IBM Cloud Continuous Delivery vs. Wrike

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
IBM Cloud Continuous Delivery
Score 8.1 out of 10
N/A
IBM Cloud Continuous Delivery, available on IBM Cloud, allows users to provision an integrated toolchain using customizable, shareable templates with tools from IBM, third parties and open source. Automate builds and tests with Tekton-based delivery pipelines, and control quality with analytics.
$0
Wrike
Score 8.6 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
Wrike is a project management and collaboration software. This solution connects tasks, discussions, and emails to the user’s project plan. Wrike is optimized for agile workflows and aims to help resolve data silos, poor visibility into work status, and missed deadlines and project failures.
$240
per year 2 users (minimum)
Pricing
IBM Cloud Continuous DeliveryWrike
Editions & Modules
Lite
$0.00
Professional
$35.00
Authorized user per month
Wrike Free
$0
per month per user
Wrike Team
$10
per month (billed annually) per user (2-15 users)
Wrike Business
$25
per month (billed annually) per user (5-200 users)
Apex
Request a quote
per month per user
Pinnacle
Request a quote
per month per user
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
IBM Cloud Continuous DeliveryWrike
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
YesYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
YesYes
Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalNo setup fee
Additional DetailsEvery premium plan begins with a 14-day trial period.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
IBM Cloud Continuous DeliveryWrike
Features
IBM Cloud Continuous DeliveryWrike
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Product A and Product B
IBM Cloud Continuous Delivery
8.5
4 Ratings
13% above category average
Wrike
7.9
942 Ratings
3% above category average
Task Management8.24 Ratings9.2933 Ratings
Resource Management8.04 Ratings7.6805 Ratings
Gantt Charts8.33 Ratings7.5658 Ratings
Scheduling8.84 Ratings8.3815 Ratings
Support for Agile Methodology8.04 Ratings7.8522 Ratings
Support for Waterfall Methodology7.63 Ratings7.8470 Ratings
Document Management8.73 Ratings7.6787 Ratings
Email integration8.63 Ratings7.9706 Ratings
Mobile Access8.73 Ratings8.0683 Ratings
Timesheet Tracking8.73 Ratings7.7444 Ratings
Change request and Case Management8.63 Ratings7.723 Ratings
Budget and Expense Management8.33 Ratings6.9340 Ratings
Search9.03 Ratings00 Ratings
Visual planning tools9.04 Ratings00 Ratings
Workflow Automation00 Ratings8.0810 Ratings
Team Collaboration00 Ratings8.7933 Ratings
Agile Development
Comparison of Agile Development features of Product A and Product B
IBM Cloud Continuous Delivery
7.6
6 Ratings
2% below category average
Wrike
-
Ratings
DevOps Tool Integrations8.66 Ratings00 Ratings
Code Review7.45 Ratings00 Ratings
Code Collaboration7.75 Ratings00 Ratings
Velocity Calculation6.84 Ratings00 Ratings
Dependencies and Blockers7.25 Ratings00 Ratings
Professional Services Automation
Comparison of Professional Services Automation features of Product A and Product B
IBM Cloud Continuous Delivery
-
Ratings
Wrike
7.4
352 Ratings
4% below category average
Quotes/estimates00 Ratings8.21 Ratings
Invoicing00 Ratings6.818 Ratings
Project & financial reporting00 Ratings7.5347 Ratings
Integration with accounting software00 Ratings7.2211 Ratings
Best Alternatives
IBM Cloud Continuous DeliveryWrike
Small Businesses
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.8 out of 10
Stackby
Stackby
Score 8.8 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Planview AgilePlace
Planview AgilePlace
Score 7.8 out of 10
InEight
InEight
Score 8.2 out of 10
Enterprises
Planview AgilePlace
Planview AgilePlace
Score 7.8 out of 10
InEight
InEight
Score 8.2 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
IBM Cloud Continuous DeliveryWrike
Likelihood to Recommend
8.5
(16 ratings)
8.6
(974 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.1
(1 ratings)
8.5
(106 ratings)
Usability
8.2
(1 ratings)
8.6
(310 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
8.3
(24 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
6.6
(21 ratings)
Support Rating
7.0
(2 ratings)
9.4
(93 ratings)
In-Person Training
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(5 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
8.3
(13 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.9
(35 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
7.5
(14 ratings)
Contract Terms and Pricing Model
-
(0 ratings)
8.3
(5 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
6.9
(7 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
8.1
(15 ratings)
Professional Services
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(4 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(8 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
7.6
(9 ratings)
User Testimonials
IBM Cloud Continuous DeliveryWrike
Likelihood to Recommend
IBM
It provides a cloud-based integrated development environment that integrates with other IBM Cloud services to provide a streamlined development workflow. This includes real-time collaboration and code sharing capabilities, making it easy for teams to work together on projects. This feature is very useful for our app to maintain the code
Read full review
Wrike
Wrike helped us stitch PMO-related activities under one umbrella. The easy collaboration with multiple access types, combined with security access definitions, helped users across the organization contribute according to their roles. This helped provide the organization with multiple items to be reviewed in a single tool. This saved time in weekly review meetings by avoiding switching between multiple tools & files.
Read full review
Pros
IBM
  • It contains the deployment templates which are much more time saving and is of great use.
  • This has the integration of the Cloud applications which makes the work much more convenient.
  • This is flexible when it comes to development, deployment, and delivery.
  • [It] also has a much more reasonable pricing.
  • Provides space for the data storage.
  • [IBM Cloud Developer Tools] also can support many useful tools.
Read full review
Wrike
  • Excellent dashboards that are easy to use and give amazing insights.
