IBM Cloud Continuous Delivery vs. Wrike

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
IBM Cloud Continuous Delivery
Score 8.8 out of 10
N/A
IBM Cloud Continuous Delivery, available on IBM Cloud, allows users to provision an integrated toolchain using customizable, shareable templates with tools from IBM, third parties and open source. Automate builds and tests with Tekton-based delivery pipelines, and control quality with analytics.
$0
Wrike
Score 8.4 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
Wrike is a project management and collaboration software. This solution connects tasks, discussions, and emails to the user’s project plan. Wrike is optimized for agile workflows and aims to help resolve data silos, poor visibility into work status, and missed deadlines and project failures.
$240
per year 2 users (minimum)
Pricing
IBM Cloud Continuous DeliveryWrike
Editions & Modules
Lite
$0.00
Professional
$35.00
Authorized user per month
Wrike Free
$0
per month per user
Wrike Team
$10
per month (billed annually) per user (2-15 users)
Wrike Business
$25
per month (billed annually) per user (5-200 users)
Wrike Enterprise
Request a quote
per month per user
Pinnacle
Request a quote
per month per user
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
IBM Cloud Continuous DeliveryWrike
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
YesYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
YesYes
Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalNo setup fee
Additional DetailsEvery premium plan begins with a 14-day trial period.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
IBM Cloud Continuous DeliveryWrike
Features
IBM Cloud Continuous DeliveryWrike
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Product A and Product B
IBM Cloud Continuous Delivery
8.5
4 Ratings
15% above category average
Wrike
7.7
858 Ratings
0% below category average
Task Management8.24 Ratings9.0850 Ratings
Resource Management8.04 Ratings7.8726 Ratings
Gantt Charts8.33 Ratings7.7598 Ratings
Scheduling8.84 Ratings8.2744 Ratings
Support for Agile Methodology8.04 Ratings7.5462 Ratings
Support for Waterfall Methodology7.63 Ratings7.9411 Ratings
Document Management8.73 Ratings7.3710 Ratings
Email integration8.63 Ratings7.3640 Ratings
Mobile Access8.73 Ratings7.5618 Ratings
Timesheet Tracking8.73 Ratings7.1393 Ratings
Change request and Case Management8.63 Ratings7.723 Ratings
Budget and Expense Management8.33 Ratings7.0300 Ratings
Search9.03 Ratings00 Ratings
Visual planning tools9.04 Ratings00 Ratings
Workflow Automation00 Ratings7.7730 Ratings
Team Collaboration00 Ratings8.7849 Ratings
Agile Development
Comparison of Agile Development features of Product A and Product B
IBM Cloud Continuous Delivery
7.6
6 Ratings
5% below category average
Wrike
-
Ratings
DevOps Tool Integrations8.66 Ratings00 Ratings
Code Review7.45 Ratings00 Ratings
Code Collaboration7.75 Ratings00 Ratings
Velocity Calculation6.84 Ratings00 Ratings
Dependencies and Blockers7.25 Ratings00 Ratings
Professional Services Automation
Comparison of Professional Services Automation features of Product A and Product B
IBM Cloud Continuous Delivery
-
Ratings
Wrike
7.5
307 Ratings
3% below category average
Quotes/estimates00 Ratings8.21 Ratings
Invoicing00 Ratings7.31 Ratings
Project & financial reporting00 Ratings7.5302 Ratings
Integration with accounting software00 Ratings7.1180 Ratings
Best Alternatives
IBM Cloud Continuous DeliveryWrike
Small Businesses
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.6 out of 10
Stackby
Stackby
Score 9.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Planview AgilePlace
Planview AgilePlace
Score 9.1 out of 10
InEight
InEight
Score 9.5 out of 10
Enterprises
Planview AgilePlace
Planview AgilePlace
Score 9.1 out of 10
InEight
InEight
Score 9.5 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
IBM Cloud Continuous DeliveryWrike
Likelihood to Recommend
8.5
(16 ratings)
8.5
(890 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.1
(1 ratings)
8.8
(103 ratings)
Usability
8.2
(1 ratings)
8.2
(225 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
8.1
(24 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
6.9
(21 ratings)
Support Rating
7.0
(2 ratings)
8.4
(90 ratings)
In-Person Training
