Engagor was a Social Media Management platform with key features include monitoring of the social web, real-time customer engagement, workflow automation, analytics and reporting. The product was acquired by Clarabridge in 2015, and then Clarabridge was acquired by Qualtrics in October 2021. Engagor is no longer available.
N/A
Sprout Social
Score 8.4 out of 10
N/A
Sprout Social provides social media management, marketing, customer care, data and intelligence, and employee advocacy solutions for brands and agencies, including Ticketmaster, Chipotle, Grubhub, Subaru, and Zendesk. Sprout’s platform is used to simplify social publishing, engagement, reviews, analytics and listening for customers. Sprout also provides customer success and technical support, to deliver consistent value to all users. Any organization, regardless of size or industry, receives…
Blows them away, both in price and user experience. Engagor is for a different sort of need and Hootsuite is more about posting and managing the individual pages. They also charge extra to get results from their UberX analytics whereas the detailed reporting is included with …
Features
Engagor (discontinued)
Sprout Social
Listening/monitoring
Comparison of Listening/monitoring features of Product A and Product B
Engagor (discontinued)
-
Ratings
Sprout Social
7.1
95 Ratings
7% below category average
Boolean keyword searches
00 Ratings
6.969 Ratings
Filtering out noise/spam
00 Ratings
6.682 Ratings
Sentiment analysis
00 Ratings
7.162 Ratings
Broad channel coverage
00 Ratings
8.073 Ratings
Publishing
Comparison of Publishing features of Product A and Product B
Engagor (discontinued)
-
Ratings
Sprout Social
8.2
119 Ratings
2% above category average
Content planning and scheduling
00 Ratings
9.3119 Ratings
Audience targeting
00 Ratings
7.292 Ratings
Content optimization
00 Ratings
7.9103 Ratings
Workflow management
00 Ratings
8.4103 Ratings
Engagement
Comparison of Engagement features of Product A and Product B
Engagor (discontinued)
-
Ratings
Sprout Social
7.9
109 Ratings
2% below category average
Automated routing and prioritization
00 Ratings
7.767 Ratings
Customer interaction histories
00 Ratings
7.895 Ratings
Bulk actions
00 Ratings
8.192 Ratings
Marketing
Comparison of Marketing features of Product A and Product B
Engagor (discontinued)
-
Ratings
Sprout Social
7.1
82 Ratings
8% below category average
Lead generation
00 Ratings
7.060 Ratings
Content marketing
00 Ratings
8.178 Ratings
Paid media management
00 Ratings
6.23 Ratings
Campaigns and promotions
00 Ratings
7.24 Ratings
Channel coverage/integration
Comparison of Channel coverage/integration features of Product A and Product B
Engagor (discontinued)
-
Ratings
Sprout Social
8.5
119 Ratings
2% above category average
Twitter
00 Ratings
8.9106 Ratings
Facebook
00 Ratings
9.0118 Ratings
LinkedIn
00 Ratings
8.9107 Ratings
Google+
00 Ratings
7.639 Ratings
Instagram
00 Ratings
8.6108 Ratings
Pinterest
00 Ratings
8.636 Ratings
YouTube
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Reporting/analytics
Comparison of Reporting/analytics features of Product A and Product B
Engagor (discontinued)
-
Ratings
Sprout Social
8.2
120 Ratings
6% above category average
Campaign success analytics
00 Ratings
8.5112 Ratings
Real-time tracking
00 Ratings
8.0108 Ratings
Competitor analysis
00 Ratings
8.297 Ratings
Account management
Comparison of Account management features of Product A and Product B
Engagor is a very powerful tool for customer care purposes to be able to engage in real-time with your customers. If there are a lot of messages coming in during important peaks throughout, we can easily answer them every 30 seconds. Engagor isn’t that fit to use for publishing. We mostly use Engagor to reply to messages in real-time. However, for scheduling posts in Engagor, we publish and schedule on the native platform instead.
IMO it's best for an organization that has a lot of different people working on social media. They could be in different departments or just different members of the same team responsible for different types of posts (corporate, e-commerce, branding, etc.). I don't think it's as vital for a one-person team working solely within the Meta platform, for instance, especially if they're less concerned with detailed analytics.
Real-time mention tracking is a must these days. Quick responsiveness is critical on many social media platforms, especially on Twitter.
Fast and helpful support via Engagor chat and messages helps a LOT! I think the longest wait time was about 40 seconds for me. My workflow never gets disrupted because of idle sessions.
Automations can help you a lot. Automated "recipes" are great tools for decreasing your agents' workload, and there are many customizable settings for them.
For each account, customize posts for each platform, and schedule them to go live simultaneously.
