TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Autodesk Build vs. Bluebeam vs. CMiC Construction Platform

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Contact about CMiC Construction Platform

Please fill out the form below to get in touch.

CMiC

Connect with CMiC

What are you interested in?

Already have an account?

You hereby consent to have TrustRadius share the information supplied on this form with CMiC so that CMiC and TrustRadius may contact you in regard to the information requested.

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Autodesk Build

    Score8.6 out of 10
    N/AAutodesk Build, based on the former PlanGrid, is construction productivity software. It includes tools to collaborate, collect, and manage project information throughout the project’s construction and operations lifespan. It enables document centralization and tracking.

    $39

    user per month

    Bluebeam

    Score8.9 out of 10
    N/ABluebeam Revu is a PDF management, control, and editing tool. It enables collaboration and markup within shared documents across projects’ life cycles and has takeoff and bid creation capabilities.

    $260

    per year per user

    CMiC Construction Platform

    Score7.5 out of 10
    Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
    CMiC Project Management is a construction project collaboration and management solution. It centralizes project-related communications and documents onto one platform, and connects the job site with the back-end office.N/A
    Pricing
    Autodesk BuildBluebeamCMiC Construction Platform
    Editions & Modules
    Nailgun
    $39
    user per month
    Dozer
    $59
    user per month
    Crane
    $139
    user per month
    Basics
    $260
    per year per user
    Core
    $330
    per year per user
    Complete
    $440
    per year per user
    Max
    $590
    per year per user
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Autodesk BuildBluebeamCMiC Construction Platform
    Free Trial
    YesYesNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    YesYesNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details———
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Autodesk BuildBluebeamCMiC Construction Platform
    Considered Multiple Products
    Autodesk
    Chose Autodesk Build
    • Asana is better at assigning tasks and completing work on a deadline.
    • Bluebeam Revu is used by other consultants, but PlanGrid is preferred by our office.
    • Acrobat is quick and dirty but is difficult to track changes and versions.
    Incentivized
    Chose Autodesk Build
    We use Bluebeam Revu very much in our daily work and it has many futures that are not available in PlanGrid.
    Incentivized
    Chose Autodesk Build
    I'm not going to lie, I still use Bluebeam Revu on the computer. There is still a big gap on what they are able to do. But on the iPad I use PlanGrid and enjoy it better. Being able to move through drawings is way easier on PlanGrid
    Incentivized
    Chose Autodesk Build
    PlanGrid doesn't have all the capabilities that Bluebeam Revu offers. However, it makes up for that in its ease to use of the capabilities it does offer with regards to documentation, reviewing, and sharing of drawings.
    Incentivized
    Chose Autodesk Build
    We currently use both Bluebeam and Adobe in our environment, but PlanGrid makes it much easier to view and do quick markups and annotations.
    Incentivized
    Chose Autodesk Build
    PlanGrid is very similar to Procore but offers a slightly more straightforward user interface and seems not to be loaded with extra options that rarely would get used like Procore. PlanGrid is a much smoother software than Submittal Exchange or CMiC due to that same interface. …
    Incentivized
    Chose Autodesk Build
    Compared on pricing, PlanGrid was best. Procore does submittals and pay apps, but GoBridgit was completely unrealistic in price for us to consider them. The overall use of PlanGrid along with current pricing makes it worthwhile for us. If pricing goes up, it would no longer be …
    Incentivized
    Chose Autodesk Build
    BlueBeam is a program that some of our customers use as their management tool. It is a little more cumbersome than Plan Grid. We would certainly prefer using PlanGrid over other products that we have tried. Our field staff prefers to have a consistent platform to share the …
    Incentivized
    Chose Autodesk Build
    PlanGrid allows easier collaboration.
    Incentivized
    Chose Autodesk Build
    The programs are not exactly parallel, however, we formerly posted RFIs on Bluebeam and by owner request we are now using Plangrid. I have found that this feature on Plangrid is slightly more intuitive and the interface is more user-friendly. Bluebeam, on the other hand, has …
    Incentivized
    Chose Autodesk Build
    PlanGrid is great for quickly communicating information within the field, however, its office capabilities are more limited compared to some alternative software I have used.
    Incentivized
    Chose Autodesk Build
    I feel that Plangrid does a good job at combining most of the best attributes of the above programs into one solid software. Finishline seems to be a bit stronger punchlist tool but it doesnt have any other features, can't be used a doc control, etc.
    Incentivized
    Chose Autodesk Build
    PlanGrid has several more features in one location, as opposed to using multiple programs to accomplish the same task.
    Incentivized
    Chose Autodesk Build
    Bluebeam is easier to use for plan markups, but the punch list function of PlanGrid is far better.
    Incentivized
    Chose Autodesk Build
    Have both but like PlanGrid much better.
    Incentivized
    Chose Autodesk Build
    We use Bluebeam and PlanGrid on a daily basis for different purposes. Bluebeam does some things better than PlanGrid, but these are things that PlanGrid was not really designed to do. However, Plangrid is the best when it come to punchlists, and no other product that I have …
    Incentivized
    Chose Autodesk Build
    Bluebeam and PlanGrid work great together, not sure one could replace the other. Bluebeam is really great for more detailed markups, better than PlanGrid in that respect. When you zoom out on the markups for PlanGrid, markups get really thick and unreadable.

