Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Looker
Score 8.2 out of 10
N/A
Looker is a BI application with an analytics-oriented application server that sits on top of relational data stores. It includes an end-user interface for exploring data, a reusable development paradigm for data discovery, and an API for supporting data in other systems.N/A
Tableau Desktop
Score 8.3 out of 10
N/A
Tableau Desktop is a data visualization product from Tableau. It connects to a variety of data sources for combining disparate data sources without coding. It provides tools for discovering patterns and insights, data calculations, forecasts, and statistical summaries and visual storytelling.
$70
per month
Pricing
LookerTableau Desktop
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Tableau Creator
$70.00
Per User / Per Month
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
LookerTableau Desktop
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
YesYes
Entry-level Setup FeeRequiredNo setup fee
Additional DetailsMust contact sales team for pricing.All pricing plans are billed annually.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
LookerTableau Desktop
Considered Both Products
Looker
Chose Looker
Looker was not as flexible as Tableau, but it provides more customization through code and it provides a consistent data model which can be nice.
Chose Looker
Looker is a lot easier to connect with our data pipelines and for users to create their own scalable Explores. Before, analysts would have to create separate Tableau dashboards for each ask, but now with Lookers Explores, some teams are able to self serve and create their own …
Chose Looker
Looker is cheaper, by far. Easier to manage. In the end, Looker was a better choice for us, even with its maintenance warts and the headaches with the APIs. Tableau licensing is difficult to manage, at the very least, whereas Looker is not. User management is much easier to …
Chose Looker
Looker was easier to use, better integration with non-standard datastores, such as Prestodb, and Snowflake, and BigTable. Ease of manageability. Creation of reports faster and easier compared to QlikView. Tableau has better heat maps, however, Looker has better drill down in …
Chose Looker
Tableau is also a great BI tool, but it felt a lot less flexible to me in terms of customization of data. As a visual platform, Tabluea is incredible; it can produce unbelievably rich visualizations and dashboards. It's also easier to get set up on Tableau too, but ultimately …
Chose Looker
Tableau has an adoption issue of having to upgrade to the most recent Tableau reader. In my experience it was very difficult to get the sales team to do this. microstrategy was the most overly complicated reporting software I have ever used. You need a consultant to do …
Chose Looker
In terms of user interface and freedom of customization, Tableau is probably still better than Looker.
However, Looker is very good in scenarios where multiple data sources and dashboards already exist within the organization and need to be integrated/unified in one place. That …
Chose Looker
Looker is considerably easier to learn than any of the other tools listed above. For example, Tableau does offer a robust selection of visualizations, however setting them up and plotting the data correctly is considerably harder than in Looker. Another major advantage of …
Chose Looker
We use both Looker and Tableau. It depends on the specific team. However, there is a clear correlation that we use Tableau more often when there are more data sources, including financial data.
Chose Looker
Looker and Tableau are similar products with benefits and drawbacks according to which software you choose to employ. Looker is a Google product whereas Tableau is a Salesforce product. Depending on your existing tech stack it is recommended to leverage the integrated, native …
Chose Looker
Looker is free, so it's certainly better bang for your buck. It's a good platform for someone who just needs a quick way to look at the data they have. It doesn't have some of the advanced functionality that Tableau has, but it integrates well with the Google ecosystem, so it's …
Chose Looker
I don't remember much about Tableau, but it was chaotic and poorly set up for our company.
Chose Looker
Tableau did not have the customization that we were told it had, and it was expensive. Domo looks promising, but is also expensive so we haven't purchased it (we may in the future). Google Sheets was very basic and did fine for what it was, but we needed something a bit more …
Chose Looker
Compared to Tableau I much prefer Looker. While they both have similar features (Tableau actually has more ability to drill down and edit data from various sources), for a mildly technical user, they're able to set up a report rather quickly and customize it to look a certain …
Chose Looker
The learning curve for Tableau Cloud was too steep for our team. After watching a couple of YouTube videos, anyone can begin connecting data sources and creating reports with Looker. Looker is also free with Google Workspace, making the decision between Looker and Tableau a …
Chose Looker
Tableau was significantly more expensive than Looker, more detailed, and required more set-up. Overall, Tabluea is great; we just didn't need something that robust. Plus, our client budgets can't afford a multi-year contract. Perhaps once they scale more, we'll need something …
Chose Looker
Looker Studio is not as robust as Tableau or Microsoft BI. So it does not provide quite as much insight or depth and it has more limitations overall then the other major reporting products. However, it is also free and connects perfectly with other Google products. Plus, all of …
Chose Looker
It takes forever sometimes to have data ready in Tableau dashboard, and also it takes effort to maintain each dashboards. We do not have so many efforts to maintain all. Also, we need to be able to see data faster and therefore take actions and work faster. With Looker we might …
Chose Looker
Looker is a great fit for our company because we have collaborative analytics workflows and complicated data ecosystems and because of its strengths in data modeling, integration, and collaboration.
Brand name and peer recommendations also helps us to select Looker against …
Chose Looker
We haven't had a proper benchmarking done. We might consider looking at other options, but this thing is deeply integrated into our platform, so not anytime soon.
Chose Looker
I choose Looker when I need quick charts. It is easier to start and configure, browser-based, and easy to connect with Google Sheets. This gives it a good competitive advantage when comparing pricing—other similar tools have expensive licenses. In a corporate Google …
Chose Looker
Looker is overall the best software for data visualization simply because it does not take a lot of time to onboard someone for this software and it still has tons of functionality.
Chose Looker
Looker provides really excellent customer service in comparison to other similar products. The sharing aspect of Looker is also a big plus, which allows multiple users to access the data at the same time. We have also found it to stand out among competitors with its dashboard …
Tableau Desktop
Chose Tableau Desktop
Looker has the benefit of being owned by Google and seamless interface with BigQuery. We didn't use BigQuery at the time, so the benefit wasn't realized. However, we are starting to use it more and more, and will be evaluating Looker again.

