Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Projecturf
Score 9.6 out of 10
N/A
Projecturf is a web-based all-inclusive project management tool from Projecturf in Redondo Beach, CA. Projecturf has the core features associated to project management software, such as real-time notifications and activity feeds, integration with various apps and programs (e.g. Dropbox, Google Apps), document management, commenting, bulk uploading, Gantt charts, reporting capabilities, and more. It also includes some CRM/Pipeline Management Features. Clutter is reduced by collapsing many tasks…
$20
per month
Wrike
Score 8.2 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
Wrike is a project management and collaboration software. This solution connects tasks, discussions, and emails to the user’s project plan. Wrike is optimized for agile workflows and aims to help resolve data silos, poor visibility into work status, and missed deadlines and project failures.
$9.80
per month per user
Pricing
ProjecturfWrike
Editions & Modules
Projecturf
$20.00
per month
Wrike Free
$0
per month per user
Wrike Team
$9.8
per month per user
Wrike Business
$24.8
per month per user
Wrike Enterprise
Request a quote
per month per user
Pinnacle
Request a quote
per month per user
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
ProjecturfWrike
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoYes
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsEvery premium plan begins with a 14-day trial period.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
ProjecturfWrike
Considered Both Products
Projecturf
Wrike

No answer on this topic

Top Pros
Top Cons
Features
ProjecturfWrike
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Product A and Product B
Projecturf
8.6
3 Ratings
13% above category average
Wrike
7.8
664 Ratings
4% above category average
Task Management9.63 Ratings8.5659 Ratings
Resource Management9.92 Ratings7.7551 Ratings
Gantt Charts9.03 Ratings7.8463 Ratings
Scheduling8.93 Ratings7.8575 Ratings
Workflow Automation7.53 Ratings7.7558 Ratings
Team Collaboration9.63 Ratings8.6658 Ratings
Support for Agile Methodology9.02 Ratings7.7330 Ratings
Support for Waterfall Methodology8.93 Ratings8.0293 Ratings
Document Management9.63 Ratings7.2553 Ratings
Email integration9.63 Ratings7.2506 Ratings
Mobile Access9.12 Ratings7.5475 Ratings
Timesheet Tracking4.92 Ratings7.9293 Ratings
Change request and Case Management8.32 Ratings7.723 Ratings
Budget and Expense Management6.62 Ratings7.7220 Ratings
Professional Services Automation
Comparison of Professional Services Automation features of Product A and Product B
Projecturf
9.7
2 Ratings
26% above category average
Wrike
7.8
224 Ratings
5% above category average
Quotes/estimates9.92 Ratings8.21 Ratings
Invoicing9.92 Ratings7.31 Ratings
Project & financial reporting9.92 Ratings8.1221 Ratings
Integration with accounting software9.11 Ratings7.6128 Ratings
Best Alternatives
ProjecturfWrike
Small Businesses
FunctionFox
FunctionFox
Score 8.3 out of 10
FunctionFox
FunctionFox
Score 8.3 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
SAP Ruum
SAP Ruum
Score 9.0 out of 10
SAP Ruum
SAP Ruum
Score 9.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Quickbase
Quickbase
Score 9.2 out of 10
Quickbase
Quickbase
Score 9.2 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
ProjecturfWrike
Likelihood to Recommend
9.6
(4 ratings)
8.4
(698 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
7.0
(1 ratings)
8.3
(94 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
8.4
(55 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(18 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
7.9
(15 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(84 ratings)
In-Person Training
-
(0 ratings)
7.5
(5 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
7.7
(11 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(31 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
6.4
(10 ratings)
Contract Terms and Pricing Model
-
(0 ratings)
7.5
(4 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
7.9
(6 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
8.3
(11 ratings)
Professional Services
-
(0 ratings)
7.9
(4 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(7 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
6.9
(7 ratings)
User Testimonials
ProjecturfWrike
Likelihood to Recommend
Projecturf
It is appropriate for team tasks. It is not appropriate for us to use a medical scheduling tool for our participants.
Read full review
Wrike
My organization used Google Sheets to work with subbies, but we've since switched to Wrike. It is user friendly, has formulas and customizable fields. Wrike has been a lifesaver because instead of sharing Google Sheets with external customers and typically they messing up - deleting formulas, users can simply fill out a request form without logging into Wrike . All details are displayed in a table view, making management much easier.
Read full review
Pros
Projecturf
  • Manages files and communication
  • Allows us to track tickets
  • Ensures we have tasks clearly outlined with timelines
Read full review
Wrike
  • Wrike has been consistent in emailing any updates or changes to each person involved in each task.
  • Wrike has a simple to navigate website, with quick access to each task.
  • Wrike keeps all data files located at the top of the task for quick reference, which makes it easier for each team member to find.
  • Wrike adds date tags as well as any edited or deleted notes where we are able to cross-reference any major changes that may have been made.
Read full review
Cons
Projecturf
  • From what I understand, there was no good way to tracking the time it took to complete tasks and a way to evaluate all that data.
  • Sometimes, when a team member thought they posted something on the notes module it is never viewable by other members.
