Using UserTesting's umbrella of products to drive web conversion rates up!
Overall Satisfaction with UserTesting
Working in marketing, we use UserTesting to help us surface user pain points and feedback that are then fed back to our optimisation squads. The squads pick out these opportunities for testing and we a/b test hypotheses backed by user research which helps drive conversion rates. We also use UserTesting to conduct user research on prototypes to allow us to get early feedback and for designers to iterate on experiences before they've ever even launched on the website.
Pros
- Multi-method studies
- Visualising results
- Centralised repository of research
Cons
- AI functionality in UserTesting and EnjoyHQ
- Participant quality in UserTesting
- Better recruitment numbers for niche profiles
- Increased conversion rate
- Research backed experimentation hypotheses
- Tracking recurring issues over time
Our optimisation process always begins with user research and without tools like UserTesting, we wouldn't be able to optimise the web experience. UserTesting allows us to get real user feedback quickly and utilising a range of methodologies to retrieve user pain points, delights and recommendations to feed into the optimisation process.
UserTesting allows us to clip from recordings of studies which we find the most important and impactful ways of sharing user feedback.
Because of UserTesting we're improving our web experiences every day and helping to inform key strategic decisions.
UserTesting allows us to clip from recordings of studies which we find the most important and impactful ways of sharing user feedback.
Because of UserTesting we're improving our web experiences every day and helping to inform key strategic decisions.
- Userlytics and EnjoyHQ
We use both UserTesting and Userlytics in conjunction with each other. Userlytics we find to be stronger with 1-2-1 moderated study set up due to it being really simple and intuitive for both the researcher and the participant to use. Userlytics also utilises AI analysis of transcripts and sentiment analysis which helps us speed up our analysis of results.
UserTesting is way stronger on the unmoderated front due to the range of methodologies you can use in one study and the rich feedback gleaned from participants. UserTesting is also much stronger in the visualisation of results and integrations with other platforms like EnjoyHQ.
UserTesting is way stronger on the unmoderated front due to the range of methodologies you can use in one study and the rich feedback gleaned from participants. UserTesting is also much stronger in the visualisation of results and integrations with other platforms like EnjoyHQ.
Do you think UserTesting delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with UserTesting's feature set?
Yes
Did UserTesting live up to sales and marketing promises?
I wasn't involved with the selection/purchase process
Did implementation of UserTesting go as expected?
I wasn't involved with the implementation phase
Would you buy UserTesting again?
Yes


Comments
Please log in to join the conversation