Coveo Qubit vs. Sitecore Digital Experience Platform

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Coveo Qubit
Score 6.0 out of 10
Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
Qubit, now from Coveo (acquired October 2021) uses visitor history data to understand different user segments and serve personalized messages to segments using JavaScript. It is available as either a managed or self-service model. Data is collected using Qubit's own Universal Variable data model, or by integrating the user's existing model via our API. It combines quantitative data with qualitative visitor feedback to give Qubit users the ability to detect areas for optimization. Using…N/A
Sitecore Digital Experience Platform
Score 8.9 out of 10
N/A
The Sitecore Experience Platform (Sitecore XP) is a digital experience platform used to build websites and create customer experiences online. The solution boasts fast content authoring, built-in personalization features, testing and other optimizations, as well as analytics and marketing features.N/A
Pricing
Coveo QubitSitecore Digital Experience Platform
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Coveo QubitSitecore Digital Experience Platform
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Coveo QubitSitecore Digital Experience Platform
Considered Both Products
Coveo Qubit
Chose Coveo Qubit
In my previous company one of the brands was using Optimizely, while the brand I was working for was using Qubit. Qubit proved to be so much more than a multi-variant platform. It was much easier to use - we didn't have to rely on the tech team to implement tests. This way we …
Chose Coveo Qubit
Key points that keep us close to Qubit are its knowledgeable resources, presentation and UI, ease of getting trained, ease of use, low time to market, analytics and reports.
Chose Coveo Qubit
We're using Qubit as a fully managed testing platform, and their account management and level of service we've received from any other contact (technical, support, sales etc) was above any of their competitors. Integration and on-boarding was well done and we feel confident …
Chose Coveo Qubit
Having previously used Maxymiser around 3 years ago, I found their setup to be geared more away from faster moving retail. While tests would be thoroughly researched and built to a high standard, the length of time to turn around a single test was too long. Qubit has allowed us …
Chose Coveo Qubit
As alternatives to Qubit, we considered:
* Optimizely: more limited personalisation options, more expensive to be used across different sites.
* Maxymiser: more expensive.
Chose Coveo Qubit
Qubit definitely beats Optimizely in terms of segmentation and personzalization. Regarding AB testing, both tools are quite similar.
Chose Coveo Qubit
We've chosen Qubit because of the data driven approach, ease of use and the offered support. We like the ability to build some tests externally with the Qubit help.
Chose Coveo Qubit
At the time of taking the product, we found no comparable alternatives. Since then, the product has only grown from strength to strength, so it still does not have any comparable competitors that offer both the technical product and business knowledge that Qubit can. Google …
Chose Coveo Qubit
We previously used Monetate but that was before my time so it's tough to specifically compare. However, I think the fact that we're no longer with Monetate proves that Qubit has been a better partner overall.
Chose Coveo Qubit
Simple usability is a controlled group testing only. Qubit on the other hand allows you to run a test on a live site with traffic ranging from 5% to 95%
Chose Coveo Qubit
Qubit has a nicer UI than Google Tag Manager and offers the A/B testing that GTM doesn't - but for script management, there's not a lot to choose between them.
Chose Coveo Qubit
Qubit has stronger account management and business understanding
Chose Coveo Qubit
By far the most streamline of the programs.
Chose Coveo Qubit
Ability to deliver A/B tests via the UI which means that JavaScript development is not required.
Chose Coveo Qubit
Qubit is probably the most powerful tool that we reviewed. The challenge is that with the power comes a large responsibility to make sure you are doing it right and not having issues. With digital tools, power and complexity seem to go together so you have to make sure that you …
Chose Coveo Qubit
I was not directly involved in the decision-making process but understand that overall functionality, data integration, and UX testing weighed against the cost of the solution were the deciding factors.
Chose Coveo Qubit
Qubit was the first CRO tool we have used, and have stuck with it, even though we've tested other platforms on our other websites. I think it's a testament to Qubit and their staff that they are still implemented on our largest website.
Chose Coveo Qubit
I have not personally used anything similar to Qubit and I was not involved in the decision to use Qubit.
Chose Coveo Qubit
Primarily the strength of Qubit's data layer and therefore the ability to personalise and create seamless user journeys for our different customer segments.
Chose Coveo Qubit
The decision to use Qubit was made based on the capacity to run a 3 month test before committing for a longer term and down to a recommendation from a sister company.
