Adobe Marketing Cloud vs. Progress Sitefinity vs. Sitecore Digital Experience Platform

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Adobe Marketing Cloud
Score 9.2 out of 10
N/A
Adobe Marketing Cloud is a suite of products including analytics, social, advertising, targeting and web experience management. It comprises foremost the popular integrated web content management and digital asset management (WCMS / DAM) solution Adobe Experience Manager, Adobe Campaign's cross-channel campaign management and marketing resource management capabilities (based on technology acquired with Neolane in 2013), the Adobe Audience Manager data management platform, analytics, and other…N/A
Progress Sitefinity
Score 7.6 out of 10
N/A
Progress Sitefinity is a content management and customer analytics platform. It supports content management, tailored marketing, multi-channel management, and ecommerce sites.N/A
Sitecore Digital Experience Platform
Score 8.7 out of 10
N/A
The Sitecore Experience Platform (Sitecore XP) is a digital experience platform used to build websites and create customer experiences online. The solution boasts fast content authoring, built-in personalization features, testing and other optimizations, as well as analytics and marketing features.N/A
Pricing
Adobe Marketing CloudProgress SitefinitySitecore Digital Experience Platform
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Adobe Marketing CloudProgress SitefinitySitecore Digital Experience Platform
Free Trial
NoYesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoYesNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Adobe Marketing CloudProgress SitefinitySitecore Digital Experience Platform
Considered Multiple Products
Adobe Marketing Cloud

No answer on this topic

Progress Sitefinity
Chose Progress Sitefinity
We evaluated a range of other platforms before selecting Progress Sitefinity. While many other platforms had a powerful range of features, Progress Sitefinity provided to be a comparable product at a price far more suited to our budget. Above all else, its ease of use gained …
Chose Progress Sitefinity
In addition to being a user of Sitefinity, my company is also a Sitefinity Partner. More than a decade ago, we were supporting several CMS platforms and decided we wanted to pick one and be great at it. After analyzing many content management systems, we decided that Sitefinity …
Chose Progress Sitefinity
It is hands down just easier for our customers to use. The interface and the page builder experience is much better than what we have used in the past and has many enterprise features even in the lower price-point.
Chose Progress Sitefinity
Sitefinity has its advantages and disadvantages. We view it as a useful tool in our toolbox and are always happy to develop a new Sitefinity site when its features align with the needs of our clients. From a content management standpoint, it is easier to work in than some and a …
Chose Progress Sitefinity
It stacks up very well and in many areas is a lot easier to use and develop.
Chose Progress Sitefinity
  • Best system from a feature/cost point of view. We had specific requirements, one of which was that the system had to be based in a IIS/.net environment.
  • Price was another factor and ease of implementation with the existing development staff another.
  • E-commerce had to be …
Chose Progress Sitefinity
In terms of feature set, Sitefinity offers more out-of-the-box features as compared to Umbraco.
In comparison to Kentico, Sitefinity has a better back-end admin set of tools.
In comparison to Sitecore, Sitefinity is cheaper and easier to use.
Chose Progress Sitefinity
We prefer Sitefinity to any of the open source solutions out there for the basic arguments you will typically hear. Additionally, Sitefinity fit well into our .NET development stack and competency we have on staff. Relative to Sitecore, Sitefinity seemed to offer better value …
Chose Progress Sitefinity
Umbraco is good for a campaign website, whereas Sitecore provides rich feature and is suitable for enterprise websites, but compared to Sitefinity it's more expensive.

Sitefinity provides features which are suitable for many enterprise websites. It also has different types of …
Chose Progress Sitefinity
It's been six years since I evaluated all of the possible CMS platforms. I really liked Sitecore but it was substantially more expensive. I really like Joomla but felt it would be most successful if you have a web designer/developer on staff. I also looked at a lot of other …
Chose Progress Sitefinity
We wanted a CMS that is based on the dot net framework to leverage existing on-site expertise. Also, ease of use for content editors was important. An API to interface with other systems was important as well.