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(5 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(13 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(32 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(12 ratings)
Contract Terms and Pricing Model
-
(0 ratings)
7.2
(4 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
6.8
(7 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(15 ratings)
Professional Services
-
(0 ratings)
6.8
(3 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
8.8
(7 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
6.7
(8 ratings)
User Testimonials
IBM Cloud Continuous DeliveryWrike
Likelihood to Recommend
IBM
It provides a cloud-based integrated development environment that integrates with other IBM Cloud services to provide a streamlined development workflow. This includes real-time collaboration and code sharing capabilities, making it easy for teams to work together on projects. This feature is very useful for our app to maintain the code
Read full review
Wrike
Wrike is well-suited for content creation, review, and management. I can't speak to other types of work it can be suitable for because I use it as a writer only, but I would recommend it to other people in content creation fields who have to work with a team. A friend of mine is an editor at the local newspaper, and I think some features of Wrike would make her editing tasks a little easier and promote more cohesion in her team.
Read full review
Pros
IBM
  • It contains the deployment templates which are much more time saving and is of great use.
  • This has the integration of the Cloud applications which makes the work much more convenient.
  • This is flexible when it comes to development, deployment, and delivery.
  • [It] also has a much more reasonable pricing.
  • Provides space for the data storage.
  • [IBM Cloud Developer Tools] also can support many useful tools.
Read full review
Wrike
  • different views to accommodate different users workflow
  • predecessors and successors to tie tasks together and adjust dates as a group
  • Being able to see other people's workloads so when I am planning my projects for the upcoming quarter, I can set a project delivery date that is better suited to workload and is more realistic
Read full review
Cons
IBM
  • Its price is quite high and this made it unsuitable for us as we cannot afford such high rates.
  • Its Setup takes much longer time and this is frustrating.
  • Its interface needs to be improved and easy even for the Newbies.
Read full review
Wrike
  • Templating.
  • For example, let's say we are onboarding a new client. There are certain tasks that need to be done. It would be great to be able to create a new project and have certain tasks preloaded.
  • Importing.
  • Importing may seem easy, but there is so much nuance to it. The fact that you need to make sure the parent task comes before child tasks is very difficult to do without the help of AI. Also, I am not sure it is possible if you have a thousand tasks to import, to make sure that you have a folder structure and parent/child tasks.
  • I also find that the documentation is lacking and the 2 import methods lacking as well.
  • Customize my inbox. When I log into Wrike, my Inbox is the first thing I see, but this doesn't show the full picture of what I want it.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
IBM
It's a great platform to develop, run, test and deploy the applications easily. And it makes very easier and secure the implementation of continuous delivery process. For first time and experts also can use this service so easily. Great service provided by the IBM Cloud Continuous Service. There are more services that helps a lot to work on it. Thanks a lot.
Read full review
Wrike
I wish that Wrike had more drag and drop functionality that would be connected to assignee and also I wish that the finish date of a task would update to the date where you checked completed. It does not do that. Also finishing a task doesn't move the start date of the next task it "protects your time in that way", but our management team wants us to quickly see what we have down the pipeline rather than having to scroll down the list of upcoming tasks.
Read full review
Usability
IBM
Nothing special to say : the UX is clear and simple.
