Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Abstract
Score 4.6 out of 10
N/A
Abstract, from the company of the same name headquartered in San Francisco, offers a collaboration tool for developers and others, featuring a version controlled master file set and approval workflow.N/A
Microsoft Teams
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft Teams combines video conferencing software with team collaboration tools. The communications platform allows MS Office users to conduct conference calls and share files via SharePoint, and join or initiate a group chat.
$4.80
per month per user
Microsoft Viva Engage
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft Viva Engage, formerly Yammer, is used for private communication within organizations or between organizational members and pre-designated groups.
$24
per year per user
Pricing
AbstractMicrosoft TeamsMicrosoft Viva Engage
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Microsoft Teams Essentials
$4.80
per month per user
Microsoft Teams Enterprise
$5.25
per month (paid yearly) per user
Microsoft Teams Enterprise
$5.25
per month per user
Microsoft 365 Business Basic
$7.20
per month per user
Microsoft 365 Business Standard
$15
per month per user
Microsoft Viva Employee Communications and Communities
$24
per year per user
Microsoft Viva Suite
$144
per year per user
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
AbstractMicrosoft TeamsMicrosoft Viva Engage
Free Trial
NoYesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoYesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsDiscounts are available for non profit organizations.Microsoft Viva Engage is also available in some Microsoft 365 packages.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
AbstractMicrosoft TeamsMicrosoft Viva Engage
Considered Multiple Products
Abstract

No answer on this topic

Microsoft Teams
Chose Microsoft Teams
Microsoft Teams is definitely a strong contender to Slack. For small organizations with small teams, Slack has a clear advantage in term of setup and ease of use. However, for large organizations with dedicated and specialized IT Administrators the task of setting up Microsoft …
Chose Microsoft Teams
I've used both Slack and Teams but think Teams will prevail for companies who embrace Office 365. With Microsoft adding new app integrations and external connections exponentially, it's never been an easier time to transition into a digital workplace. Microsoft introduced a free…
Chose Microsoft Teams
Microsoft Teams provide a good feature set that matches the commonly used enterprise collaboration tools from multiple vendors. What the Teams product lacks in VoIP support, it makes for in its web conferencing capabilities. Yammer only has a small set of collaboration …
Chose Microsoft Teams
Prefer JIRA Software, easy to document requirements, dev notes, QA notes and share this with anyone who cares about the work. You can also easily plug this into Confluence and create dashboards if you like. JIRA has a great UI and drag and drop functionality is easy for anyone …
Chose Microsoft Teams
Personally, I have used a number of applications similar to Teams for a variety of functions. However, with regard to my current organizational use, I would say my experience with Teams provides a much more well-rounded user experience than Skype for Business. Teams performs …
Chose Microsoft Teams
Prior to adopting Teams, our organization used Slack. I think Teams has made big gains in recent years and now offers essentially the same functionality and services has Slack does. While I enjoyed using Slack, I have not seen a drop off in functionality or usability since …
Microsoft Viva Engage
Chose Microsoft Viva Engage
We now use Microsoft Teams for chatting and project communication and it is more effective than Yammer. I do not find a use for Yammer any longer.
Chose Microsoft Viva Engage
My organization has both Teams & Microsoft Yammer. They use Microsoft Yammer for a larger group as a social media tool for the whole organization, more like a one-way communication from the organization towards a large group of employees. However, I think teams is more suitable …
Chose Microsoft Viva Engage
I like how Yammer has functions that are fun and interactive, which can give you much more to do than using Teams or even Microsoft Forms. Yammer helps people feel included and gives people a better sense of how their friends and co-workers are feeling on certain issues. Yammer …
Chose Microsoft Viva Engage
Yammer is very rudimentary as a broadcast tool and team notification. I has been surpassed in functionality and usefulness by all the other apps listed.
Chose Microsoft Viva Engage
Yammer is better-suited than MS Teams for quick, informal texts with my colleagues.
