TrustRadius
Siemens PLM Software (formerly UGS) is a computer software company specializing in 3D & 2D Product Lifecycle Management (PLM) software. The company is a business unit of Siemens Industry Automation division, and is headquartered in Plano, Texas.https://media.trustradius.com/product-logos/Lj/Pf/UMH3V4IPDX2A.jpegSiemens AGTeamcenter is a powerful, but highly buggy tool. It would be great if it were to get significant attention from Siemens to fix the problems and make it work right.2019-02-23T22:04:48.150ZWe use Teamcenter throughout NOV, as our main PLM/EDC tool.,Teamcenter tracks & creates revisions pretty well, but that is after much customization we've done to it.
Quite a bit of search power, although very complicated and challenging to use the search features.
A database that can be integrated with ERP systems, but that does require much code writing and an SOA system.
Document security -- not sure if these features are out-of-the-box or customizations, but this capability is highly valuable to protect IP.,Teamcenter is highly buggy, and most bugs are very time consuming to live with. Many bugs have existed for a long time and Siemens has yet to fix them. Examples are extremely slow response for the Windows Explorer plug-in used for adding datasets for document items, views in the viewer getting "stuck" and won't clear even after a full window refresh - solution currently is to close the viewer and reopen it, or sometimes close & reopen Teamcenter; functions that fail one way but work another, such as Teamcenter will freeze up when selecting "save and check in" after an item data edit, but will work fine if the user saves and then does a "right click - check in." Many more examples exist too numerous to list here.
Teamcenter is too complex and non-intuitive. This causes a need for a lot of training, and refresh training. Occasional users really struggle because of this, and require a lot of hand-holding by support or admin folks.
Also highly unstable, particularly the Java portion, at the Client level. We get a lot of Java errors or Java related errors (some users almost daily - no exaggeration). Java never closes on its own after a user closes Teamcenter, which is normally not a problem unless Teamcenter inadvertently creates a second instance of Java, or otherwise crashes. Also, sometimes apparently related, the various cache folders on the Client machine get corrupt and require the user to clean them out after closing Teamcenter (unless it had already crashed) and restart Teamcenter - this every week or two per user, depending on usage. This all seems to be worse with Windows 10, so perhaps there's a Teamcenter - Java - Windows 10 compatibility issue.
Because of the issues mentioned above, Teamcenter requires an inordinate amount of support personnel. We have an entire corporate department dedicated to supporting Teamcenter, and local users who serve as local admins and support.
Teamcenter is a very expensive to use, because of the issues expressed here. Many, many man-hours per year are spent supporting this tool, and many, many more man-hours are spent just on dealing with delays due to bugs and inefficiencies.,3,I believe, based on observation, that for our facility, Teamcenter has had a negative impact, overall. Some things are improved, and with the complexity comes some sophisticated benefit, but the benefits do not outweigh the negative impact on productivity.,,Microsoft Office 2016William PinsonPLM for Engineering2018-06-13T18:24:42.482ZSiemens PLM software is being used a company-wide level for engineers and designers to analyze CAD in 3D. Visualization Mockup is the most often element used. This addresses our problem of analysis of design for design reviews and for problem-solving issues.,3D CAD review works really well in VisMockup. It allows for a virtual representation of the product.
Sectioning in 2D works well for tolerance checks.
The ability to move and rotate components allows engineers to see how the components interact and how they perform in different positions.,Measurements are not always accurate and sometimes difficult to take.
The user interface needs to be updated and a better arrangement of the icons are needed.
Importing and exporting data is cumbersome.,8,It allows us to quickly problem solve and not miss timing.
It allows us to reduce the need for a physical property to review.
It allows us the ability to markup the CAD for proposals for design.,AutoCAD 360,OneNote, AutoCAD 360, Fusion 360Verified UserSiemens PLM - Organize Your Data2017-10-05T15:37:58.375ZWe use Siemens PLM software to manage our Engineering data, including 3D CAD models, 2D drawings, and supporting documentation. We have also built our ECN workflow into the system, which gets used by all of our business departments, including Product Development, Manufacturing Engineering, Quality, Accounting, Purchasing, Marketing, and Operations.,Easy to navigate
Version control of shared documents
Electronic workflows and notifications for processing ECNs.,Web client for occasional users
Easier data migration from other systems
Single sign-on integration with Windows Active Directory,8,Decreased time to process ECNs with electronic workflow and notifications
Ability to track status of ECNs has given us a better overview of the health of our process and resource constraints
Version control for released items going through revision has reduced risk of manufacturing the wrong revision,,Microsoft Project, Cherwell Service Management, MS SharePointVerified UserAn Overview of PLM, the Siemens way2014-08-04T21:56:26.234ZThe Engineering Manager wanted to use the software to during our transition from 2D to 3D design. It would primarily be used in our department only at first, and by other departments later. It was very mature software, but at the time we wanted to install locally and what I was given was under powered, so I spent too much time arguing with the IT dept over getting more hardware. It solved all of our design problems in that it tracked EVERYTHING. The biggest problem was that it required a change in discipline by all our designers to track everything instead of using AutoCAD alone. Siemens PLM was great in that respect...,Tracks design data very thoroughly.