Chose Progress Sitefinity
I previously used Ektron. It felt clunky and outdated and wasn't keeping current with browser updates. We looked at Sitefinity, Sitecore and Ingeniux when it was time to upgrade. Sitefinity stood out from the rest namely because of the personalization features, content editing …
Chose Progress Sitefinity
I don't think the Sitefinity stacks up against them, and i would no longer recommend Sitefinity after using the other mentioned CMS's
Chose Progress Sitefinity
The cost of Sitefinity compared to other enterprise level CMS systems along with their built-in functions makes this a one stop solution for most companies. We also have the ability to easily create other content types and tools.
Chose Progress Sitefinity
SharePoint was too limited. Sitecore was too expensive. Sitefinity was just right.
Chose Progress Sitefinity
We've used Sitecore in the past and the interface was very unintuitive and difficult to use. Since then we have experimented with DotNetNuke and Umbraco, but are not satisfied only being supported by a community of volunteers. Customers have requirements and Sitefinity is able …
Chose Progress Sitefinity
We currently use ElementCMS and it is slow to use and slow to upgrade. We evaluated Kentico, Sitecore and a few others when looking for Sitefinity. Sitefinity was the easiest to use and offered all the features we wanted.

It was important to us the company stayed up to date and …
Chose Progress Sitefinity
I have never used Sitecore, but we are using it on a new project. I know it is comparatively very expensive to Sitefinity and they have been very proactive with sending me information regarding certification and training courses for our development team. Many projects we have …
Chose Progress Sitefinity
Umraco, SharePoint, DotNetNuke, Sitecore. I prefer Sitefinity in almost every instance. Sitecore is more enterprise level but overkill for most clients.
Chose Progress Sitefinity
We have also evaluated Sitecore CMS, but we choose Sitefinity because of its support and a big software company as Progress has convinced us more. We hope to see quick support from Progress, and new cool development of Sitefinity with a lot a new features in the news releases.
Chose Progress Sitefinity
Ultimately, Sitefinity won over the competitor products in three key areas - price, ease of use and ease of extension/integration.
Chose Progress Sitefinity
  • Easy installation,
  • Value for money (license costs)
  • Backend usability
Chose Progress Sitefinity
We chose Sitefinity because it was the only CMS framework that was built on ASP.Net MVC web pages and we believed it was going to be a much easier implementation than the others, since our site was already written in that language.
Chose Progress Sitefinity
Sitefinity combines the benefits of being easy to use, extremely customizable, and has great support. None of the other products we evaluated or have used in the past had everything we needed. Cost is comparable with other non open source products we evaluated, but the free …
Sitecore Digital Experience Platform
Chose Sitecore Digital Experience Platform
Other tools lack one or the other and fail to provide a comprehensive best experience for everyone - content authors, marketers and developers. Sitecore comes with out of the box authoring host, best content authoring and WYSIWYG editing experience and much more.
Chose Sitecore Digital Experience Platform
Its is simply by far the most advanced system. Using other CMS you will soon be blocked with advanced customizations specially to their back office but Sitecore enables you to do whatever you want and hook into the pipelines and embed your own code/business logic.
Chose Sitecore Digital Experience Platform
Sitefinity is improving but at the time of decision making it had nothing that could compare with the A/B testing and personalisation features that Sitecore offers. This was a key differentiator and ultimately ensured Sitecore was purchased. WordPress isn't really comparable …
Chose Sitecore Digital Experience Platform
Of all the competitors listed above, Sitecore owned, by far, the best combination of power, easy-of-use, and extensibility. It easily outperformed the other paid-for CMS systems. Its power is especially noticeable in its ability to handle very complex workflows, security …
Chose Sitecore Digital Experience Platform
Even though sitecore is not an open source program it's offering was valuable enough to make us choose it.
