DISCO is a legal technology company that applies artificial intelligence and cloud computing to legal problems to help lawyers and legal teams improve outcomes for their clients. The vendor states corporate legal departments, law firms, and government agencies around the world use DISCO for ediscovery, case management, compliance, disputes, and investigations. In addition to its technology solutions, DISCO offers services to help legal teams manage ediscovery from anywhere at any…
N/A
Logikcull
Score 9.1 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
Data is often not information, but noise. It’s multiplying and it’s all discoverable. So Logikcull, from Reveal, is designed to automatically organize and cull the noise. This is to help legal & IT teams quickly find and preserve the signal, and meet their deadlines. Logikcull boasts users among than 1500 in-house legal teams, law firms and government organizations. Since the August 2023 acquisition, Logikcull is a Reveal technology.
N/A
Relativity
Score 9.4 out of 10
N/A
Relativity (formerly kCura) is a data e-discovery solution supporting litigation, government inquires, internal investigations and data governance policies within a secure cloud platform, from the company of the same name headquartered in Chicago.
N/A
Pricing
DISCO Ediscovery
Logikcull
Relativity
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
DISCO Ediscovery
Logikcull
Relativity
Free Trial
No
Yes
No
Free/Freemium Version
Yes
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Yes
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
DISCO’s all-inclusive flat-rate per-GB pricing is transparent and predictable, making it easy to accurately budget for any matter. Pricing automatically includes ingestion, processing, early case assessment, and production. In addition, DISCO does not charge for user licenses, meaning customers can add or remove user licenses based on the need of the case, not on the constraints of the budget. When it comes to managed review, DISCO guarantees every matter will come in on time and on budget.
Logikcull's pay-as-you-go GB pricing is month-to-month. All plans come with unlimited 24/7/365 support and unlimited users. Storage- and matter-based subscriptions with bulk discounts are available.
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
DISCO Ediscovery
Logikcull
Relativity
Considered Multiple Products
DISCO Ediscovery
Verified User
Professional
Chose DISCO Ediscovery
I have used other "legacy" document review platforms such as Relativity and Concordance, and there is simply no comparison between them and DISCO. DISCO is faster, leaner, more efficient, more powerful, more flexible, and more user-friendly, by miles and miles. My firm chooses …
Logikcull has hidden fees - their pricing is not as predictable as they represent. eDiscovery Point has major flaws in its production utility - generating overlapping images, creating jagged edges on produced documents, etc. We also use Everlaw which is proving to be on par …
DISCO is cheaper, faster, and easier to use than the competitors. Relativity is expensive, slow, and take a long time to process documents for production. Nextpoint, while speedy, lacks the ease of use and customer service that DISCO provides. And Concordance is simply …
Speed is better. DISCO is more user-friendly. Generally, I prefer DISCO in terms of efficiency, and that's dramatically helpful in investigations. The one advantage Relativity has is that the major providers often use it. Our clients are comfortable with that software - so …
DISCO is more nimble and user-friendly than any of the competitor software I have used in the past. DISCO has its limitations with large projects, for which I still prefer Relativity, but for small to medium projects, DISCO cannot be beaten right now.
I have used a few others as well. DISCO is better than all of them. Full stop. Maybe if you have a big law case, with dozens of review teams, and a client willing to pay thousands to organize the data, then maybe you could get more use out of a Relativity type platform. But …
DISCO kills Relativity in my mind. the speed, ease of use, modern and user-friendly interface, etc., etc. hands down. do not use Relativity if you can use disco. i haven't used concordance in ages because it was terrible than so I can only assume it's still terrible.
This is what I told the sales rep for Relativity and Lumix: "DISCO Ediscovery is much more user-friendly, faster, accurate, and… well, just everything else pales in comparison, is STILL an understatement – it was a collective decision and unanimous. We will stay with DISCO …
Verified User
Professional
Chose DISCO Ediscovery
We've used Relativity, Xera, and a few others I'm forgetting. I strongly dislike Relativity when I have to use it now that I've been using DISCO Ediscovery.
I believe Relativity had greater functionality for more advanced users, but it's more complicated nature caused more mistakes among users who lacked experience.
I found DISCO to be easier to use than ViewPoint and Relativity. However, my use of this platform was strictly reviewing and coding. I didn't do any productions or upload documents, so I cannot attest to the functionality of DISCO as compared to the other two.
DISCO Ediscovery is easier to learn, more intuitive to use, and seems to give more consistent results. The interface is quite easy to use and gives a lot of information that aids in document review. The threading and family functions are extremely helpful
DISCO is more user friendly, easier to search, and provides superior methods of tagging and viewing documents (and their attachments). Searching documents for specific terms sound simple, and DISCO in fact makes it simple compared to its competitors. But Disco is ultimately …
DISCO hands down surpasses the other two discovery platforms that I have worked with. Speed, functionality, and technical support are key factors in that. Document review becomes manageable even to a person new to electronic document review platforms.
Additional platforms reviewed are: Xera, Axcelerate, Summation and Concordance.