Making 3D models of our designs was a daunting change, but worthwhile.
The PLM tracking of old data was excellent.
The tracking of existing designs in template format was excellent.,Nothing,10,I left just as the implementation was getting really expanded, so I don't know firsthand. But, if it was accepted, it wasn't because of the software. The software turned out to be much better than expected.,,10,8,9,Yes,Once in a meeting, a manager responded with a negative comment about both support and social media... so during the meeting I texted to Twitter something like "@#!$ GTAC". When I got to my desk there were two voicemails waiting for me, one from the head of GTAC, and one from our support person at GTAC.,8,9Rick StavanjaMy time with Siemens PLM Software2014-07-29T14:37:15.644ZDuring my time as a Design Engineer with Graham Packaging Co. I utilized the CAD (NX), CAE (NX FEA/Nastran), and PLM (Teamcenter) software offered by Siemens. My role was to support new and existing business by developing and engineering new package designs to meet our customers needs. The use of Siemens software helped ensure we remained ahead of our competition by improving effciency/throughput, minimzing risk, and providing the tools needed for innovation.,NX CAD is a highly customizable software that any designer/drafter can learn in a short period of time. I would consider NX to be one fo the best CAD packages available on the market. The base platform allows for easy integration into other software offered by Siemens, which improves data tranfsers and file integrtiy moving from concept (Studio), CAD (NX), and CAE (NX FEM).
NX CAE is a state of the art computer aided engineering software that helped us improve our design decisions and drive our first run capability from concept to production.
Siemens PLM is a fully integrated product lifecycle managment software that helps manage design/data, create standard workflows/roles, and drives effciency throughout the organization. It is an off that shelf product that can be implemented into any organziaiton without spending large amounts of money customizing and developing an internal version that will become obsolete in 5-10 years.,As with any technical software package the support and buy in from upper managment is critical to drive the implementaiton and culture within the organziation. If support is lacking then the full capabilities and return on investment will not be realized.
Some standard functionality/capabilities are embeded into alternate software or require additional licenses to use.,9,Improved employee efficiency/throughputs using NX CAD software.
Improved standardization of design elements between design engineering teams using NX CAD and Teamcenter
Improved workflow and lead times of concepts to production using NX CAE.,Pro-Engineer,Solid-Works,Ansys,Auto-Cad,10Matt GillSiemens PLM: A Useful Enterprise Tool2014-07-28T22:19:29.104ZCurrently, we are using Teamcenter and NX to allow for better CAD and CAD-BOM management. Engineering is the only department currently using the softwares, although Siemens and third-party developers provide many modules and add-ons to push the data stored in Teamcenter to the Shop Floor and throughout other parts of the organization. Teamcenter removes the headaches of storing CAD files on a local/network drive which can get very convuluted if not controlled correctly.,Inherent strengths (check-in/check-out, revision control, access control)
Integration with NX
Customization capabilities
Global Product Data Management,Expensive
Unreliable programming can cause unexpected crashes
Almost forces you to rely on Siemens consultants for customizations,6,Increased Engineering lead times for design work
Very expensive (Licensing and maintenance),10,Item Creation
NX integration
Sharing Data amongst remote sites,Yes, but I don't use it,6Kyle LongSiemens PLM2014-07-28T18:39:34.065ZWe use it specifically in engineering department. I am part of the service industry, where I am involved with automotive clients. So my answers are related to my clients' requirements. Siemens PLM addresses data sharing between sites, helps in collaboration between engineering, suppliers and plants.,User Interface is much better, and easy to understand
Structure Manager shows and manages Bill of Materials (BOM) in a effective manner. Freedom to choose what you want to view -- dynamic perspective
Manufacturing Process Planner module is well represented, integration with digital manufacturing tools.
Ease of set up and template distribution through BMIDE
Ability to handle real life data flow using workflow module,Need some more improvements in product documentation. eEasy to get lost in documentation.
PLMXML module needs help clues in creating rules, Just like query builder.
