Powerful Collaboration Tool for Hybrid Teams
May 02, 2025

Powerful Collaboration Tool for Hybrid Teams

Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 10 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User

Overall Satisfaction with Miro

We use Miro for all kinds of things, including project management, presentation development, facilitated sessions, processing / synthesizing information, etc. Increasingly Miro has become a core tool for day-to-day team collaboration, especially for teams that are spread across multiple offices / regions. Thanks to Miro, even co-located teams depend far less on physical print-outs and mark-ups, because it's much easier to share, review, comment, and iterate on this platform.

Pros

  • Boosting participation and engagement in hybrid meetings
  • Serving as a repository of old versions and related feedback
  • Facilitating synchronous and asynchronous collaborations

Cons

  • Content scale is very easy to lose track of, limiting zoom function and board navigation; could have better guides for this
  • Text formatting is very limited; e.g. you have to create multiple text boxes for difference sizes of text
  • Color palette management is not great; it would be nice to be able to be able to create and toggle between multiple custom palettes
  • Greatly reduced time spent on printing and pinning up
  • Made feedback and iteration process more efficient
  • Ability to create custom templates has saved many hours
It's a very user-friendly tool, and I think anyone can learn to use it, but some important functions are not super obvious. I'm always reminding people about board scale, keeping boards organized in projects, starring boards and projects for easier access in the future, etc. The home dashboard is not great, and within boards there are some things buried in menus that I think should be easier to get to.
I do a lot of client-facing work, and the Miro tools we use to gather and display their feedback, simple things like stickies, comments, and sketching, have had a huge impact. When we present in Miro, sometimes people love to directly participate in the board. Other times we record notes live on screen, and it makes people feel heard in an immediate sense. They can see their feedback appearing on screen. I also have clients who prefer to get an overview of content in a meeting and then revisit it later on their own to leave detailed comments asynchronously. The flexibility and different tools available allow people to choose what works best for them.
While Miro is a super useful tool and it keep getting better, people still use a ton of different tools. What Miro really did for us is provide a "neutral" space for people to share progress generated with all of the different tools in one place. It's also made it a lot easier for teams to track the evolution of work over time. Rather than versions being buried in server folders, everything is spread out for review at any time.
I've used similar virtual whiteboard tools Google Jamboard and Mural, and I greatly prefer Miro over these.

Do you think Miro delivers good value for the price?

Not sure

Are you happy with Miro's feature set?

Yes

Did Miro live up to sales and marketing promises?

I wasn't involved with the selection/purchase process

Did implementation of Miro go as expected?

Yes

Would you buy Miro again?

Yes

Miro is great for creating and sharing drafts. It's a powerful collaboration tool. However, it's not great for final finished products. For instance, you can quickly create a deck outline and rough in the content for discussion, but for polished look you will need to transfer over to another presentation building platform that gives you more layout control. I also wouldn't use Miro for longer form writing. That said, it's useful for collecting references and images that support the development of these types of finished products. The ability to collect all kinds of media together in one place is a huge benefit.

Comments

More Reviews of Miro