Read full review
Wrike
The platform is intuitive, easy to navigate, and flexible enough to accommodate the complexity of payer contracting workflows. Features such as custom workflows, automated reminders, and real-time collaboration make it simple for our team to stay aligned and efficient. Wrike allows us to track negotiations and related tasks without needing extensive training or technical expertise, which has driven adoption across departments and ensured consistent usage.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
IBM
No answers on this topic
Wrike
Over two years of (almost) daily usage without outages. Don't remember any errors. I give it 9 only because some Wrike plugins (for online document edit) are based on NPAPI architecture. These types of plugins are being phased out in new browsers, and NPAPI plugins are disabled by default in recent versions of Chrome so you have to do some browser adjustments when you switch browsers or move to another computer.
Read full review
Performance
IBM
No answers on this topic
Wrike
Wrike tasks loads fine, but I hate clicking files and wait for a bit of time since it is powerpoint or word, Wrike assumes I want to open those on Wrike. My suggestion is to link it to office 365 so we do not need Wrike based decoder for PPTX and DOCX
Read full review
Support Rating
IBM
In more than a year using the IBM Cloud Continuous Delivery tool, I haven't had any major complaints or problems. However, in the last month, IBM suffered from a couple of problems through several of its services, and for a short period of time, I couldn't deploy successfully my projects. The problem was brief and was quickly fixed.
Read full review
Wrike
During my learning phase with Wrike, I initially struggled with setting up automation rules and request forms. However, Wrike support was always my go-to, resolving issues within seconds or minutes. Their assistance made the learning process much easier. My best experience was receiving step-by-step screenshots to follow, with the support team on standby until I was completely satisfied.
Read full review
In-Person Training
IBM
No answers on this topic
Wrike
We had staff in person provide some training
Read full review
Online Training
IBM
No answers on this topic
Wrike
I love the Wrike training options. Wrike Discover has tons of courses, learning plans, certifications, etc. This is an area where Wrike definitely shines! I wish these resources were more in your face for new people, because it seems like a lot of coworkers didn't know all of this training was available to them.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
IBM
No answers on this topic
Wrike
There are a lot of bells and whistles in Wrike, and not all of it is easy or intuitive to understand once it's plopped in your lap. It's easier when there are a few choice people who understand Wrike as a platform and articulate it in such a way where it makes it easy to pass it along to others in the group
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
IBM
We chose IBM Cloud Developer Tools for multiple reasons. Cost, current infrastructure vendor list, and Cloud Operations team experience were key driving factors for us. Palo Alto's Prisma Cloud product was slick for sure but we found it more difficult to deploy and integrate with our current environment and applications
Read full review
Wrike
We use both monday.com and Wrike. While Monday does have a better user interface, Wrike allows us to have more visibility into tasks where multiple people are collaborating. And also to receive project brief-ins and requests for new projects. We use both differently and I would say for us Wrike is more the collaboration tool than the day to day individual task management tool - and it works great.
Read full review
Contract Terms and Pricing Model
IBM
No answers on this topic
Wrike
company purchase
Read full review
Scalability
IBM
No answers on this topic
Wrike
The sky is the limit for what can be done in Wrike. We started with 1 use case and within 5 months we migrated several key business practices over to Wrike because they were easier to manage. Use cases so far: process improvement, management review, corrective actions, maintenance requests, month-end financial closing, and document management. As we grow, it's easy to imagine putting even more into Wrike where it becomes a cornerstone for how we do business
Read full review
Professional Services
IBM
No answers on this topic
Wrike
I do not use professional services.
Read full review
Return on Investment
IBM
  • This has made the configuration files much easier to access.
  • Has made the commands more logical as well as easy for use and learning.
  • Contains great AI capabilities
  • The documentation needs improvement.
  • Error received from commands are pretty hard to understand.
Read full review
Wrike
  • Wrike has improved our resource management significantly.
  • Wrike has improved the request intake process for us.
  • One negative impact of using Wrike is that we had to include Workato for some customised automations, which were not supported by Unito, but this can be on a need-to basis.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Wrike Screenshots

Screenshot of DashboardsScreenshot of DashboardsScreenshot of DashboardsScreenshot of DashboardsScreenshot of Space workflowsScreenshot of Space workflows