Whether launching a first test or scaling a sophisticated experimentation program, Optimizely Web Experimentation aims to deliver the insights needed to craft high-performing digital experiences that drive engagement, increase conversions, and accelerate growth.
N/A
Forma, now part of Snapchat
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
Forma was used to build photorealistic avatars, aiming to put the customer directly at the center of the shopping experience with a single photo, with the goal of grabbing their attention and helping them build confidence before buying. Forma was acquired and is now part of Snapchat.
N/A
Wyng
Score 8.8 out of 10
Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
Wyng is used to build interactive digital experiences that engage customers at the right moments, collect their preferences and other zero-party data, and personalize their website experiences in real time. Whether the experience is a product finder quiz, promotion, or preference center, Wyng experiences are designed to be well-timed and user-friendly while offering genuine value to consumers.
N/A
Pricing
Optimizely Web Experimentation
Forma, now part of Snapchat
Wyng
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Optimizely Web Experimentation
Forma, now part of Snapchat
Wyng
Free Trial
Yes
Yes
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
Yes
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Yes
No
Yes
Entry-level Setup Fee
Optional
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Optimizely Web Experimentation
Forma, now part of Snapchat
Wyng
Features
Optimizely Web Experimentation
Forma, now part of Snapchat
Wyng
Testing and Experimentation
Comparison of Testing and Experimentation features of Product A and Product B
Optimizely Web Experimentation
8.0
163 Ratings
5% below category average
Forma, now part of Snapchat
-
Ratings
Wyng
-
Ratings
a/b experiment testing
9.0163 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Split URL testing
8.5135 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Multivariate testing
8.4139 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Multi-page/funnel testing
7.9126 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cross-browser testing
8.197 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Mobile app testing
8.175 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Test significance
8.4147 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Visual / WYSIWYG editor
8.1133 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Advanced code editor
8.0125 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Page surveys
6.217 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Visitor recordings
8.418 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Preview mode
7.6145 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Test duration calculator
7.9112 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Experiment scheduler
8.2112 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Experiment workflow and approval
7.890 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Dynamic experiment activation
7.574 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Client-side tests
7.896 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Server-side tests
7.250 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Mutually exclusive tests
8.180 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Audience Segmentation & Targeting
Comparison of Audience Segmentation & Targeting features of Product A and Product B
Optimizely Web Experimentation
8.2
152 Ratings
7% below category average
Forma, now part of Snapchat
-
Ratings
Wyng
-
Ratings
Standard visitor segmentation
8.4147 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Behavioral visitor segmentation
7.7122 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Traffic allocation control
9.1144 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Website personalization
7.8111 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Results and Analysis
Comparison of Results and Analysis features of Product A and Product B
Optimizely Web Experimentation
8.3
149 Ratings
4% below category average
Forma, now part of Snapchat
-
Ratings
Wyng
-
Ratings
Heatmap tool
9.313 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Click analytics
8.833 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Scroll maps
8.517 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Form fill analysis
8.072 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Conversion tracking
8.744 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Goal tracking
8.2127 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Test reporting
7.9137 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Results segmentation
7.7103 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
CSV export
7.9102 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Experiments results dashboard
8.049 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Optimizely Web Experimentation
Forma, now part of Snapchat
Wyng
Small Businesses
Convert Experiences
Score 9.9 out of 10
Bloomreach - The Agentic Platform for Personalization
Score 9.0 out of 10
Bloomreach - The Agentic Platform for Personalization
I think it can serve the whole spectrum of experiences from people who are just getting used to web experimentation. It's really easy to pick up and use. If you're more experienced then it works well because it just gets out of the way and lets you really focus on the experimentation side of things. So yeah, strongly recommend. I think it is well suited both to small businesses and large enterprises as well. I think it's got a really low barrier to entry. It's very easy to integrate on your website and get results quickly. Likewise, if you are a big business, it's incrementally adoptable, so you can start out with one component of optimizing and you can build there and start to build in things like data CMS to augment experimentation as well. So it's got a really strong a pathway to grow your MarTech platform if you're a small company or a big company.
Very good for smaller stores, very easy to start and expand. Swimwear is a good use case, people want to know what they look like in swimwear. Also it works best on phones so it's good if customers shop on mobile. Not good if you are not on Shopify, it won't work. Also maybe not good for very high-end luxury brands, users who upload photos use their camera phones and not beautiful like models.