Chose Microsoft Viva Engage
There are few good alternatives to Microsoft Yammer that serve up the same functionality and allow for networking to the same extent. Prior to Yammer, we used an internal tool which was clunky and did not meet our companies needs. Yammer has proven to be much more successful …
Features
AbstractMicrosoft TeamsMicrosoft Viva Engage
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Product A and Product B
Abstract
7.8
4 Ratings
2% above category average
Microsoft Teams
7.3
196 Ratings
5% below category average
Microsoft Viva Engage
5.4
42 Ratings
35% below category average
Workflow Automation7.62 Ratings7.0102 Ratings2.021 Ratings
Mobile Access7.03 Ratings8.1187 Ratings9.040 Ratings
Search8.93 Ratings6.9171 Ratings7.040 Ratings
Task Management00 Ratings7.4149 Ratings6.025 Ratings
Gantt Charts00 Ratings6.576 Ratings7.013 Ratings
Scheduling00 Ratings7.1167 Ratings3.019 Ratings
Visual planning tools00 Ratings7.7118 Ratings4.023 Ratings
Communication
Comparison of Communication features of Product A and Product B
Abstract
8.7
4 Ratings
9% above category average
Microsoft Teams
7.7
205 Ratings
4% below category average
Microsoft Viva Engage
8.2
45 Ratings
3% above category average
Chat10.02 Ratings8.8204 Ratings8.040 Ratings
Notifications9.04 Ratings7.6203 Ratings8.545 Ratings
Discussions8.04 Ratings8.2190 Ratings9.044 Ratings
Internal knowledgebase7.62 Ratings8.2124 Ratings9.534 Ratings
Surveys00 Ratings7.8113 Ratings7.535 Ratings
Integrates with GoToMeeting00 Ratings6.547 Ratings7.314 Ratings
Integrates with Gmail and Google Hangouts00 Ratings5.743 Ratings6.713 Ratings
Integrates with Outlook00 Ratings9.1155 Ratings8.632 Ratings
File Sharing & Management
Comparison of File Sharing & Management features of Product A and Product B
Abstract
8.1
4 Ratings
2% above category average
Microsoft Teams
7.6
190 Ratings
5% below category average
Microsoft Viva Engage
6.7
38 Ratings
17% below category average
Versioning10.04 Ratings7.8133 Ratings7.025 Ratings
Document collaboration8.53 Ratings8.6176 Ratings4.632 Ratings
Access control6.24 Ratings8.3159 Ratings5.632 Ratings
Advanced security features6.92 Ratings7.8121 Ratings7.629 Ratings
Device sync9.13 Ratings7.7135 Ratings8.525 Ratings
Video files00 Ratings7.5161 Ratings6.633 Ratings
Audio files00 Ratings7.9163 Ratings6.131 Ratings
Integrates with Google Drive00 Ratings5.353 Ratings8.014 Ratings
Best Alternatives
AbstractMicrosoft TeamsMicrosoft Viva Engage
Small Businesses
Stackby
Stackby
Score 9.0 out of 10
Stackby
Stackby
Score 9.0 out of 10
Stackby
Stackby
Score 9.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Troop Messenger
Troop Messenger
Score 9.8 out of 10
Troop Messenger
Troop Messenger
Score 9.8 out of 10
Troop Messenger
Troop Messenger
Score 9.8 out of 10
Enterprises
HCL Connections
HCL Connections
Score 9.0 out of 10
HCL Connections
HCL Connections
Score 9.0 out of 10
HCL Connections
HCL Connections
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
AbstractMicrosoft TeamsMicrosoft Viva Engage
Likelihood to Recommend
2.1
(4 ratings)
8.3
(282 ratings)
8.4
(55 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
3.7
(9 ratings)
9.0
(11 ratings)
Usability
7.0
(1 ratings)
8.7
(67 ratings)
8.0
(5 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
8.8
(4 ratings)
8.3
(113 ratings)
7.0
(12 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(2 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
Contract Terms and Pricing Model
-
(0 ratings)
6.3
(7 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Professional Services
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(7 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
AbstractMicrosoft TeamsMicrosoft Viva Engage
Likelihood to Recommend
Abstract
  • Large teams with dedicated design operations support
  • UX managers that want a facilitated workflow for their teams
  • Disciplined teams of individual contributors that want to adopt a process in their UI workflow
  • Cross-discipline teams that want a central collaboration space for reviewing and critiquing UI artifacts
  • If your files are named "FOR-REALS_FINAL_FINAL_FINAL_Super-Important-Project (copy).sketch"
  • If you're managing multiple pattern libraries
Read full review
Microsoft
Positive: The virtual workspace created for a work team within the same company, for the resemblance of information and communications in one place.Negative: The access for members of a non-profit organization who have external emails from the host but need the same access as an internal person since their volunteer work is part of the very core of the federation.