    For me, Procore is …
    Incentivized
    Chose Autodesk Build
    Have tried different options for plan review on-site (mostly on iPads):

    - Pdf viewers (various): Big files, complex process that takes a long time to reduce files for easy and fast access, limited annotation possibilities
    Incentivized
    Chose Autodesk Build
    In comparison to other products, Plangrid excels for field documentation and management. There are other solutions on the market that are well suited for their niche as well, but for field management Plangrid has been the most robust and easiest to use. Have so many features …
    Incentivized
    Chose Autodesk Build
    Bluebeam tends to be really slow on the iPad compared to PlanGrid and is more cumbersome.
    Incentivized
    Bluebeam
    Chose Bluebeam
    Adobe is good for viewing PDFs, but as far as how PDFs are utilized in construction, Bluebeam is hands-down the best program I have used.
    Incentivized
    Chose Bluebeam
    Bluebeam is a diverse program with many functions and tools, whereas competitive programs only specialize in one or few tasks. Although there are many tools within the program, users can still quickly learn how to use the program to best fit their needs. There is always a help …
    Incentivized
    Chose Bluebeam
    I personally like the tools that Bluebeam offers over Acrobat and feel that, for my company, Bluebeam was much better suited. Scaling tools, markups, as-builts, RFI’s, submittal approval, and detail creation all really show its strength.
    Incentivized
    Chose Bluebeam
    The only software I've ever used that even comes close to Revu is Adobe Acrobat Pro, which I find is most confusing and has a less attractive interface. Since Revu 2015 (the oldest version I've used), there's always been a dark mode Adobe does not have. PlanGrid and Procore, …
    Incentivized
    Chose Bluebeam
    This program directly replaces our use of Adobe company wide. We have also phased out PlanGrid for the most part as the tools of Procore and Bluebeam both have been more user friendly for our teams.
    Incentivized
    Chose Bluebeam
    If Bluebeam can be compared to any other PDF editing software, the closest competitor would be Adobe Acrobat. Unfortunately, this really isn't a fair comparison because to tools available (and user interface) in Bluebeam FAR outweigh the ones available in Adobe Acrobat. This …
    Incentivized
    Chose Bluebeam
    Bluebeam has more capabilities than both PlanGrid and Acrobat when using it to review and edit PDFs. It is not as intuitive to use as either since it does provide more abilities to markup files. It is not as easy to load and share files as PlanGrid, but it does provide access …
    Incentivized
    CMiC
    Chose CMiC Construction Platform
    At the time we switched it was the only product that was feature rich and cloud based, our old product was heavily reliant on on premise servers.
    Incentivized
    Chose CMiC Construction Platform
    I believe Acumatica is a much more stable system with far better support, security, and reliability. Customization options are better in Acumatica as well. In my opinion, there is no competition. I believe CMiC Construction Platform will lose its client base to Acumatica in …
    Incentivized
    Chose CMiC Construction Platform
    CMiC Construction Platform is the best price point in the market. Others are revenue-based billings, and the annual fees reflect as such. CMiC Construction Platform support staff is generally amazing and offers real-time support on critical issues. The imaging and workflow …
    Incentivized
    Chose CMiC Construction Platform
    CMiC has far more capability than these other software platforms. We had to use all of the other software together to meet the same capability as CMiC alone.
    Incentivized
    Chose CMiC Construction Platform
    CMiC incorporates more features and reduces the need to use additional software platforms. We found that Foundation Software is not as user-friendly and can be limited in the various types of reports that are available. PlanGrid and Procore both would have had to be partnered …
    Incentivized
    Chose CMiC Construction Platform
    The look and feel of CMiC is very similar to PlanGrid but when you get into the nitty-gritty of using CMiC for drawing management, it's lacking features our employees have pointed out. Submittal Exchange is much cleaner for submittal management. The interface is better. The …
    Incentivized
    Chose CMiC Construction Platform
