Drupal is a free, open-source content management system written in PHP that competes primarily with Joomla and Plone. The standard release of Drupal, known as Drupal core, contains basic features such as account and menu management, RSS feeds, page layout customization, and system administration.
N/A
Microsoft Dynamics GP
Score 5.2 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft Dynamics GP is an ERP software with accounting capabilities. It includes various packs for customizability and features tailored to specific industries’ needs. GP is offered as a perpetual license or subscription.
N/A
Webflow
Score 8.7 out of 10
N/A
Webflow is a Website Experience Platform for modern marketing teams, used to visually build, manage, and optimize websites that offer both the consumer experience teams expect and enterprise-grade performance and scale.
$18
per month
Pricing
Drupal
Microsoft Dynamics GP
Webflow
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Basic
$18
per month
CMS
$29
per month
Ecommerce - Standard
$42
per month
Business
$49
per month
Ecommerce - Plus
$84
per month
Ecommerce - Advanced
$235
per month
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Drupal
Microsoft Dynamics GP
Webflow
Free Trial
No
No
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Yes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
Up to a 22% discount available for annual pricing.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Drupal
Microsoft Dynamics GP
Webflow
Features
Drupal
Microsoft Dynamics GP
Webflow
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
Drupal
8.1
74 Ratings
1% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics GP
7.0
40 Ratings
16% below category average
Webflow
7.8
16 Ratings
5% below category average
Role-based user permissions
8.174 Ratings
8.240 Ratings
7.816 Ratings
Single sign-on capability
00 Ratings
5.932 Ratings
00 Ratings
Platform & Infrastructure
Comparison of Platform & Infrastructure features of Product A and Product B
Drupal
7.6
69 Ratings
2% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Webflow
8.2
13 Ratings
6% above category average
API
7.264 Ratings
00 Ratings
8.113 Ratings
Internationalization / multi-language
8.160 Ratings
00 Ratings
8.311 Ratings
Web Content Creation
Comparison of Web Content Creation features of Product A and Product B
Drupal
6.5
78 Ratings
18% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Webflow
8.1
19 Ratings
4% above category average
WYSIWYG editor
6.171 Ratings
00 Ratings
8.119 Ratings
Code quality / cleanliness
8.175 Ratings
00 Ratings
8.518 Ratings
Admin section
6.878 Ratings
00 Ratings
6.919 Ratings
Page templates
5.577 Ratings
00 Ratings
8.318 Ratings
Library of website themes
5.468 Ratings
00 Ratings
8.315 Ratings
Mobile optimization / responsive design
6.572 Ratings
00 Ratings
9.519 Ratings
Publishing workflow
6.876 Ratings
00 Ratings
8.418 Ratings
Form generator
6.372 Ratings
00 Ratings
7.015 Ratings
Web Content Management
Comparison of Web Content Management features of Product A and Product B
Drupal
6.5
77 Ratings
13% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Webflow
7.4
19 Ratings
1% below category average
Content taxonomy
6.971 Ratings
00 Ratings
7.114 Ratings
SEO support
6.272 Ratings
00 Ratings
8.516 Ratings
Bulk management
6.367 Ratings
00 Ratings
6.516 Ratings
Availability / breadth of extensions
6.570 Ratings
00 Ratings
7.317 Ratings
Community / comment management
6.569 Ratings
00 Ratings
7.513 Ratings
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
Drupal
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics GP
6.4
20 Ratings
17% below category average
Webflow
-
Ratings
Pay calculation
00 Ratings
6.319 Ratings
00 Ratings
Benefit plan administration
00 Ratings
5.915 Ratings
00 Ratings
Direct deposit files
00 Ratings
7.518 Ratings
00 Ratings
Salary revision and increment management
00 Ratings
6.517 Ratings
00 Ratings
Reimbursement management
00 Ratings
6.016 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Product A and Product B
Drupal
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics GP
4.3
27 Ratings
55% below category average
Webflow
-
Ratings
API for custom integration
00 Ratings
2.526 Ratings
00 Ratings
Plug-ins
00 Ratings
6.021 Ratings
00 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Drupal
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics GP
5.4
41 Ratings
36% below category average
Webflow
-
Ratings
Dashboards
00 Ratings
3.529 Ratings
00 Ratings
Standard reports
00 Ratings
6.239 Ratings
00 Ratings
Custom reports
00 Ratings
6.539 Ratings
00 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Product A and Product B
Drupal
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics GP
5.1
48 Ratings
39% below category average
Webflow
-
Ratings
Accounts payable
00 Ratings
6.445 Ratings
00 Ratings
Accounts receivable
00 Ratings
5.936 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cash management
00 Ratings
6.436 Ratings
00 Ratings
Bank reconciliation
00 Ratings
5.741 Ratings
00 Ratings
Expense management
00 Ratings
4.531 Ratings
00 Ratings
Time tracking
00 Ratings
8.014 Ratings
00 Ratings
Fixed asset management
00 Ratings
4.628 Ratings
00 Ratings
Multi-currency support
00 Ratings
2.919 Ratings
00 Ratings
Multi-division support
00 Ratings
3.026 Ratings
00 Ratings
Regulations compliance
00 Ratings
3.314 Ratings
00 Ratings
Electronic tax filing
00 Ratings
9.012 Ratings
00 Ratings
Self-service portal
00 Ratings
7.012 Ratings
00 Ratings
Global Financial Support
00 Ratings
6.07 Ratings
00 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers
00 Ratings
4.721 Ratings
00 Ratings
Intercompany Accounting
00 Ratings
3.918 Ratings
00 Ratings
Localizations
00 Ratings
