Likelihood to Recommend We are a services organization and we use Riverbed SteelCentral AppInternals with our customers. It has allowed us to expand the footprint in the application management business with virtually all of our major accounts. We were able to expand and go into other applications that we weren't in or offering previously. Now, we have a new value proposition for our customer enhanced visibility, enhanced stability, and we can reduce our cost to them because our cost structure is reduced by using Riverbed SteelCentral AppInternals.
Read full review I believe the scenarios we used it for were quite well covered, from the executive perspective. The downtime alarms worked very well and were easy to setup, uptime monitoring tools were clear and easy to use, even for non-technical people (C-level) and the SLA management tools allowed us to spend less time, and have less friction, with our clients
Read full review Pros Root cause finding/remediation (it goes beyond analysis). Shows latency between applications and servers. Identifies long-running SQL queries, and puts the onus back on developers to clean up their SQL code. Read full review The alerts are very responsive offering quite detailed timing information The UI for reports is very clear and set up of reports is very intuitive Customer service was good when there were problems - e.g. lapsing billing causing reporting to go down Read full review Cons The tool demands High CPU resources to perform monitoring which reduces the overall performance and the user experience is sluggish Also a good amount of training is required to set up the different use cases and monitoring parameters which in return demands a dedicated resource to work on the tool Read full review The PagerDuty integration could be a lot better. When you use the PagerDuty integration, it doesn't send any information about which check failed! It just sends a message like "Timeout (> 30s)" -- this isn't very helpful when we have hundreds of checks. We've worked around this by using both the PagerDuty and Slack integrations and having them both post to the same Slack channel. But this means that when an engineer is paged from PagerDuty, they have to go to Slack (or Pingdom) to find the details about the page; it's not available on the page itself. Read full review Likelihood to Renew Recently added features have made Pingdom less intuitive for our requirements. While Pingdom has a broad offering and remains a good value, it is becoming more than we need. Our customer base is becoming more and more global and Pingdom still lacks Asia-Pacific monitoring, which we will need within a year.
Ted White Sr. Mgr., Information Systems Production Operations
Read full review Usability Pingdom is easy to use, very intuitive and has a very short learning curve. From the onset, we've been able to jump in and leverage the tool to accomplish our goals for page speed performance and discover the insights we need to make improvements. Its a well-designed tool and makes for a good user experience.
Read full review Performance Interface is unnecessarily complicated and frequently responds slowly.
Ted White Sr. Mgr., Information Systems Production Operations
Read full review Support Rating The support I give the highest rating because it is really amazing. Every time we triggered the tool support, we were very well served very quickly and efficiently. The problems were solved quickly and without stress. The staff helped us within minutes and had a lot of patience with us
Erik Silva Senior Information Technology Specialist
Read full review Support responded the same day to my query, as I was setting the product up but couldn't find the setting I needed. This was successfully resolved in a short time frame, so I was pleased with how quickly we were able to get this resolved. I haven't needed to contact support since.
Read full review Alternatives Considered There is a wide variety of APM solutions out there for companies to pick from. Riverbed AppInternals sits near the top of the stack certainly. We already deploy steelhead units across the estate with client licenses, that aided us in our decision to select AppInternals. We found the costs of
AppDynamics and
New Relic ( which we had trials for) both costly against AppInternals.
Rob Bates Public & Private Cloud Senior Engineer
Read full review PRTG Network Monitor was a far more complicated tool to use and set up albeit it does both Internal and External monitoring. The setup wasn't intuitive and there are too many configuration options to complete to form an alertAmazon CloudWatch is specific to AWS resources and cannot be easily use outside of the AWS EcosystemRead full review Return on Investment This product has really wonderful features and one of the most valuable ones is the transaction searches into TTW. This will show you the operations that occurred under conditions that the user specifies, giving you the opportunity to drill down on the things that are more important and affecting system performance. Besides that, the capability of analyzing each individual transaction captured to a very low-level detail (method call/line of code). This ability empowers the testing teams to provide more visibility to developers on how they can improve. Read full review Honestly, we have 4 other products that overlap this functionality whose organizations provide far superior support. At this point it is an unnecessary expense. In my opinion, their lack of support responsiveness and commitment has impacted our IT agility. Its time to explore other alternatives. Read full review ScreenShots SolarWinds Pingdom Screenshots