Viewers ( JT) needs improvements.,8,Positive - PLM systems are expensive, they take years of fine tuning but efforts are worth spending.
Positive - Well collaborated teams, all information is available at a single source.
Negative - Learning curve is not straight, some time users resist change. Convincing users/managers to switch to new technology is a management challenge.,8Shivakumar PatilWhy Siemens PLM is the only choice2014-07-22T22:00:41.495ZSiemens PLM software was used widely by Engineering and Supply Chain for CAD model management, ECO management, document management and BOM management (eBOM and mBOM). This software allowed collaboration across multiple global locations with hundreds and thousands of end users working in various engineering functions and responsibilities. This software was key to keeping teams in synch regarding live designs and on time for project completion / deadlines.,BOM Management
Integrated CAD Management
Customization of API,Forward compatibility
Integration between Teamcenter and NX and which versions will work together
Performance / speed,9,Improved collaboration across global sites
Reduced rework through file management
Intellectual property protection through SSO and security measures,Enovia,10Mike McCulloughSiemens PLM-NX user review2014-07-27T03:25:22.671ZNorfolk Southern's equipment design and equipment manufacturing facility is made up of a 6 person engineering team that is responsible for designing and developing new and preexisting machines for Norfolk Southern. For a smaller design team, we really are only involved with the design and product development side of Siemens PLM software through the use of NX CAD, NX Nastran, and NX Cam. Having just recently purchased NX Cam, we have greatly increased the amount of products being produced while significantly increasing our products overall quality.,Seamless interaction across multiple departments.
The software allows you to create a very high level of control and organization within your engineering staff. This reduces the companies mistakes and maximizes productivity.
The software makes it very easy to track your product through every phase of the production cycle.,Speaking from experience with NX, each revision seems to be focused more on the layout of icons as compared to the functionality of the features.
Features within NX that have been used for years are no longer being used as a result of new revisions. Doesn't make a lot of sense to the end user. It would be nice to know what the reason is on a much larger scale (ie large customer recommendation?),8,Do not knowtotal investment cost, but there have been several projects where Siemens PLM software has both produced a better product and maximized production.
NX CAM has saved our machining centers thousands of hours and allows direct contact between the designers and the machine programmers.,,6,9Verified UserNX CAD with Teamcenter Integration2014-08-04T22:15:55.587ZOur engineering department has been using Siemens PLM software since 2010. NX (formerly known as Unigraphics; UGS) is a powerhouse CAD package that has helped us achieve our goals for modeling, drafting, and CNC programming. It is incredibly powerful and is suited well for working with the complexity associated with aerospace components. To manage our files, we use Teamcenter. Teamcenter provides a vehicle to keep track of file revisions, workflows, etc.,NX offers powerful modeling capabilities, and is able to handle very complex geometry.
The Drafting package within NX is world-class. The quality and ease of use of producing blueprints are better than most any other software I have worked with.
Teamcenter is integrated with the NX system, to ensure control over file revisions and workflows.
The help that I have received when contacting Siemens' technical support (GTAC) is generally prompt, courteous, and usually effective.,Within the NX CAD package, there are often various little bugs and glitches that we come across in daily use. We generally submit incident reports to Siemens on these.
In general, the Teamcenter software package lacks ease of use, general users within the department require frequent intervention and help from higher users for seemingly simple tasks.,8,Depending on the skill set of the user group, there could be a very lengthy lead time to get users to a state of proficiency using the software.
Implementing NX has allowed us to better communicate with the engineers at the companies we do business with.
Various customization made by us have allowed the product to suit us even better than "out-of-the-box" configuration. It has streamlined many of our engineering functions.,,10Verified UserSiemens PLM software Review2014-07-24T21:32:01.969ZIt is used as a document repository (includes revision history of documents) and workflow (emails users, accept and reject requests). It also sends information to other systems. It is used by manufacturing to pull documentation. It is used by the power users to accept and reject requests. It fills the gap that other Siemens applications do not fill.,The interface of the application is nice!,It is too much of a system for the basic needs of the application it is used for. Siemens spec'd and recommended the solution.
The system is not very flexible or customizable. It has several limitations that cannot be modified.
It is overly complex and difficult for users to understand. It lacks common sense UI functions that do not need a manual to figure out.,1,Negative. Users do not accept the system as it is difficult to use and understand.
Negative. Need Siemens involvement on several product issues that cannot be solved internally.,,3Verified User
Unspecified
Siemens PLM Software
21 Ratings
<a href='https://www.trustradius.com/static/about-trustradius-scoring' target='_blank' rel='nofollow'>trScore algorithm: Learn more.</a>
