Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Apigee Edge
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
Apigee Edge is an API management platform now owned and offered by Google, since Google acquired Apigee in 2016.N/A
Appian
Score 8.2 out of 10
N/A
Appian is a low-code development and business process management platform. It features drag-and-drop design for app building, automated work processes, unified data management, and cloud-based deployment.
$0
OutSystems
Score 6.1 out of 10
N/A
The OutSystems Platform is a Platform-as-a-Service solution for rapid delivery of responsive web and mobile applications. It includes functionalities required to develop, deploy, manage and change web and mobile applications. It is targeted at the delivery of enterprise applications that require integration with backend systems, complex business rules and logic, usable interfaces and flexibility to change. It can be deployed in the cloud, on-premises or in hybrid environments.
$4,000
per month
Pricing
Apigee EdgeAppianOutSystems
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Appian Community Edition
$0
Application - Input-Only
$2
per month per user
Application - Infrequent
$9
per month per user
Application - Standard
$75
per month per user
Platform
Custom Quote Priced per user with unlimited apps.
minimum 100 users, no maximum
Unlimited
Custom Quote Priced per development with unlimited apps.
unlimited
Basic
$4,000.00
per month
Pro
$10,000.00
per month
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Apigee EdgeAppianOutSystems
Free Trial
NoYesYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoYesYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoYesYes
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Apigee EdgeAppianOutSystems
Considered Multiple Products
Apigee Edge

No answer on this topic

Appian
Chose Appian
Appian presented us that the software will allow EDPR to develop better solutions than OutSystems because our developments need to be very closed to the business needs, and we are in a really changing work environment, then we need to be able to adapt our development as fast as …
Chose Appian
Appian stands out when it comes to low code development and easy to use and develop platform. It helps developers and business to meet the users requirements within no time with equal efficiency.
Chose Appian
Appian is a very flexible platform which can easily fit into any enterprise architecture standards.
OutSystems
Chose OutSystems
The biggest benefit is that it helps avert vendor lock-in (you can take the code and leave if you need to/want to)! Also, OutSystems supports multi-tenancy and directly incorporates containers and DevOps concepts/tools. OutSystems is on top of analyst charts for two …
Chose OutSystems

Most complete solution. Beyond the super fast ability to create high-quality web and native mobile apps, the built-in analytics have proven to almost eliminate the need for added overhead of analytics tags.

