Microsoft Teams combines video conferencing software with team collaboration tools. The communications platform allows MS Office users to conduct conference calls and share files via SharePoint, and join or initiate a group chat.
$4.80
per month per user
Panopto
Score 7.6 out of 10
N/A
Panopto is a video management platform for businesses and universities from the company of the same name in Seattle, supporting the recording, sharing, live streaming, and (after recording) sharing via LMS or internal video site, video search, and virtual classroom.
$14.99
per month
Pricing
Microsoft Teams
Panopto
Editions & Modules
Microsoft Teams Essentials
$4.80
per month per user
Microsoft Teams Enterprise
$5.25
per month (paid yearly) per user
Microsoft Teams Enterprise
$5.25
per month per user
Microsoft 365 Business Basic
$7.20
per month per user
Microsoft 365 Business Standard
$15
per month per user
Pro
$14.99
per month
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Microsoft Teams
Panopto
Free Trial
Yes
No
Free/Freemium Version
Yes
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
Discounts are available for non profit organizations.
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Microsoft Teams
Panopto
Features
Microsoft Teams
Panopto
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Teams
7.6
228 Ratings
2% below category average
Panopto
-
Ratings
Task Management
7.6168 Ratings
00 Ratings
Gantt Charts
7.086 Ratings
00 Ratings
Scheduling
7.7195 Ratings
00 Ratings
Workflow Automation
7.8115 Ratings
00 Ratings
Mobile Access
8.0217 Ratings
00 Ratings
Search
6.9199 Ratings
00 Ratings
Visual planning tools
8.1132 Ratings
00 Ratings
Communication
Comparison of Communication features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Teams
7.8
237 Ratings
2% below category average
Panopto
-
Ratings
Chat
8.9236 Ratings
00 Ratings
Notifications
8.1235 Ratings
00 Ratings
Discussions
8.4222 Ratings
00 Ratings
Surveys
7.8133 Ratings
00 Ratings
Internal knowledgebase
8.4146 Ratings
00 Ratings
Integrates with GoToMeeting
6.547 Ratings
00 Ratings
Integrates with Gmail and Google Hangouts
5.743 Ratings
00 Ratings
Integrates with Outlook
9.1155 Ratings
00 Ratings
File Sharing & Management
Comparison of File Sharing & Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Teams
8.0
222 Ratings
0% below category average
Panopto
-
Ratings
Versioning
8.3156 Ratings
00 Ratings
Video files
8.0189 Ratings
00 Ratings
Audio files
8.5188 Ratings
00 Ratings
Document collaboration
8.7202 Ratings
00 Ratings
Access control
8.4184 Ratings
00 Ratings
Advanced security features
8.1144 Ratings
00 Ratings
Integrates with Google Drive
5.353 Ratings
00 Ratings
Device sync
8.3159 Ratings
00 Ratings
Video Marketing
Comparison of Video Marketing features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Teams
-
Ratings
Panopto
7.0
6 Ratings
8% below category average
Video personalization
00 Ratings
7.06 Ratings
eCommerce
00 Ratings
6.01 Ratings
Support for advertisements
00 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
Video SEO
00 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Video Platform Integrations
Comparison of Video Platform Integrations features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Teams
-
Ratings
Panopto
9.4
7 Ratings
41% above category average
Integration to LMS
00 Ratings
9.47 Ratings
Video Security
Comparison of Video Security features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Teams
-
Ratings
Panopto
8.8
10 Ratings
2% above category average
Video access controls
00 Ratings
9.09 Ratings
User management
00 Ratings
9.010 Ratings
Video link sharing
00 Ratings
10.010 Ratings
Internal video
00 Ratings
8.010 Ratings
External video
00 Ratings
8.09 Ratings
Video Player
Comparison of Video Player features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Teams
-
Ratings
Panopto
8.5
10 Ratings
3% above category average
Player customization
00 Ratings
7.08 Ratings
Embedded videos
00 Ratings
9.08 Ratings
Video quality / Bandwidth controls
00 Ratings
8.89 Ratings
Mobile compatibility
00 Ratings
9.08 Ratings
Video Analytics
Comparison of Video Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Teams
-
Ratings
Panopto
7.5
10 Ratings
5% below category average
A/B testing
00 Ratings
9.04 Ratings
Streaming quality reports
00 Ratings
6.04 Ratings
Per viewer tracking
00 Ratings
8.010 Ratings
Per video tracking
00 Ratings
8.010 Ratings
Video analytics dashboard
00 Ratings
6.38 Ratings
Video Hosting, Management & Storage
Comparison of Video Hosting, Management & Storage features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Teams
-
Ratings
Panopto
8.1
9 Ratings
7% below category average
On-Demand video
00 Ratings
7.68 Ratings
Live streaming
00 Ratings
7.28 Ratings
Impact of streaming on network
00 Ratings
8.04 Ratings
Video upload & format support
00 Ratings
9.08 Ratings
Video library / File management
00 Ratings
9.29 Ratings
Video portal
00 Ratings
7.88 Ratings
Video Engagement
Comparison of Video Engagement features of Product A and Product B
It is well-suited for an organization with many team members who are scattered throughout different locations. It offers organization and clarity to projects, files, and tasks in one centralized location. It would be a bit of an overkill for a small organization where everyone is in the same location 5 days a week
Panopto is great if you have a lot of video content that you need to put in a central repository. It makes it easy to manage who sees it and how it is categorized. The captioning features are also really good too. For folks to view the video, they don't need a Panopto account. You can send them a direct link. If you want to upload videos, however, they will need a Panopto account. If you only have a few videos or care less about usage statistics, SharePoint may be a better file repository option
Simple to use - It really is a click-and-go system. Log in, click on record, and you're set.
