow automation options, including Nintex, Joget, and custom-built solutions. Overall, Power Automate provided the best balance of integration, cost, speed, and governance for our needs. Power Automate is Low-code, rapid development, minimal maintenance, faster changes, and iteration. Compared with Nintex, Power Automate has a strong workflow designer, lower licensing and operational costs, a separate vendor ecosystem, but Power Automate has Native Microsoft 365 integration, included or incremental licensing, and a strong roadmap with AI and Copilot.
Read full review
I was not part of selecting Nintex, but I think Nintex does a better job of generating linear flowcharts vs. Microsoft Visio because it automates the majority of the process of creating process maps. (Microsoft Visio is better for creating flowcharts that are not linear. because it is less automated and more flexible.)
Read full review
We did evaluate multiple products offerings with Pega Platform capabilities and observed that Pega PRPC rules engine and case management capabilities are better over so many BPM Tools. We also conducted a detailed study with developers to identify the best products out of Suite of BPM products. It's observed that Rules engines integration is very streamlined with forms in Pega whereas other tools multiple have powerful data model capabilities but lacks the ease of creating business rules.
Read full review
Scalability
No answers on this topic
The scalability is really bottlenecked by the imagination of the user. I was able to make processes for my own personal usage, making my daily tasks easier. I was also able to make processes that affected hundreds of employees, making large standardization and efficiency gains. So either way, the system is used the same way, and I was the limiting factor.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • Automating emails for finance and payroll has not only saved hours of work for those departments but lowers the risk of human error.
  • Creating workflows and approvals for our goals and bonus system has saved everyone in the organization hours of manual work and MATH!
Read full review
  • People have woken up to the amount of overlap after mapping their processes.
  • People can be resistant to process changes. You need to have the support from above or support from the 'business' that you are process changing to be able to see the positive impacts.
  • Numbers talk. if you can get a general salary figure from your HR dept to show savings for 'employee bands', then when you present reports, they will be all the richer in data.
Read full review
  • Our company has boomed in the past few years because we of how we use Pega.
  • We will get a project from a client and the turnaround will be so quick they will throw 3-4 more projects at us.
  • Smaller developer teams means less complexity and less overhead.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Microsoft Power Automate Screenshots

Screenshot of Microsoft Power Automate (Interface Screenshot) - Work Queues, Initial pageScreenshot of Microsoft Power Automate (Interface Screenshot) - Signed-in web portal home pageScreenshot of Microsoft Power Automate (Interface Screenshot) - Signed-in web portal create pageScreenshot of Microsoft Power Automate (Interface Screenshot) - Desktop designerScreenshot of Microsoft Power Automate (Interface Screenshot) - Hosted RPAScreenshot of Microsoft Power Automate (Interface Screenshot) - Display of DLP violations (on Run)

Nintex Screenshots

Screenshot of Nintex Automation CE, a complete agentic business orchestration platform — unifying process intelligence, agentic workflow orchestration, and AI-driven solution building in one governed platform.Screenshot of the Nintex K2 dashboard. The application offers on-premises and hosted solutions that brings together advanced orchestration, control, and scalability, and security into a single platform.