Overall Satisfaction with ClickUp
Handle multiple tasks in dev/innovation planning. Making scheduled
subtasks.Automating the creation of tasks as recursive. Being able to
get a glimpse of the pending work to do on a whiteboard and linked to
GitLab makes it possible to claim tasks and filter search those related to
the assignees or observers.
subtasks.Automating the creation of tasks as recursive. Being able to
get a glimpse of the pending work to do on a whiteboard and linked to
GitLab makes it possible to claim tasks and filter search those related to
the assignees or observers.
- Automation
- Quick Commands.
- Accessibility
- Trustworthy to save pending lineups.
- Connection
- Notifications
- Organization of schedule.
- Make specific milestones.
- Establish OKRs.
- Divide workload.
Including observers without assigning them the task. Also making a broad observer without the need to add them specifically in every task (for high admins). The share of space by adapting the statuses one space has, unlike the main one. Or even the possibility of disputing it. The possibility to assign multiple users to a task.
By making checklists, we can shorten the need to put details for little steps that still need to be noted based on the project, then move on to subtasks or even work in each space per status change. The way ClickUp enables the establishment of multiple deadlines works best for management.
It is much more intuitive and shows more dev-driven tasks to create stories. Also, the fact that ClickUp enables the system to save multiple files from online to locally uploaded files, and GitLab is the way to archive them. Maybe Asana has new features, but I'm sure Clickup is now my family to evaluate new ideas.
Do you think ClickUp delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with ClickUp's feature set?
Yes
Did ClickUp live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of ClickUp go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy ClickUp again?
Yes