Atlassian Confluence vs. OpenText Content Suite Platform vs. PDFTables

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Confluence
Score 8.2 out of 10
N/A
Confluence is a collaboration and content sharing platform used primarily by customers who are already using Atlassian's Jira project tracking product. The product appeals particularly to IT users.
$0
Free for 10 Users
OpenText Content Suite Platform
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
The OpenText Content Suite Platform oversees the lifecycle management of information across the enterprise from capture through archiving and disposition. With agile information governance to address the latest data governance and data privacy best practices, the vendor states their Content Suite reduces risk and empowers organizations to focus on using information to drive strategic growth and productivity.N/A
PDFTables
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
PDFTables is made by The Sensible Code Company, based in London. PDFTables focus is converting tables accurately from PDF documents to XLSX, CSV or XML. The tool also converts the text around the tables. PDFTables is available as a web service, via API or as an On-Premises Enterprise solution. The Enterprise solution allows customers to convert sensitive data securely within their own network, ensuring a secure process. The API allows batch conversion and the option to convert only selected…
$30
Pricing
Atlassian ConfluenceOpenText Content Suite PlatformPDFTables
Editions & Modules
Free
$0
Free for 10 Users
Standard
$6.40
per month per user
Premium
$12.30
per month per user
Data Center
220,000.00
40,001+ Users - Annually
Enterprise
Contact Sales
No answers on this topic
1000 pages
$30.00
5,000 pages
$100.00
10000 pages
$200.00
10,000 - 100,000 pages
$200.00-$2000.00
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
ConfluenceOpenText Content Suite PlatformPDFTables
Free Trial
YesNoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsPrices shown here reflect prices for deployments with 100 users or less. The prices decrease wien the user base surpasses 100.You can set your own page credits from 5,000 up to 100,000 pages, at a cost of $0.02 per page. You can purchase as many page credits as you require, there will be no limit on your account.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Atlassian ConfluenceOpenText Content Suite PlatformPDFTables
Considered Multiple Products
Confluence
Chose Confluence
It has great features like integration and real time collaboration with new features like AI and automation. So it gives an edge over other tools I have used in the past few years. I am sure there are a lot of features which I have not explored yet, but the features I am using …
Chose Confluence
Atlassian Confluence has a more comprehensive and flexible set of capabilities that stand out and made the decision upfront more straightforward for our team. The tools we evaluated have knowledge management, task management and collaboration capabilities, however Atlassian …
Chose Confluence
Atlassian Confluence is way popular for a larger team and makes collaboration way easier. The community is strong and you get easier resolution against any request. It's integration with other Atlassian products like JIRA is an icing on the cake.
Chose Confluence
In my experience, Atlassian Confluence is at the top of these tools. I've had first hand experience with other tools and they are not at par with Atlassian Confluence. The versatility of the tool is very well recognized and utilized. Being a new user is not a probably as all …
Chose Confluence
Atlassian Confluence is a super handy hub for sharing ideas and keeping all your docs in one place. While Jira Service Management is more about handling tickets and support issues, Atlassian Confluence really makes teamwork easy. I feel Atlassian Confluence is user-friendly, …
Chose Confluence
We choose Atlassian Confluence because it is the reference for managing a SAAS wiki service. And having such a solution in our company to manage the knowledge and especially the knowledge transfer is crucial.
Chose Confluence
Confluence has a more robust set of capabilities compared to Dovetail and Trello and also was already approved by our legal and compliance teams, so it tends to keep its stickiness due to that. It's also widely known in the market as a knowledge management tool. I would say it …
Chose Confluence
It's good if you're using Atlassian products, the other ones provide different connections and better UX for documentation in different ways.
Chose Confluence
Overall, Atlassian Confluence is a user-friendly tool and offers such a vast array of capabilities for project and knowledge management purposes and beyond. Other tools listed above have much more limited capabilities, although they are great tools for very specific needs and …
Chose Confluence
The main reason for moving to Atlassian Confluence was for: 1) Having 1 space that holds all of the org's documentation and knowledge sharing 2)We already used JSM and Jira so it would an organic move to have Atlassian Confluence as our main documentation hub 3) The cost …
Chose Confluence
Confluence, since it is part of the overall infrastructure of Atlassian, makes it immensely powerful internally, to build an internal knowledgebase, and is far ahead of its counterparts in Zendesk and Hubspot, which is more centered towards their customers. Confluence is just …
Chose Confluence
Sharepoint in out organisation was mostly used for collaborating on documents, which to some degree has been moved to Confluence, where the Confluence pages have replaced the specific documents.