The main drawback of Looker compared …
Chose Tableau Desktop
Tableau can create visually attractive customizable dashboards than can quickly by drag-drop while in power bi we can create simple dashboard. Power bi support lesser data source while in Tableau there is a lot of options
When we talk about data handling tableau is a clear …
Chose Tableau Desktop
We shifted to Tableau as it performs better than power BI. Tableau can handle data from multiple data sources while Power BI is restricted to limited data sources.
Chose Tableau Desktop
  • It's easy to use and has a great selection of color palettes and templates.
  • Easy to learn.
  • Easy to share reports.
Top Pros
Top Cons
TrustRadius Insights
LookerTableau Desktop
Highlights

TrustRadius
Research Team Insight
Published

Looker and Tableau Desktop are Business Intelligence tools designed to help users perform data analysis and create visualizations to display their findings. Both Business Intelligence tools are used by businesses of all sizes, though large enterprises prefer Tableau Desktop while Looker is most popular with mid-sized businesses.

Tableau Desktop offers strong visualization features that allow data analysts to create sophisticated visualizations. Looker has robust analytics features that enable non-technical users to create simple queries, while technical staff can create complex, customized queries.

Features

Looker and Tableau Desktop both provide essential business intelligence features such as data visualization and analysis, but they also both have some standout features.

Looker includes a library of analytics code blocks that allow new users to perform analysis on stored data easily. These code blocks are entirely customizable as well, so advanced users can create custom queries. Looker also offers many built-in integrations and has a flexible system for pulling in data from applications that don’t have a native integration. As a result, Looker can collect data from many sources without issue.

Tableau Desktop includes OLAP compatibility, allowing for web-based analytics and data collection. Additionally, Tableau Desktop has APIs for many big data analytics tools, allowing for visualizations based on data analysis performed by big data software. Lastly, Tableau has robust visualization features that help users to create simple visualizations, or use advanced features to create complex, interactive visualizations.

Limitations

Though Looker and Tableau Desktop both have comprehensive features for business intelligence, they also have a few important limitations.

Looker doesn’t have any support for OLAP, which makes web-based analytics more difficult. Companies that need to make use of OLAP may not be able to use Looker. Additionally, Looker doesn’t offer as many tools or integrations for big data analysis. Lastly, though Looker offers visualization features, they are not as sophisticated as the advanced visualizations that Tableau Desktop provides.

Tableau Desktop doesn’t offer analytics tools that are as straightforward as Lookers analytics blocks. Performing analytics using Tableau requires technical staff to write queries using Tableau Desktop’s visual query language. Tableau Desktop’s tools for third-party data collection are not as robust as Looker’s multiple integrations and tools for third-party data collection.

