Convert Experiences vs. Optimizely Web Experimentation

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Convert Experiences
Score 9.9 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
Convert Experiences is an experimentation platform that offers features and support to run A/B tests across multiple growth channels. Its enterprise-ready advanced features include full stack experimentation, multi-page testing, post-segmentation, sequential testing, targeting with 40+ filters, triggering tests based on data in other apps (data sources), dynamic triggers, complex goal tracking, and a secure API. It includes 90+ out-of-the box integrations in a…
$399
per month 100k tested users per month
Optimizely Web Experimentation
Score 8.7 out of 10
N/A
Whether launching a first test or scaling a sophisticated experimentation program, Optimizely Web Experimentation aims to deliver the insights needed to craft high-performing digital experiences that drive engagement, increase conversions, and accelerate growth.N/A
Pricing
Convert ExperiencesOptimizely Web Experimentation
Editions & Modules
Growth
$399
per month 100k tested users per month
Pro
$5040
per year 1.5M tested users/year
Enterprise
Pricing available on request
From 1M tested users/mo (billed annually)
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Convert ExperiencesOptimizely Web Experimentation
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
Additional Details1. Annual contract or monthly payments available 2. Pricing is not feature dependent. Some features like integrations, goals, Live Logs are necessary to test successfully. This is why Convert caps by unique tested users - basically visitors who have been bucketed to see a variation and are unique to that variation. As a result the app tested users are always </= the site's net traffic.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Convert ExperiencesOptimizely Web Experimentation
Considered Both Products
Convert Experiences
Chose Convert Experiences
Three words: value for money. In a due diligence comparison, Convert Experiences came up more than twice less expensive than the nearest competitor, while offering more product features, better performance and a quick response time with support/sales agents that actually …
Chose Convert Experiences
Convert Experiences sits in a niche of great products, against which it competes very well and remains held in high regard as it achieves pretty much everything that the bigger platforms put on the table but in a more cost-effective model. The reason we initially chose …
Chose Convert Experiences
Convert has the best JS code editor for advanced users (and developers). It doesn't have as great integration with GA as Google Optimize, but it also doesn't have a limit to 5 tests at one time. It's also much easier to use than Optimizely.
Chose Convert Experiences
Although not as robust as Adobe Target, Convert fills the niche with solid functionality at a great price. Comparable to Optimizely and far above Google Optimize.
Chose Convert Experiences
Although VWO is slightly cheaper it flickers quite a bit, hence why I originally looked into alternative software to use for A/B testing. VWO also has other features that could be useful, but they can be found in tools you may already be using, like Hotjar. Also, their support …
Chose Convert Experiences
Convert Experiences has a better UI, better reporting and is a faster platform.
Chose Convert Experiences
Convert was selected based on price point, feature set, and UI/UX. All three are very friendly to new testers and small to mid-market size companies. Their UI and tool workflow is the best out of all of the non-enterprise solutions that I have tried. There is some small room …
Chose Convert Experiences
There were a number of other tools I used. Specifically though: they expose the DMP features that some other companies price into oblivion and enterprise levels (if the other tools have them at all!)

I feel like I've gushed a lot about the DMP and power user features of Convert …
Chose Convert Experiences
Convert is better vs. Optimizely and VWO for the following reasons:
  • Better pricing
  • Faster App - easier and quicker to create tests, less clunky but just as powerful as the others
Chose Convert Experiences
The biggest point for Convert Experiences is definitely the price and the completeness of their packages. Their Magento plugin makes it great for running tests on ecommerce stores. One thing that's missing for me is deeper insights into revenue (something optimizely does …
Chose Convert Experiences
Convert works similar to Optimizely, but at a more competitive rate.
Chose Convert Experiences
Visual Website Optimizer's feature set is not as well suited to advanced experiments (it doesn't seem to allow direct editing of variation code). Optimizely is expensive and their agency plan requires a 12 month minimum contract. Support is not as great. Optimizely also does …
Chose Convert Experiences
While Optimizely is an amazing A/B testing tool, Convert has almost the exact same offerings but at a much lower cost. The customer and technical support are excellent as well, and Dennis's insights and strategy calls are very helpful.
Chose Convert Experiences
Visual Website Optimizer costs too much and misses a lot of transactions due to third-party cookies. Optimizely flat out refused to support Shopify. They withdrew their app from the marketplace in 2014.
