Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro vs. Wrike

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro
Score 8.7 out of 10
N/A
Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro (formerly BIM360) is a construction software for project managers, site managers, and Building Information Modelling (BIM) managers. It is designed to connect the office and site components of construction, providing cloud-based access to plans and models.
$480
per user/per year
Wrike
Score 8.3 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
Wrike is a project management and collaboration software. This solution connects tasks, discussions, and emails to the user’s project plan. Wrike is optimized for agile workflows and aims to help resolve data silos, poor visibility into work status, and missed deadlines and project failures.
$9.80
per month per user
Pricing
Autodesk BIM Collaborate ProWrike
Editions & Modules
Autodesk Bim 360
$480.00
per user/per year
Wrike Free
$0
per month per user
Wrike Team
$9.8
per month per user
Wrike Business
$24.8
per month per user
Wrike Enterprise
Request a quote
per month per user
Pinnacle
Request a quote
per month per user
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Autodesk BIM Collaborate ProWrike
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoYes
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsEvery premium plan begins with a 14-day trial period.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Autodesk BIM Collaborate ProWrike
Top Pros
Top Cons
Features
Autodesk BIM Collaborate ProWrike
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro
8.4
2 Ratings
4% above category average
Wrike
-
Ratings
Dashboards8.52 Ratings00 Ratings
Standard reports8.52 Ratings00 Ratings
Custom reports8.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Data exportability8.52 Ratings00 Ratings
Construction Project & Field Management
Comparison of Construction Project & Field Management features of Product A and Product B
Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro
8.4
11 Ratings
12% above category average
Wrike
-
Ratings
Plan distribution & viewing8.011 Ratings00 Ratings
Plan markups & sharing8.511 Ratings00 Ratings
Issue tracking & punchlists8.010 Ratings00 Ratings
Photo documentation8.010 Ratings00 Ratings
Jobsite reports8.09 Ratings00 Ratings
Document sharing8.510 Ratings00 Ratings
RFI tools9.09 Ratings00 Ratings
Collaboration & approvals9.010 Ratings00 Ratings
As-built drawings8.58 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile app7.010 Ratings00 Ratings
Submittal design and management8.08 Ratings00 Ratings
Checklists8.52 Ratings00 Ratings
Meeting Minutes9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Specifications8.52 Ratings00 Ratings
Change orders9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Estimating
Comparison of Estimating features of Product A and Product B
Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro
8.0
1 Ratings
2% below category average
Wrike
-
Ratings
Takeoff tools8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Job costing8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Cost databases8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Cost calculator8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Bid creation8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Product A and Product B
Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro
-
Ratings
Wrike
7.8
682 Ratings
4% above category average
Task Management00 Ratings8.6677 Ratings
Resource Management00 Ratings7.7567 Ratings
Gantt Charts00 Ratings7.8476 Ratings
Scheduling00 Ratings7.8590 Ratings
Workflow Automation00 Ratings7.6572 Ratings
Team Collaboration00 Ratings8.6675 Ratings
Support for Agile Methodology00 Ratings7.7340 Ratings
Support for Waterfall Methodology00 Ratings8.0299 Ratings
Document Management00 Ratings7.2569 Ratings
Email integration00 Ratings7.2518 Ratings
Mobile Access00 Ratings7.6487 Ratings
Timesheet Tracking00 Ratings7.9302 Ratings
Change request and Case Management00 Ratings7.723 Ratings
Budget and Expense Management00 Ratings7.7226 Ratings
Professional Services Automation
Comparison of Professional Services Automation features of Product A and Product B
Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro
-
Ratings
Wrike
7.8
231 Ratings
5% above category average
Quotes/estimates00 Ratings8.21 Ratings
Invoicing00 Ratings7.31 Ratings
Project & financial reporting00 Ratings8.1228 Ratings
Integration with accounting software00 Ratings7.6130 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Autodesk BIM Collaborate ProWrike
Small Businesses
FollowUp CRM
FollowUp CRM
Score 9.5 out of 10
FunctionFox
FunctionFox
Score 8.3 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Revit
Revit
Score 8.9 out of 10
SAP Ruum
SAP Ruum
Score 9.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Revit
Revit
Score 8.9 out of 10
Quickbase
Quickbase
Score 9.2 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Autodesk BIM Collaborate ProWrike
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(11 ratings)
8.4
(716 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
8.3
(94 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
8.3
(55 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(18 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
7.9
(15 ratings)
Support Rating
6.9
(2 ratings)
9.0
(84 ratings)
In-Person Training
-
(0 ratings)