I've been following OutSystems for 3 years and the pace of innovation …

Features
Apigee EdgeAppianOutSystems
API Management
Comparison of API Management features of Product A and Product B
Apigee Edge
9.4
7 Ratings
11% above category average
Appian
-
Ratings
OutSystems
-
Ratings
API access control9.07 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Rate limits and usage policies9.07 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
API usage data9.07 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
API user onboarding9.97 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
API versioning9.97 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Usage billing and payments9.06 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
API monitoring and logging9.97 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Apigee Edge
-
Ratings
Appian
8.1
9 Ratings
4% above category average
OutSystems
-
Ratings
Dashboards00 Ratings8.29 Ratings00 Ratings
Standard reports00 Ratings8.59 Ratings00 Ratings
Custom reports00 Ratings7.69 Ratings00 Ratings
Process Engine
Comparison of Process Engine features of Product A and Product B
Apigee Edge
-
Ratings
Appian
7.4
9 Ratings
1% above category average
OutSystems
-
Ratings
Process designer00 Ratings7.99 Ratings00 Ratings
Process simulation00 Ratings6.49 Ratings00 Ratings
Business rules engine00 Ratings6.49 Ratings00 Ratings
SOA support00 Ratings8.29 Ratings00 Ratings
Process player00 Ratings7.39 Ratings00 Ratings
Form builder00 Ratings7.69 Ratings00 Ratings
Model execution00 Ratings8.59 Ratings00 Ratings
Low-Code Development
Comparison of Low-Code Development features of Product A and Product B
Apigee Edge
-
Ratings
Appian
-
Ratings
OutSystems
7.9
54 Ratings
6% below category average
Visual Modeling00 Ratings00 Ratings5.351 Ratings
Drag-and-drop Interfaces00 Ratings00 Ratings8.052 Ratings
Platform Security00 Ratings00 Ratings6.251 Ratings
Platform User Management00 Ratings00 Ratings8.149 Ratings
Reusability00 Ratings00 Ratings9.954 Ratings
Platform Scalability00 Ratings00 Ratings10.051 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Apigee EdgeAppianOutSystems
Small Businesses
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.1 out of 10
CMW Platform
CMW Platform
Score 9.4 out of 10
Creatio
Creatio
Score 9.3 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.1 out of 10
Quixy
Quixy
Score 9.9 out of 10
Quixy
Quixy
Score 9.9 out of 10
Enterprises
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.1 out of 10
CMW Platform
CMW Platform
Score 9.4 out of 10
Creatio
Creatio
Score 9.3 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Apigee EdgeAppianOutSystems
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(7 ratings)
9.4
(139 ratings)
7.1
(131 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.0
(1 ratings)
8.5
(19 ratings)
8.2
(4 ratings)
Usability
9.0
(1 ratings)
8.7
(95 ratings)
8.1
(5 ratings)
Support Rating
6.0
(1 ratings)
8.4
(118 ratings)
7.5
(44 ratings)
In-Person Training
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
9.1
(1 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
6.0
(2 ratings)
8.2
(1 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
1.0
(5 ratings)
7.3
(2 ratings)
User Testimonials
Apigee EdgeAppianOutSystems
Likelihood to Recommend
Google
Few scenarios 1. For viewing API analytics, I think it is best in the market 2. For earning money via API monetization 3. Securing API 4. Onboarding legacy APIs to provide modern REST endpoints
Read full review
Appian
Appian works great for automating manual processes and integrating multiple systems through its toolset. It gives great flexibility for establishing rules for approvals, routings, escalations, and the like. Because of the low code toolset, it's very easy to deploy and make changes as needed as processes evolve and as the organization learns to utilize the system better. Minimal maintenance is required to support the applications build on the platform. Some of the automated testing integration with tools like Jenkins is limited so that may be an issue for some.
Read full review
OutSystems
Well suited for internal exposure of business processes (invoicing, API layer to other systems, customer maintenance etc), whether a UI is required or not. Not so well suited for full fledged web design. An OutSystems application must serve one particular business need, if gets too much functionalities and responsibilities it tends to get chaotic and complex.
Read full review
Pros
Google
  • Better exception handling with the Raise exception policies help to monitor the flow by setting up the flow conditions.
  • Easy development of a Proxy and APIs with much less tutoring and helps make getting started for new users easy.
  • Very good documentation and blog with details of most common failures and error handling.
  • A very very easy to use console.
Read full review
Appian
  • Allows at a glance workflow documentation which assists in the need we have for information readiation.
  • Drag and drop interface for workflow development greatly speeds our apps time to market.
  • Using the advanced features of Appian, we are able to create working sites in a fraction of the time it would take to do so using "traditional" development.
Read full review
OutSystems
  • Developing end user interfaces with ease and speed with a modern look and feel.
  • First class low code development to reduce time to market with visual programming
  • Their technical support team is fast and responsive. We've yet to have any issues they could not resolve.
Read full review
Cons
Google
  • Only one user can be active in a proxy at a time
  • No version control
  • Prohibited from using JSON.stringify on Apigee objects (tokens)
  • Debugging is difficult
  • Unable to rename or delete policies without bumping revision
  • Why would anyone give a js policy one name, display name something else, and script a different name?
  • 'Trace' limited to only 20 transactions
  • UI allows users to add target servers, but users must utilize the api to turn on SSL.
  • I'm sure there's more, they just aren't coming to mind right now.
  • Apigee forgets (expires?) your password at random intervals without notice. Every few weeks, or days, sometimes even three times in one day, I'll attempt to login to Apigee and my password will be 'wrong'. I've reset my password and Apigee still claims it's wrong. I've had to reset my password three times before it finally let me log back in.
Read full review
Appian
  • Search issues when type ahead and database search are used in the same field.
  • Buttons implementation where user is require[d] to click on the button description - if clicks on the button outside that text - button will not work.
  • Problems with using certain off-the-shelf performance tools like WebLoad or Neoload. That is because of different dynamic variables being used internally in Appian - which these tools are unable to correlate. We are still investigating using other tools like Jmeter to overcome dynamic correlation problem for performance testing.
Read full review
OutSystems
  • Price – The licensing model of OutSystems is very expensive and not suitable for small scale developments. This is offset by the time to develop and stability for larger scale developments