Honestly, DISCO blows them out of the water when it comes to speed and interface. We selected DISCO because of its speed, ease of use and transparent cost (no user fees and no data expansion costs). …
When we evaluated our long-term litigation support solution, we looked at all of the eDiscovery tools on the market. That included looking at in-house solutions, hosted solutions and cloud-based solutions. For our needs, the in-house solution seemed to be the best fit. As such, …
Again, specifically for Slack JSON parsing, I think Logikcull's handling of the data is the best. It handles Thread messages very nicely and things like "code snippets" display much like they do in Slack itself. I have not found a Slack JSON parser that is better.
Logikcull is highly customizable and adaptable. You can upload a wide variety of load files, establish custom issue tags, and export your data with any number of metadata fields and load file templates. This allows us to meet the needs not only of our clients but also the …
It's user-friendly and very intuitive. It has many capabilities that are out of the box, and it does not need to do any workaround. Also, there are many ways to do the same thing which is great when we are in a rush and how a user learns. Attorneys are loving the Case Builder function. I am happy that we can streamline processes and get to do more of what we love to do versus being bogged down by tedious steps.
Logikcull is a fabulous tool for the firms that do not have a dedicated Litigation Support department. They offer a tool that is very simple and easy to use. You do not need to be highly tech-savvy to use it. And their support team is absolutely fabulous.
In cases involving massive datasets (I.e. regulatory investigations, cross-border litigation), Relativity's powerful search, deduplication, and technology-assisted review features enable fast, accurate identification of relevant documents. For example, we used it in a front-running investigation involving a large asset management firm, where Relativity streamlined data review across multiple custodians. There are multiple use case available.
Review Stages are used by our Experts with direct access, which eliminates the need to create folders on our servers, download to flash drives, or having to upload documents and create links in the cloud
It ingests data robustly, allowing the user to set a variety of ingestion rules.
It provides an interface for attorney review that significantly reduces user training.
It has robust user features to enhance the review and tag function of an attorney review team.
There are too many wonderful export features to list, but suffice it to say very robust.
Support is at the platinum level with real-time chat interface with REAL tech types who can solve issues, without going through a script
The company obviously invests heavily in development and seems to always be on the industry edge of simply making things better, faster, more efficient, and cost-effective.
I would like to have an easier way to identify the last email in a string that includes all the attachments in the string
Other areas I have contacted Logikcull about I have been pleasantly surprised to find out that either there had been an update that solved my issue or one was on the way.
Very powerful tool, but does require a high level of expertise and head count to administer the product.
If hosting yourself, requires investment in servers and ideally is housed in a data center
Providers need to pay kCura a monthly user license fee for every user who has access to the tool. Providers can purchase blocks of users, but with a large amount of users on a case, it's cost that some external clients are not thrilled about
I've been able to go from never using this type of software before, to confidently using it on an everyday basis, and the learning curve was not steep at all.
The platform and user interface are very intuitive and easy to use. Built-in features obviously come from a team that knows the industry, and it is customizable for all the odd uses, and individual issues we have with each project. I’ve been able to manage things incredibly easily without the use of third-party vendors, and when I hit a snag, the support team is easy to contact and quick to resolve issues.
Relativity is a well established tool that continues to evolve and look for ways to improve. Particular focus on Australian workflows is very promising for us and appreciated. There is a lot of scope for improvement in the processing and PDF workflows but it is great to see Relativity being proactive in those areas
The Support Team is very responsive. They offer lots of convenient training sessions in either a group or individual setting. If you have a problem or can't figure out how to do something in Logikcull, they are easy to reach and will easily walk you through every step of the process.
I have used proprietary in-house software at a litigation management firm. The in-house software allowed for documents to be processed and coded in order for the end-user to run a report that met the end-users parameters. DISCO allows for documents to be ingested, and for those ingested documents to be divided into review stages. The reports that DISCO allows the end-user to run are far superior to end-user reports of other in-house systems
Again, specifically for Slack JSON parsing, I think Logikcull's handling of the data is the best. It handles Thread messages very nicely and things like "code snippets" display much like they do in Slack itself. I have not found a Slack JSON parser that is better.
Relativity contains all the features together in a single platform. And most of all other than Brainspace none of the other tools have document review capability as good as Relativity has.
One of the issues we had with using Logikcull was the expense. It was difficult for our attorneys to pass along the hard copy expense of paying for the service based on the types of clients we have. Logikcull was very good at trying to help us with this challenge, but in the end, we found that our attorneys were hesitant to use the product because of the fear that there would be a high hard-cost expense that the client would not pay. This was one of the primary reasons we stopped using it. Our firm has the technical personnel and equipment to maintain an eDiscovery platform in-house, so the investment to bring in another product was, for our firm, a better solution for the long run.
As we were developing our litigation support department, Logikcull was the perfect product for us. It allowed us to provide for our attorneys a review platform when they had the cases that could not be managed without one but also gave us the simplicity we needed as we learned how to provide litigation support services to our legal teams.