  • User friendly interface that is also easy to interact with.
  • Lot of integrations.
  • Robust project and task management features.
  • Facilitate seamless team collaboration and communication.
  • Highly customizable and multiple project views.
Read full review
Cons
IBM
  • Its price is quite high and this made it unsuitable for us as we cannot afford such high rates.
  • Its Setup takes much longer time and this is frustrating.
  • Its interface needs to be improved and easy even for the Newbies.
Read full review
Wrike
  • Email alerts sometimes send too slowly.
  • If you put a project on hold, it can be hard to find it once you are ready to return to it.
  • Sometimes there are too many steps/tasks and the main page can get cluttered.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
IBM
It's a great platform to develop, run, test and deploy the applications easily. And it makes very easier and secure the implementation of continuous delivery process. For first time and experts also can use this service so easily. Great service provided by the IBM Cloud Continuous Service. There are more services that helps a lot to work on it. Thanks a lot.
Read full review
Wrike
I wish that Wrike had more drag and drop functionality that would be connected to assignee and also I wish that the finish date of a task would update to the date where you checked completed. It does not do that. Also finishing a task doesn't move the start date of the next task it "protects your time in that way", but our management team wants us to quickly see what we have down the pipeline rather than having to scroll down the list of upcoming tasks.
Read full review
Usability
IBM
Nothing special to say : the UX is clear and simple.
Read full review
Wrike
We have project templates set up based on what job type is selected in our work request form. This helps save time by having specific tasks already on each job as it is opened. Then it's just a matter of scheduling the tasks based on the job request and current workload. As long as a due date is flexible, it's easy to shift specific due dates as needed.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
IBM
No answers on this topic
Wrike
Over two years of (almost) daily usage without outages. Don't remember any errors. I give it 9 only because some Wrike plugins (for online document edit) are based on NPAPI architecture. These types of plugins are being phased out in new browsers, and NPAPI plugins are disabled by default in recent versions of Chrome so you have to do some browser adjustments when you switch browsers or move to another computer.
Read full review
Performance
IBM
No answers on this topic
Wrike
Wrike tasks loads fine, but I hate clicking files and wait for a bit of time since it is powerpoint or word, Wrike assumes I want to open those on Wrike. My suggestion is to link it to office 365 so we do not need Wrike based decoder for PPTX and DOCX
Read full review
Support Rating
IBM
In more than a year using the IBM Cloud Continuous Delivery tool, I haven't had any major complaints or problems. However, in the last month, IBM suffered from a couple of problems through several of its services, and for a short period of time, I couldn't deploy successfully my projects. The problem was brief and was quickly fixed.
Read full review
Wrike
During my learning phase with Wrike, I initially struggled with setting up automation rules and request forms. However, Wrike support was always my go-to, resolving issues within seconds or minutes. Their assistance made the learning process much easier. My best experience was receiving step-by-step screenshots to follow, with the support team on standby until I was completely satisfied.
Read full review
In-Person Training
IBM
No answers on this topic
Wrike
We had staff in person provide some training
Read full review
Online Training
IBM
No answers on this topic
Wrike
I love the Wrike training options. Wrike Discover has tons of courses, learning plans, certifications, etc. This is an area where Wrike definitely shines! I wish these resources were more in your face for new people, because it seems like a lot of coworkers didn't know all of this training was available to them.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
IBM
No answers on this topic
Wrike
There are a lot of bells and whistles in Wrike, and not all of it is easy or intuitive to understand once it's plopped in your lap. It's easier when there are a few choice people who understand Wrike as a platform and articulate it in such a way where it makes it easy to pass it along to others in the group
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
IBM
We chose IBM Cloud Developer Tools for multiple reasons. Cost, current infrastructure vendor list, and Cloud Operations team experience were key driving factors for us. Palo Alto's Prisma Cloud product was slick for sure but we found it more difficult to deploy and integrate with our current environment and applications
Read full review
Wrike
Jira did not at all help us get our work done as content creators. I think that was because Jira wasn't quite right for our uses. Wrike fits our needs so much better. I can't tell you enough the relief I felt when we adopted Wrike and I never had to use Jira again.
Read full review
Contract Terms and Pricing Model
IBM
No answers on this topic
Wrike
company purchase
Read full review
Scalability
IBM
No answers on this topic
Wrike
The sky is the limit for what can be done in Wrike. We started with 1 use case and within 5 months we migrated several key business practices over to Wrike because they were easier to manage. Use cases so far: process improvement, management review, corrective actions, maintenance requests, month-end financial closing, and document management. As we grow, it's easy to imagine putting even more into Wrike where it becomes a cornerstone for how we do business
Read full review
Professional Services
IBM
No answers on this topic
Wrike
I do not use professional services.
Read full review
Return on Investment
IBM
  • This has made the configuration files much easier to access.
  • Has made the commands more logical as well as easy for use and learning.
  • Contains great AI capabilities
  • The documentation needs improvement.
  • Error received from commands are pretty hard to understand.
Read full review
Wrike
  • Different teams (e.g., contracting, compliance, provider relations) can view updates in real time, comment directly on tasks, and escalate items when needed.
  • Wrike allows us to template the contracting process (from intake to signature) to ensure consistency across payers and reduce administrative overhead.
  • Leadership can see the status of negotiations at a glance, identify bottlenecks, and prioritize resources accordingly.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Wrike Screenshots

Screenshot of DashboardsScreenshot of DashboardsScreenshot of DashboardsScreenshot of DashboardsScreenshot of Space workflowsScreenshot of Space workflows