Chose Confluence
Being a company which uses other Atlassian tools, Atlassian Confluence was a great fit; the natural and automatic linking of assets from other platforms made following paper trails seamless. Though the editing options aren't as advanced as some other options out there, it does …
Chose Confluence
We find Atlassian better for its ease of use, real time editing, integration with Jira for bug tracking, stores our security compliance documents in structured way, it is feature rich and have lots of capabilities.
Chose Confluence
In the past, I have used MediaWiki hosted locally as well as Microsoft Team Foundation Server. Wiki was simply a nightmare so all the money saved from paying for Atlassian subscriptions was lost in time while trying to use Wiki and format something properly. I haven't used …
Chose Confluence
We use Jira for the IT tickets, so the step to use Atlassian Confluence was the logical decisson.
Chose Confluence
Atlassian Confluence is better suited for documenting and acting as a repository for information than the more immediate what is currently being worked on things that are better suited for in Jira. In my opinion, Atlassian Confluence certainly has it's short comings but it is …
Chose Confluence
We still use Atlassian Confluence only for its integration with Jira and Bitbucket. For everything else, we moved away from it and are using more modern solutions.
Chose Confluence
We chose Atlassian Confluence over SharePoint because it's much more user-friendly and intuitive. Atlassian Confluence makes collaboration and knowledge sharing easier with its simpler interface and better search. While SharePoint can be powerful, it often feels clunky and …
Chose Confluence
Freshdesk is basically for support teams, while Confluence is better for internal communication and collaborations.
Chose Confluence
The alternatives tested are based only on the whiteboarding functionality added by Confluence Whiteboard, and not the core Confluence functionality (documentation).

Chose Confluence
Again, Atlassian Confluence is efficient when paired with Jira and can do most of what a company needs it to do. But, I thi Spekit is better for "just-in-time" learning, Sharepoint is better for file hosting and organization, Asana is much better for project/task management, …
Chose Confluence
We were inclined to use Atlassian Confluence for its easy collaboration with Jira which is used for tracking project development tasks and issues. Using Atlassian Confluence, content creation became easy and even applying access control to the created content was possible. It …
OpenText Content Suite Platform
Chose OpenText Content Suite Platform
In my opinion, OpenText Content Suite Platform provides more powerful product and highly integrated solutions more than OCR solution that Abbyy provides.
I think OpenText Content Suite Platform obviously provides stronger support and services that Abbyy support and services …
Chose OpenText Content Suite Platform
OpenText comes in different versions and you are able to choose depending on your departmental or organizational needs. In terms of functionality and capabilities, it was able to offer more value as it checked all the boxes in terms of long-time retentions, reporting …
Chose OpenText Content Suite Platform
OpenText Content Suite Platform replaced an existing Records Management solution and checked all of the boxes in regards to capabilities surrounding search, physical objects, long-term retention, and reporting capabilities.
