An ERP primarily aimed at medium-sized companies that combines financial management capabilities contain the familiar general ledger along with expense management, accounts payable and receivable (AP/AR), advanced cost accounting, and fixed asset accounting.
N/A
Power Apps
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
PowerApps is a low code / rapid application development product from Microsoft that allows users to quickly build apps.
$20
per month per user
Quickbase
Score 8.6 out of 10
N/A
Quickbase helps users tackle any project, no matter how complex. Quickbase helps customers see, connect and control complex projects. Whether it’s raising a skyscraper or coordinating vaccine rollouts, the no-code software platform allows business users to custom fit solutions to the way they work – using information from across the systems they already have.
$700
per month
Pricing
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
Power Apps
Quickbase
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Power Apps Premium
$20
per month per user
Enterprise
Full Customizable
per month/billed annually
Business
Starting at $2,200
per month
Team
Started at $700
per month
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
Power Apps
Quickbase
Free Trial
No
Yes
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Yes
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Optional
Additional Details
—
—
Quickbase offers three key plans, with feature distinction, simple and consistent entitlements, and a flexible licensing model, giving users the option of either user based or usage based licensing across all 3 plans.
QuickBase was easy to implement. Functionality matched our needs of replacing Excel managed processes with a tool that had modern app capabilities and was hosted in the cloud.
Although also a nice competitor, it is still very linked to the Microsoft ecosystem which we do not use that extensively. Also building apps and linking their data was more straight forward in Quick Base.
I have evaluated this product only because our SharePoint intranet will be getting an upgrade EOY. I'm not sure what the full capabilities are yet but highly doubt it compares to QB.
Features
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
Power Apps
Quickbase
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
7.5
11 Ratings
2% above category average
Power Apps
-
Ratings
Quickbase
-
Ratings
Pay calculation
9.010 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Benefit plan administration
8.09 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Direct deposit files
8.09 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Product A and Product B
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
8.0
16 Ratings
7% above category average
Power Apps
-
Ratings
Quickbase
-
Ratings
API for custom integration
8.013 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Plug-ins
8.015 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
8.5
21 Ratings
2% above category average
Power Apps
-
Ratings
Quickbase
-
Ratings
Single sign-on capability
9.015 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Role-based user permissions
8.021 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
7.7
18 Ratings
5% above category average
Power Apps
-
Ratings
Quickbase
-
Ratings
Dashboards
7.013 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Standard reports
8.017 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Custom reports
8.015 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Product A and Product B
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
7.2
23 Ratings
6% below category average
Power Apps
-
Ratings
Quickbase
-
Ratings
Accounts payable
7.022 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Accounts receivable
8.020 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Global Financial Support
8.015 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers
8.017 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations
8.017 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Configurable Accounting
8.016 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Standardized Processes
7.019 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Product A and Product B
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
7.9
16 Ratings
0% below category average
Power Apps
-
Ratings
Quickbase
-
Ratings
Inventory tracking
7.016 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Automatic reordering
8.012 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Location management
10.014 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Product A and Product B
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
7.2
17 Ratings
9% below category average
Power Apps
-
Ratings
Quickbase
-
Ratings
Pricing
8.016 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Order entry
9.016 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Credit card processing
6.88 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cost of goods sold
8.113 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Order Orchestration
9.08 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Subledger and Financial Process
Comparison of Subledger and Financial Process features of Product A and Product B
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
7.0
21 Ratings
7% below category average
Power Apps
-
Ratings
Quickbase
-
Ratings
Billing Management
8.015 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cash and Asset Management
7.018 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Travel & Expense Management
9.012 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting
5.710 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Period Close
8.916 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Financial Management
Comparison of Project Financial Management features of Product A and Product B
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
7.2
11 Ratings
5% below category average
Power Apps
-
Ratings
Quickbase
-
Ratings
Budgeting and Forecasting
5.38 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Costing
7.09 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cost Capture
6.88 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Capital Project Management
6.99 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customer Contract Compliance
6.06 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Revenue Recognition
7.56 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Execution Management
Comparison of Project Execution Management features of Product A and Product B
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
8.8
6 Ratings
23% above category average
Power Apps
-
Ratings
Quickbase
-
Ratings
Project Planning and Scheduling
8.06 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Task Insight for Project Managers
9.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Mobile Functionality
8.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Definable Resource Pools
8.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Grants Management
Comparison of Grants Management features of Product A and Product B
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
7.4
6 Ratings
0% below category average
Power Apps
-
Ratings
Quickbase
-
Ratings
Award Lifecycle Management
7.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Procurement
Comparison of Procurement features of Product A and Product B
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
6.9
