The Wrike Stuff.
July 03, 2025

The Wrike Stuff.

Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 8 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User

Overall Satisfaction with Wrike

We use Wrike for all our internal and cross-functional project needs at my organization. It's a handy tool for determining your week-by-week project load, to-do list, and identifying areas where you're falling behind in your workload. Also very useful for cross-team collaboration, where we need to discuss different deliverables and have a friendly debate in the comments section. We can break down long, complex projects into manageable pieces, allowing us to understand each element before we begin working, while also being able to adjust along the way.

Pros

  • Cross Team Collaboration.
  • Open Communication.
  • Organization
  • Automations
  • Reviews

Cons

  • User Interface.
  • Dynamic Anchor Dating.
  • Version Controlling.
  • Quicker Review Iterations.
  • Transparent Work Creation.
  • Transparent Organization Priorities.
We have used some of the automation features here. We use it quite often in our review process, where we need many team members looking at a single piece of copy or media and need their input by a certain date. It's easy to create a single review task, assign it to the relevant people, and have Wrike auto-generate those individual tasks so nothing slips through the cracks. This allows for large group reviews where everyone can have an opinion.
I did not set up these automated tasks, but I am a beneficiary of them. The computerized functions significantly reduce the number of busy work hours, allowing me to quickly complete tasks like copying reviews and distributing them to a large number of people with minimal effort. I have set up some automated reporting that was super simple and helps me keep organized with my manager and team.
There is a time and place for any project management tool, and it largely depends on what your team has historically used and where they feel comfortable. Many of the tools are so similar in their features that feel becomes such a significant factor in how teams handle work inside them. Wrike is more focused on business outcomes, and as such, the UI is drier, which is not a bad thing per se. Less cute and "bouncy" than what you would find in Asana, maybe fewer design considerations, but this lets you focus on tasks and project setup.

Do you think Wrike delivers good value for the price?

Not sure

Are you happy with Wrike's feature set?

Yes

Did Wrike live up to sales and marketing promises?

I wasn't involved with the selection/purchase process

Did implementation of Wrike go as expected?

I wasn't involved with the implementation phase

Would you buy Wrike again?

Yes

Wrike is great for organizations with work groups who typically don't meet in person or regularly through video calls. You can do tons of collaborative work in Projects and Comments and deliver complex projects using just those features. Wrike is less effective for client delivery projects that require repeatable tasks to be reported, as the reporting functionality in Wrike is lacking.

Wrike Feature Ratings

Task Management
10
Resource Management
4
Gantt Charts
Not Rated
Scheduling
4
Workflow Automation
9
Team Collaboration
10
Support for Agile Methodology
8
Support for Waterfall Methodology
10
Document Management
7
Email integration
7
Mobile Access
5
Timesheet Tracking
5
Budget and Expense Management
3
Project & financial reporting
7
Integration with accounting software
Not Rated

Comments

More Reviews of Wrike