Chose OpenText Content Suite Platform
Having used OpenText Content Suite for a long time, I can say it stands the competition. It offers many versions which is unlike many products in its category. Also, while it is not affordable, I believe the cost is justified considering what a business can achieve with this …
Chose OpenText Content Suite Platform
OpenText Content Suite has been an amazing addition to our business thanks to its many features and capabilities. The fact that OpenText offers many versions makes its products competitive because there is so much we can accomplish with these products. Price wise, OpenText …
Chose OpenText Content Suite Platform
OpenText is stronger in the management of high volume and secure information. However, SharePoint, while less functional from a document management perspective, provides a much stronger user interface which eases user adoption and the presentation of content. SharePoint also …
Chose OpenText Content Suite Platform
SharePoint is not very strong on records management as part of the base system. So after evaluation, it was found to not comply to all needs and therefore discarded. We also evaluated Afresco which is an opensource offering. The problem was that we could not find enough people …
Chose OpenText Content Suite Platform
I also used Tridion while at AP. It's tougher to learn (HTML knowledge is very helpful), but it is a much more powerful CMS. Tridion allows for language variation, more customization and the embedding of HD video. OpenText was a legacy system of our internal site. Tridion was …
PDFTables

No answer on this topic

Features
Atlassian ConfluenceOpenText Content Suite PlatformPDFTables
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Product A and Product B
Atlassian Confluence
7.1
Ratings
9% below category average
OpenText Content Suite Platform
-
Ratings
PDFTables
-
Ratings
Task Management7.20 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Gantt Charts7.90 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Scheduling7.20 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Workflow Automation6.50 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile Access6.90 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Search6.90 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Visual planning tools7.20 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Communication
Comparison of Communication features of Product A and Product B
Atlassian Confluence
7.9
Ratings
1% below category average
OpenText Content Suite Platform
-
Ratings
PDFTables
-
Ratings
Chat6.40 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Notifications8.20 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Discussions7.80 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Surveys7.00 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Internal knowledgebase9.00 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Integrates with GoToMeeting6.00 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Integrates with Gmail and Google Hangouts9.30 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Integrates with Outlook9.60 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
File Sharing & Management
Comparison of File Sharing & Management features of Product A and Product B
Atlassian Confluence
7.7
Ratings
4% below category average
OpenText Content Suite Platform
-
Ratings
PDFTables
-
Ratings
Versioning8.20 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Video files6.90 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Audio files6.90 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Document collaboration8.40 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Access control8.70 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Advanced security features8.30 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Integrates with Google Drive5.90 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Device sync8.40 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Enterprise Content Management
Comparison of Enterprise Content Management features of Product A and Product B
Atlassian Confluence
-
Ratings
OpenText Content Suite Platform
8.4
Ratings
4% above category average
PDFTables
-
Ratings
Content capture & imaging00 Ratings9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
File sync, storage & archiving00 Ratings9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Document management00 Ratings9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Records management00 Ratings8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Content search & retrieval00 Ratings8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Enterprise content collaboration00 Ratings9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Content publishing & creation00 Ratings8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Security, risk management & information governance00 Ratings8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Contract lifecycle management00 Ratings8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Automated workflows00 Ratings9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Artificial intelligence00 Ratings7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile support00 Ratings9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Integration00 Ratings8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Atlassian ConfluenceOpenText Content Suite PlatformPDFTables
Small Businesses
Stackby
Stackby
Score 8.9 out of 10
Square 9 Softworks
Square 9 Softworks
Score 9.3 out of 10
Square 9 Softworks
Square 9 Softworks
Score 9.3 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Troop Messenger
Troop Messenger
Score 9.8 out of 10
MediaValet
MediaValet
Score 8.8 out of 10
MSB Docs
MSB Docs
Score 9.4 out of 10
Enterprises
HCL Connections
HCL Connections
Score 9.0 out of 10
MediaValet
MediaValet
Score 8.8 out of 10
M‑Files
M‑Files
Score 8.9 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Atlassian ConfluenceOpenText Content Suite PlatformPDFTables
Likelihood to Recommend
8.3
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.4
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.1
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Availability
9.0
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
8.0
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
5.4
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
8.8
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Configurability
6.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
8.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
8.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
8.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
8.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Atlassian ConfluenceOpenText Content Suite PlatformPDFTables
Likelihood to Recommend
Atlassian Confluence is a great tool for housing important information and resources across the organization, as it's very easy to search and find content across different teams and departments. The search function is mostly very accurate and the additional tagging with keywords also helps in the search experience. It's also good at tagging other team members, which triggers an automated email to them. Atlassian Confluence also has an extensive template library for all kinds of purposes like project management, etc., which saves time overall.
Read full review
Your organisation has to support the type of document and records management needed for this to work. In an organisation that only needs to store documents and maybe share with many different parties, this might not be the best-suited software. In a large organisation with stringent document and records management policies, this suite is well suited. It makes management of documents across business units easy to manage and control.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Pros
  • Its integration with Jira for tracking development and the bugs and work linked to detailed Confluence documentation.
  • We use it extensively for writing Software Product Requirement Documents, feature specs, architecture designs, and retrospectives.
  • Our company follows compliance very seriously, so it helps in streamlining all documentation for ISO27001/27017 compliance and security-related information.
