Oracle CPQ vs. QuotaPath

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Oracle CPQ
Score 4.5 out of 10
N/A
Oracle CPQ is a cloud-based application that helps sellers configure the right mix of products or services and create accurate, professional quotes to quickly meet their customers’ pricing needs.
$240
per month per user
QuotaPath
Score 8.6 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
QuotaPath automates the commission process, helping revenue teams manage and track variable pay. Teams that use QuotaPath gain real-time visibility into commissions and forecasted earnings.
$250
per month per user
Pricing
Oracle CPQQuotaPath
Editions & Modules
CPQ Pricing
$240.00
per month per user
Essential
$25
per month (billed annually) per user
Growth
$35
per month (billed annually) per user
Premium
$50
per month (billed annually) per user
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Oracle CPQQuotaPath
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsQuotaPath has three pricing editions, each with a platform fee that includes the all-in cost of QuotaPath for teams with up to five users. (This includes user access, ongoing support, integration implementations, and is billed annually. Any users beyond the first five have a per-seat cost relative to their associated tier.) The Growth tier offers a free trial.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Oracle CPQQuotaPath
Features
Oracle CPQQuotaPath
CPQ
Comparison of CPQ features of Product A and Product B
Oracle CPQ
6.7
18 Ratings
28% below category average
QuotaPath
-
Ratings
Quote sharing/sending7.017 Ratings00 Ratings
Product configuration8.017 Ratings00 Ratings
Configuration options8.017 Ratings00 Ratings
Pricing rules7.016 Ratings00 Ratings
Price adjustment5.017 Ratings00 Ratings
Purchase history and open contracts6.016 Ratings00 Ratings
Guided selling/Sales portal7.016 Ratings00 Ratings
CPQ reporting & analytics7.017 Ratings00 Ratings
CPQ-CRM integration7.015 Ratings00 Ratings
Attachments to quotes5.017 Ratings00 Ratings
Order capturing7.07 Ratings00 Ratings
Sales ICM
Comparison of Sales ICM features of Product A and Product B
Oracle CPQ
-
Ratings
QuotaPath
9.1
23 Ratings
16% above category average
Sales compensation plan creation00 Ratings9.523 Ratings
Complex sales crediting00 Ratings9.219 Ratings
Sales compensation process automation00 Ratings9.722 Ratings
Incentive auditing/regulation compliance00 Ratings8.818 Ratings
Sales compensation dashboards & forecasting00 Ratings9.523 Ratings
Incentive modeling00 Ratings8.720 Ratings
Agile incentive strategy00 Ratings8.916 Ratings
ICM mobile visibility00 Ratings8.314 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Oracle CPQQuotaPath
Small Businesses
QuoteWerks
QuoteWerks
Score 9.6 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
QuoteWerks
QuoteWerks
Score 9.6 out of 10
Everstage
Everstage
Score 9.2 out of 10
Enterprises
SAP Sales Cloud
SAP Sales Cloud
Score 8.5 out of 10
Everstage
Everstage
Score 9.2 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Oracle CPQQuotaPath
Likelihood to Recommend
1.0
(45 ratings)
9.5
(23 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
7.0
(26 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Usability
3.0
(8 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Availability
10.0
(3 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
8.0
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
1.0
(4 ratings)
9.6
(11 ratings)
In-Person Training
8.0
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
2.0
(6 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Oracle CPQQuotaPath
Likelihood to Recommend
Oracle
I think CPQ had worked so well for our company because of the widespread nature of our associates and tracking orders that were being placed in multiple time zones. My team specifically needed a way of analyzing these orders to track our progress in real time and sort out any supply orders before they became an issue. If you are in a centralized location with a smaller team then this may not yield much use to you.
Read full review
QuotaPath
Well suited for getting your sales team visibility on their efforts, it’s great for showing how and why commissions payout as they do with each deal. Adjustments can also be made very quickly on the backend if needed. It’s straightforward and quick to set up and doesn’t require much training, which is very good for smaller-end businesses and sales forces. It doesn’t work well with more nuanced deals that may age multiple pay points or for larger sales forces, and some custom CRMs will have trouble or be incompatible.
Read full review
Pros
Oracle
  • Leveraged automation to minimize headcount costs despite 10% year-over-year business growth, and enabled staff to focus on more strategic tasks.
  • Established a flexible CPQ system that scales on demand to easily accommodate the company’s multiple global locations.
  • Improved customer relations by reducing configuration time and allowing sales more time to meet with customers and close orders.
Read full review
QuotaPath
  • We don’t have to calculate commissions in Excel anymore! It takes a fraction of the time it used to calculate commissions. Saves about 1-2 days on month end close. I like that it is easy for me and reps to drill down and see the calculations of their payouts. Reps can see calcs all month long instead of having to wait until the end of the month, so acts as a motivator. Sales managers can manage their direct reports better.
  • When I first started using QP, I was not thrilled with the quota attainment reporting for dollars, percent, and team management. I’m glad that they added leaderboards and are working on better reporting. I like the UX and UI of the whole software.
  • I like being able to export the following easily to Excel – resolved payouts for all payouts, payouts by rep, and Ledger (ASC 606) info.
  • Admins can request that reps acknowledge their plans through QP, which helps with compliance and ensures we are in agreement with calculations. I like that they are adding a docusign feature.
  • You can easily adjust earnings if a correction is needed, even after the month is closed. Just make sure you reverse from the end of the process (i.e. undo in ledger, undo the resolved payout, delete the unresolved payout, un-approve the deal).
Read full review
Cons
Oracle
  • Significant setup time, cost, and maintenance. We have to use an implementation partner
  • Does not always play well with other software, even Oracle software. While this is improved and being further improved, that it was a third party acquisition means things sometimes require a little extra care
  • Additional setup documentation and first walkthroughs would be helpful, especially if it was all in one place
Read full review
QuotaPath
  • More workspace roles with the ability to customize what each user is able to do. Currently, there's only member and team manager. The team manager currently has too much power and we want to remove some of the things they're able to do like approve deals.
  • When you sync a deal from the CRM, you can override the earnings but you cannot override the field value you're syncing over. It would be great if that was possible.
  • When you want to exclude a deal, you have to go in the filters and add a rule to exclude the ID. It would be better if there's an option to reject deals in certain paths as an approver.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Oracle
So far it is all good with BigMachines, looking for new features since Oracle acquisition has created a lot of expectations. We have outlined our limitations (out of box functionality) in our periodic customer successor advice meetings for a while, hope we get a resolution soon. Also, the BigMachines user license fee has increased a lot in the last three years.
Read full review
QuotaPath
I don't have buying decision but we have input on the software or solutions we use and this has been a game changer to review our commissions. Quota Path makes it very easy to ensure we are on target. Saves us a lot of time compared to using spreadsheets
Read full review
Usability
Oracle
The software UI can be as complex or as simple as you need it to be (depending on the business). It does require training others on quote configuration and the order in which to build out order positions prior to configuring a quote. Once users are trained;however, it is fairly straight-forward. The UI is still more static than other new wizard/drag-and-drop models, but it get's the job done
Read full review
QuotaPath
No answers on this topic
Reliability and Availability
Oracle
Other than one day two years ago and an hour or two a few times since then due to data center outages, it has been very reliable
Read full review
QuotaPath
No answers on this topic
Performance
Oracle
It depends upon the day however there are so many failure points with online services, including our internet service, that this is probably closer to 9 with the latest version
Read full review
QuotaPath
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Oracle
Some specific support personal was good and fixed some problems fast using proper solutions. But when one of them went to sleep when we had critical issues and they do unreported commits to our production environment which caused issues and they were hiding it?? you can not give more than a two (maybe even that is too much). They also failed to add a feature for us which also bring the grade down.
Read full review
QuotaPath
I ran into some issues with setting up an MRR earning path. Their customer service team was readily available to assist, provide guidance and get their hands on our setup, which made getting this up and running much easier. Also (shame on me), I missed a couple of calls with my CSM, Daniel, but he never got frustrated with my absence. In fact, he was always able to reschedule and was flexible with my schedule — when we were able to connect, he was a major, major help.
Read full review
In-Person Training
Oracle
They have pretty good training. Our business analysts have been able to go to entry and advanced level training. They have a train the trainer model. Our business analyst attended training, then trained the rest of our staff.
Read full review
QuotaPath
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
Oracle
It was a much more technical implementation than we thought. It involved much more code.