Chose Coveo Qubit
We were not aware of some of the other offerings from Qubit so I think this is an area that could be improved upon. For us, Qubit is seen as an A/B testing tool more than anything else so I would say that the promotion of additional tools offered by Qubit is certainty something …
Chose Coveo Qubit
Our company decided to choose Qubit due to its perceived similarly to optimizely and promise infinite integrations through open tag. Sadly it didn't live up to its promise. The integrations were not integrations as most people would understand it. It was all very manual and you …
Chose Coveo Qubit
We opted for Qubit due to their personalisation features compared to the other market offering, as we felt their Visitor Cloud was a USP in the industry. The Visitor Cloud allows further personalisations, such as social proofs, to complement internal data we have gathered and …
Sitecore Digital Experience Platform
Chose Sitecore Digital Experience Platform
Sitecore DXP stands out from the other products in terms of reusability, faster time to market, it's extensive feature capabilities.
Chose Sitecore Digital Experience Platform
The XM cloud technology stack is ahead of the platforms and its data structure is easier to learn.
Chose Sitecore Digital Experience Platform
Adobe Marketo Engage is a fantastic product for managing campaigns and audience segmentations syncing with Adobe Audience Manager. It also has OOTB connectivity to very popular CRM platforms. Adobe Analytics and Adobe Target are pretty similar to Sitecore CDP/Personalize. Any …
Chose Sitecore Digital Experience Platform
Other tools lack one or the other and fail to provide a comprehensive best experience for everyone - content authors, marketers and developers. Sitecore comes with out of the box authoring host, best content authoring and WYSIWYG editing experience and much more.
Chose Sitecore Digital Experience Platform
Really the only comparable product to Sitecore DXP is Adobe Experience Manager. Both are very well established and robust content management platforms. Products like Contentful and Contentstack are very lightweight and do not have as many built-in features like DXP, so it is …
Chose Sitecore Digital Experience Platform
For one our client, we utilized Sitecore XM Cloud with Sitecore Search to build their websites. Sitecore search help to provide more ai based search experience with suggestions, textual relevance, facets. XM Cloud with Next JS help us to deliver the website for more modern …
Chose Sitecore Digital Experience Platform
Its is simply by far the most advanced system. Using other CMS you will soon be blocked with advanced customizations specially to their back office but Sitecore enables you to do whatever you want and hook into the pipelines and embed your own code/business logic.
Chose Sitecore Digital Experience Platform
I haven't used other DXPs in that great detail to provide a holistic comparison between it and Sitecore. Overall, I feel every product has its pros and cons. With Sitecore, I feel they are always innovating and coming up with new solutions to help the partners deliver the best …
Chose Sitecore Digital Experience Platform
Adobe Experience Manager, Acquia Digital Experience Platform, Optimizely Content Management System, WordPress and Kentico Xperience
Chose Sitecore Digital Experience Platform
We experienced issues with this CMS and thus switched from Sitecore Experience Platform to AEM and both of them have their own pro and cons.
While Sitecore Experience Platform provides flexibility to copy properties from one page to other, AEM doesnot allow that.. we need to …
Chose Sitecore Digital Experience Platform
The main reason to use Sitecore Experience Manager is if you want to develop something completely custom. Sitecore is best suited for very robust, multi-page websites. If you need to build out a website that supports multiple product lines, Sitecore could be a good option.
Chose Sitecore Digital Experience Platform
All of these platforms have their pros and cons. Selecting the best fit is a matter aligning corporate need vs features provided. Have a .NET shop with an advanced marketing team looking to push UX forward and willing to pay a premium, then Sitecore may be the right fit. …
Chose Sitecore Digital Experience Platform
After evaluating OpenText, we found that Sitecore has stronger capabilities to utilize the content for personalization and contextual marketing. We also favored Sitecore's user permissions, roles, and content creation processes out of the box.
Chose Sitecore Digital Experience Platform
Sitecore was evaluated by our practice next to two other Content management systems 4 years ago. Sitecore scored the highest following a series of questions related to product stability, scalability, ease of use, and a host of other categories.
Chose Sitecore Digital Experience Platform
WordPress and Wix are great solutions for a small business or a solopreneur who's just looking to get a simple website up and running. For larger businesses with more robust content, I think Sitecore offers a bit more flexibility. Wix and Wordpress are both really simple to get …
Chose Sitecore Digital Experience Platform
Sitecore provides and enterprise grade CMS over Wordpress and allow us to do the customization we need for our unique environment. Optimizely might be better for AB testing.