Pricing

Looker pricing depends on the size and user needs of the business. Quotes from Looker can include or remove features as needed by the organization.

Tableau Desktop pricing depends on the number of licenses purchased. The Viewer license costs $12.00 per month per user and allows for data viewing and interaction. The Explorer package costs $35.00 per month per user and allows for data querying and content sharing. Lastly, the Creator package costs $70.00 per month per user and allows for the creation of sophisticated visualization.

Features
LookerTableau Desktop
BI Standard Reporting
Comparison of BI Standard Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Looker
7.9
113 Ratings
3% below category average
Tableau Desktop
8.4
167 Ratings
3% above category average
Pixel Perfect reports7.392 Ratings8.5139 Ratings
Customizable dashboards8.7112 Ratings8.7166 Ratings
Report Formatting Templates7.896 Ratings7.8145 Ratings
Ad-hoc Reporting
Comparison of Ad-hoc Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Looker
8.0
113 Ratings
0% below category average
Tableau Desktop
9.0
164 Ratings
11% above category average
Drill-down analysis8.0109 Ratings9.0159 Ratings
Formatting capabilities7.4111 Ratings9.3162 Ratings
Integration with R or other statistical packages7.946 Ratings8.3122 Ratings
Report sharing and collaboration8.7113 Ratings9.5157 Ratings
Report Output and Scheduling
Comparison of Report Output and Scheduling features of Product A and Product B
Looker
8.4
109 Ratings
1% above category average
Tableau Desktop
8.4
158 Ratings
1% above category average
Publish to Web8.191 Ratings8.4149 Ratings
Publish to PDF8.797 Ratings7.8149 Ratings
Report Versioning8.072 Ratings8.4116 Ratings
Report Delivery Scheduling8.894 Ratings9.3123 Ratings
Delivery to Remote Servers00 Ratings8.173 Ratings
Data Discovery and Visualization
Comparison of Data Discovery and Visualization features of Product A and Product B
Looker
6.6
110 Ratings
18% below category average
Tableau Desktop
8.5
156 Ratings
7% above category average
Pre-built visualization formats (heatmaps, scatter plots etc.)7.8106 Ratings9.0154 Ratings
Location Analytics / Geographic Visualization7.395 Ratings8.4149 Ratings
Predictive Analytics4.66 Ratings8.5126 Ratings
Pattern Recognition and Data Mining00 Ratings8.02 Ratings
Access Control and Security
Comparison of Access Control and Security features of Product A and Product B
Looker
8.2
109 Ratings
3% below category average
Tableau Desktop
8.7
142 Ratings
3% above category average
Multi-User Support (named login)8.8103 Ratings9.0139 Ratings
Role-Based Security Model7.991 Ratings8.1119 Ratings
Multiple Access Permission Levels (Create, Read, Delete)8.2103 Ratings8.7129 Ratings
Report-Level Access Control8.042 Ratings9.03 Ratings
Single Sign-On (SSO)00 Ratings8.877 Ratings
Mobile Capabilities
Comparison of Mobile Capabilities features of Product A and Product B
Looker
5.7
82 Ratings
32% below category average
Tableau Desktop
8.1
135 Ratings
3% above category average
Responsive Design for Web Access6.579 Ratings8.4124 Ratings
Mobile Application5.01 Ratings7.397 Ratings
Dashboard / Report / Visualization Interactivity on Mobile6.273 Ratings8.7117 Ratings
Application Program Interfaces (APIs) / Embedding
Comparison of Application Program Interfaces (APIs) / Embedding features of Product A and Product B
Looker
-
Ratings
Tableau Desktop
9.2
64 Ratings
16% above category average
REST API00 Ratings9.356 Ratings
Javascript API00 Ratings8.951 Ratings
iFrames00 Ratings9.449 Ratings
Java API00 Ratings9.946 Ratings
Themeable User Interface (UI)00 Ratings8.653 Ratings
Customizable Platform (Open Source)00 Ratings8.946 Ratings
Best Alternatives
LookerTableau Desktop
Small Businesses
Cyfe
Cyfe
Score 8.8 out of 10
Cyfe
Cyfe
Score 8.8 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Reveal
Reveal
Score 10.0 out of 10
Reveal
Reveal
Score 10.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Jaspersoft Community Edition
Jaspersoft Community Edition
Score 9.7 out of 10
Jaspersoft Community Edition
Jaspersoft Community Edition
Score 9.7 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
LookerTableau Desktop
Likelihood to Recommend
8.5
(114 ratings)
8.8
(194 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.5
(6 ratings)
8.9
(39 ratings)
Usability
8.8
(12 ratings)
8.6
(63 ratings)
Availability
10.0
(1 ratings)
8.0
(10 ratings)
Performance
6.0
(1 ratings)
6.1
(9 ratings)
Support Rating
8.8
(14 ratings)
7.0
(56 ratings)
In-Person Training
-
(0 ratings)
9.4
(4 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(4 ratings)
Implementation Rating
10.0
(1 ratings)
8.0
(34 ratings)
Configurability
10.0
(1 ratings)
8.1
(2 ratings)
Contract Terms and Pricing Model
10.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
10.0
(1 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Product Scalability
10.0
(1 ratings)
7.0
(3 ratings)
Professional Services
10.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
10.0
(1 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