Features
Adobe Marketing CloudProgress SitefinitySitecore Digital Experience Platform
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
Adobe Marketing Cloud
-
Ratings
Progress Sitefinity
8.1
163 Ratings
0% below category average
Sitecore Digital Experience Platform
9.8
32 Ratings
19% above category average
Role-based user permissions00 Ratings8.1163 Ratings9.832 Ratings
Platform & Infrastructure
Comparison of Platform & Infrastructure features of Product A and Product B
Adobe Marketing Cloud
-
Ratings
Progress Sitefinity
8.1
144 Ratings
0% below category average
Sitecore Digital Experience Platform
9.7
29 Ratings
18% above category average
API00 Ratings8.1137 Ratings9.928 Ratings
Internationalization / multi-language00 Ratings8.1106 Ratings9.526 Ratings
Web Content Creation
Comparison of Web Content Creation features of Product A and Product B
Adobe Marketing Cloud
-
Ratings
Progress Sitefinity
8.0
170 Ratings
11% above category average
Sitecore Digital Experience Platform
8.8
32 Ratings
20% above category average
WYSIWYG editor00 Ratings8.1160 Ratings8.332 Ratings
Code quality / cleanliness00 Ratings8.0151 Ratings8.530 Ratings
Admin section00 Ratings8.0168 Ratings8.831 Ratings
Page templates00 Ratings8.1164 Ratings9.329 Ratings
Library of website themes00 Ratings8.0104 Ratings8.417 Ratings
Mobile optimization / responsive design00 Ratings8.0155 Ratings8.828 Ratings
Publishing workflow00 Ratings8.1152 Ratings9.230 Ratings
Form generator00 Ratings8.0140 Ratings9.429 Ratings
Web Content Management
Comparison of Web Content Management features of Product A and Product B
Adobe Marketing Cloud
-
Ratings
Progress Sitefinity
8.0
164 Ratings
17% above category average
Sitecore Digital Experience Platform
9.1
31 Ratings
30% above category average
Content taxonomy00 Ratings8.1157 Ratings9.329 Ratings
SEO support00 Ratings8.1151 Ratings9.227 Ratings
Bulk management00 Ratings8.0122 Ratings8.925 Ratings
Availability / breadth of extensions00 Ratings8.0130 Ratings8.629 Ratings
Community / comment management00 Ratings8.0121 Ratings9.527 Ratings
Results and Analysis
Comparison of Results and Analysis features of Product A and Product B
Adobe Marketing Cloud
-
Ratings
Progress Sitefinity
-
Ratings
Sitecore Digital Experience Platform
7.5
11 Ratings
6% below category average
Conversion tracking00 Ratings00 Ratings7.710 Ratings
Test reporting00 Ratings00 Ratings7.511 Ratings
Funnel Analysis00 Ratings00 Ratings7.211 Ratings
User Segmentation00 Ratings00 Ratings7.511 Ratings
Digital Experience Platform
Comparison of Digital Experience Platform features of Product A and Product B
Adobe Marketing Cloud
-
Ratings
Progress Sitefinity
-
Ratings
Sitecore Digital Experience Platform
8.1
13 Ratings
6% below category average
Campaign management00 Ratings00 Ratings7.813 Ratings
Cloud enablement00 Ratings00 Ratings8.413 Ratings
Content aggregation00 Ratings00 Ratings8.313 Ratings
Content classification00 Ratings00 Ratings8.313 Ratings
Multi-channel content personalization00 Ratings00 Ratings8.013 Ratings
Customer data analytics00 Ratings00 Ratings7.512 Ratings
DXP Third-Party Integrations00 Ratings00 Ratings7.613 Ratings
Multi-website management00 Ratings00 Ratings8.612 Ratings
Digital asset management00 Ratings00 Ratings8.413 Ratings
Editorial workflows and task management00 Ratings00 Ratings8.112 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Adobe Marketing CloudProgress SitefinitySitecore Digital Experience Platform
Small Businesses
HubSpot Marketing Hub
HubSpot Marketing Hub
Score 8.5 out of 10
Bloomreach
Bloomreach
Score 9.0 out of 10
Bloomreach
Bloomreach
Score 9.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Brandfolder
Brandfolder
Score 7.3 out of 10
RWS Tridion Sites
RWS Tridion Sites
Score 9.0 out of 10
RWS Tridion Sites
RWS Tridion Sites
Score 9.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Airtable
Airtable
Score 8.6 out of 10
RWS Tridion Sites
RWS Tridion Sites
Score 9.0 out of 10
RWS Tridion Sites
RWS Tridion Sites
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Adobe Marketing CloudProgress SitefinitySitecore Digital Experience Platform
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(14 ratings)
7.1
(171 ratings)
9.3
(42 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
6.5
(2 ratings)
7.2
(7 ratings)
8.2
(10 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
8.9
(10 ratings)
9.0
(17 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
5.5
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(7 ratings)
9.0
(3 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
4.6
(4 ratings)
9.1
(2 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
5.5
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
4.5
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Professional Services
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
6.4
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
5.5
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Adobe Marketing CloudProgress SitefinitySitecore Digital Experience Platform
Likelihood to Recommend
Adobe
If you have a rather large budget and/or several clients to take advantage of the AMC, you would likely benefit from its all-in-one solutions. There are a myriad of excellent tools for digital marketing professionals to take advantage of within the suite, and creating a campaign becomes much more manageable for collaboration and execution through to reporting thanks to the suite's vertically integrated nature.
