Miro Pricing

slides are pretty static expensive for additional seats beta features appears and disappears without any notice

Can improve flow chart capabilities to match lucid chart Bit expensive infinite canvas is sometimes different to manage

Miro is more cost effective than Visio. Confluence is a bit more structured for architecture

customizable. It's more scalable designed for any size of industry and the product prices vary on this. The support team is amazing in managing their updates and … It's efficient in team collaborative tasks. Cost optimization. Project productivity.

Problems are very varied from retail intelligence all the way to engineering cost cutting. We use Miro extensively for all the Initiatives involving : 1

Improved team productivity Added value to our weekly CRM status

with my other tools and workflows is solid. That means switching away will cost time and effort. Although if the costs increase, I can review my position

spent preparing things like retro sessions Just investigating the new AWS costing features which are a regular metric our teams and others need to track and

decrease license cost cross-functional teams due to different software

needs. The full-screen presentation of the canvas is impressive and adds value during the meeting. Miro is a great tool for brainstorming activity too.

Little expensive than alternatives

everyone on the one product I don't believe that Miro has had any impact on cost reduction

integrations much. Honestly, the only downside for me was the price, it’s a bit on the expensive side. But I would love to use the PRO version features again … Flexible prices for smaller teams More advanced templates to save time Mobile app lac…

It has greatly impacted production thus reducing cost per unit

I would say on par, but a better value than Mural, hence why our company changed contracts. And, at this time, much

improving team alignment Team productivity - Concepts can be designed in hours Cost saving, by eliminating the need of travels for many situations

for archiving the content which is no longer required but is of important value.

one use and throwaway, versus Miro boards which are long-lived and deliver value over and above the workshop itself.

For Miro to replace a whiteboard discussion, one must also invest in expensive hardware that gives the same feeling as writing and drawing on a whiteboard … Miro is superior to these tools, but it is also significantly expensive.

satisfaction of our clients. This would help spread goodwill and improve the brand value of both the client's product and services as well as our organization.

online workshops. Normally, I prepare my workshops a head with the process or value mapping and then with stickers and other tools, we identify problems, brainstorm … Customer Journey Mapping Brainstorming session Process / value mapping Lean workshops

anything on the miro board if one doesn't have a paid license which is not affordable. When writing in a shape eg flowcharts if you text is longer than that

remotely.I love Miro still, even after the pandemic. It is continuing to add value because it supports the way we're working hybrid, making collaboration fun

Lately we're also seeing option of planning poker which definitely adds value to the Miro board specially during Quarterly Plannings, Sprint Planning as

the team takes some time. The members who are into tech are finding it's value with in no time. Adoption to non technical people need good training and