Skip to main content
TrustRadius
SharePoint Designer (discontinued)

SharePoint Designer (discontinued)

Overview

What is SharePoint Designer (discontinued)?

Microsoft's SharePoint Designer was a tool for developing SharePoint applications that has been discontinued.

Read more
Recent Reviews

Outdated

2 out of 10
August 30, 2021
Incentivized
I occasionally use it on old sites because they're harder to manage than modern pages. It's my last resort when I can't find something on …
Continue reading
Read all reviews

Awards

Products that are considered exceptional by their customers based on a variety of criteria win TrustRadius awards. Learn more about the types of TrustRadius awards to make the best purchase decision. More about TrustRadius Awards

Return to navigation

Pricing

View all pricing
N/A
Unavailable

What is SharePoint Designer (discontinued)?

Microsoft's SharePoint Designer was a tool for developing SharePoint applications that has been discontinued.

Entry-level set up fee?

  • No setup fee

Offerings

  • Free Trial
  • Free/Freemium Version
  • Premium Consulting/Integration Services

Would you like us to let the vendor know that you want pricing?

Alternatives Pricing

What is Progress Telerik?

With Telerik UI libraries, Progress aims to equip .NET ninjas with a full arsenal of weapons, helping to create beautiful, modern and future-proof applications quickly and intuitively. The vendor states that with its over 1,250 UI components for all .NET platforms, as well as various themes, skins…

What is Syncfusion Essential Studio Enterprise Edition?

Syncfusion’s Essential Studio Enterprise Edition is a suite of 1,800+ software components and frameworks for developing web, mobile, and desktop applications. Its UI controls are designed to be flexible and are optimized for high performance. According to Syncfusion, the suite has users among 80%…

Return to navigation

Product Details

What is SharePoint Designer (discontinued)?

SharePoint Designer (discontinued) Technical Details

Operating SystemsUnspecified
Mobile ApplicationNo
Return to navigation

Comparisons

View all alternatives
Return to navigation

Reviews and Ratings

(65)

Attribute Ratings

Reviews

(1-16 of 16)
Companies can't remove reviews or game the system. Here's why
August 30, 2021

Outdated

Score 2 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Incentivized
I haven't used anything else like this. I use different products for workflows and forms, but they aren't listed in the listings for this page. Instead of using it for workflows or forms (deprecated 2 years ago), I use Nintex. For everything else, I have what I need in the Modern version of SharePoint online.
Score 8 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Incentivized
In order to simplify our internal workflows, we have installed additionnal tool for our SharePoint platforms : Nintex Workflow and forms.

Compared to Nintex, SharePoint Designer is very far away. I am only talking here for 2 main features of SharePoint Designer :
- Workflows
- Forms

But for these 2 features, Nintex is way above SharePoint Designer
September 11, 2019

SharePoint Designer Novice

Doreen Giles | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 6 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Incentivized
I prefer InfoPath for designing forms for use in SharePoint over SharePoint Designer. I have not used SharePoint Designer for designing pages in SharePoint. I have found it easier to work directly in SharePoint. Granted I have only had the product for a little over a year.
Score 6 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Incentivized
I'd say that Nintex is a lot easier to configure and identifying errors is less complex than SharePoint Designer. In addition, an alternative that developers may prefer using is Adobe Dreamweaver which is also a web development tool. A third option is Coda, a text editor that gives previews and allows management of local and remote files. Bluefish Editor is another tool, different from SharePoint Designer, that writes websites, scripts, and programming code.
Score 7 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Incentivized
SharePoint Designer is somewhat inferior when compared to a purpose-built third-party tool like Nintex. Even though Nintex leverages built-in workflow engines (SP2010 and SP2013 depending on platform), it builds on top of that and adds many useful features.
Matt Finley, MSIT | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 8 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Incentivized
Both K2 and Nintex provide a powerful platform to build and run business applications that integrate seamlessly with SharePoint; business apps typically consist of workflow, forms, data and reports. The type of business apps range from simple document approval workflows to powerful business applications with complex forms that incorporates data from multiple systems with workflows that deliver the correct information to the right people to make the most effective business decisions, reducing cost, complexity and enabling a more agile business environment. SharePoint Designer from a workflow standpoint simply does not have these capabilities and is somewhat limited.
Nicholas Miller | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 8 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Incentivized
Both Nintex and K2 Blackpearl are great products in their own way, but they are expensive. The pricing models for the SharePoint Online environment is very expensive for how Holiday uses workflows. Nintex's pricing model is by the number of workflows in your tenant, and I have well over 200 workflows in my environment, and the cost would be thousands of dollars per year, compared to SharePoint Designer's price of Free. K2 Blackpearl would not fit our business model directly. It would take a good bit of customization to integrate, and the price for it did not compare to the price of SharePoint Designer, Free. Since Microsoft has stated they are not coming out with a new version of SharePoint Designer, and have not stated what the replacement is, I am currently speechless as the direction. Microsoft Flow is, in my opinion, a very sad attempt to replace SharePoint Designer Workflows. Flow is open to anyone with a Microsoft Live ID, without any security trimming from Office 365 Admins. Flow is going to cause more trouble than solve problems. Currently it is free, but will more than likely follow a similar pricing model to Nintex.
April Dunnam | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 6 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Incentivized
There really isn't a holistic, complete SharePoint Designer replacement currently. You can utilize several different tools and piece together the functionality of Designer. No one really "selects" SharePoint Designer, it is just a necessary evil. For O365 subscribers, Flow is worth investigating for replacing the workflow function of SharePoint Designer, however, it doesn't have all of the features that Designer does. If you need a large scale workflow solution, there are third party tools such as Nintex. As far as the HTML editing capabilities, there are several tools such as Visual Studio, Sublime, TextMate, etc.
Kristina Geiger | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 8 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Incentivized
SharePoint Designer is the only tool of its kind that I feel 100% comfortable using. Compared to the Nintex workflows/forms, SharePoint Designer has much more increased functionality and ease for an IT-type user like myself. I think it has a much better and easier to navigate user interface, because the user interface is more similar to the intended product, SharePoint.
Mary Kay Scott | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 7 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Incentivized

As I said before, I didn't select SharePoint Designer per se, but I did (and will continue to) elect to sometimes use Designer rather than create deployable solutions in Visual Studio.

Designer could be called the lazy person's tool for modifying SharePoint. Solutions created in Designer are not replicable, and possibly not upgradeable. Designer deploys directly into our production environment, so it could be a real issue trying to modify currently live sites.

On the other hand, Visual Studio is only installed in our test environment, and the solutions it creates must be deployed to production. Deploying a solution from test to a live production site that already has data can be tricky. Designer can be used to modify an existing site in production. Similarly, using Visual Studio just to create custom CSS or JavaScript, like I often do with Designer, would be overkill.

So, I continue to use Designer in 2010, and will no doubt continue to use it when we move to 2013. But I will also continue to heavily restrict its use in the production environment.

Return to navigation