    Worse than all 3. PlanGrid: Smoother use than CMiC. The way it is formatted and shows the plans in order is the best. CMiC shows plans in the order they were uploaded instead of plan order (A100, A101, etc.). Procore: Same reason as PlanGrid. It just feels as though CMiC's plan …
    Incentivized
    Chose CMiC Construction Platform
    In addition to PlanGrid, I have used a purpose-built in-house system, about 10 years ago. It was build using forms designed with Word & Excel. These forms were infilled, saved as signed PDFs, and uploaded to Google Cloud. The in-house user base was small and use was managed …
    Incentivized
    Chose CMiC Construction Platform
    CMiC is not there yet in terms of usability when compared to PlanGrid. I have attended the conferences and have seen the plans to improve usability and look forward to these changes. Unfortunately, until it is at this point it does not compete in regards to construction plan …
    Incentivized
    Chose CMiC Construction Platform
    It can handle accounting, field operations, safety, and document control all in one place. I have not come across another software that is able to have so many applications all using one tool. The best part is that the technology advancement is never ending!
    Incentivized
    Chose CMiC Construction Platform
    It doesn't. There are many other programs out there that offer similar services (Procore) that are much more user friendly and offer a collaborative environment for different entities (owner, architect, subcontractors). But the layout and interface is so layered and cumbersome …
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    94%
    Would buy again
    17 Answers
    71%
    Would buy again
    79 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    93%
    Delivers good value for the price
    14 Answers
    79%
    Delivers good value for the price
    57 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    94%
    Happy with the feature set
    17 Answers
    81%
    Happy with the feature set
    90 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    92%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    11 Answers
    49%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    22 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    92%
    Implementation went as expected
    11 Answers
    43%
    Implementation went as expected
    27 Answers
    Features
    Autodesk BuildBluebeamCMiC Construction Platform
    Construction Project & Field Management
    Comparison of Construction Project & Field Management features of Autodesk Build and Bluebeam and CMiC Construction Platform
    Feature
    Autodesk Build
    6.5
    58 Ratings
    16% below category average
    Bluebeam
    9.8
    54 Ratings
    25% above category average
    CMiC Construction Platform
    8.0
    106 Ratings
    5% above category average
    Plan distribution & viewing7.057 Ratings9.752 Ratings8.067 Ratings
    Plan markups & sharing6.057 Ratings9.854 Ratings7.963 Ratings
    Issue tracking & punchlists5.052 Ratings9.733 Ratings8.081 Ratings
    Photo documentation9.049 Ratings9.736 Ratings8.077 Ratings
    Jobsite reports9.037 Ratings9.831 Ratings8.088 Ratings
    Document sharing8.056 Ratings9.847 Ratings8.089 Ratings
    RFI tools5.039 Ratings9.835 Ratings8.090 Ratings
    Collaboration & approvals8.043 Ratings9.842 Ratings9.095 Ratings
    As-built drawings5.043 Ratings9.845 Ratings8.054 Ratings
    Mobile app3.055 Ratings10.027 Ratings8.064 Ratings
    Submittal design and management00 Ratings9.821 Ratings8.085 Ratings
    Checklists00 Ratings9.93 Ratings7.947 Ratings
    Change orders00 Ratings9.93 Ratings8.060 Ratings
    Meeting Minutes00 Ratings00 Ratings8.051 Ratings
    Specifications00 Ratings00 Ratings8.039 Ratings
    Reporting & Analytics
    Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Autodesk Build and Bluebeam and CMiC Construction Platform
    Feature
    Autodesk Build
    -
    Ratings
    Bluebeam
    10.0
    1 Ratings
    26% above category average
    CMiC Construction Platform
    8.0
    56 Ratings
    4% above category average
    Dashboards00 Ratings10.01 Ratings8.043 Ratings
    Standard reports00 Ratings10.01 Ratings8.055 Ratings
    Custom reports00 Ratings10.01 Ratings8.046 Ratings
    Data exportability00 Ratings10.01 Ratings8.053 Ratings
    Estimating
    Comparison of Estimating features of Autodesk Build and Bluebeam and CMiC Construction Platform
    Feature
    Autodesk Build
    -
    Ratings
    Bluebeam
    9.6
    29 Ratings
    24% above category average
    CMiC Construction Platform
    8.0
    56 Ratings
    6% above category average
    Takeoff tools00 Ratings9.728 Ratings8.021 Ratings
    Job costing00 Ratings8.45 Ratings8.052 Ratings
    Cost databases00 Ratings10.01 Ratings8.043 Ratings
