Microsoft Dynamics GP is an ERP software with accounting capabilities. It includes various packs for customizability and features tailored to specific industries’ needs. GP is offered as a perpetual license or subscription.
N/A
Vista
Score 8.1 out of 10
N/A
Viewpoint’s Vista is a construction accounting software. Vista’s core accounting features include accounts receivable and payable, general ledger, payroll and time management, and cash management. It also provides tools for document management, including document templates and reporting.
N/A
Pricing
Microsoft Dynamics GP
Viewpoint Vista
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Microsoft Dynamics GP
Vista
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
Prospective buyers may contact Viewpoint directly for a price quote.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Microsoft Dynamics GP
Viewpoint Vista
Features
Microsoft Dynamics GP
Viewpoint Vista
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
6.8
18 Ratings
10% below category average
Viewpoint Vista
8.0
25 Ratings
9% above category average
Pay calculation
7.017 Ratings
8.124 Ratings
Benefit plan administration
7.013 Ratings
7.318 Ratings
Direct deposit files
7.016 Ratings
8.124 Ratings
Salary revision and increment management
7.015 Ratings
00 Ratings
Reimbursement management
6.014 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
7.0
25 Ratings
9% below category average
Viewpoint Vista
7.6
6 Ratings
2% above category average
API for custom integration
7.024 Ratings
7.76 Ratings
Plug-ins
7.019 Ratings
7.55 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
8.5
37 Ratings
3% above category average
Viewpoint Vista
8.3
13 Ratings
0% below category average
Single sign-on capability
8.030 Ratings
8.111 Ratings
Role-based user permissions
9.037 Ratings
8.513 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
6.0
38 Ratings
26% below category average
Viewpoint Vista
8.3
29 Ratings
13% above category average
Dashboards
4.026 Ratings
8.124 Ratings
Standard reports
7.036 Ratings
8.029 Ratings
Custom reports
7.036 Ratings
8.026 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
6.4
45 Ratings
17% below category average
Viewpoint Vista
8.0
18 Ratings
4% above category average
Accounts payable
8.042 Ratings
8.418 Ratings
Accounts receivable
8.033 Ratings
8.215 Ratings
Cash management
8.033 Ratings
00 Ratings
Bank reconciliation
7.038 Ratings
00 Ratings
Expense management
5.028 Ratings
00 Ratings
Time tracking
7.013 Ratings
00 Ratings
Fixed asset management
6.026 Ratings
00 Ratings
Multi-currency support
4.018 Ratings
00 Ratings
Multi-division support
7.025 Ratings
00 Ratings
Regulations compliance
4.012 Ratings
00 Ratings
Electronic tax filing
7.011 Ratings
00 Ratings
Self-service portal
7.012 Ratings
00 Ratings
Global Financial Support
6.07 Ratings
7.31 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers
7.018 Ratings
8.21 Ratings
Intercompany Accounting
5.017 Ratings
00 Ratings
Localizations
8.011 Ratings
00 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations
6.023 Ratings
8.313 Ratings
Enterprise Accounting
4.015 Ratings
00 Ratings
Configurable Accounting
8.015 Ratings
8.514 Ratings
Centralized Rules Framework
6.013 Ratings
00 Ratings
Standardized Processes
7.016 Ratings
7.317 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
7.8
25 Ratings
4% above category average
Viewpoint Vista
7.3
6 Ratings
8% below category average
Inventory tracking
9.023 Ratings
7.36 Ratings
Automatic reordering
6.012 Ratings
7.32 Ratings
Location management
8.017 Ratings
7.34 Ratings
Manufacturing module
9.014 Ratings
00 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
5.4
23 Ratings
33% below category average
Viewpoint Vista
7.8
8 Ratings
0% below category average
Pricing
3.017 Ratings
7.76 Ratings
Order entry
3.020 Ratings
7.78 Ratings
Credit card processing
7.011 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cost of goods sold
7.023 Ratings
7.88 Ratings
Order Orchestration
7.08 Ratings
7.95 Ratings
End-to-end order visibility
7.010 Ratings
00 Ratings
Order exception Resolution
4.06 Ratings
00 Ratings
Subledger and Financial Process
Comparison of Subledger and Financial Process features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Viewpoint Vista
7.6
16 Ratings
2% above category average
Billing Management
00 Ratings
7.913 Ratings
Cash and Asset Management
00 Ratings
7.613 Ratings
Travel & Expense Management
00 Ratings
6.77 Ratings
Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting
00 Ratings
7.08 Ratings
Period Close
00 Ratings
7.811 Ratings
Project Financial Management
Comparison of Project Financial Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Viewpoint Vista
8.0
1 Ratings
5% above category average
Budgeting and Forecasting
00 Ratings
7.31 Ratings
Project Costing
00 Ratings
9.11 Ratings
Cost Capture
00 Ratings
9.11 Ratings
Customer Contract Compliance
00 Ratings
7.31 Ratings
Project Revenue Recognition
00 Ratings
7.31 Ratings
Project Execution Management
Comparison of Project Execution Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Viewpoint Vista
7.0
9 Ratings
0% below category average
Task Insight for Project Managers
00 Ratings
7.97 Ratings
Project Mobile Functionality
00 Ratings
7.88 Ratings
Procurement
Comparison of Procurement features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
Viewpoint Vista
7.5
8 Ratings
7% above category average
Contract Authoring
00 Ratings
7.66 Ratings
Contract Repository
00 Ratings
7.96 Ratings
Requisitions-to-Purchase Orders Integrated
00 Ratings
7.27 Ratings
Supplier Management
00 Ratings
7.45 Ratings
Supply Chain
Comparison of Supply Chain features of Product A and Product B
A large company where users have one function- for instance, where someone only receives or works in payables. That minimizes the number of windows they need. A smaller company where one user does multiple functions will require a lot more training and user knowledge to navigate, and it makes it harder to secure users. You also have to understand that GP started life as Great Plains, designed for accountants. The other modules were added on after Microsoft bought Great Plains, which means that modules like Manufacturing are red-headed step children with much smaller support ecosystems. So, if you're starting fresh, you may want to look at something built for the mobile world. D365 and Business Central are a lot more money, buggy, and hard to customize and essentially still vaporware. Microsoft is heavily investing there, leading to the previously mentioned question about the future of GP. If I was starting today I would be hard pressed to justify jumping into GP in a world where Salesforce ties in with so many programs. GP has MRP but it is limited so it's hard to justify a manufacturer starting with GP today.