  • Flexibility on PaaS version – The PaaS hosted version of OutSystems limits your flexibility to access the front end and backend database systems which can significantly restrict your options on high data volume developments or where anything requiring slightly out of the ordinary access is required
  • Same price for PaaS and self-hosted system. Licensing model dictates that you pay the same price even when you host the system on your own hardware which effectively means you pay more to manage the infrastructure yourself
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Google
I am not the one deciding whether to use apigee or not really. But personally, I would recommend the use of it as developing APIs on it is easy. And as a mediator between backend servers, we could easily modify request and responses in it without touching any backend code while having a centralize gateway to access our backend APIs too.
Read full review
Appian
We recently renewed our license with Appian. We are convinced that its flexibility, relative ease of use, the support they provide, there mobile advancements and their general willingness and desire to see us succeed all contributed to our reason to renew our agreement with Appian
Read full review
OutSystems
We are very happy with OutSystems and our developers deliver good work. OutSystems lets us build new software on a regulare (2 weekly) basis, which is highly flexible and adjustable. Even without very much experience, our developers manage to build usefull software, which is working a lot better than our previous (legacy) software.
Read full review
Usability
Google
Support has helped us to resolved all the queries and community support was also good.
Read full review
Appian
Appian is a low code environment, because of this, a very good visual interface is required. Appian is providing a feature-rich dashboard [that] we can use for building the dashboards and other interfaces. Appian also provides patches and releases to enhance these features. A developer can start off development just by going through a basic course from the Appian learning community.
Read full review
OutSystems
OutSystems has a feature in which we can develop a functionality in a application and can use that functionality in another application without developing it again. That is main plus point for the development team so they can work with different functionalities rather focusing on the same thing again and again. if we want to make any change on the user side then we can make it live with just the deployment using the service center.
Read full review
Support Rating
Google
Quite hard to get support, at least on the coding side, when we encounter blockers. But general concerns, they would schedule a call to you for them to get a whole picture of your concern. Albeit in my experience, bad really as they haven't replied about the progress, but otherwise seems to have been fixed.
Read full review
Appian
Appian is one of the leading low code business automation platforms that support RPA, decision rules, case management, workflow automation, and machine learning all in a single bundle. But it is also harder to implement and replace the traditional business process.
Read full review
OutSystems
The tech support is very reachable. Usually by [email] from but also by phone if needed. We had some difficulties at the start with understanding "what our machine was doing" under high performance load. After some good sessions understanding our needs they delivered good solutions for our problems we had in the beginning.
Read full review
In-Person Training
Google
No answers on this topic
Appian
As analyst I participated in a developer boot camp. At times it was hard to keep up but most of the time it made sense. Trainer took the time to explain and slowed pace down to answer questions etc.
Read full review
OutSystems
Excellent material full of hands on that improve the understanding of the platform.
Read full review
Online Training
Google
No answers on this topic
Appian
Very boring; hard to get through quickly, but rather effective in demonstrating the use of the platform.
Read full review
OutSystems
The online training material is well designed and explanations are step by step, helping trainees to understand and follow each exercise and new concept.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Google
No answers on this topic
Appian
It was really seamless. SaaS in the true definition of the word. We logged on and started using the product. Very easy.
Read full review
OutSystems
In a large company, patiently and consistently work the behind the scenes politics with business and IT partners across the firm.
This is transformational - you will need a solid set of key business partners to lock arms together to move forward.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Google
Apigee is the best in the market in terms of API Analytics Apigee is having wonderful Documentation with short videos Security is a major concern and Apigee provides an easily configurable policy to secure API Quota and rate-limit is again very easy to configure on every API basis It provides various policies to transform the response from one form to another form e.g. JSON to XML or XML to JSON
Read full review
Appian
Appian has enormously transformed and keeps on updating the product every quarter to meet the latest needs of the world with new innovations & technologies being integrated within the platform. What gives more pleasure than a product that keeps on continuous[ly] improv[ing]?
Read full review
OutSystems
I tried to use WordPress with some success. Also looked at Joomla. But when I saw OutSystems I knew I had been wasting my time there. It takes you longer to get going with OutSystems - but even I as a novice realized immediately that Outsystems is simply in another league. Outsystems is powerful. (Can you compare WordPress and Joomla to Outsystems - I don't think so).
Read full review
Return on Investment
Google
  • As a public entity it is hard to say how much ROI we can have. We have yet to create a billing and ROI plan. We are thinking of other ways to create ROI, possibly through data/service barter.
Read full review
Appian
  • I believe it has negatively impacted our release dates. There may have been a misunderstanding as to the learning curve, even though it is "low code."
  • The look and feel of the applications created using Appian have uniformity and it's easier to have "reuse" between applications.
  • There is less developer control when it comes to features. I think this mainly has to do with the amount of plugins available. I would think there should be many more available plugins. But again, our use case is probably different than most others.
Read full review
OutSystems
  • The ease of use of the OutSystems development process has been the biggest ROI for us. We have developed our Framework product and maintained/enhanced it with only 4 workers.
  • OutSystems has enhanced their product very significantly over the last 4 years. They have gone from a simple to use tool to a very simple to use sophisticated tool that covers the standard mainframe-based computing apps and the apps used on handheld mobile devices all using the same basic set of development tools.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Appian Screenshots

Screenshot of Low-Code DevelopmentScreenshot of Business Process Management SuiteScreenshot of Dynamic Case ManagementScreenshot of Mobile App DevelopmentScreenshot of Appian RPA with Blue Prism