Chose Sitecore Digital Experience Platform
Wordpress is easier than Sitecore. Drupal has more functionality and more support. Joomla also has more support.
Chose Sitecore Digital Experience Platform
Sitefinity is improving but at the time of decision making it had nothing that could compare with the A/B testing and personalisation features that Sitecore offers. This was a key differentiator and ultimately ensured Sitecore was purchased. Wordpress isn't really comparable …
Chose Sitecore Digital Experience Platform
Launchrock, Webdam, eZ, crownpeak, SignalMind
Chose Sitecore Digital Experience Platform
Based on my perspective these are the main reasons for choosing Sitecore over others.
  • It is a one-stop shop for all customer engagement platforms with a lot of developer communities over the web.
  • It is a .NET based platform as there are a lot of .Net developers in the market.
Chose Sitecore Digital Experience Platform
The decision to select Sitecore was not ultimately mine, but the fact that we were able to leverage in-house Microsoft .Net (C#) experience on a platform that had a library of extensions, but also allowed us to customize and keep private our confidential IP has been a big help. …
Chose Sitecore Digital Experience Platform
Of all the competitors listed above, Sitecore owned, by far, the best combination of power, easy-of-use, and extensibility. It easily outperformed the other paid-for CMS systems. Its power is especially noticeable in its ability to handle very complex workflows, security …
Chose Sitecore Digital Experience Platform
Even though sitecore is not an open source program it's offering was valuable enough to make us choose it.
Chose Sitecore Digital Experience Platform
I have used an in-house CMS and the Amaxus CMS. Sitecore is a great balance of these two. The in-house CMS was VERY user friendly, for the least technical client. It showed the actual page you were editing and allowed you to basically edit the text on the page, no HTML …
Chose Sitecore Digital Experience Platform
Every product has a cost window it fits in. Umbraco is perfect for small to mid-enterprise implementations. However Sitecore is more stable from a developement standpoint.
Features
Coveo QubitSitecore Digital Experience Platform
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
Coveo Qubit
-
Ratings
Sitecore Digital Experience Platform
9.8
Ratings
19% above category average
Role-based user permissions00 Ratings9.80 Ratings
Platform & Infrastructure
Comparison of Platform & Infrastructure features of Product A and Product B
Coveo Qubit
-
Ratings
Sitecore Digital Experience Platform
9.7
Ratings
18% above category average
API00 Ratings9.90 Ratings
Internationalization / multi-language00 Ratings9.50 Ratings
Web Content Creation
Comparison of Web Content Creation features of Product A and Product B
Coveo Qubit
-
Ratings
Sitecore Digital Experience Platform
8.9
Ratings
21% above category average
WYSIWYG editor00 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Code quality / cleanliness00 Ratings8.50 Ratings
Admin section00 Ratings8.80 Ratings
Page templates00 Ratings9.40 Ratings
Library of website themes00 Ratings8.40 Ratings
Mobile optimization / responsive design00 Ratings8.90 Ratings
Publishing workflow00 Ratings9.30 Ratings
Form generator00 Ratings9.40 Ratings
Web Content Management
Comparison of Web Content Management features of Product A and Product B
Coveo Qubit
-
Ratings
Sitecore Digital Experience Platform
9.2
Ratings
31% above category average
Content taxonomy00 Ratings9.40 Ratings
SEO support00 Ratings9.30 Ratings
Bulk management00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Availability / breadth of extensions00 Ratings8.60 Ratings
Community / comment management00 Ratings9.60 Ratings
Results and Analysis
Comparison of Results and Analysis features of Product A and Product B
Coveo Qubit
-
Ratings
Sitecore Digital Experience Platform
7.5
Ratings
6% below category average
Conversion tracking00 Ratings7.70 Ratings
Test reporting00 Ratings7.50 Ratings
Funnel Analysis00 Ratings7.20 Ratings
User Segmentation00 Ratings7.50 Ratings
Digital Experience Platform
Comparison of Digital Experience Platform features of Product A and Product B
Coveo Qubit
-
Ratings
Sitecore Digital Experience Platform
8.1
Ratings
6% below category average
Campaign management00 Ratings7.80 Ratings
Cloud enablement00 Ratings8.40 Ratings
Content aggregation00 Ratings8.30 Ratings
Content classification00 Ratings8.30 Ratings
Multi-channel content personalization00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Customer data analytics00 Ratings7.50 Ratings
DXP Third-Party Integrations00 Ratings7.60 Ratings
Multi-website management00 Ratings8.60 Ratings
Digital asset management00 Ratings8.40 Ratings
Editorial workflows and task management00 Ratings8.10 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Coveo QubitSitecore Digital Experience Platform
Small Businesses
Bloomreach
Bloomreach
Score 9.1 out of 10
Bloomreach
Bloomreach
Score 9.1 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Dynamic Yield