Read full review
Microsoft
Yammer is great when you have a company culture that encourages friendly collaboration and communication. It can be a great supplement (but certainly not a substitute) for bonding and sharing ideas and thoughts. Certain channels can be really successful, too, like a channel where people can post dog pictures or something fun like that!
Read full review
Pros
Abstract
  • Versioning for desginers
  • Collaboration between team members
Read full review
Microsoft
  • Virtual meetings - ease of set up and execution
  • File sharing! We build channels for projects, and being able to invite only project members is huge!
  • Peer-to-peer communications - being able to "ping" one of my colleagues, either text, video or call-only, on-demand, is what runs our business.
Read full review
Microsoft
  • Providing a platform for social news in the company where "bottom up" topics can percolate freely across department
  • Social networking across the company where folks can divide their work into topics instead of teams
  • Basic collaboration within a group including document sharing with ability to pin documents to a team
Read full review
Cons
Abstract
  • Asset exports are not as great as Zeplin and others.
  • Filtering within files.
Read full review
Microsoft
  • The feature of notifications in the mobile application could be improved. Sometimes notifications of different teams are not visible and are only visible when the application is opened.
  • It uses lots of computational resources while running and thus, slows down the system sometimes.
  • It allows a few channels per team. The number of channels could be increased for better productivity.
Read full review
Microsoft
  • Although the social enterprise network works very well, there is room for some slight improvement - such as the ability to attract users. By being part of the Microsoft Office Suite, it is offered as an "add-on" and many overlook it and see it as unnecessary at first. It would be smart for Microsoft to sell it as its own product so it could gather more popularity as a "social network".
  • Giving an option to filter results could be better as well as giving an option to turn off the "recent activity" bar on the home page.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Abstract
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
Microsoft Teams is included with our Office 365 subscription and we have no intention of migrating off of Office 365 and Microsoft products. Since Microsoft Teams is included for free with our Office 365 subscription, and since we enjoy all the features, benefits, and functionality, there is no question that our team will continue to use the product
Read full review
Microsoft
Microsoft is dedicated to continual improvement on Yammer. They realize the value that Yammer brings to the table with their clients. In the short time that we have had Yammer implemented, we are just now beginning to see the strong impact it has on becoming more effective and efficient around collaboration.
Read full review
Usability
Abstract
Abstract has a difficult learning curve. If a feature-branch workflow is new to you, then it will take some getting used to. They make a lot of updates to the interface and these feature releases get ahead of their documentation. They rely heavily on an excellent customer support team and are present on various Slack channels to help design professionals with issues.
Read full review
Microsoft
User experience has been much better than the previous Skype for Business app. It has an easy-to-use interface with persistent chats. The search feature is very fast and useful. MS Teams has mostly focused on Collaboration and team building features which are very useful for organizational communications. Since Teams is accessible from multiple platforms like Laptop, Desktop, Mobile phones, etc it has been very convenient from a Mobility perspective.