Flexible - It allows multiple information-rich inputs to be recorded simultaneously (for example, the screen, webcams, microphones, etc.). For some demonstrations, having multiple perspectives/views can be beneficial. The ability to add multiple webcams enhanced the value of some of my recordings.
Reliable - This is critical when an unforeseen opportunity arises and you want to capture it visually and with audio. I had multiple experiences where a unique person was available briefly and due to Panopto's reliability, I was able to capture content that would otherwise have been seen by only those physically present at the time.
Panopto doesn't fully support Ultra courses in Blackboard - we can do quizzing, which is very helpful, but we can't do video submissions like an Original course.
There is no built-in certificate option for completing a video and its quiz questions, which requires us to use additional systems for tracking and awarding.
Analytics are mediocre. The reporting tools are challenging to use and to get clear information on a consistent basis.
Quizzing is limited to multiple choice or T/F -- there is no reflection point or open-ended question format.
Microsoft Teams is included with our Office 365 subscription and we have no intention of migrating off of Office 365 and Microsoft products. Since Microsoft Teams is included for free with our Office 365 subscription, and since we enjoy all the features, benefits, and functionality, there is no question that our team will continue to use the product
If you have the full Microsoft Office suite, it works really well because it's integrated well within its ecosystem, but if not, it can be annoying because it tries to open a shared file in the web versions of the file equivalents. The web version is also a bit slow, and the login is very difficult to handle if you have multiple Microsoft or Outlook accounts.
The overall support provided by Microsoft for Microsoft Teams has been quite good but there is still some room for improvements. Microsoft needs to proactively work on fixing the open bugs in order to provide a seamless experience to the users. But over the service and experience provided by the Microsoft team have been quite satisfactory.
Panopto has been quick to answer any questions, but their rollouts and updates have caused issues where we felt a little blindsided by unexpected changes. Their development cycle is slow and often their promises for future updates have been extremely slow or never come.
Microsoft Teams offers a much more integrated experience between their chat and video call function compared to Google Chat and Slack. Both other tools are much better for internal communications are they have simpler UI without other features. Whereas Microsoft Teams can be used for more critical conversations, particularly between external companies, and has been very useful in sales conversations which is what we chose it for when speaking to companies that work exclusively through Microsoft.
Cost wise, unless you have a huge audience, Panopto is better. Both Zoom Meeting and Kaltura and for more expensive and a smaller program/company may not have the demand to justify them. Kaltura- is a far superior tool, the UI is much more modern and easier for a novice user to understand, and it makes sharing videos amongst faculty much easier. The LMS integration if far smoother and the recording is much easier and faster (from within the LMS). The analytics are also present in a much cleaner and digestible way. Lastly, the quizzing feature is far more robust. Zoom - Smoother at streaming and live interactions. Stronger chat feature and supports larger audiences, it can handle over 100 HD webcams at once if needed. It does basic desktop capture and supporting audio-only formats that can easily be converted to Podcast or Soundcloud. Google Loom - This one is not listed above as it's rather new but its a FREE tool for fast video/desktop/PPT recordings and it's extremely fast and easy to share. That said it's pretty basic as far as any additional features are concerned. Post-production editing is limited to basic timeline trimming.
Honestly, this tool is worth every penny. Yes, it's not free and you pay for the quality of services and the license. But the ROI and the benefits are all there. Also, the renewal, negotiation, and contract terms are all very well explained by our Microsoft account manager, and she's a charm.
I used Skype for Business to take calls, hold conferences, and provide remote assistance to users. Microsoft Teams, on the other hand, is superior to Skype for Business in my opinion. My job entails a lot of screen sharing.
Because our unit decided to go all in with Microsoft Products, the integration and flow of our communication and files are seamless.
Microsoft Teams is very secure. Only those who are logged in with their university credentials can access the files we share and the events we host. Therefore, we don't have to worry about privacy and security for the virtual events we host.
If our virtual events are open to the public, joiners outside the organization often struggle to join because Microsoft Teams is not the most familiar tool amongst the public.