Dynamic Yield
Score 9.0 out of 10
RWS Tridion Sites
RWS Tridion Sites
Score 9.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Dynamic Yield
Dynamic Yield
Score 9.0 out of 10
RWS Tridion Sites
RWS Tridion Sites
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Coveo QubitSitecore Digital Experience Platform
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(0 ratings)
9.4
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
8.1
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
Usability
7.1
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Availability
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
7.3
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
6.8
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
In-Person Training
8.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
7.4
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
9.1
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
8.7
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
7.6
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Coveo QubitSitecore Digital Experience Platform
Likelihood to Recommend
Coveo Qubit is a very helpful platform mainly for organizations that need to provide a solid business model before carrying out any implementation or new functionality. In addition, it is a very good tool to generate changes and show different content to different types of clients, with their personalization and segmentation criteria.It is ideal for simultaneous testing and customization, only one of these activities individually is not recommended.
Read full review
Having worked with other DXP platforms, I find Sitecore to be the most suitable for enterprise-level clients. The platform is highly flexible - both customizable and extendable - making it adaptable to any customer needs or requirements. The platform focuses on the success of both marketing and technical teams, which I don't see on other platforms.
Read full review
Pros
  • The testing platform itself is continually evolving. This means that we are always able to try new ideas as well as quickly and efficiently put others into practice.
  • The beta programme and the additional functionality products are both exciting to see as well as ensuring we can cherry pick the functionality we need. This means that we don't end up paying for functionality we don't need
Read full review
  • Customer Profiles - the ability to identify key features on the site and flag those interactions to tie customer visits back to specific persona types.
  • Lead Scoring - the ability to establish a funnel for leads and use this funnel to assign a score or qualification within the sales funnel.
  • Personalization - the ability to tailor experiences to unique customer segments based on their needs, identifiying and optimizing the experience in real-time.
Read full review
Cons
  • Some of the reporting within Qubit has been overly simplified in the past, a point they are continually addressing.
  • At times the syntax of experience (test) creation can be specific to Qubit and so there is a slight learning curve for developers.
  • Unless developers have much time to allocate to creating tests in Qubit, marketers may potentially find simple tests limited. I would recommend having someone in-house as we do.
Read full review
  • Sitecore is complicated. Software developers need (costly) training to get the most value out of it and business users do not find it intuitive to use. Concepts like the content tree can be difficult for the business users to grasp.
  • Despite everything being possible in Sitecore, virtually nothing comes out of the box - you need to develop every component and do so within a defined process and framework, which can be a fairly big development overhead.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Qubit helps out immensely and lays out in plain English the profitability of each of our A-B tests. Say Qubit has provided us overall with a 5% profit increase this year (that is a completely arbitrary figure for illustration only), then if we didn't renew it could be seen as us taking a 5% loss as Qubit wouldn't be there. The results of our tests are showing no slowing down and as Qubit and Toast grow to understand each other better we can only see our performance getting better as the years go on.
Read full review
Sitecore has proven that it can deliver on its promise of a robust, reliable enterprise CMS solution with plenty of features. Also, they keep updating it with more and better features. Now that we are highly trained on it we have started on getting the most out of it and we plan to keep doing more of that in the future.
Read full review
Usability
Overall navigation on Qubit is very user friendly and requires a minimal training to be up and running. Be it reviewing existing experiences or setting up new experiences, the process is pretty simple for business user. Add some basic development skills to your kitty, you can do magic with Qubit and make your website do wonders!