13 Ratings
1% below category average
Power Apps
-
Ratings
Quickbase
-
Ratings
Bids Analyzed and Compared
4.36 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Contract Authoring
7.55 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Contract Repository
7.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Requisitions-to-Purchase Orders Integrated
8.09 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Supplier Management
7.011 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Risk Management
Comparison of Risk Management features of Product A and Product B
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
7.6
4 Ratings
14% above category average
Power Apps
-
Ratings
Quickbase
-
Ratings
Risk Repository
8.34 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Control Management
8.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Control Efficiency Assessments
7.23 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Issue Detection
6.73 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Remediation and Certification
7.83 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Logistics
Comparison of Logistics features of Product A and Product B
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
6.9
10 Ratings
1% above category average
Power Apps
-
Ratings
Quickbase
-
Ratings
Transportation Planning and Optimization
7.06 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Transportation Execution Management
7.07 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Trade and Customs Management
5.55 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Fulfillment Management
8.07 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Warehouse Workforce Management
8.06 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Manufacturing
Comparison of Manufacturing features of Product A and Product B
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
7.0
9 Ratings
5% below category average
Power Apps
-
Ratings
Quickbase
-
Ratings
Production Process Design
4.86 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Production Management
4.38 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Configuration Management
8.35 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Work Execution
9.07 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Manufacturing Costs
9.08 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Supply Chain
Comparison of Supply Chain features of Product A and Product B
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
6.3
13 Ratings
13% below category average
Power Apps
-
Ratings
Quickbase
-
Ratings
Forecasting
5.410 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Inventory Planning
8.013 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Performance Monitoring
8.08 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Product Lifecycle Management
Comparison of Product Lifecycle Management features of Product A and Product B
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
8.0
7 Ratings
10% above category average
Power Apps
-
Ratings
Quickbase
-
Ratings
Proposal Management
8.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Product Master Data Management
8.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Low-Code Development
Comparison of Low-Code Development features of Product A and Product B
If there are lot of complicated systems this might not be the best system. If you have only some complexity Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is a product a technical or application person can wrap their hands around and understand the whole system.
Power Apps is ideal for scenarios that are neither too complex nor too large. It is easy to begin development in Power Apps, as it is one of the best tools for low-code development. Power Apps can be implemented for complex scenarios as well, provided there is strong knowledge of the tool and ample time for planning. Our applications benefit from Power Apps' cross-platform support, making it easy to use on any device, including desktops, laptops, and mobile devices.
I no longer think that Quickbase is the way of the future. They do not fix major bugs in a timely manner, and are releasing basic functionality behind a paywall. I believe that Enterprise Level Tier should be given certain things, like SLAs on Support and up-time. However, as a low-code no-code platform the majority of the accounts, "builders", and users are not going to be able to justify the cost of an Enterprise Tier Plan, and won't be able to use the features that Quickbase continues to advertise.
The new versions (9.2) of JDE has so much open functionality and really gives the user control over the screens and what they want to see. Love that the layout of the screen is really up to the user and what they want to see it along with freezing columns and creating favorites for way access.
It is so flexible with the system platforms that it can run on and so easy to customize since it supports so many databases.
It is intuitive and does not need to have a lot of training on how to use the software.
It's just a great ERP software and one of the better ones I've seen.
Oracle is FINALLY starting to listen to the users and SIGs and putting enhancements into the system which makes life easier for us business users.
Power Apps has formats that are pre-built that don't require any coding which makes it easier to achieve your vision. This does become a challenge if your App needs don't fit into that format.
We deal with a ton of data so the fact that you can connect to any data source in addition to their pre-stablished data connections makes the process a breeze.
The online learning resources and tutorials are helpful as well for those who are tech savvy.
The Configurable Network Language (CNC) is a proprietary protocol, and it can be difficult to source resources that understand this language well.
It has some inherent limitations with generating PDF or printable files. Most organizations use a third party platform like Creat!form or Bottomline to solve this.
No built in credit card processing solution, and no plug-and-play eCommerce or webstore capabilities available.
Sometimes the cost of solutions is greater than the benefit. Licensing is expensive relative to the scope of some business user-created personal or team-level solutions.
While there is a starter-kit for Governance, it is complicated to stand up and requires dedicated resources to provide on-going governance operations. Many organizations are not going to be able to dedicate resources to governance and this causes the sprawl, solution duplication, silos, unneeded and unplanned licensing expenses, and a general "wild wild west" environment.
There needs to be better direction and best practices given around Power Platform Environment utilization and optimization.
The accessibility to the platform and ease for business partners to independantly create solutions is both a benefit and a negative. When the business outcome needed is a good fit for PowerApps it is a quick win, but when not a good fit it becomes a frustration for the business partner attempting to make the platform do something it is not well-suited for. The business partner entangles tech teams in the effort which drains resources and provides a lack-luster solution. All of this to say, it would be beneficial to have some tools that business partners could leverage to determine\understand if the type of business outcome they need is well suited to PowerApps or not.
