ELMO Software (ASX:ELO) is a cloud-based solution that helps thousands of organisations across Australia, New Zealand and the United Kingdom to manage their people, process and pay. ELMO solutions span the entire employee lifecycle from ‘hire to retire’. They can be used together or stand-alone, and are configurable according to an organisation’s unique processes and workflows.
N/A
Oracle PeopleSoft HCM
Score 6.8 out of 10
N/A
Oracle's PeopleSoft HCM is a complete, customizable suite including Global Core Human Capital Management, Workforce Management, Workforce Service Delivery, and Talent Management. PeopleSoft can be integrated to run on the Oracle Cloud.
$85
Per User Per Month
TribeHR (discontinued)
Score 6.0 out of 10
N/A
TribeHR was acquired by Netsuite in 2013. It has since been discontinued.
N/A
Pricing
ELMO Software
Oracle PeopleSoft HCM
TribeHR (discontinued)
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Benefits
$85.00
Per User Per Month
Pension Administration
$85.00
Per User Per Month
Human Resources
$185.00
Per User Per Month
Payroll
$225.00
Per User Per Month
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
ELMO Software
Oracle PeopleSoft HCM
TribeHR (discontinued)
Free Trial
No
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Yes
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
ELMO Software
Oracle PeopleSoft HCM
TribeHR (discontinued)
Features
ELMO Software
Oracle PeopleSoft HCM
TribeHR (discontinued)
Human Resource Management
Comparison of Human Resource Management features of Product A and Product B
ELMO Software
7.9
11 Ratings
3% below category average
Oracle PeopleSoft HCM
7.7
75 Ratings
5% below category average
TribeHR (discontinued)
6.6
2 Ratings
21% below category average
Employee demographic data
8.09 Ratings
8.371 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
Job profiles and administration
7.78 Ratings
7.471 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Workflow for transfers, promotions, pay raises, etc.
7.27 Ratings
7.569 Ratings
6.01 Ratings
Organizational charting
8.38 Ratings
7.661 Ratings
5.02 Ratings
Organization and location management
7.88 Ratings
8.066 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Compliance data (COBRA, OSHA, etc.)
8.65 Ratings
7.458 Ratings
6.02 Ratings
Employment history
00 Ratings
7.769 Ratings
6.02 Ratings
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
ELMO Software
8.1
5 Ratings
0% below category average
Oracle PeopleSoft HCM
7.3
65 Ratings
11% below category average
TribeHR (discontinued)
6.7
2 Ratings
19% below category average
Pay calculation
8.25 Ratings
7.561 Ratings
5.01 Ratings
Support for external payroll vendors
8.14 Ratings
7.145 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Benefit plan administration
8.03 Ratings
7.256 Ratings
6.02 Ratings
Direct deposit files
8.03 Ratings
7.659 Ratings
7.02 Ratings
Salary revision and increment management
8.23 Ratings
7.657 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Reimbursement management
7.83 Ratings
7.044 Ratings
6.01 Ratings
Off-cycle/On-Demand payment
00 Ratings
7.18 Ratings
6.01 Ratings
Leave and Attendance Management
Comparison of Leave and Attendance Management features of Product A and Product B
ELMO Software
8.5
3 Ratings
4% above category average
Oracle PeopleSoft HCM
7.3
53 Ratings
11% below category average
TribeHR (discontinued)
7.3
2 Ratings
11% below category average
Approval workflow
8.53 Ratings
7.545 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Balance details
8.53 Ratings
7.252 Ratings
6.02 Ratings
Annual carry-forward and encashment
00 Ratings
7.141 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Employee Self Service
Comparison of Employee Self Service features of Product A and Product B
ELMO Software
7.9
10 Ratings
4% below category average
Oracle PeopleSoft HCM
7.3
74 Ratings
12% below category average
TribeHR (discontinued)
7.0
2 Ratings
16% below category average
View and generate pay and benefit information
8.05 Ratings
7.864 Ratings
6.02 Ratings
Update personal information
8.010 Ratings
8.472 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
View company policy documentation
8.26 Ratings
6.750 Ratings
9.02 Ratings
Employee recognition
7.66 Ratings
5.943 Ratings
7.02 Ratings
View job history
00 Ratings
8.168 Ratings
5.02 Ratings
HR Reporting
Comparison of HR Reporting features of Product A and Product B
ELMO Software
7.7
6 Ratings
2% above category average
Oracle PeopleSoft HCM
7.0
70 Ratings
7% below category average
TribeHR (discontinued)
8.0
1 Ratings
6% above category average
Report builder
7.56 Ratings
8.367 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
Pre-built reports
7.76 Ratings
7.064 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Ability to combine HR data with external data
7.84 Ratings
5.859 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Onboarding
Comparison of Onboarding features of Product A and Product B
ELMO Software
7.8
7 Ratings
2% below category average
Oracle PeopleSoft HCM
7.6
49 Ratings
5% below category average
TribeHR (discontinued)
8.5
1 Ratings
6% above category average
New hire portal
8.26 Ratings
7.649 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Manager tracking tools
7.44 Ratings
7.745 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Performance and Goals
Comparison of Performance and Goals features of Product A and Product B
ELMO Software
7.8
8 Ratings
3% below category average
Oracle PeopleSoft HCM
6.9
38 Ratings
15% below category average