4.513 Ratings
00 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations
00 Ratings
4.726 Ratings
00 Ratings
Enterprise Accounting
00 Ratings
2.916 Ratings
00 Ratings
Configurable Accounting
00 Ratings
4.117 Ratings
00 Ratings
Centralized Rules Framework
00 Ratings
3.814 Ratings
00 Ratings
Standardized Processes
00 Ratings
6.219 Ratings
00 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Product A and Product B
Drupal
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics GP
4.6
26 Ratings
46% below category average
Webflow
-
Ratings
Inventory tracking
00 Ratings
6.324 Ratings
00 Ratings
Automatic reordering
00 Ratings
1.013 Ratings
00 Ratings
Location management
00 Ratings
4.018 Ratings
00 Ratings
Manufacturing module
00 Ratings
4.615 Ratings
00 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Product A and Product B
If you want to set up a basic Not For Profit (NFP) Membership system and content base, Word Press is easier than Drupal. However, if you have specific needs that require a fair bit of customisation then Drupal is the best CRM available. If the webmaster is confident with PHP and SQL, Drupal allows a lot of creativity.
Microsoft Dynamics GP is well-suited for our environment, as we pay a diverse group of employees, including on-the-road drivers, shop employees (some in other locations), and office employees. It easily tracks time off, taxes, pay, etc. The reporting allows us to verify with our drivers how they are paid each week, whether it be through mileage or stop-offs.
Since the purpose in my case is to build a small professional looking site to present project outcomes and other research, I can create custom fields and design experimentations. Webflow builds sites that are super professional, with many amazing templates that don't look cheap. Additionally, I can test responsive layouts. Apart from this, I used 1-2 static pages to illustrate key findings for example what a multilingual site could look like with screenshots without needing CMS in free version, which are all the valuable skills to acquire. Compared to WordPress, Webflow is expensive with limited free features, although it has really cool additional features that will make the site I build stand out.
Great Plains started as back office/accounting, and that is still it's strong suit.
SQL and the GP programming language, Dexterity, provide a robust, scalable, and stable platform with well documented maintenance and repair procedures. Relatively easy to manage, tune, and support.
Microsoft support for GP verges on "particularly well". Doesn't quite get there but good enough once you know what you're doing
Strong partner network, including the GP User Group (GPUG)
Saves time- because I don't have to do double entry of content.
It saves money. I like that it is an all-in-one system, so I don't have to host elsewhere.
Flexibility - Webflow provides me with a lot of flexibility in my webpage design, allowing me to adjust pages as needed, depending on the content types.
This is not an easy CMS to work with if you don't have a good understanding of website development. It isn't "plug-and-play" like Wordpress or Shopify.
Over time, doing major updates to the system can be taxing, especially if you aren't well-versed enough in doing system updates in line with your "child" theme and code.
The CMS can become somewhat cumbersome with server resources if not carefully optimized while you build and customize it to your liking.
With respect to the allocations, once the expense is entered into the allocation account, you lose the ability to run any detail on just the total of the expense. It would be nice if you could run a trial balance on the allocation accounts the same way you can with regular accounts.
I've always thought security set up could be a bit simpler. It actually has gotten better through the years. Specifically, with eight separate entities, it would be nice to have a "master" setup where you could call up one group entity, assign the users rights, and then be finished. Currently, whenever I have a new user, I have to call up each individual entity and select all of the features I want the user to have. That means I have to do eight steps for each user.
Brand recognition is still behind WordPress, which can make it a challenging sell for clients looking to play it safe in their CMS decision.
The CMS is ideal for smaller datasets, but higher content sites introduce some minor challenges.
Alignment between designers and developers is key prior to implementation. The flexibility of the platform requires careful planning to avoid over-engineering.
The time and money invested into this platform were too great to discontinue it at this point. I'm sure it will be in use for a while. We have also spent time training many employees how to use it. All of these things add up to quite an investment in the product. Lastly, it basically fulfills what we need our intranet site to do.
Due the economic challenges that Puerto Rico is having, the company has had to merge some companies in order to be more efficient. It has been easy in GP to process those merges, even thought we had to spend days to accomplish that the process was smooth and accurate. In addition we were able to streamline the purchasing and sales process and the organization is confident to keep renewing GP for the future versions.
As a team, we found Drupal to be highly customizable and flexible, allowing our development team to go to great lengths to develop desired functionalities. It can be used as a solution for all types of web projects. It comes with a robust admin interface that provides greater flexibility once the user gets acquainted with the system.