The company has made a commitment to the use of the Vista products and continue to move forward trying to implement more with the Vista HR Management. From timekeeping to onboarding in the near future we strive to look for better ways to utilize the products for our accounting and payroll purposes.
Able to be extended into multiple areas of your business
One feature we have been using for a few years is EFT for payables - it has significantly reduced the time spent paying vendors and reduced our check printing and mailing costs. It is very easy to setup and use.
With respect to the allocations, once the expense is entered into the allocation account, you lose the ability to run any detail on just the total of the expense. It would be nice if you could run a trial balance on the allocation accounts the same way you can with regular accounts.
I've always thought security set up could be a bit simpler. It actually has gotten better through the years. Specifically, with eight separate entities, it would be nice to have a "master" setup where you could call up one group entity, assign the users rights, and then be finished. Currently, whenever I have a new user, I have to call up each individual entity and select all of the features I want the user to have. That means I have to do eight steps for each user.
Their payroll module is terribly slow and very clunky.
Job costing parameters are very strict and limited.
Each module interface has too many forms and screens.
There is too much flexibility regarding where to put information into the system. There isn't one place to do anything, which creates confusion for staff.
Due the economic challenges that Puerto Rico is having, the company has had to merge some companies in order to be more efficient. It has been easy in GP to process those merges, even thought we had to spend days to accomplish that the process was smooth and accurate. In addition we were able to streamline the purchasing and sales process and the organization is confident to keep renewing GP for the future versions.
It is extremely customizable and tracks so many complicated costs very well, more-so than other construction software programs out there that we've used in the past. It is also not an easy program to use for those even slightly not comfortable with a computer. The help sections/knowledge base could be better organized and updated more. It is a very powerful software program for our business and we rely on it hugely to see how our projects are running in real-time.
Though it is a basic accounting package, I believe some users do not find the old style menus and navigation options intuitive. There is also a great lack of training resources in the market, so users have to learn the product without guidance a lot, resulting in inefficient workflows and misuse or misunderstanding of many features.
I think that Vista's is an easy program to use very user friendly with lots of help features to allow the user to fix an issue without having to put a support call into Vista. The reporting and exporting capability's are strong.
Only issue is when there is an upgrade - it takes several times to get back logged in. Otherwise no issues with getting on to the program. We are set up on lap top or on the remote desk top. Works 90% of the time
No issue downloading the reports - I do find sometimes it is easier to export and save than it is to print to a pdf. Options on the different reports not consistent. You can print a couple projects on the JC Contract Status Report - but you have to do each project for the JC Cost by contract item - when neither one is a drill down - not a big deal
When privately owned, it was very good, then dropped when owned by Bane Capital Investments. Now that it has been bought by Trimble and has a home, support is back up again. Response time is better than most software companies, and the information provided is good. They have Chat support for quick answers, and a good Knowledge Base and video libraries.
Excellent training! They keep you on track to insure your implementation is going as planned. There are ample ways to receive additional training and training can be provided by position type. If you put on the effort, the training is there.
Basically the challenge with this implementation was the Business Portal, too many errors and even the aplication is up and running the users are still having issues. We will start planning the migraton to GP 2015 soon.
The trainer Viewpoint sent did not understand the processes, he only knew where the modules were located. He had no understanding of the actual process itself.
I come from a strong background of using SAP. SAP doesn't have the flexibility of GP, an example would be SAP doesn't allow core mods, if they catch you, you lose support. Microsoft doesn't really care about mods, but they will be quick to have the vendor you used support your issue if it is caused by those mods. With SAP your company adapts to the software, where with GP you adapt the software to you.
I personally have not used another ERP system other than Viewpoint Vista. I am sure there are others out there, but from listening to my managers experiences before Great Basin Industrial implemented Viewpoint, the other options were less superior to what Viewpoint offers. I think if you are looking for an ERP system in the construction industry, then Viewpoint is the way to go
For a small business - this program is well used in the accounting and operations. The two different work plans are set up for success. Alot of the programs we do not use - but like the reports that are generated - one disadvantage if you do not know crystal reports you cannot edit your form to meet your needs so there is a lot of printing different several forms to get all the information you need.
Microsoft Dynamics GP allows my clients to move from a paper or spreadsheet based company to an integrated, electronic, streamlined business. I love being able to help clients gain efficiencies through the use of Microsoft Dynamics GP.
Microsoft Dynamics GP allows for better customer service because everything is at our fingertips. If someone calls questioning an invoice, we can easily look it up. If someone calls stating they paid an invoice with a certain check number, we can quickly run a query to find that particular check number to see where it was applied.
Having everything on a single platform provides ease of use for upgrades, backups and end user training. There is only one software to learn!
Not sure I can speak to this as the company moved to Viewpoint before I began here. I think it is helpful for the Project Management and Superintendent staff to easily review how specific job items went, which we do in the PM contract drilldown analysis