    Cost calculator00 Ratings10.02 Ratings8.030 Ratings
    Bid creation00 Ratings9.98 Ratings7.929 Ratings
    Human Resource Management
    Comparison of Human Resource Management features of Autodesk Build and Bluebeam and CMiC Construction Platform
    Feature
    Autodesk Build
    -
    Ratings
    Bluebeam
    -
    Ratings
    CMiC Construction Platform
    8.0
    30 Ratings
    13% above category average
    Employee demographic data00 Ratings00 Ratings8.020 Ratings
    Employment history00 Ratings00 Ratings8.024 Ratings
    Job profiles and administration00 Ratings00 Ratings8.020 Ratings
    Workflow for transfers, promotions, pay raises, etc.00 Ratings00 Ratings8.019 Ratings
    Organizational charting00 Ratings00 Ratings8.014 Ratings
    Organization and location management00 Ratings00 Ratings8.014 Ratings
    Compliance data (COBRA, OSHA, etc.)00 Ratings00 Ratings8.019 Ratings
    Payroll Management
    Comparison of Payroll Management features of Autodesk Build and Bluebeam and CMiC Construction Platform
    Feature
    Autodesk Build
    -
    Ratings
    Bluebeam
    -
    Ratings
    CMiC Construction Platform
    8.0
    24 Ratings
    16% above category average
    Pay calculation00 Ratings00 Ratings8.024 Ratings
    Support for external payroll vendors00 Ratings00 Ratings8.015 Ratings
    Off-cycle/On-Demand payment00 Ratings00 Ratings8.015 Ratings
    Benefit plan administration00 Ratings00 Ratings8.017 Ratings
    Direct deposit files00 Ratings00 Ratings8.021 Ratings
    Salary revision and increment management00 Ratings00 Ratings8.020 Ratings
    Reimbursement management00 Ratings00 Ratings8.015 Ratings
    Asset Management
    Comparison of Asset Management features of Autodesk Build and Bluebeam and CMiC Construction Platform
    Feature
    Autodesk Build
    -
    Ratings
    Bluebeam
    -
    Ratings
    CMiC Construction Platform
    8.0
    19 Ratings
    16% above category average
    Tracking of all physical assets00 Ratings00 Ratings8.019 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    Autodesk BuildBluebeamCMiC Construction Platform
    Small Businesses
    CMiC Construction Platform
    Score7.5 out of 10
    CMiC Construction Platform
    Score7.5 out of 10
    Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro
    Score7.5 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    Bluebeam
    Score8.9 out of 10
    Autodesk Build
    Score8.6 out of 10
    Autodesk Build
    Score8.6 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Revit
    Score8.9 out of 10
    Revit
    Score8.9 out of 10
    Revit
    Score8.9 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Autodesk BuildBluebeamCMiC Construction Platform
    Likelihood to Recommend
    7.0
    (70 ratings)
    9.9
    (66 ratings)
    7.9
    (115 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    1.0
    (2 ratings)
    9.4
    (7 ratings)
    Usability
    5.0
    (2 ratings)
    9.8
    (4 ratings)
    9.0
    (7 ratings)
    Availability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    Performance
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.0
    (1 ratings)
    Support Rating
    9.0
    (52 ratings)
    1.0
    (11 ratings)
    4.7
    (96 ratings)
    In-Person Training
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.5
    (2 ratings)
    Online Training
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    6.9
    (5 ratings)
    Configurability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    Vendor post-sale
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    Vendor pre-sale
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Autodesk BuildBluebeamCMiC Construction Platform
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Autodesk
    PlanGrid performs really well in all aspects of construction from the general to the sub/trade. The platform distributes and communicates project documentation in an extremely user-friendly manner. As with most software, it is cheaper the larger the scale of the project. In situations where the project is relatively small, and the trade contracts are also of relatively low dollar value, the product can be cost-prohibitive.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Bluebeam
    The program is great for editing construction drawings, stamping/approving official documents and overlaying revised documents to see design changes. You can use it as an estimating takeoff tool, estimating database, document control, cloud document storage, the list goes on! Bluebeam poses many applications for the user to utilize for the desired needs. There may be some other software that has one specific function that can perform the specific task better, but Bluebeam is a holistic program with many tools for use.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    CMiC