Read full review
Wrike
  • The email notifications that are automatically sent from Wrike when something is done are easy for users to miss or ignore.
  • Reporting can be limited. You have to create workarounds for collecting/storing the name of the person submitting the form in instances where they do not have their own Wrike license.
  • A more user-friendly interface, especially for those less familiar with project management software, would enhance overall accessibility.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Projecturf
I am not in the position to choose our project management software, and my current company has already used our current software for a number of years. But if I were to ever use project management software for personal projects with remote team members then I think Projecturf would be a great contender for the job.
Read full review
Wrike
I wish that Wrike had more drag and drop functionality that would be connected to assignee and also I wish that the finish date of a task would update to the date where you checked completed. It does not do that. Also finishing a task doesn't move the start date of the next task it "protects your time in that way", but our management team wants us to quickly see what we have down the pipeline rather than having to scroll down the list of upcoming tasks.
Read full review
Usability
Projecturf
No answers on this topic
Wrike
Wrike is def NOT rocket science, but it does take some of our users a good while to learn to navigate around and about all the zillions of features and things they can set up to make their work life smoother.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Projecturf
No answers on this topic
Wrike
Over two years of (almost) daily usage without outages. Don't remember any errors. I give it 9 only because some Wrike plugins (for online document edit) are based on NPAPI architecture. These types of plugins are being phased out in new browsers, and NPAPI plugins are disabled by default in recent versions of Chrome so you have to do some browser adjustments when you switch browsers or move to another computer.
Read full review
Performance
Projecturf
No answers on this topic
Wrike
Wrike tasks loads fine, but I hate clicking files and wait for a bit of time since it is powerpoint or word, Wrike assumes I want to open those on Wrike. My suggestion is to link it to office 365 so we do not need Wrike based decoder for PPTX and DOCX
Read full review
Support Rating
Projecturf
No answers on this topic
Wrike
Support is very quickly and they want to solve problems actively. When I need additional info I can use community forum, when I've an issue I can use support form to get help. The support is of excellent quality from the first level, to grow when you talk to the engineers it becomes even more important
Read full review
In-Person Training
Projecturf
No answers on this topic
Wrike
We had staff in person provide some training
Read full review
Online Training
Projecturf
No answers on this topic
Wrike
I love the Wrike training options. Wrike Discover has tons of courses, learning plans, certifications, etc. This is an area where Wrike definitely shines! I wish these resources were more in your face for new people, because it seems like a lot of coworkers didn't know all of this training was available to them.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Projecturf
No answers on this topic
Wrike
There are a lot of bells and whistles in Wrike, and not all of it is easy or intuitive to understand once it's plopped in your lap. It's easier when there are a few choice people who understand Wrike as a platform and articulate it in such a way where it makes it easy to pass it along to others in the group
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Projecturf
It is very good against its competition. We have used tools like Asana, Basecamp, Wrike and Trello, and it outpaces all of them.
Read full review
Wrike
I have not used other products except Microsoft Teams channels with file sharing and standard sharing from Adobe, text and email messaging, and Zoom/gotomeeting sharing. This is the first product that I have used that had the functionality and platform where the sharing is simplistic. It is better than standard sharing through email or other simple forms because everything stays together.
Read full review
Contract Terms and Pricing Model
Projecturf
No answers on this topic
Wrike
company purchase
Read full review
Scalability
Projecturf
No answers on this topic
Wrike
The sky is the limit for what can be done in Wrike. We started with 1 use case and within 5 months we migrated several key business practices over to Wrike because they were easier to manage. Use cases so far: process improvement, management review, corrective actions, maintenance requests, month-end financial closing, and document management. As we grow, it's easy to imagine putting even more into Wrike where it becomes a cornerstone for how we do business
Read full review
Professional Services
Projecturf
No answers on this topic
Wrike
not sure
Read full review
Return on Investment
Projecturf
  • Saves us time
Read full review
Wrike
  • Adding versions of a document streamlines our editing process, preventing us from reviewing outdated versions of a document. This feature saves time, especially when working with external contributors who may not know Wrike well.
  • Blueprints save time because we do not have to manually enter all the details when scheduling a recurring project.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Wrike Screenshots

Screenshot of Resource ManagementScreenshot of Wrike TemplatesScreenshot of Team WorkloadScreenshot of Wrike ReportsScreenshot of Wrike apps & integrationsScreenshot of Wrike Gantt Chart