TribeHR (discontinued)
8.5
2 Ratings
6% above category average
Individual goal setting
8.28 Ratings
7.438 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Line-of sight-visibility
8.08 Ratings
6.736 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Performance tracking
7.38 Ratings
6.638 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Corporate goal setting
00 Ratings
6.836 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Performance Management
Comparison of Performance Management features of Product A and Product B
ELMO Software
7.6
10 Ratings
4% below category average
Oracle PeopleSoft HCM
5.8
43 Ratings
30% below category average
TribeHR (discontinued)
7.8
2 Ratings
1% below category average
Performance plans
7.710 Ratings
6.142 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Performance improvement plans
7.710 Ratings
5.641 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
Review status tracking
6.78 Ratings
5.841 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Review reminders
7.79 Ratings
5.836 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Multiple review frequency
8.29 Ratings
5.739 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
Succession Planning
Comparison of Succession Planning features of Product A and Product B
ELMO Software
7.4
7 Ratings
6% below category average
Oracle PeopleSoft HCM
6.4
34 Ratings
20% below category average
TribeHR (discontinued)
8.3
1 Ratings
6% above category average
Create succession plans/pools
7.96 Ratings
6.633 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Candidate ranking
7.66 Ratings
6.432 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Candidate search
6.45 Ratings
6.433 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
Candidate development
7.96 Ratings
6.430 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Recruiting / ATS
Comparison of Recruiting / ATS features of Product A and Product B
ELMO Software
7.5
5 Ratings
4% below category average
Oracle PeopleSoft HCM
6.7
39 Ratings
15% below category average
TribeHR (discontinued)
8.9
1 Ratings
14% above category average
Job Requisition Management
7.84 Ratings
6.137 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Company Website Posting
7.74 Ratings
6.635 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Publish to Social Media
7.32 Ratings
5.932 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Job Search Site Posting
6.82 Ratings
6.136 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Duplicate Candidate Prevention
7.82 Ratings
7.029 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Applicant Tracking
7.53 Ratings
7.438 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Notifications and Alerts
7.94 Ratings
7.537 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Asset Management
Comparison of Asset Management features of Product A and Product B
The performance review process is clear and easy to complete, for both employee and manager. I have experienced this in both roles, with my own staff, and undergoing my own review with my manager. I haven't experienced scenarios where it is less appropriate, I think our HR department customised the software well to our needs.
Oracle PeopleSoft HCM is great for onboarding new hires. The process, including some newer direct entry features, has been streamlined and made more intuitive. However, there is a steep learning curve for those who are completely unfamiliar with enterprise systems as a whole. In my experience, Oracle PeopleSoft HCM's updates have historically failed to improve the intuitiveness of navigation and features even through a move to a SaaS configuration in the cloud. This makes it hard to train new HR staff because there may be five different ways to accomplish the same thing and none of them are intuitive enough to just "figure out". This has been a bone of contention for me for all Oracle products for my entire 20+ year career, and it has never been fully addressed.
I think it's great for small companies to manage their basic HR functions if they do not have a dedicated department. I'm unsure of the capabilities it holds for a large company with multiple teams to organize and how the calendaring functions across departments. But, for our team of roughly 20 folks it is simple and straightforward.
Oracle PeopleSoft HCM is one of the best product and has helped implement the complex Business functionalities in the Higher Education business in a very streamlined process.
Oracle PeopleSoft HCM helped in moving from 34 different legacy system to one centralized system which helps immensely in maintaining the data and reporting purpose.
Oracle PeopleSoft HCM also helps immensely in data analytics and trend analysis which helps immensely in preparing for the resourcing and planning for the peak season in advance and be better prepared to handle the quarterly on annual activities.
We have issues with students using Time & Labor for multiple jobs, where time is incorrectly calculated, including negative balances where none exist.
The application is complex and some areas, especially Time & Labor, are very difficult to troubleshoot. The overall level of complexity has increased over the years.
We also use Campus Solutions and had to split apart HCM and CS, significantly increasing our maintenance overhead and creating inter-system issues that aren't always resolvable.
Campus Solutions has developed a solution for managing preferred names and gender identity that is missing/ incompatible with the HCM product.
