TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Lyssna

    Score7.8 out of 10
    N/ALyssna (formerly UsabilityHub) is a user research platform used to test digital products with real users and gain insights into their audience. Its tools and features help Lyssna to optimize users' designs and create more engaging user-friendly experiences. Lyssna is a research platform, offering a broad range of testing features including: Five Second Testing - Used to quickly test the effectiveness of landing pages, messaging and designs by showing users a…

    $0

    per month (3 seats included)

    UserTesting

    Score8.1 out of 10
    N/AUserTesting helps UX researchers, designers, product teams, and marketers gather actionable insights through research, testing, and feedback. With a network of real people ready to share their perspectives, UserTesting enables organizations to make customer-first decisions at scale.N/A
    Pricing
    LyssnaUserTesting
    Editions & Modules
    Free
    $0
    3 seats included
    Growth
    $199
    per month 5 seats included
    Enterprise
    Contact Sales
    custom seats
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    LyssnaUserTesting
    Free Trial
    YesYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    YesNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional DetailsDiscount available for annual plan. Panel responses are priced seperately.—
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    LyssnaUserTesting
    Considered Both Products
    Lyssna
    Chose Lyssna
    Lyssna is certainly the least expensive, most basic and easy to use out of the range of usability tools I have used in the past. Depending on your maturity as a business and the projects that you are doing, this can be a great starting point before scaling up.
    Incentivized
    UserTesting
    Chose UserTesting
    We have evaluated two other platforms - UserZoom and UsabilityHub. We ultimately decided to maintain our relationship with UserTesting due to the overall usability and the functionality that it offers. The features better suited our needs, and it met a price point that worked …
    Incentivized
    Chose UserTesting
    UserTesting is more robust. We also use UsabilityHub, but for different purposes - one off tests that don't require many screens but do require more responses.
    Incentivized
    Chose UserTesting
    I have not used them in the last few years and cannot comment about current features.
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    95%
    Would buy again
    128 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    92%
    Delivers good value for the price
    94 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    92%
    Happy with the feature set
    126 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    95%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    82 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    97%
    Implementation went as expected
    90 Answers
    Best Alternatives
    LyssnaUserTesting
    Small Businesses
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Medium-sized Companies
    Dovetail
    Score8.7 out of 10
    Dovetail
    Score8.7 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Optimal
    Score8.5 out of 10
    Optimal
    Score8.5 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    LyssnaUserTesting
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.0
    (5 ratings)
    8.5
    (196 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.4
    (8 ratings)
    Usability
    7.0
    (1 ratings)
    8.6
    (174 ratings)
    Availability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.1
    (1 ratings)
    Performance
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.1
    (1 ratings)
    Support Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.3
    (173 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    4.6
    (4 ratings)
    Configurability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.3
    (1 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.3
    (1 ratings)
    Vendor post-sale
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.1
    (1 ratings)
    Vendor pre-sale
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.1
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    LyssnaUserTesting
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Lyssna
    UsabilityHub is well suited for remote unmoderated testing. Responses are captured very quickly and live updates allow the user to keep track of how the test is performing. The types of testing that make the most sense to use on UsabilityHub are preference test, first click test, navigational, and design surveys. It is less appropriate for one-on-one testing and lengthy questionnaires.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    UserTesting
    UserTesting has been great for moderated customer interviews/usability testing as well as for unmoderated testing of messaging, imagery, prototypes and live experiences. I would say that the scope of what you want needs to be limited, as the participants are only paid so much and tests are supposed to not exceed a certain amount of time. For customer interviews, I think it can be difficult to onboard customers to UserTesting if they have never used it before. If I set up interviews, I don't even have them use the UserTesting scheduling tool, I actually set up all the interviews with the customers myself through the tool (being mindful of time zones!). When we run the meeting, they really don't even know UserTesting is involved. Might be nice for UserTesting to allow the upload/connecting to of a Zoom interview and let it do the transcription/analysis from there.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Lyssna
    • Rapid user feedback
    • Demographic targeting
    • Well presented results
    • Easy to use
    • Relatively inexpensive
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    UserTesting
    • Product Manager who follows up on your UserTesting usage and gives advice/support when you need it.
    • UserTesting University is a great platform to learn how to use UT and general information about research.
    • UserTesting can find participants quickly, so you won't need to wait long before you can start the analysis.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Lyssna