Though it is a basic accounting package, I believe some users do not find the old style menus and navigation options intuitive. There is also a great lack of training resources in the market, so users have to learn the product without guidance a lot, resulting in inefficient workflows and misuse or misunderstanding of many features.
Webflow is very easy for a beginner to get started with and achieve good results, but to achieve an expert level of understanding requires experience and some web development knowledge. HTML5, CSS3 and JavaScript knowledge aren't required to use Webflow, but an expert will know BEM class naming patterns, be able to create reusable elements and design systems, and add 3rd party integrations that require custom code.
Drupal itself does not tend to have bugs that cause sporadic outages. When deployed on a well-configured LAMP stack, deployment and maintenance problems are minimal, and in general no exotic tuning or configuration is required. For highest uptime, putting a caching proxy like Varnish in front of Drupal (or a CDN that supports dynamic applications).
In my experience, their customer service is an absolute joke, I tried reaching out to them they took forever. I had to keep following up with them as if they never received it in the first place. It’s a new platform, so guidance is needed. Tried the university they offer, in my opinion, it is completely useless, I would just completely move on from this website.
Drupal page loads can be slow, as a great many database calls may be required to generate a page. It is highly recommended to use caching systems, both built-in and external to lessen such database loads and improve performance. I haven't had any problems with behind-the-scenes integrations with external systems.
In my opinion, it is horrible, the rendering takes forever. I have the newest MacBook and the platform will still lag and slow down on me. I’m not a developer, I am a designer which makes it worst because I am using the features they are providing not extra coding features. In my opinion, it is a horrible platform really, stay away.
As noted earlier, the support of the community can be rather variable, with some modules attracting more attraction and action in their issue queues, but overall, the development community for Drupal is second to none. It probably the single greatest aspect of being involved in this open-source project.
I haven't had to engage them from a support perspective; however, there is a considerable user community for tips/ideas/troubleshooting and the like. I believe the Pro plan supports additional resources but we didn't find that the cost justified the outcome. Overall the need for support has been relatively minor.
I was part of the team that conducted the training. Our training was fine, but we could have been better informed on Drupal before we started providing it. If we did not have answers to tough questions, we had more technical staff we could consult with. We did provide hands-on practice time for the learners, which I would always recommend. That is where the best learning occurred.
The on-line training was not as ideal as the face-to-face training. It was done remotely and only allowed for the trainers to present information to the learners and demonstrate the platform online. There was not a good way to allow for the learners to practice, ask questions and have them answered all in the same session.
Plan ahead as much you can. You really need to know how to build what you want with the modules available to you, or that you might need to code yourself, in order to make the best use of Drupal. I recommend you analyze the most technically difficult workflows and other aspects of your implementation, and try building some test versions of those first. Get feedback from stakeholders early and often, because you can easily find yourself in a situation where your implementation does 90% of what you want, but, due to something you didn't plan for, foresee, or know about, there's no feasible way to get past the last 10%
Basically the challenge with this implementation was the Business Portal, too many errors and even the aplication is up and running the users are still having issues. We will start planning the migraton to GP 2015 soon.
Drupal can be more complex to learn, but it offers a much wider range of applications. Drupal’s front and backend can be customized from design to functionality to allow for a wide range of uses. If someone wants to create something more complex than a simple site or blog, Drupal can be an amazing asset to have at hand.
I come from a strong background of using SAP. SAP doesn't have the flexibility of GP, an example would be SAP doesn't allow core mods, if they catch you, you lose support. Microsoft doesn't really care about mods, but they will be quick to have the vendor you used support your issue if it is caused by those mods. With SAP your company adapts to the software, where with GP you adapt the software to you.
A lot more design control and easier to create a custom site, and then also to scale that site going forward. There's a lot about WordPress I miss, though, when it comes to managing a blog—user permissions, SEO control, edit HTML version of posts.
Drupal is well known to be scalable, although it requires solid knowledge of MySQL best practices, caching mechanisms, and other server-level best practices. I have never personally dealt with an especially large site, so I can speak well to the issues associated with Drupal scaling.
I feel it doesn’t perform the way it’s supposed to and it doesn’t have any beneficial factors to it. In my opinion, there is no reason to use a platform like this when Wix and Shopify, and WordPress exist. I believe Webflow is a platform that shouldn’t exist and it’s only popular because of the hype it received. I tried it and hate it completely.
Microsoft Dynamics GP allows my clients to move from a paper or spreadsheet based company to an integrated, electronic, streamlined business. I love being able to help clients gain efficiencies through the use of Microsoft Dynamics GP.
Microsoft Dynamics GP allows for better customer service because everything is at our fingertips. If someone calls questioning an invoice, we can easily look it up. If someone calls stating they paid an invoice with a certain check number, we can quickly run a query to find that particular check number to see where it was applied.
Having everything on a single platform provides ease of use for upgrades, backups and end user training. There is only one software to learn!