TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Adobe Target

    Score8.3 out of 10
    N/AAdobe Test and Target is an A/B, multi-variate testing platform which Adobe acquired as part of the Omniture platform in 2009. It is now part of the Adobe Marketing Cloud. It offers tight integration with Adobe analytics and content management products.N/A

    Bound

    Score10 out of 10
    N/ABound (formerly Get Smart Content) is a website segmentation and targeting platform that enables marketers to read a website visitor's digital body language and serve relevant content based on the person's stage in the buying journey. Using behavioral, demographic, and firmographic data, Bound creates personalized web experiences for both anonymous and known website visitors to increase the effectiveness of marketing efforts and dramatically reduce the buyer's path to conversion. Bound partners…N/A
    Pricing
    Adobe TargetBound
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Adobe TargetBound
    Free Trial
    NoYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoYes
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
    Additional Details
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Adobe TargetBound
    Considered Both Products
    Adobe
    No answer on this topic
    Bound Systems, Inc.
    Chose Bound
    Get Smart Content is quite cost effective, simple to use with great support. The support systems and simplicity based on other products used and evaluated is the best in the industry.
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    83%
    Would buy again
    15 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    86%
    Delivers good value for the price
    12 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    89%
    Happy with the feature set
    16 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    75%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    9 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    47%
    Implementation went as expected
    8 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Features
    Adobe TargetBound
    Testing and Experimentation
    Comparison of Testing and Experimentation features of Adobe Target and Bound
    Feature
    Adobe Target
    8.0
    18 Ratings
    5% below category average
    Bound
    9.7
    1 Ratings
    14% above category average
    a/b experiment testing9.318 Ratings10.01 Ratings
    Split URL testing8.617 Ratings9.01 Ratings
    Multivariate testing7.817 Ratings9.01 Ratings
    Multi-page/funnel testing8.314 Ratings10.01 Ratings
    Cross-browser testing8.39 Ratings10.01 Ratings
    Mobile app testing8.57 Ratings9.01 Ratings
    Test significance8.415 Ratings10.01 Ratings
    Visual / WYSIWYG editor7.315 Ratings10.01 Ratings
    Advanced code editor6.414 Ratings10.01 Ratings
    Page surveys8.77 Ratings10.01 Ratings
    Visitor recordings8.59 Ratings9.01 Ratings
    Preview mode8.116 Ratings10.01 Ratings
    Test duration calculator7.916 Ratings10.01 Ratings
    Experiment scheduler8.315 Ratings9.01 Ratings
    Experiment workflow and approval7.612 Ratings10.01 Ratings
    Dynamic experiment activation7.412 Ratings9.01 Ratings
    Client-side tests7.915 Ratings10.01 Ratings
    Server-side tests7.410 Ratings10.01 Ratings
    Mutually exclusive tests7.816 Ratings10.01 Ratings
    Audience Segmentation & Targeting
    Comparison of Audience Segmentation & Targeting features of Adobe Target and Bound
    Feature
    Adobe Target
    8.2
    18 Ratings
    7% below category average
    Bound
    9.8
    1 Ratings
    11% above category average
    Standard visitor segmentation7.918 Ratings10.01 Ratings
    Behavioral visitor segmentation7.417 Ratings10.01 Ratings
    Traffic allocation control8.418 Ratings9.01 Ratings
    Website personalization9.216 Ratings10.01 Ratings
    Results and Analysis
    Comparison of Results and Analysis features of Adobe Target and Bound
    Feature
    Adobe Target
    8.0
    18 Ratings
    8% below category average
    Bound
    9.4
    1 Ratings
    8% above category average
    Heatmap tool7.58 Ratings10.01 Ratings
    Click analytics7.515 Ratings10.01 Ratings
    Scroll maps8.88 Ratings9.01 Ratings
    Form fill analysis8.28 Ratings10.01 Ratings
    Conversion tracking8.515 Ratings8.01 Ratings
    Goal tracking8.117 Ratings9.01 Ratings
    Test reporting7.918 Ratings9.01 Ratings
    Results segmentation8.316 Ratings10.01 Ratings
    CSV export8.115 Ratings10.01 Ratings
    Experiments results dashboard7.218 Ratings9.01 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    Adobe TargetBound
    Small Businesses
    Google Optimize
    Score6.7 out of 10
    Google Optimize
    Score6.7 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    AB Tasty
    Score8.6 out of 10
    AB Tasty
    Score8.6 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Google Content Experiments (discontinued)
    Score7.3 out of 10
    Google Content Experiments (discontinued)
    Score7.3 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Adobe TargetBound
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.4
    (46 ratings)
    10.0
    (5 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    6.3
    (24 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Usability
    8.1
    (14 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Availability
    6.1
    (4 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Performance
    8.0
    (3 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Support Rating
    3.5
    (9 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    In-Person Training
    8.1
    (3 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Online Training
    6.1
    (3 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    7.2
    (5 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Adobe TargetBound
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Adobe
    If you're using the Adobe stack and tools to power your website, Target is a great solution to implement. I've utilized Target within two organizations, one running on Adobe Experience Manager (AEM), and the other on Adobe Magento. I don't see how companies could harness the full capacity of Target without also having Adobe Analytics integrated. This is their 'secret sauce' and might not be a good solution for companies who are invested in Google Analytics 360. Integration was straightforward but did require support from the Adobe team to implement successfully. While Target is a great tool for digital teams to support, you'll need your tech team aligned and available to support implementation.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Bound Systems, Inc.
    I think the customer service and relationship we have with Get Smart Content is great
    Read full review