    • Add additional demographic sorting options for the audience to better meet the needs of B2B users - for example include industry type, functional area, etc.
    • Bring back the navigation test type
    • Add additional test types
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    UserTesting
    • Sometimes there are restrictions around types of research that can be used for moderated user-testing with our own users.
    • For tests on relatively small areas of a website or app, the AI analysis seems rather overblown, like it's trying too hard to come up with something insightful when the test is actually about something quite small (e.g. structure of a mobile app menu).
    • It's difficult to invite our own users to unmoderated user-testing because they wouldn't know how the UserTesting interface works - this is particularly an issue for mobile research.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Lyssna
    No answers on this topic
    UserTesting
    I'm very happy with my experience of the product and the level of service and learning resources they provide. If the service becomes more expensive than it currently is then we might not be able to justify additional cost - but this is theoretical. I would recommend UserTesting and would ideally renew our contract.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Lyssna
    Due to its simplicity and design it is really easy to navigate. You can clearly understand which sections you have completed and which are still left to be done. It is also really easy to change ordering of content etc, which I have found hasn’t been an option in other tools which means it is a really lengthy task of rewriting all of the tasks or questions to get them in the correct order that is desired.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    UserTesting
    It's very good, I have used other tools in the past and this is by far the most intuitive and user friendly. Testament to this is the ease with which other non researchers who have been onboarded to the tool with our additional seat have found it easy to use
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Reliability and Availability
    Lyssna
    No answers on this topic
    UserTesting
    Never encountered any problems
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Performance
    Lyssna
    No answers on this topic
    UserTesting
    Perfectly fine. Never had any problems.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Lyssna
    No answers on this topic
    UserTesting
    I have contacted UserTesting's customer service online, by email, or by phone a few times, and each time, I have encountered the same professionalism and expertise. Even in person during a work event, they were there, and it was the same experience.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Implementation Rating
    Lyssna
    No answers on this topic
    UserTesting
    From a technical perspective, the implementation was extremely smooth. Most of the change management / implementation hurdles were clearing use of the tool through our various security, legal, and information privacy teams. Once these concerns were addressed (UserTesting.com was very helpful in providing all the needed documentation), the implementation process was very simple and we were able to get going right away.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Lyssna
    UsabilityHub provides very fast, short responses to specific questions about a static image of a website. This is useful for checking what is most prominent on a page, what they would click on, what they see/read within the first 5 seconds of landing etc. WhatUsersDo is a broader tool, that records the screen and audio as a user navigates the website. You can set tasks and ask questions, but it much more about the user journey experience and their opinion, rather than testing a particular feature. Feedback also takes a bit longer. Hotjar is a combination of both, its a screen recording which helps you to see where users click and move to, but there is no audio or text feedback, just heatmaps/click maps for watching user behaviour.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    UserTesting
    The quality of the participants: they usually have good feedback and act like "professional" users. Which is good when we want a few insights in a short amount of time. Also, the interface is good. I miss having more features, like a good transcription tool like we have in Condens
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Scalability
    Lyssna
    No answers on this topic
    UserTesting
    The package we have limits the number of people who can set up tests. This prevents us from scaling the use of the platform.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Lyssna
    • Increase in testing frequency per quarter.
    • Increase in approved projects for developments.
    • Few reverts per project.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    UserTesting
    • Content is key to the sign up journey and UserTesting helps me improve that.
    • UserTesting has helped me improve the Cashier on our site, making it easier for users to deposit money.
    • UserTesting is helping me iterate all our content decisions, helping us improve the UX across all platforms.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    Lyssna Screenshots

    Product screenshotProduct screenshotProduct screenshotProduct screenshotProduct screenshotProduct screenshot

    UserTesting Screenshots

    Screenshot of UserTesting's several solutions for gathering rich customer experience narratives.Screenshot of Interactive Path Flows
Built on recent research in data mining, the Interactive Path Flow aggregates interaction data across multiple participant sessions to visualize the customer journey, surface unexpected behaviors, and locate key moments in the customer journey.Screenshot of Keyword Mapping
Similar keywords are automatically grouped based on overall sentiment (positive, negative, or neutral) to identify themes. Highlight reels associated with each keyword are grouped together, to discover the why behind each sentiment.Screenshot of Video capture and live streaming
Digital and real-world customer experiences are recorded on desktop and mobile devices or live streamed for in-platform viewing.Screenshot of Audience targeting
Audiences are specified by screening contributors from UserTesting’s global network of contributors or connecting to any preferred network.