Read full review
Progress Software Corporation
Progress Sitefinity remains a little heavyweight for sites that require basic text content, or a limited number of pages. However, its flexibility (including the range of different content types if supports) make it a good choice for any organization requiring advanced content management capabilities at an affordable price.
Read full review
Sitecore
Sitecore offers Content Hub with Product Content Management and Content Management Platform. The Digital Experience Platform and Content Hub can both host structured content and publish the finalized version to Experience Edge. Both platforms offer different ways to manage content. During a technical and business evaluation, the evaluation panel must understand the difference between a Content Modelling focused approach, or a layout management focused approach. Sitecore Digital Experience Platform is also best not to be used to host many files and images in the Media Library. That responsibility should be offloaded to a digital asset management company like Sitecore Content Hub DAM. The technology evaluation panel must also understand how to work with a Headless CMS, where the HEAD needs to be hosted, and the costs associated with the HEAD. Composable DXP is fantastic, but everyone must understand the various cost components. Marketers and the data team will need to go into the CDP and Personalize the platform with an excellent understanding of how a composable "installation" works. All the Martech vendors have similar challenges that data and development teams need to work through with a full experience. Any CDP/analytics platform will, at some stage, require further data enrichment from other sources. Understanding the Sitecore Search features and limitations is also essential.
Read full review
Pros
Adobe
  • Content Analysis - Between the Pages report and the participation metrics which show what percentage of conversions a page was involved with, you get an excellent analysis of what content is important and effective, and what is not. With the ability to add up to ten metrics side by side, drill downs, and power tools like Ad Hoc Analysis, you will know exactly where you need better content.
  • Pathing - Adobe Analytics captures every single path of every single visit of every single visitor and puts it at your fingertips. There are tools to aggregate common paths so you find out how frequent they are, lots of good page flow reports, and tools to pick out specific paths that will keep you from being overwhelmed. This has been absolutely invaluable to us as we have learned about how our customers are using our sites and which paths are leading to exits rather than converions.
  • Customization - There are so many custom metrics and dimensions you can add and you can create segments based on all of them, along with the out of the box metrics and dimensions. You truly get an implementation that is specific to your company, your needs, your strategy, and your site.
Read full review
Progress Software Corporation
  • 'Low-code structured content' (dynamic content types) is one of Sitefinity's most powerful features that allows you to structure content according to business needs, while at the same time dampening editorial freedom to ensure accessibility, meta enhancement, SEO and API consumption can be achieved.
  • Sitefinity's content provider model allows us to flexibly (by means of admin interface) easily aggregate or separate content sharing within a multi-site instance.
  • This proofs particularly powerful in emerging situations where there suddenly is a demand for content sharing across countries or regions.
  • Adaptability at its core.
  • While there's never a perfect fit for everything, it allows for easy code customization and extension being a .NET application at heart. Giving it a corporate edge over other custom solutions, whether it is on the development side or deployment side (on premise, IaaS or Azure DevOps Paas). And it has enabled us to put the system to use in its core feature - which is to manage content, where on other occasions we were able to take full advantage of its features such as A/B testing and personalization.
Read full review
Sitecore
  • Comprehensive Solution: Sitecore offers a fully integrated suite of products that cover the full spectrum of DXP capabilities, including search, personalization experimentation and more, delivering a complete composable DXP solution for customers.