Read full review
Once you learn how to use the platform and can put a solid strategy in place to manage it long-term, it becomes a lot easier to use. The tricky part is working with resources who are familiar with the platform to navigate some of the common implementation and configuration pitfalls. Although Sitecore has worked very hard to overcome some of these from their earlier product versions by creating wizards and improving their support documentation, at the end of the day it is still a very complex and powerful system that needs to be implemented carefully in order to foster the best possible user experience for authors. So it could be rated very usable or not usable at all based on how much planning took place and the quality of the implementation.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
I would say that the Qubit account managers are always available for any request. We have a lot of different promotions that could always do with last minute optimizing or changes and Qubit can be relied on to get this changes up and running in an impressive amount of time, so that we don't need to patch live or wait for the next IT sprint. Invaluable to our business.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Performance
Technology is good for A/B testing and personalisation - allowing any team with a dedicated developer to create test relatively easily and to report/analyse them in a fair amount of details. Some advanced features, especially on the set up of test cells, are dearly missing. Unfortunately, new features are often not free of bugs... Also, support is sub-par, which means new features are realised without proper documentation, example or training (but of our Qubit counterparts and internally).
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Qubit are supportive and flexible in providing support. They are happy working out of usual hours, even on weekends and if I have any doubts about the set up of an experience they’re quick to respond and willing to check my work. On particularly big revenue days they monitor our account and they’re quick to identify and problem solve any issues.
Read full review
1. Customized software development & maintenance. 2. Technology Consulting - Consulting-based services for technology solutions data engineering or cloud solutions. 3. Used for tapping into multiple data sources such as CRM and marketing automation systems and, creating automated data extracts with a high-end visual representation of data. 4. Implemented for scheduling an existing report to automatically refresh and be delivered to specific users at a specific regular interval.
Read full review
In-Person Training
The training was great, but would be great to have a script or PDF with some explanations of the qubit JS layer. Without the script you can just try to learn on your own, so the training is not as powerfull as it could be. On the other hand - would be great to have training related to reading statistics or personalisation.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Online Training
No answers on this topic
Sitecore captures and remembers every single interaction your customers and prospects have in any part of the system, allowing you to build comprehensive, ever-learning profiles of each individual. From email marketing, to social media, to online shopping, Sitecore remembers where each interaction left off so you can automatically continue the conversation. Sitecore helps you manage your content for each and every experience your customers enjoy. Customize what content you want and the system will take care of how it's displayed.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Implementation couldn't be easier. All we needed to do was insert the tag. (easy) and set up the data layer. (dev required) This was pretty smooth in comparison to some of the other tools we use on our site, and was done in less than a day. Note : Data needs to be collected for a set period of time before you can accurately rely on the data that you are receiving. This is normal though with everyone else that we have used
Read full review
We implemented Sitecore on an Agile project team, which worked very well. We worked closely with the stakeholders for each feature and all features and user stories were prioritized outside of the development team. Anyone trying to implement a website of this magnitude should definitely attempt to do so in as much an Agile fashion as possible.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
We're using Qubit as a fully managed testing platform, and their account management and level of service we've received from any other contact (technical, support, sales etc) was above any of their competitors. Integration and on-boarding was well done and we feel confident that the campaigns are developed and tested thoroughly.
Read full review
Adobe Marketo Engage is a fantastic product for managing campaigns and audience segmentations syncing with Adobe Audience Manager. It also has OOTB connectivity to very popular CRM platforms. Adobe Analytics and Adobe Target are pretty similar to Sitecore CDP/Personalize. Any custom/extension implementation required in the Adobe space has the same complexity as Sitecore.
Read full review
Scalability
Our requirements change throughout the year like most E Commerce retailers. At Christmas and Peak we're dealing with around ten times the usual traffic on the site. Qubit had no problems with this at all, tests continued to fire, and stats were still reported accurately. I don't think that it is the most server intensive .js anyway, but we have seen no issues at all.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • Faster recognition of customer needs - finding out exactly what customers are doing when they come on site.
  • Assessment of online assets for effectiveness and improvements - facilitated the analysis of 500 online feedback questionnaires for a campaign.
  • Mapping out lead conversion and helping identify opportunities to improve it.
Read full review
  • Headless capabilities have enabled us to use our favorite frontend framework for rapid development and faster feature rollouts.
  • Our team's productivity have improved significantly and we have no hassle to deploy new features.
  • We are able to extend the feature set as per our own needs which gives us great flexibility and competitive advantage.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Coveo Qubit Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Qubit Pro segments metrics page, showing the key metrics and activity for an audience segment.Screenshot of Segments overview page in Qubit Pro, showing a list of user-created audience segments.Screenshot of Selecting between the different types of experience in Qubit Pro to create a new personalization.Screenshot of Using a Qubit Pro template to create a Visitor Pulse Survey to gather user information.