Overall Satisfaction with Miro
We currently use Miro for Ideation, Product Roadmap planning and to radiate long-term and roadmap planning across the company
- Real-time Ideation with teams
- Roadmap planning across product group
- Story-telling
- Note-taking
- MFA and session handover from the web to the desktop app. Sometimes we cannot just jump from a web tab to the same in the desktop app.
- Ability to bold just parts of text inside an object, e.g. post-it
- More text- formating options inside objects, e.g. post-its
- Miind-maps, simple keyboard shortcuts to add new leaves (e.g. tab)
- Company specific styling and templates (Not sure this not already available, but we don't use it)
- IT would be awesome to level-up the presentation capabilities, similar to google slides. I see a great opportunity to just adopt it for this purpose.
- Integration with JIRA and Confluence
- improved productivity: +30%
- Better communication: +30%
Immensely. We use Miro to sync on quarterly plans across an engineering department of > 1000 engineers. It's also used to ensure alignment on collaboration rules and best-practices.
Do you think Miro delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with Miro's feature set?
Yes
Did Miro live up to sales and marketing promises?
I wasn't involved with the selection/purchase process
Did implementation of Miro go as expected?
I wasn't involved with the implementation phase
Would you buy Miro again?
Yes
- Conceptboard and MURAL
Miro became the industry standard.
MURAL is too specific and limited to ideation process support. Miro is definitely more flexible and supports a broader set of use-cases.
ConpactBoard is pretty similar, but lacks a desktop app.
MURAL is too specific and limited to ideation process support. Miro is definitely more flexible and supports a broader set of use-cases.
ConpactBoard is pretty similar, but lacks a desktop app.