    CMiC is a robust platform best suited for large companies with resources for implementation and management of the program. One analogy is CMiC is like a droid phone where the user must decide how to use all the features of the program (as opposed to an iPhone where most configuration decisions are made for the user). Smaller companies with limited resources can struggle with CMiC both with the expense and configuration.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Autodesk
    • Plangrid is the best SaaS I have seen for ease of uploading construction plans and automated organization of those plans.
    • For companies that are not using other products for mobile access, the Plangrid mobile apps are perfect to allow people on and off site to share and collaborate in many phases of construction project documentation.
    • Plangrid has a very responsive technical support team (although it is pretty much email only).
    • Plangrid's website layout is easy to use and understand and allows new users to jump right in and do basic to moderate tasks without little training.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Bluebeam
    • Once you set Bluebeam Revu as your default PDF handler, it launches immediately when clicking a PDF to open. The speed with which it opens documents is impressive.
    • Creating PDF's out of other documents, such as Word, Excel, JPG's, etc. is simple.
    • Digitally signing documents is a simple, secure process. You can keep your signature password-protected, yet still access it quickly.
    • The Bluebeam Revu mobile application ( I use the iOS version on an iPad Pro), is awesome. Not only does it handle PDF's like you would expect it to, it allows for effortless digital signing of documents on the fly. Nice to be able to quickly sign a document and email right back out from the tablet no matter where I am.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    CMiC
    • The user interface is similar to that of other project management software applications so folks in our company that had previously used other applications have been able to switch over fairly easily.
    • I really like the software and it was much less expensive than other applications.
    • I like the mobile application so that our superintendents can view the documentation on their phones.
    • I really like the punch list capability mobile field, however, we have a hard time getting our superintendents to use it for some reason.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Autodesk
    • The photo attachment process is a bit complicated. In ProCore (another similar software I've used), you can upload photos directly into RFIs for your reference, or into e-mails. For PlanGrid, you have to first upload the photo into the documents tab, then link them into the RFI. It's not intuitive and can add confusion to the documents tab.
    • Photos can't be directly uploaded. Between different devices and colleagues, it's possible you'll get an important photo outside of the PlanGrid photo capture feature within its app. Again, it's complicated for users to use.
    • In their new drawings viewer, the icons for actions do not have icons available. I had to use them all in order to understand what they meant, and I'm fairly tech savvy. I'm not sure if a new person to PlanGrid will pick up on each icon's abilities very easily.
    • There's no all-in-one solution in CM, but PlanGrid is fairly barebones, and I don't believe it has any ability to connect to other software. There's no ability to take meeting munites; you can hack the field reports feature to accomplish this, but it's clear that was not the intent of the designers.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Bluebeam
    • If you have several tabs open and you try to drag one out for a side by side view then you do not have all the modification options and you have to combine them back together.
    • There is a lag time when hitting the print option.
    • There is also a lag time when opening files, sometimes I think the window is frozen.
    • I wish the basic version also had basic file editing, as in editing a document as Adobe does.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    CMiC
    • Needs to be more user friendly on the mobile side of the platform. Ease of use is key here.
    • There is not much instruction or support in standing up some programs like deploying ECM for outlook, making Collaboration Gateway work, or setting up the system for getting Plans available on the mobile devices.