10.0
(1 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
LookerTableau Desktop
Likelihood to Recommend
Google
It's great for clients who don't have a huge reporting budget and/or want to add voiceover insight and analysis to the report. I love Looker for weekly updates. The client gets a general overview and can compare data against any time period that works for them. Plus, it's a free tool - who doesn't love that?
Read full review
Tableau
Tableau Desktop is one the finest tool available in the market with such a wide range of capabilities in its suite that makes it easy to generate insights. Further, if optimally designed, then its reports are fairly simple to understand, yet capable enough to make changes at the required levels. One can create a variety of visualizations as required by the business or the clients. The data pipelines in the backend are very robust. The tableau desktop also provides options to develop the reports in developer mode, which is one of the finest features to embed and execute even the most complex possible logic. It's easier to operate, simple to navigate, and fluent to understand by the users.
Read full review
Pros
Google
  • Show visited pages - sessions, pageviews - which programs are viewed the most.
  • Displays session source/medium views to see where users are coming from.
  • It shows the video titles, URLs, and event counts so we can monitor the performance of our videos.
  • It gives a graphic face to the numbers, such as using bar charts, pie graphs, and other charts to show user trends or which channels are driving engagement.
  • Our clients like to see the top pages visited for a month.
  • I like the drop-and-drag approach, and building charts is a little easier than it was before.
Read full review
Tableau
  • An excellent tool for data visualization, it presents information in an appealing visual format—an exceptional platform for storing and analyzing data in any size organization.
  • Through interactive parameters, it enables real-time interaction with the user and is easy to learn and get support from the community.
Read full review
Cons
Google
  • I’d like a bit more personalization, particularly in the “Style” section (e.g., fonts, paragraph settings, the ability to map the axis labels to shorter names…).
  • Performance can be quite slow when there are many graphs on one page, even making the page unresponsive sometimes.
  • I’d love to be able to easily embed a dashboard in the Google Sheets it comes from (without injecting code to embed the HTML).
Read full review
Tableau
  • Formatting the data to work correctly in graphical presentations can be time consuming
  • Daily data extracts can run slowly depending on how much data is required and the source of the data
  • The desktop version is required for advanced functionality, editing on [the] Tableau server allows only limited features
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Google
We are very haooy with Looker, it provides us with all the funciomalities we need for both the day to day oerformance tracking and longer periods reporting. It is easy to use for account managers, configurable and customizable for soecialists and what is most imoortant, our clinets generally really love it
Read full review
Tableau
Our use of Tableau Desktop is still fairly low, and will continue over time. The only real concern is around cost of the licenses, and I have mentioned this to Tableau and fully expect the development of more sensible models for our industry. This will remove any impediment to expansion of our use.
Read full review
Usability
Google
Looker is relatively easy to use, even as it is set up. The customers for the front-end only have issues with the initial setup for looker ml creations. Other "looks" are relatively easy to set up, depending on the ETL and the data which is coming into Looker on a regular basis.
Read full review
Tableau
Tableau Desktop has proven to be a lifesaver in many situations. Once we've completed the initial setup, it's simple to use. It has all of the features we need to quickly and efficiently synthesize our data. Tableau Desktop has advanced capabilities to improve our company's data structure and enable self-service for our employees.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Google
No objections
Read full review
Tableau
When used as a stand-alone tool, Tableau Desktop has unlimited uptime, which is always nice. When used in conjunction with Tableau Server, this tool has as much uptime as your server admins are willing to give it. All in all, I've never had an issue with Tableau's availability.
Read full review
Performance
Google
Somehow resources heavy, both on server and client. I recommned at least 50Mbs data rate and high performance desktop comouter to be abke to run comolex tasks and configure larger amount of data. On the other hand, the client does not need to worry when viewing, the performance is usually ok
Read full review
Tableau