I'd like to see a link on email notices that take you directly into said notice. On an app that only has 1 or 2 email notices firing, there's no issue. However, we have some tools that are so complex that they have about 20 email notices firing at any given time based on the action users take. In this case, if we have to go in to modify a notice, we have to guess or scroll down the long list of notices to see which one we need to customize. It would be great if Quickbase had the URL of said notice somewhere at the footer of that notice so when Administrators click on it, it takes them into the exact notice they need to update.
When filling out or reviewing a lengthy form, I'd like to see the Save & close button, as well as a Save & next option at the bottom of the form rather than having to scroll back up to the top of those forms just to click on those choices.
For our use-case of QuickBase, there really aren't any other products out there that can offer us the same out-of-the-box solutions they provide to us. We're also so integrated with it in our daily processes that to move away from it abruptly would cause mass chaos, so it's going to be renewed for at least the next several years.
PowerApps is a great solution and I have spent the last year familiarizing myself with the platform and building custom applications to complete a whole range of tasks such as asset management, custom invoice generation, and item restriction tracking. We as a company have barely begun to scratch the surface of what can be achieved with PowerApps.
Quick Base has done everything we have asked it to do and then some. Our original goal was to have one system for CRM that encompassed both the sales process and the customer management. We have gone w-a-y beyond that with analytics, project management, system bug logging, and historical effort reporting.
Once we did get Quick Base configured and customized it was reliably available when we needed it. We may have had one or two occasions when the product was inaccessible but those were few. The greatest challenge with its availability was its difficulty with integrating with our systems.
Some of our tables that hold over a million records are starting to perform poorly, with some summaries taking over 20 seconds to load. This may be an indication that it is best to archive old data when reaching large volumes like this.
The community forums are extremely responsive to questions asked, there is a good body of online documentation and many community posts to draw from. Although the platform has changed, which means some of the posts are out of date and the solutions provided aren't relevant. Of relevance, I read over 400 articles plus documentation to get this first app built in SharePoint, move it to SQL and make it work exactly the way it should.
If you utilize the community, the support is amazing. Unfortunately, I find their actual support system a bit underwhelming. They don't seem to have a great process for interacting directly with an issue and often sweep significant issues under the rug by categorizing them as "Enhancement" ideas or legacy items.
Quick Base already is having a separate portal of providing training to customers and it is very easy to use and updates as per the new features added in to the application
I was not directly involved with the initial account implementation, only a bystander. For the app I directly implemented for my department only, I wish I had know to create an app diagram first. I don't remember if that was suggested. I think that would be a great help tip tool when a new app is created, to have a page with a check list of what is needed or how to get started. If you are a regular app builder, then you can bypass it or have the ability to turn it off in the app settings.
It is simple to use and implement as compared to complex softwares in the market that may take ample amount of time to implement. The budget is also slightly less to provide the same functionality that other softwares are providing. Also having Oracle database that comes with the system is much easier to handle and use and have much security.
1. PowerApps functionality comes with E1 over E3 License without adding extra costs 2. For Nintex you pay (at the beginning) for each workflow, so my intention would be, to do no workflows to prevent additional costs, but I want a platform with a fair price that allows me to create workflows without thinking about the price for each workflow and we use only some workflow and relative easy workflows and forms as a medium-sized company. 3. PowerApps provides a lot of functionality without needing to invest in premium features directly.
Well, there's a plethora of low-code tools out on the marketplace and, you know, there's a reason that we've decided to partner with QuickBase because it has all the right balance of the ability to integrate with the ability for a citizen developer to create apps successfully. So if you look at something like Zo Ho's low-code offering, for example, yes, there are some similarities there, but they're really dependent on all of their other licensed products to get you where you want to be, where with QuickBase you have the ability to truly create something custom.
It has evolved really well with our company, but there is a hard limit to the table size that has begun to affect us and not let us grow. The table size limit is set at 500 MB and we have had to jump through quite a few hoops to be able to get by.
Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne's advantage is significant cost savings and operational improvements when you run Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne in the Oracle Cloud. Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne offers the only no-compromise enterprise cloud platform for moving Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne, its associated database systems, an ecosystem of apps to the cloud. Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne's One-Click Provisioning tool allows you to deploy Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne on the Oracle Cloud in hours, not days while maintaining the integrity of existing customized apps.
ROI is HUGE. Our company saved over 3.5 million in one year alone based on developments that year in Quickbase that saved time for many teams
Less user error - implementing automations and standardized workflows has led to less user error as was previously seen by maintaining spreadsheets or Smartsheets