Read full review
Microsoft
Overall easy to use and intuitive, although limited in the possibility to personalize layout and look & feel of a site. Some functionalities are not easy to use, like document editing, but some others are quick and effective (posts and tagging above all). Performance and responsiveness of the Yammer site is typically acceptable, in my experience.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Abstract
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
Rare, but outages do happen
Read full review
Microsoft
Very available
Read full review
Performance
Abstract
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
Sometimes about once a week I get a message that says "Sorry, there seems to be something wrong". But it goes away in a few minutes.
Read full review
Microsoft
It's a simple product but it does provide value.
Read full review
Support Rating
Abstract
Abstract by nature is complex and has to respond to whatever changes in Sketch. So there are frequent issues. Support can be slow to respond and are not always helpful, but they are quick to find and patch the bugs. Overall, it's not the best support, but it hasn't been detrimental.
Read full review
Microsoft
Using Microsoft Teams has resulted in much faster business communications with both co-workers and consultants. There has been little need for support with this software as the interface is very intuitive and the product is overall very well designed. We did encounter an issue with the built-in phone service, however, this was quickly resolved by the support team.
Read full review
Microsoft
We have never had to use the support for Yammer. The tool works well and we have not come across any bugs. User Interface is simple and easy to use, similar to other forum type products, thereby removing the need for any extensive training. Team members are invited in and immediately are able to start using the tool.
Read full review
Online Training
Abstract
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
The training that Microsoft provides is very generic training for Yammer. I like the fact the training is short and easy to understand
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Abstract
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
I find everything I need for my day-to-day work.
Read full review
Microsoft
We organically implemented the product
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Abstract
I purchased and administer Abstract. It was requested by our design department who evaluated it.
Read full review
Microsoft
Our company and IT department previously used Skype for our communication needs. Skype was not dependable in my opinion, because it seems each time I used it during a call and/or a meeting, I and several other team members would get disconnected more than once. This caused a great interruption of our meeting, caused team members to have to ask others to repeat themselves and caused a general lack of interest in employee attendance during meetings.
Read full review
Microsoft
Our team briefly used Salesforce.com's Chatter product before switching over to Yammer in 2012. While Chatter is essentially the same product as Yammer, it left much to be desired. Chatter's design was (and remains) clunky and difficult to navigate. Yammer is a simple, easy-to-use product that offers similar functionality as Salesforce's Chatter.
Read full review
Contract Terms and Pricing Model
Abstract
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
Honestly, this tool is worth every penny. Yes, it's not free and you pay for the quality of services and the license. But the ROI and the benefits are all there. Also, the renewal, negotiation, and contract terms are all very well explained by our Microsoft account manager, and she's a charm.
Read full review
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Scalability
Abstract
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
It does not appear to have a limit to how many teams and employees we can have using it
Read full review
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Professional Services
Abstract
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
I used Skype for Business to take calls, hold conferences, and provide remote assistance to users. Microsoft Teams, on the other hand, is superior to Skype for Business in my opinion. My job entails a lot of screen sharing.
Read full review
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
Abstract
  • Single source of truth for the team.
  • Could quickly get expensive with corporate accounts.
Read full review
Microsoft
  • I'm not sure I can point to a specific ROI, but it has improved our ability to communicate and work more effectively together.
  • It's also nice to have records of every interaction, photo, and document that has been shared. Less chance of something completely disappearing.
Read full review
Microsoft
  • My company is pleased with the positive impact Yammer has created departmentally and on an individual basis with work flow efficiency.
  • Adversely, most old and new employees are more familiar with SharePoint, causing the company to pay for training for all current and incoming employees.
  • As Yammer becomes more widely used, the need for training may diminish, which is where we will see our return on investment, as the product clearly provides a more effective form of file sharing and communication between employees and their department.
Read full review
ScreenShots