7.5
(5 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
7.7
(11 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(31 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
6.4
(10 ratings)
Contract Terms and Pricing Model
-
(0 ratings)
7.4
(4 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
7.9
(6 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
8.3
(11 ratings)
Professional Services
-
(0 ratings)
7.9
(4 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(7 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
6.8
(7 ratings)
User Testimonials
Autodesk BIM Collaborate ProWrike
Likelihood to Recommend
Autodesk
Autodesk Bim 360 is well suited to the majority of construction projects in my opinion. On the construction side I could see how the straightforward nature of the platform would be well liked. The new update with the widgets is a great touch and allows for ease of site visits by showcasing good to know info like project location on a map and the local weather. You can also customize the "widgets" as you see fit to add more information if necessary to the home screen. From my experience as a LEED consultant, Bim 360 does not differ much from other platforms used for submittal review like Procore. It is easy enough to search for what you want but searches do take a while and you need to move the cursor over every time you search and do not find what you're looking for, which seems very unnecessary. Overall it is fine for reviewing documentation but isn't anything extraordinary.
Read full review
Wrike
My organization used Google Sheets to work with subbies, but we've since switched to Wrike. It is user friendly, has formulas and customizable fields. Wrike has been a lifesaver because instead of sharing Google Sheets with external customers and typically they messing up - deleting formulas, users can simply fill out a request form without logging into Wrike . All details are displayed in a table view, making management much easier.
Read full review
Pros
Autodesk
  • Live updates between design teams. This keeps the team up to date for quicker design and frees up personnel from having to do file transfers.
  • The cloud-based platform gives your company a little bit of a break on computer requirements.
  • Allows multiple offices and/or cloud-based consultants to collaborate on a design as if they are one office or one company.
Read full review
Wrike
  • Wrike has been consistent in emailing any updates or changes to each person involved in each task.
  • Wrike has a simple to navigate website, with quick access to each task.
  • Wrike keeps all data files located at the top of the task for quick reference, which makes it easier for each team member to find.
  • Wrike adds date tags as well as any edited or deleted notes where we are able to cross-reference any major changes that may have been made.
Read full review
Cons
Autodesk
  • Bim360 is extremely unintuitive and frequently confusing to end users.
  • There are multiple avenues of sharing and collaboration for models and information. The advantages/disadvantages of each and how to perform even the most basic of tasks requires extensive training and mentoring for even the most advanced of users.
  • There are many enormous limitations and constraints to BIM 360 that are not immediately obvious and even contrary to published marketing materials and even product naming.
  • Development cycles of the product are seemingly monthly, but incredibly minor. This makes the desperately-needed and glaringly obvious massive usability, capability, and performance improvements into deal-breakers and hair pulling events. Change cannot come fast enough.
  • There are no integrations into Microsoft's Azure AD SSO or other 3rd party SSOs available for SMBs. This makes the provided MFA a huge headache for all SMBs.
  • There are no integrations into the Microsoft 365 ecosystem for SharePoint/OneDrive or Outlook. This is desperately needed for most organizations using Bim360.
Read full review
Wrike
  • The email notifications that are automatically sent from Wrike when something is done are easy for users to miss or ignore.
  • Reporting can be limited. You have to create workarounds for collecting/storing the name of the person submitting the form in instances where they do not have their own Wrike license.
  • A more user-friendly interface, especially for those less familiar with project management software, would enhance overall accessibility.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Autodesk
No answers on this topic
Wrike
I wish that Wrike had more drag and drop functionality that would be connected to assignee and also I wish that the finish date of a task would update to the date where you checked completed. It does not do that. Also finishing a task doesn't move the start date of the next task it "protects your time in that way", but our management team wants us to quickly see what we have down the pipeline rather than having to scroll down the list of upcoming tasks.
Read full review
Usability
Autodesk
No answers on this topic
Wrike
Wrike, overall, is pretty easy to setup and use. I still find challenges in changing milestone dates but our programs / date changes are different than industry standard so that is partly the issue. We love the Excel look along with the dashboards! There are also built in analytics that really assist in seeing where the projects are!