They have a variety of offerings so the best approach is to have a clear idea of what type of results you're looking to achieve. They can offer advice on which modules will help you achieve those goals.
The Platform contains drag-and-drop editor options for creating variations, which ease the A/B tests process, as it does not require any coding or development resources.
Establishing it is so simple that even a non-technical person can do it perfectly.
It provides real-time results and analytics with robust dashboard access through which you can quickly analyze how different variations perform. With this, your team can easily make data-driven decisions Fastly.
My role is mostly involved with social media analytics; measuring campaigns. Offerpop could improve in how they track views. I would like to see the number of views and unique views captured each day versus just the total number of views since the start of the campaign.
For our Facebook sign up campaigns, I would like to see more reporting on the information captured in the form fields. For example: the total number of entries, unique entries, bounce rate (how many people viewed the form but didn't complete/submit it).
In addition, I would like to see reporting on how some of our questions within the lead form were answered. The number of entrants who selected various options from our drop down lists.
I rated this question because at this stage, Optimizely does most everything we need so I don't foresee a need to migrate to a new tool. We have the infrastructure already in place and it is a sizeable lift to pivot to another tool with no guarantee that it will work as good or even better than Optimizely
I dont get a lot of great feedback from our social media department. I dont think the issues and concerns where addressed in detail before signing up and before launch
Optimizely Web Experimentation's visual editor is handy for non-technical or quick iterative testing. When it comes to content changes it's as easy as going into wordpress, clicking around, and then seeing your changes live--what you see is what you get. The preview and approval process for sharing built experiments is also handy for sharing experiments across teams for QA purposes or otherwise.
I would rate Optimizely Web Experimentation's availability as a 10 out of 10. The software is reliable and does not experience any application errors or unplanned outages. Additionally, the customer service and technical support teams are always available to help with any issues or questions.
I would rate Optimizely Web Experimentation's performance as a 9 out of 10. Pages load quickly, reports are complete in a reasonable time frame, and the software does not slow down any other software or systems that it integrates with. Additionally, the customer service and technical support teams are always available to help with any issues or questions.
They always are quick to respond, and are so friendly and helpful. They always answer the phone right away. And [they are] always willing to not only help you with your problem, but if you need ideas they have suggestions as well.
The tool itself is not very difficult to use so training was not very useful in my opinion. It did not also account for success events more complex than a click (which my company being ecommerce is looking to examine more than a mere click).
In retrospect: - I think I should have stressed more demo's / workshopping with the Optimizely team at the start. I felt too confident during demo stages, and when came time to actually start, I was a bit lost. (The answer is likely I should have had them on-hand for our first install.. they offered but I thought I was OK.) - Really getting an understanding / asking them prior to install of how to make it really work for checkout pages / one that uses dynamic content or user interaction to determine what the UI does. Could have saved some time by addressing this at the beginning, as some things we needed to create on our site for Optimizely to "use" as a trigger for the variation test. - Having a number of planned/hoped-for tests already in-hand before working with Optimizely team. Sharing those thoughts with them would likely have started conversations on additional things we needed to do to make them work (rather than figuring that out during the actual builds). Since I had development time available, I could have added more things to the baseline installation since my developers were already "looking under the hood" of the site.
The ability to do A/B testing in Optimizely along with the associated statistical modelling and audience segmentation means it is a much better solution than using something like Google Analytics were a lot more effort is required to identify and isolate the specific data you need to confidently make changes
We heard of 3D Look but needs 3D cameras, too expensive so didn't really try. True Fit is what many bigger companies use but it's expensive and doesn't work well
While Rafflecopter was free to use, I didn't like the bulky box that sat in the middle of our web pages. Wildfire rates were just too high to justify continuing to use them, especially as OfferPop interface was so simple and streamlined
We can use it flexibly across lines of business and have it in use across two departments. We have different use cases and slightly different outcomes, but can unify our results based on impact to the bottom line. Finally, we can generate value from anywhere in the org for any stakeholders as needed.
We're able to share definitive annualized revenue projections with our team, showing what would happen if we put a test into Production
Showing the results of a test on a new page or feature prior to full implementation on a site saves developer time (if a test proves the new element doesn't deliver a significant improvement.
Making a change via the WYSIWYG interface allows us to see multiple changes without developer intervention.