    Pros
    Adobe
    • This application gives us an incredible integration with Adobe Analytics that allows its operation to be the best and determine the performance of our website.
    • It offers us an analysis based on user behavior and a web page customization option to adapt and meet the needs of those users.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Bound Systems, Inc.
    • Connects easily with other APIs such as Demandbase and Google Analytics.
    • Easily create segments.
    • Easily create segmented content.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Adobe
    • This is something a lot of testing tools struggle with, but I think the WYSIWYG ("What you see is what you get") editor - or Visual Experience Composer (VEC) in Adobe terminology - could definitely use some work. It's a struggle to execute many tests beyond simple copy, color, placement changes, and even the features that do exist are often clunky if not altogether broken.
    • The interface itself can be a bit counterintuitive in certain parts. If you are familiar with other tools, it's likely middle of the road in this respect; think much easier to understand than Monetate for instance, but a far cry from the simplicity of an Optimizely.
    • It can be a bit buggy from time to time. The worst example is the frequency at which the tool will fail to save due to an error, but not inform you of this until you try to save, at which point your only option is to log out, log back in, and make all of your updates once again. It can become an extreme pain point at times, and I personally have just gotten into the habit of saving every couple of minutes to avoid a massive loss of productivity.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Bound Systems, Inc.
    • When you set up a campaign you should be able to set up content while in the campaign.
    • You should be able to set up new segments while in the campaign.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Adobe
    We have a team of people trained on how to use the application and it integrates well with the other Adobe products we use. Our future roadmap of testing will require some complex scenarios which we hope Target will be able to accomplish
    Read full review
    Bound Systems, Inc.
    No answers on this topic
    Usability
    Adobe
    The recent UI update is a complete mess. It is difficult to navigate and find features that previously existed. The reactiveness of the page depending on window size is also ridiculous and it is absurd that depending on how large your window is, entire columns of functions will disappear with no indication that they are missing. The usability of the tool has fallen off a cliff.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Bound Systems, Inc.
    No answers on this topic
    Reliability and Availability
    Adobe
    i don't think we use the full functionalities of the tool, but to use the full functions, it's almost impossible (Too hard)
    Read full review
    Bound Systems, Inc.
    No answers on this topic
    Performance
    Adobe
    The bottleneck is never the software program
    Read full review
    Bound Systems, Inc.
    No answers on this topic
    Support Rating
    Adobe
    On several occasions, we have had the need to ask for help from the Adobe Target support team, and I must say that they have provided us with an excellent experience, as they take care of solving the problems quickly and with high precision
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Bound Systems, Inc.
    No answers on this topic
    In-Person Training
    Adobe
    The instructor that came to train us was awesome and this training was very useful. I would recommend it for anyone who is going to be using this software. I only mark it lower because it is an added expense to an already expensive product, and a lot of the training covered the "Target" portion of the software (which again, we didn't use)
    Read full review
    Bound Systems, Inc.
    No answers on this topic
    Online Training
    Adobe
    The training was very easy to understand, however it would have been more useful to my development team than me. It was also primarily over-the-phone, which is never as easy to follow as in-person. We ended up scheduling and paying for an in-person training session to supplement the online/phone training because it wasn't helpful enough.
    Read full review
    Bound Systems, Inc.
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation Rating
    Adobe
    Implement using a global mBox on the page so you can change any and everything over the traditional method. Traditional method is good if you do not have technical web dev resources, do not know Javascript/jQuery, or you have money to blow on mBox calls. Global deployment reduces mBox calls and allows you to touch many parts of the page easily. A lot more customizable
    Read full review
    Bound Systems, Inc.
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    Adobe
    We seriously considered another software but because we use so many other Adobe products this made the most sense for us. If you are not dependent on other Adobe software and are a smaller company, in my opinion, Target may not be the best fit.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Bound Systems, Inc.
    It has the inability to export subject line or ISP complaints that require manual pulling by each campaign when needed. Results from variable tests are also reported only as a percentage of chosen KPI (opens, clicks, etc.). There's no ability to see hard numbers from the tests or other metrics to determine the statistical significance or unintended results (maybe opens increased per the test, but we saw clicks or conversions were lower). On the other hand, Bound performs absolutely great.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Adobe
    • We have been able to run specific A/B tests that have shown an increase in conversion, which in turn has led to very large banked sales numbers for the year.
    • We have been able to prove that using and automated Merchandising process did not decrease conversion. This allowed us to greatly increase efficiency by opening up resource time.
    Read full review
    Bound Systems, Inc.
    • We have seen more traffic going to revenue generating sites after using Get Smart Content. I'm not sure of the dollar amount since that's a separate department, but traffic increasing is great.
    • Engagement on our internal site has increased after implementing Get Smart Content. We are getting more views, comments and likes on our content than before.
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    Bound Screenshots

    Screenshot of Campaign viewScreenshot of Segment viewScreenshot of Segment list