  • Beyond Headless: XM Cloud provides more than just headless capabilities, featuring in-built tools like authoring host, page editor, etc., enabling faster and more powerful implementations.
  • Focus on AI: Sitecore has now got an excellent AI offering called Stream; it looks promising; however, it would be too early to give feedback on the same.
  • Customization: Sitecore's backend is highly customizable, allowing for deep modifications through pipelines and patch configurations.
Read full review
Cons
Adobe
  • Customer services could be improved for smaller clients. Adobe Marketing Cloud provides great support for most of its customers, however, it may not work well enough for smaller engagements.
  • Adobe could offer multiple price options based on the usage, which is missing at the moment.
Read full review
Progress Software Corporation
  • Diagram or illustrate more use cases for server setups, and managing of upgrades.
  • I'd like to see the ability to synchronize from one server to multiple others at once.
  • Implementation assistance as part of the purchase rather than farming out to 3rd party, although they did answer every question we asked in order to determine our best architecture setup.
Read full review
Sitecore
  • Experience Editor is a little old fashioned and sometimes slow to use.
  • Bulk operations in the Content Editor
  • Sitecore serialization is should be part of the Content Editor to provide visual reference for items which are serialized and will be overwritten by future deployments similar to what Unicorn does so well
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Adobe
Although a powerful tool, Google Analytics has been catching up in capabilities and is much simpler to use. As analytics move to the spotlight, more sections in a company want to have access to it. However, creating straightforward reports/dashboards and sharing them with different groups is not a strength of Adobe Marketing Cloud.
Read full review
Progress Software Corporation
Pricing makes this a no brainer. Not the best CMS, but with work arounds and some fumbling around we are able to make it do what we want it to do
Read full review
Sitecore
Sitecore has proven that it can deliver on its promise of a robust, reliable enterprise CMS solution with plenty of features. Also, they keep updating it with more and better features. Now that we are highly trained on it we have started on getting the most out of it and we plan to keep doing more of that in the future.
Read full review
Usability
Adobe
No answers on this topic
Progress Software Corporation
Very big fan of this CMS, as it allows scalability, performance, and everything else. The support is great whenever we need it. As a marketer, the digital/marketing side of things is very easy to use and we've seen strong results from an SEO and marketing perspective. I can't speak to the developer/creative side too much, but in talking with these teams, they do recommend the tool as well.
Read full review
Sitecore
Once you learn how to use the platform and can put a solid strategy in place to manage it long-term, it becomes a lot easier to use. The tricky part is working with resources who are familiar with the platform to navigate some of the common implementation and configuration pitfalls. Although Sitecore has worked very hard to overcome some of these from their earlier product versions by creating wizards and improving their support documentation, at the end of the day it is still a very complex and powerful system that needs to be implemented carefully in order to foster the best possible user experience for authors. So it could be rated very usable or not usable at all based on how much planning took place and the quality of the implementation.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Adobe
No answers on this topic
Progress Software Corporation
Has been solid for us on availability
Read full review
Sitecore
No answers on this topic
Performance
Adobe
No answers on this topic
Progress Software Corporation
A bit sluggish sometimes as the compiler works.
Read full review
Sitecore
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Adobe
No answers on this topic
Progress Software Corporation
Support can be pretty good, even though, depending on the level of licensing, it can take longer to hear back from their team. They do have a phone option, which works well. Overall, they are knowledgeable, and helpful when needed. At times, support is able to access the system directly and troubleshoot critical items when needed.
Read full review
Sitecore
1. Customized software development & maintenance. 2. Technology Consulting - Consulting-based services for technology solutions data engineering or cloud solutions. 3. Used for tapping into multiple data sources such as CRM and marketing automation systems and, creating automated data extracts with a high-end visual representation of data. 4. Implemented for scheduling an existing report to automatically refresh and be delivered to specific users at a specific regular interval.