    • Security configuration is extremely detailed and spread throughout the system. It is extremely hard to make adjustments to a person's security unless you know exactly where to look, which requires years of experience but shouldn't.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Autodesk
    We are at the point where we have shown our teams what is possible with this software. We cannot take it away and go back to the way we used to do things. I think that they would push back on us to give them access to something electronic. It is a good program that we will continue to use
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Bluebeam
    Bluebeam is a powerful PDF viewer and mark-up tool. We are more familiar with it than Adobe Acrobat Pro or other viewers, and it has more features geared towards construction document managers than Acrobat Pro does.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    CMiC
    This is a platform that would continue to be in the best interest for our company. I just hope that CMiC support removes the gaps between the enhancements that they create to better the system to what they currently have
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Autodesk
    Hard to get the hang of this software, but with time it become very repetitive and easier to navigate. I have used this software for over a year now and the constant updates by Autodesk have made the software better and better to use at work. This allows me to use this tool more effectively
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Bluebeam
    I'm constantly finding that Bluebeam Revu does more than I knew it could. And when I find something that it can't do, I've found that Bluebeam truly listens to its user base and will work to incorporate any good suggestion when feasible.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    CMiC
    I believe it isn't easy to use and is unintuitive. Undecipherable error messages appear throughout the application without indicating what is wrong or how to correct it, in my experience. The terminology on the screens is specific to Canada, which adds to the confusion.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Reliability and Availability
    Autodesk
    No answers on this topic
    Bluebeam
    No answers on this topic
    CMiC
    Sometimes since this is a cloud based product the system can become slow but we haven’t had any issues of availability without CMiC first letting us know it would be down
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Performance
    Autodesk
    No answers on this topic
    Bluebeam
    No answers on this topic
    CMiC
    Reports are pretty shown to run but general pages typically load pretty quick.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Autodesk
    Online chat during business hours is extremely helpful. The Plangrid staff has gone above and beyond many times to help us. One time they even offered to completely rebuild our 900+ sheet project so I could slip sheet a few old drawing revisions! This undoubtedly would have taken hours on Plangrid's end. They are always responsive and are continually improving, listening to user feedback.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Bluebeam
    Its hard for me to give a rating on this one as we rarely have to use the support feature for Bluebeam. However, when we have used it, they have been ultra supportive in helping us get exactly what we needed. I know another engineer was trying to figure out a feature and the rep gave a detailed tutorial on how to complete the task
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    CMiC
    The support team [has] been in touch with our deployment team and has given them effective guidance up to completion. It has helped us in [the] best methods of resource allocation and secure record-keeping process. We have tracked all our billing information and made the right payments with documentation and avoided [unnecessary losses]. [The] support team has [to] lead our teams to the right channels and empowering our team with the right skills for maximum production.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    In-Person Training
    Autodesk
    No answers on this topic
    Bluebeam
    No answers on this topic
    CMiC
    The training was on system functions and not really how best to use it for our business. It would have been nice to be provided recommendations for use rather than just a blank slate of functionality.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Online Training
    Autodesk
    No answers on this topic