Future releases have made and will make administering the tool easier.

EDL consulting had one good developer, but when he was moved off, they were horrible to work with.

The BMI sales team does a “BOA” or a “Business Operation Assessment” which is extremely valuable, not only for them to scope an implementation and get more reach within the organization, but it is also a documentation of business process that most organizations don’t have. It highlights inefficiencies and allows for correction during implementation.

Having a dedicated team (in-house) for implementation is key
Read full review
QuotaPath
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Oracle
Oracle engagement is ahead. They are active in the development of the tool and provide great support after implementation. They also listen to their customers and offer opportunities to feedback and provide input through activities like the customer advisory board forum.
Read full review
QuotaPath
Xactly Incent was very difficult to configure. And UI wasn't very friendly. Spiff and CaptivateIQ had a good UI but the learning and coding required was going to be too much for the short window of time before implementation was due. QuotaPath was able to build our comp plans in less than a month so we could focus on the necessary configuration of data in Salesforce.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Oracle
  • Increased Sales Rep efficiency. Being able to create multiple quotes ACCURATELY and quickly was a game changer.
  • Large implementation time. It's a little difficult to fit BMI into a SCRUM style build, with multiple working models and prototypes of all 3 simultaneously.
  • A larger fee for licensing and implementation cost. ROI wouldn't be realized in the first year.
Read full review
QuotaPath
  • Reduce commission calculations from a full day to minutes
  • Provides both managers and reps with insight into their earnings
  • Highly flexible plan structuring that allowed us to pay based on our objectives
  • While saving money on the elimination of manual commission processing (+/12c days per year) I believe the real payback has been the way it has helped us to better incentivize and motivate our reps
Read full review
ScreenShots

QuotaPath Screenshots

Screenshot of the scalable team workflows that automate commission management, with task prioritization and success insights.Screenshot of the home experience for reps to create ownership for their compensation, where they can see updates from the last time they logged in (including deals with commissions earned), understand how they are performing, and forecast earnings based on their pipeline.Screenshot of quota attainment tracking and forecasting, to understand how individual reps and teams are pacing toward goals, with leaderboards to motivate teams with friendly competition.Screenshot of payout schedules for earned amounts, with the option to split commissions into multiple payouts with installments, and explanations of clawbacks to catch overpayments. Reps can cross-reference their earnings and know exactly what will be on their paycheck.Screenshot of the AI-Powered Plan Builder, which enables quick setups and adjustments to build and execute your comp plans in QuotaPath. Describe your plan in a few words, or upload a PDF of your plan, and allow AI to configure it for QuotaPath.Screenshot of the self-serve integrations to connect data, with CRM connections like HubSpot and Salesforce and invoicing systems like Quickbooks and Stripe.