I would like even more capabilities, but I think that has to do with how we are using the site.
I would like to receive email notifications once a week with a summary of activity in TribeHR, including time-off scheduled by my team and any new documents or information that has been added.
I'd like reminders if I am going to go over my time off that is allotted to carry over into the new year and other pertinent vacation, floating holiday, sick time notifications.
PeopleSoft HCM has provided a very flexible platform for our HR needs. The ability to add customizations to handle some of our unique business processes have been critical in the longevity of our PS HCM use. We've been able to handle a wide variety of business processes for multiple subsidiaries due to the ability to customize when needed.
Once I learned the specific way of doing things, the software became very logical and ergonomic. It is easy to use and is an excellent resource for many of the specific tasks required for my role, especially in relation to staff onboarding and management. It is also excellent as a resource for my own personal HR information.
Oracle HCM has been around for more thab a decade and is a preferred package to use for Human capital management.Ease with which upgrades happen and how updates are pushed has come thru a long way of improvement and research over the years.Oracle has moved toward cloud based architecture which will help in its customers keep at par with current industry trends.
I give this rating because we have had no issues in the area of the product's overall availability. In my opinion the resources are there when we need them and the features serve the purpose they are set to do. I feel things have gone really well as far as the availability of the product.
This is highly dependent on the server setup you implement. You need to make sure you've included enough hardware to support your users. Not enough power will quickly rear its ugly head. If you've got the correct setup, the product will operate quickly and provide a good user experience. Oracle is slowed down by certain realtime interfaces to other systems, but this can be addressed by your technical team relatively easily.
I am not sure whether you are asking how the learning & development team rates ELMO Software or how ELMO supports our team when issues arise with the software? It is not my decision to purchase the software nor am I involved with the maintenance of the software.
Overall support has been positive and Oracle has gladly sent out representatives to meet with our teams in person. Despite sometimes sow and inadequate fixes, their willingness to try and meet face to face helps give them a better name in our organization. Sometimes their people do not understand unique needs of the industry, and it can be a challenge to explain that one size does not fit all. Finding the appropriate IT support for our unique requests has been hit and miss.
In my opinion, training in Oracle PeopleSoft HCM is arduous at best. In my experience, there are numerous issues with creating training environments and that makes practice in a sandbox costly. I prefer asynchronous simulated environment training for this reason, but that costs even more due to the development and testing time needed to create that training. eLearning is always there with only the need to keep it up-to-date.
It was a great training tool and provided all of the necessary information we needed to implement the sites for our clients. We were provided with a great deal of resources in regards to Oracle CRM. We didn't have any issues with the training at all. The only thing I would say would that there could be more FAQ's for users to read through
When we implement Oracle and Taleo to different clients it typically goes pretty smoothly. When we do system upgrades we usually test the main issues the clients are having just to make sure there are not outstanding issues or errors. I don't have any examples where implementation went poorly. It typically goes well and clients are pleased with the final result. The only complaint would be the time it takes to implement
Aspen is more straightforward in creating a course of personal development recognized by our industry, but your ELMO Software is generally easier to use. As the workforce in our company is very often built by the majority of people with basic academic background education, IE they often have only just completed year 10... it is very important your element of making it easy to understand, using simple words and clear explained multiple choices in the final quiz
Oracle PeopleSoft HCM is not as good as SuccessFactors HCM. The look and feel of Oracle PeopleSoft HCM is still 'old school'. Cloud solutions can do more. SuccessFactors offers a great talent management, performance measurement, and employee development, while Oracle PeopleSoft HCM's core is employee records, benefits, and payroll.
We evaluated Greenhouse but went with net suite because we were already using some of the other NetSuite. Greenhouse seemed a bit easier to use. The others were a bit too small, didn't have the stretch to scale.
In my opinion I rate this high because we have had no issues in this area and so that is why I give it such a high rating. There is no issue with the product's overall scalability. In my opinion this has been a positive from my team and client's view.
As a long time PeopleSoft user, my institution has found great advantages of being involved in the HCM realm such as first-hand information, a complete suite of solutions as well as regular updates to stay up with federal and state regulations.
Ease of use of development, customization, maintenance and usage perspectives can lead to a better management of financial resources, that minimizes expenditure while providing all necessary resources.
Opportunities to provide better customer service and meet organizational policies have to lead to a positive outlook on the tool and its features.
As I stated it has alleviated numerous back and forth emails with our CFO (who is only available PT) and CEO (who is often too busy to spend time on HR functions) - this has allowed for easy answers to basic HR questions.
It has allowed us to track all employee time-off in one place, saving us time from checking each individual Outlook calendar for scheduling purposes.
It has allowed us to direct all employees to one place for core HR documents and information, ensuring that folks are always getting the same answers to their inquiries.