    Bluebeam
    No answers on this topic
    CMiC
    I felt the training was good and the trainers knew the software.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Implementation Rating
    Autodesk
    No answers on this topic
    Bluebeam
    No answers on this topic
    CMiC
    Lots of confusion between sales and implementation regarding what was included and not included...the security encountered a "bug" and made it extremely difficult to set up roles and individual responsibilities
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Autodesk
    Plangrid, while not serving the external document distribution function, is unrivaled for internal document distribution and sharing in the construction industry. The speed at which documents are navigatable, the ability to download your projects for viewing without an internet connection, and the document mark-up and photo tools place it head and shoulders above the competition.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Bluebeam
    We feel there is not another program out there that would compare to Bluebeam at this current time. Some of the other programs out there do not include studio or the overlaying process which is one of our main uses. The ease of hyperlinking makes this product stand out the most.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    CMiC
    CMiC Construction Platform is the best price point in the market. Others are revenue-based billings, and the annual fees reflect as such. CMiC Construction Platform support staff is generally amazing and offers real-time support on critical issues. The imaging and workflow functions are real-time savers. CMiC Construction Platform is generally a smaller and in touch organization that treats your team like their own and stays with you after the purchase.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Scalability
    Autodesk
    No answers on this topic
    Bluebeam
    No answers on this topic
    CMiC
    CMiC has several key features that can either work together or independently depending on your companies needs.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Autodesk
    • It helped us "wow" a joint commission survey in 2016 and have a successful survey because he loved how we could access plans on an iPad, check suite sizes, and didn't have to carry around huge, heavy sets of life safety plans.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Bluebeam
    • A major positive aspect is being able to take your computer home without taking the entire set of paper drawings. They have made it so easy to navigate a set of drawings that I can work at home using only the digital drawings.
    • Collaboration with owners and architects has been a great feature. Setting up a Bluebeam studio and having everyone get in and mark things up, then having the architect be able to go in and see what markups have been added, has made the constructability review process much much better.
    • Even when not working on drawings, Bluebeam is a very good tool for working with standard PDF documents. The markup tools are very easy to use.
    • The negative aspect is the takeoff function because some people would like estimators to use the Bluebeam takeoff because it would make their job easier down the road; however, the actual act of doing a full scale takeoff in Bluebeam would require much more time.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    CMiC
    • Better project visibility, surely. I can step into a former project and see how well/poorly it was run.
    • Forecasting underway - nearly complete with year 2.
    • Cost status tracking - this has been valuable, especially when figuring out how much of a liquid budget is left over.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    Autodesk Build Screenshots

    Screenshot of No confusing folders - all your plans at your fingertips.Screenshot of Easy overlay to visually detect changes or clashes.Screenshot of Track issues directly on the plan, including descriptions, photos, cost, and schedule impacts.Screenshot of Mark up plans for instant communication between field and office.Screenshot of Attach any kind of construction documents to your plans, including 360 photos.Screenshot of Track, review, and submit all your field reports on a mobile device.

    Bluebeam Screenshots

    Screenshot of Bluebeam Cloud with Markup ListScreenshot of Bluebeam Cloud with Tool ChestScreenshot of Bluebeam Revu MarkupScreenshot of Bluebeam Revu Studio Session

    CMiC Construction Platform Screenshots

    Screenshot of CMiC FIELDScreenshot of CMiC AnalyticsScreenshot of CMiC Drawing ManagementScreenshot of CMiC FIELD