Conga Composer vs. SAP CPQ
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Conga Composer | Score7.9 out of 10 | N/A | Conga Composer is a document generation and automation tool designed to simplify and streamline the process of creating and distributing customized documents, presentations, and reports. | $30 per month per user |
SAP CPQ | Score7.9 out of 10 | N/A | SAP CPQ (replacing the former CallidusCloud CPQ solution) has been built to be independent of any CRM. The vendor says that this makes their solution more flexible. The vendor also says their solution provides businesses the flexibility to customize and enhance the solution without the constraints of CRM code. Pricing and product catalog changes can also be made by the users without having to rely on a CRM administrator. | N/A |
| Conga Composer | SAP CPQ | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | Optional | Optional | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Conga Composer | SAP CPQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
91% Would buy again 128 Answers | 100% Would buy again 8 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
94% Delivers good value for the price 112 Answers | 100% Delivers good value for the price 6 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
91% Happy with the feature set 127 Answers | 88% Happy with the feature set 7 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
93% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 80 Answers | 100% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 5 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
90% Implementation went as expected 95 Answers | 100% Implementation went as expected 8 Answers | |
| Conga Composer | SAP CPQ | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CPQ |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Conga Composer | SAP CPQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | Formstack for Salesforce Score7.1 out of 10 | QuoteWerks Score9.7 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | Formstack for Salesforce Score7.1 out of 10 | QuoteWerks Score9.7 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | Formstack for Salesforce Score7.1 out of 10 | Agentforce Revenue Management Score8.6 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| Conga Composer | SAP CPQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 8.3 | 8.0 |
| Likelihood to Renew | 8.9 | 9.5 |
| Usability | 7.5 | 7.8 |
| Availability | 3.6 | - |
| Performance | 3.6 | - |
| Support Rating | 6.9 | 8.0 |
| Implementation Rating | 3.7 | 10.0 |
| Configurability | 1.8 | - |
| Ease of integration | 2.7 | - |
| Product Scalability | 3.6 | - |
| Professional Services | 2.7 | - |
| Vendor post-sale | 1.8 | - |
| Vendor pre-sale | 3.3 | - |
| Conga Composer | SAP CPQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Likelihood to Renew |
|
|
| Usability |
|
|
| Reliability and Availability |
| No answers on this topic |
| Performance |
| No answers on this topic |
| Support Rating |
|
|
| Implementation Rating |
| No answers on this topic |
| Alternatives Considered |
|
|
| Contract Terms and Pricing Model |
| No answers on this topic |
| Scalability |
| No answers on this topic |
| Professional Services |
| No answers on this topic |
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots | Conga Composer Screenshots | SAP CPQ Screenshots |