Read full review
Online Training
Adobe
No answers on this topic
Progress Software Corporation
No answers on this topic
Sitecore
Sitecore captures and remembers every single interaction your customers and prospects have in any part of the system, allowing you to build comprehensive, ever-learning profiles of each individual. From email marketing, to social media, to online shopping, Sitecore remembers where each interaction left off so you can automatically continue the conversation. Sitecore helps you manage your content for each and every experience your customers enjoy. Customize what content you want and the system will take care of how it's displayed.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Adobe
No answers on this topic
Progress Software Corporation
N/A - I was not part of the implementation team. We have had this internally for over 5 years. Based on my experience, ensure that you have documentation on the initial implementation and subsequent upgrades. I would also recommend to have all the documentation on how and why the system was implemented the way it was
Read full review
Sitecore
Make sure you work with a partner that can help you take advantage of the entire platform. Specifically we see a lot of customers not taking advantage of Sitecore DMS and thus missing a huge opportunity. Sitecore is a platform that is meant to be constantly optimized and improved upon.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Adobe
I would say it is the leader in the industry and was easily the number one choice in two of the three places I have implemented a marketing automation platform. Hubspot is its closest competitor and ended up being the better choice for a membership association but the Adobe product can doo all the things and do them well. Just make sure you get all the discounts available before closing the deal.
Read full review
Progress Software Corporation
It is hands down just easier for our customers to use. The interface and the page builder experience is much better than what we have used in the past and has many enterprise features even in the lower price-point
Read full review
Sitecore
Sitefinity is improving but at the time of decision making it had nothing that could compare with the A/B testing and personalisation features that Sitecore offers. This was a key differentiator and ultimately ensured Sitecore was purchased. WordPress isn't really comparable and isn't within our technology stack, which is mostly Microsoft.
Read full review
Scalability
Adobe
No answers on this topic
Progress Software Corporation
Seems pretty scalable.
Read full review
Sitecore
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
Adobe
  • It has helped us track our ROI better and see costs versus revenue coming in directly from emails.
  • A/B testing is very helpful to ensure the best email is being chosen to get sent out.
  • Our deliverability has improved a lot.
Read full review
Progress Software Corporation
  • Sitefinity has reduced the amount of time it takes to edit and publish content, which has enabled us to get information out more quickly.
  • Sitefinity allowed us to establish a consistent and modern brand identity and apply it across multiple websites.
Read full review
Sitecore
  • ROI depends on what features the customer wants to leverage from Sitecore. Sitecore is not just a CMS. It's CEP platform which comes with Analytics, Personalization, A/B Testing, and Email for marketers modules etc., out of the box.
  • Based on my experience some of the customers lean towards third party services. This is primarily due to lack of the understanding of these features. If a customer leverages these out of the box features ROI will be high. It depends on how much is being [sent] to third parties services.
  • Sitecore has very good accelerators in the market. These accelerators allows you to create response sites very quickly. If a simple campaign site takes 50K to build the site may save at least 50% of that cost. Examples of site accelerators are Brainjocks, Keystone, Cognifide etc.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Progress Sitefinity Screenshots

Screenshot of Engage your audience with thoughtful, relevant content. Your marketing team can create and manage content faster and easier than ever before with inline drag-and-drop editing, requiring no help from your web team.Screenshot of Create a truly global solution that provides consistent experiences and unmatched performance across brands, regions and languages. Reduce maintenance and hosting infrastructure by managing multiple websites from a single platform. Reduce time to market and deploy changes faster with content and code synchronization between websites and environments.Screenshot of Increase revenue with a personalized, connected experience between your website and online store. Easily manage your product catalogs, price lists, shopping cart and checkout process. Connect to cloud services for accurate real-time tax and shipping rates. Integrate with your ERP and other business systems to improve and automate inventory management, order fulfillment and customer support throughout the product lifecycle.Screenshot of Increase conversions and generate more leads with 1:1 conversations with your customers. Create, preview and deliver personalized experiences at a massive scale with amazingly easy to use tools. Analyze and optimize the experience with the help of contextual analytics and A/B testing solutions.Screenshot of Analyze cross-channel data to get a detailed view of content and campaign performance. Gather data on visitors and build persona segments and track their behavior on your site. Get ML-driven recommendations for the next best update to introduce into your journey.