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Autodesk
No answers on this topic
Wrike
Over two years of (almost) daily usage without outages. Don't remember any errors. I give it 9 only because some Wrike plugins (for online document edit) are based on NPAPI architecture. These types of plugins are being phased out in new browsers, and NPAPI plugins are disabled by default in recent versions of Chrome so you have to do some browser adjustments when you switch browsers or move to another computer.
Read full review
Performance
Autodesk
No answers on this topic
Wrike
Wrike tasks loads fine, but I hate clicking files and wait for a bit of time since it is powerpoint or word, Wrike assumes I want to open those on Wrike. My suggestion is to link it to office 365 so we do not need Wrike based decoder for PPTX and DOCX
Read full review
Support Rating
Autodesk
AutoDesk support is slow and if you are not an enterprise customer they will likely tell you to go to forums and post for help pushing the support on the high-level end-users (some of which are AutoDesk employees). I haven't actually had issues requiring support with docs altough there are some features I wish it had
Read full review
Wrike
Support is very quickly and they want to solve problems actively. When I need additional info I can use community forum, when I've an issue I can use support form to get help. The support is of excellent quality from the first level, to grow when you talk to the engineers it becomes even more important
Read full review
In-Person Training
Autodesk
No answers on this topic
Wrike
We had staff in person provide some training
Read full review
Online Training
Autodesk
No answers on this topic
Wrike
I love the Wrike training options. Wrike Discover has tons of courses, learning plans, certifications, etc. This is an area where Wrike definitely shines! I wish these resources were more in your face for new people, because it seems like a lot of coworkers didn't know all of this training was available to them.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Autodesk
No answers on this topic
Wrike
There are a lot of bells and whistles in Wrike, and not all of it is easy or intuitive to understand once it's plopped in your lap. It's easier when there are a few choice people who understand Wrike as a platform and articulate it in such a way where it makes it easy to pass it along to others in the group
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Autodesk
The saving in reduced field changes/mistakes quickly paid for the license plus some. The software allows for easy data collection, especially at project completion for field software by checklist creation. Furthermore, the internal punch-list tracking, tracking completion lists and punch lists created for us by others is optimal compared to the competition. We chose Bim360 over other options due to its ability to import out of other software programs directly into the system, adding reports in one location and then distributing it to subcontractors and internally from there to fix deficiencies. It does the tracking, importing, markups of pictures and document viewing well and fulfills our needs.
Read full review
Wrike
I have not used other products except Microsoft Teams channels with file sharing and standard sharing from Adobe, text and email messaging, and Zoom/gotomeeting sharing. This is the first product that I have used that had the functionality and platform where the sharing is simplistic. It is better than standard sharing through email or other simple forms because everything stays together.
Read full review
Contract Terms and Pricing Model
Autodesk
No answers on this topic
Wrike
company purchase
Read full review
Scalability
Autodesk
No answers on this topic
Wrike
The sky is the limit for what can be done in Wrike. We started with 1 use case and within 5 months we migrated several key business practices over to Wrike because they were easier to manage. Use cases so far: process improvement, management review, corrective actions, maintenance requests, month-end financial closing, and document management. As we grow, it's easy to imagine putting even more into Wrike where it becomes a cornerstone for how we do business
Read full review
Professional Services
Autodesk
No answers on this topic
Wrike
not sure
Read full review
Return on Investment
Autodesk
  • Positively we use for all safety items, so its potential to save money is really something cannot be quantified. It has helped document trends, big items leading trends and odd ball cases which overall helps perfecting process to eliminate those trends and save time.
  • Negative impact is we need to pay for another program to handle budget, submittals and bidding so we are paying for two systems and paying for all employees to learn each system and possible make errors since there are differences in the systems.
Read full review
Wrike
  • Adding versions of a document streamlines our editing process, preventing us from reviewing outdated versions of a document. This feature saves time, especially when working with external contributors who may not know Wrike well.
  • Blueprints save time because we do not have to manually enter all the details when scheduling a recurring project.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Wrike Screenshots

Screenshot of Resource ManagementScreenshot of Wrike TemplatesScreenshot of Team WorkloadScreenshot of Wrike ReportsScreenshot of Wrike apps & integrationsScreenshot of Wrike Gantt Chart