  • Its integration with various tools allows us to create flow diagrams which are often required to make client and customer understand the overall flow of interactions across various modules of the design architecture
Read full review
  • ECM OpenText version is secure and easy to use
  • The different versions makes it easy to accomplish different tasks . We have more than three versions deployed in our company
  • The software is highly scalable
  • There are many customization options
  • The software is relatively affordable
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Cons
  • You need to watch over the structure of the content yourself. if not you can get information added anywhere so nobody can find it.
  • Top search field is hard to set to only search a section of pages.
  • You really need to think your structure through before starting. a guide when setting up at the start could help in that perspective.
Read full review
  • The user interface and configurability of that interface lack a lot of flexibility and modern tools.
  • There needs to be stronger and more powerful integration to electronic forms and workflow capabilities which are core to modern ECM.
  • Management of audit and content history needs to be modernized and made more dynamic and sustainable.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Likelihood to Renew
I am confident that Atlassian can come with additional and innovative macros and functions to add value to Confluence. In 6 months, Atlassian transformed a good collaborative tools into a more comprehensive system that can help manage projects and processes, as well as "talk" with other Atlassian products like Jira. We are in fact learning more about Jira to evaluate a possible fit to complement our tool box.
Read full review
The staff is comfortable with it and I doubt they'd change at this point.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
It's very intuitive for most things, making it easy to jump in and start creating pages and collaborating. This makes it ideal for onboarding new members to the team. There are a few areas that could be a little smoother, but overall it's a great experience.
Read full review
Strong for Core Content and Records Management
Effective for Non-Technical Users (with the right configuration)
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Reliability and Availability
I do not recall having outages or applications error so far, very reliable and available.
Read full review
I never had any issues with access internally or via VPN. But, the response via VPN, was a bit slow.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Performance
We never worked against the tide while using Confluence. Everything loads considerably fast, even media components like videos (hosted on the platform or embed external videos from Youtube, for example). We are not using heavy media components a lot, but in the rare occasion we happen to use one we have no problems whatsoever.
Read full review
  • I used OpenText nearly every day and I never had any performance issues that I can recall. That said, it's not terribly fast either.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
This rating is specifically for Atlassian's self-help documentation on their website. Often times, it is not robust enough to cover a complex usage of one of their features. Frequently, you can find an answer on the web, but not from Atlassian. Instead, it is usually at a power user group elsewhere on the net.
Read full review
OpenText has an outstanding support and knowledge base. All problems which couldn't be solved by us (high complexity cases) were promptly resolved and the resolution also shared with us.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
Overall, I am very satisfied with the initial implementation (and the subsequent upgrades and implementations made over the years).
This product has never rose to the level of being an major issue at an executive level. It has quietly and valiantly done it's job for our company!
Read full review
No, it's pretty easy to implement and use.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Atlassian Confluence is a super handy hub for sharing ideas and keeping all your docs in one place. While Jira Service Management is more about handling tickets and support issues, Atlassian Confluence really makes teamwork easy. I feel Atlassian Confluence is user-friendly, integrates smoothly with other Atlassian tools, and helps everyone stay in sync. It's great for brainstorming, and project planning as well. Overall, it is a great way to boost collaboration and ensure all team members are on the same page.
Read full review
OpenText comes in different versions and you are able to choose depending on your departmental or organizational needs. In terms of functionality and capabilities, it was able to offer more value as it checked all the boxes in terms of long-time retentions, reporting capabilities, physical objects, and searches are great.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Scalability
This tool is very adaptable. So much so we use it for three completely separate projects, in three very different ways.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • Merging instances has saved search time - We used to have several instances of Atlassian Confluence, which means they're separate and so can't communicate with each other. We've since merged into one instance and now with the help of the search feature can find the documents you're looking for in seconds rather than several minutes.
  • Cross linking product assets streamlines following paper trails - Being able to click on a BitBucket link from a Confluence page which then links to a JIRA ticket means you can follow paper trails really easily; seconds rather than several minutes.
Read full review
  • With OpenText Content Suite, we save time thanks to its features such as imaging
  • Mobile support is amazing and this makes working anywhere easy
  • Since it is very secure, we do not have to worry about content
  • The collaboration features make it even better by improving the user experience.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
ScreenShots

PDFTables Screenshots

Screenshot of Converted PDF bank statement to ExcelScreenshot of PDFTables homepage