Employee Advocacy via Sprout Social has integrated AI assistance for captions. Usually I would generate one suggested caption for employees to use/stem from when re-sharing to their socials. But now, EA message ideas display in random orders to better promote the full range of content.
Sprout Social has made the option to gamify the sharing concept quite easily with Employee Advocacy. Using the Leaderboard feature, employees can earn points in Employee Advocacy. Customized point values ensure you know how to climb the Leaderboard and start some friendly competition.
The UX is pretty clunky. Engagor only loads about 10 mentions per page, so if my team is behind on tagging/mention resolution by a couple of days, for a global brand that can mean an extra week of work. Would be much easier if the user could choose how many mentions show up on their screen.
Over the year we have had issues with Engagor's glitches. For example, the user has the capability to publish to a platform (like Facebook, Twitter, etc.) through Engagor as the brand. For a couple of the brands we work on, Engagor would show the update as published as one brand, but would actually publish as another. As an agency that handles social media content/community management for several very large brands, we cannot afford to have accidental status updates despite the author's efforts. This happened several times over the course of our experience with Engagor, to a point that we had to forego this feature for those brands and publish natively through the platform.
It has definitely skewed reporting numbers more than once -- for a set time period (i.e. 30 days, our typical monthly reporting period), the stats for a platform will appear very different from how they display on the native platform itself. For example, on occasion Engagor would load numbers from a Facebook fan count during a 30-day period that did not at all match up with the numbers Facebook showed me. This also applies to the number of overall mentions of a brand/account.
There is no immediately clear "undo" feature when resolving a mention. There have been times I have bulk-tagged a set of mentions, set all as resolved and then realized that I had made an error, without a very clear way to revert that action.
Double mentions have shown up, skewing numbers and sentiment/tagging analytics.
The insights/reporting section could definitely be a little more clear in how it explains metrics (or why the user should care to report these metrics). While we have an analyst on our team who is happy to explain these terms, I can see how some of them would not be intuitive at all to a user who doesn't live and breathe social media analytics. Also, the line graphs can be very difficult to read and parse. If the user downloads a line graph to their desktop from Engagor, it doesn't necessarily show all of the information you need, making it necessary to screengrab rather than downloading a higher-quality visual.
Social media platforms don't always play nice with Sprout so it will always be a challenge to get all integrations to work properly.
Sprout Social is a growing organization and they are acquiring new technologies, which can be good. However, they often spend time in meetings upselling new services. I like to learn about enhancements and opportunities but prefer to focus on my investments first.
Both the tool and the support that we receive from the customer service department and the customer success manager makes me likely to renew the use of Engagor.
I like Sprout for our needs and I like that it is easy to use. We want something better than HootSuite but don't need a high-level fancy program. The only think I don't like is customer service (except for chat).
Sprout Social's ease of use and navigation throughout the technology are relatively easy to figure out and teach. We also had a representative thoroughly walk us through the features and functionality to set us up for success in using the platform. I didn’t give it a ten because there were times when the navigation didn’t make sense, but once you figured out the quirks, it didn’t cause any trouble.
Uptime was OK, but given the fact that we are in Europe, there were some specific problems: They tended to take the system down for maintenance during the night in the US, which was during our workday. This was definitely problematic and hard to explain to our clients.
Sprout Social's customer support is extremely responsive. They're also always looking for suggestions on how they can make the product better and will actually take your ideas to their team to see if they're worth implementing. I've never had an issue that couldn't be resolved by them in a timely manner.
Their training is good, but the promotion of it is even better. I don't need or have the time for training, but I was always happy to know it was there. They did a great job sending updates out and making me aware when there was a new feature that I may want training for. As for the training I never used it, so I can't comment on that
Make sure you do it all the way. Do not break it into phases. Pour yourself a coffee, start it in the morning and you'll be done before you finish that coffee.
Sprout Social is good for smaller accounts with limited traffic. Some insights available but often questionable data. Only picks up direct interaction (i.e. doesn't monitor likes or favourites). Sysomos was used for a while, but spent ages defining search times still producing questionable data. Did not properly monitor Facebook interaction and often did not pick up from that platform at all. Customer service only operated in US time (we are UK) which proved increasingly problematic
We are constantly exploring our options and looking for the most cutting-edge products that suit our needs as a business. Sprout ticked the boxes for what we needed when it was time for a change. Both are powerful tools, and you can only see by doing.
One positive impact has been a huge time saver for our team. Where we once had multiple systems and delays from producing content to approval to publishing, now everything is seamless.
Another positive impact is streamlining the onboarding process for new team members. Sprout Social is user-friendly and intuitive, making it easy to study even for someone completely new to social media.
One negative impact has been the time it takes to wade through irrelevant social listening posts. The filtering is not effective enough to eliminate the noise.