Tableau Desktop's performance is solid. You can really dig into a large dataset in the form of a spreadsheet, and it exhibits similarly good performance when accessing a moderately sized Oracle database. I noticed that with Tableau Desktop 9.3, the performance using a spreadsheet started to slow around 75K rows by about 60 columns. This was easily remedied by creating an extract and pushing it to Tableau Server, where performance went to lightning fast
Read full review
Support Rating
Google
Never had to work with support for issues. Any questions we had, they would respond promptly and clearly. The one-time setup was easy, by reading documentation. If the feature is not supported, they will add a feature request. In this case, LDAP support was requested over OKTA. They are looking into it.
Read full review
Tableau
I have never really used support much, to be honest. I think the support is not as user-friendly to search and use it. I did have an encounter with them once and it required a bit of going back and forth for licensing before reaching a resolution. They did solve my issue though
Read full review
In-Person Training
Google
No answers on this topic
Tableau
It is admittedly hard to train a group of people with disparate levels of ability coming in, but the software is so easy to use that this is not a huge problem; anyone who can follow simple instructions can catch up pretty quickly.
Read full review
Online Training
Google
No answers on this topic
Tableau
The training for new users are quite good because it covers topic wise training and the best part was that it also had video tutorials which are very helpful
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Google
Very satisfied, easy to implement
Read full review
Tableau
Again, training is the key and the company provides a lot of example videos that will help users discover use cases that will greatly assist their creation of original visualizations. As with any new software tool, productivity will decline for a period. In the case of Tableau, the decline period is short and the later gains are well worth it.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Google
Looker gives you options to integrate external APIs with great ease. Our data analytics team is able to easily use multiple data sources as input to the Looker dashboard, and everything is consolidated in one single Dashboard. You also have an option for Shared folders to be accessed by multiple people. The reporting system is perfect and has a wide range of options/reporting options that can be implemented.
Read full review
Tableau
If we do not have legacy tools which have already been set up, I would switch the visualization method to open source software via PyCharm, Atom, and Visual Studio IDE. These IDEs cannot directly help you to visualize the data but you can use many python packages to do so through these IDEs.
Read full review
Contract Terms and Pricing Model
Google
Perfect price to performance
Read full review
Tableau
No answers on this topic
Scalability
Google
No answers on this topic
Tableau
Tableau Desktop's scaleability is really limited to the scale of your back-end data systems. If you want to pull down an extract and work quickly in-memory, in my application it scaled to a few tens of millions of rows using the in-memory engine. But it's really only limited by your back-end data store if you have or are willing to invest in an optimized SQL store or purpose-built query engine like Veritca or Netezza or something similar.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Google
  • Looker has a poignant impact on our business's ROI objectives. As an advertising exchange we have specific goals for daily requests and fill, and having premade Looks to monitor this is an integral piece of our operational capability
  • To facilitate an efficient monthly billing cycle in our organization, Looker is essential to track estimated revenue and impression delivery by publisher. Without the Looks we have set up, we would spend considerably more time and effort segmenting revenue by vertical.
  • Looker's unique value proposition is making analytical tools more digestible to people without conventional analytical experience. Other competing tools like Tableau require considerably more training and context to successfully use, and the ability to easily plot different visualizations is one of its greatest selling points.
Read full review
Tableau
  • Tableau was acquired years ago, and has provided good value with the content created.
  • Ongoing maintenance costs for the platform, both to maintain desktop and server licensing has made the continuing value questionable when compared to other offerings in the marketplace.
  • Users have largely been satisfied with the content, but not with the overall performance. This is due to a combination of factors including the performance of the Tableau engines as well as development deficiencies.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Looker Screenshots

Screenshot of a Looker dashboard with a geo chart.