Optimizely Web Experimentation
Chose Optimizely Web Experimentation
Atlassian Jira
Chose Optimizely Web Experimentation
We have just used experimentation just now, so we don't have any other tools or products.
Chose Optimizely Web Experimentation
I'm new to Experimentations. This is the only product that I've used.
Chose Optimizely Web Experimentation
Optmizely is much more performant product. We have witnessed less issues with page performance on Optimizely and have no issues with flickering. We had these issues with Maxymiser.
Chose Optimizely Web Experimentation
Contentsquare and Sitecore Digital Experience Platform
Chose Optimizely Web Experimentation
Best-in-Class Experiment Design compared to platforms like VWO and Convert. Optimizely offers a more polished and intuitive UI for setting up experiments. It feels purpose-built with lots of concurrent tests. Features like traffic allocation, audience targeting, and variation …
Chose Optimizely Web Experimentation
The ability to do A/B testing in Optimizely along with the associated statistical modelling and audience segmentation means it is a much better solution than using something like Google Analytics were a lot more effort is required to identify and isolate the specific data you …
Chose Optimizely Web Experimentation
I do not have any issues with AB Tasty. They are great. We went with Optimizely because they have several other products that will work together with our business model. Optimizely has grown and it now offers many other products that work with experimentation like CMS, CMP, ODP …
Chose Optimizely Web Experimentation
Google Optimize and Hotjar
Chose Optimizely Web Experimentation
Optimizely is highly intuitive, allowing marketers or non-technical folks to run experiments without complicated coding. It also allows for various types of experimentation, including A/B tests, multivariate tests, and personalization. This capability will enable teams to run …
Chose Optimizely Web Experimentation
Better UI, more integrated with our enterprise
Chose Optimizely Web Experimentation
This is a platform that was already implemented when I started with my current company.
Chose Optimizely Web Experimentation
The feature set and ecosystem for Optimizely seemed much more robust and scalable.
Chose Optimizely Web Experimentation
None of them have a best in class stats engine and live within an ecosystem of marketing technology products the way that Optimizely does, so the scalability of using any one of those tools is limited as compared to using Optimizely Web Experimentation.
Chose Optimizely Web Experimentation
It's a lot more, well, site stacked, it's way better than that. Adobe Target. I think the UI is easier to use on Optimizely. The one thing that I would say comparatively is our analytics talking to each other. Obviously Adobe, we use Adobe Analytics and Adobe Target, so they …
Chose Optimizely Web Experimentation
Optimizely is more user-friendly and cost-effective, ideal for experimentation-focused teams, while Adobe Target excels in advanced personalization and seamless integration within the Adobe ecosystem, making it better suited for large enterprises.
Chose Optimizely Web Experimentation
We analyzed a few competitors and optimizely had the most robust feature set and scalability
Chose Optimizely Web Experimentation
I feel Optimizely Web Experimentation stacked up well against Split
Chose Optimizely Web Experimentation
We haven't used other Optimizely products apart from Web Experimentation.
Chose Optimizely Web Experimentation
Optimizely Web Experimentation was more robust and able to handle the broad array of sites we run than VWO. It has been a great platform to easily add additional sites onto, but still providing a universal overview of all of them, making management a simple task.
Chose Optimizely Web Experimentation
we used Optimizely Web Experimentation then AB Tasty but came back to Optimizley because of its robust stat sig and features as well as all of the products we will be able to work in synchronization.
Chose Optimizely Web Experimentation
We use both, it just depends on the use case. I personally prefer feature experimentation but I see why both are useful.
Chose Optimizely Web Experimentation
Optimizely Web Experimentation has more robust product for experimentation specialists than VWO
Features
Convert ExperiencesOptimizely Web Experimentation
Testing and Experimentation
Comparison of Testing and Experimentation features of Product A and Product B
Convert Experiences
9.4
Ratings
11% above category average
Optimizely Web Experimentation
8.0
Ratings
5% below category average
a/b experiment testing9.90 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Split URL testing10.00 Ratings8.50 Ratings
Multivariate testing9.80 Ratings8.40 Ratings
Multi-page/funnel testing9.00 Ratings7.90 Ratings
Cross-browser testing9.50 Ratings8.10 Ratings
Mobile app testing9.10 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Test significance10.00 Ratings8.40 Ratings
Visual / WYSIWYG editor9.80 Ratings8.10 Ratings
Advanced code editor9.90 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Page surveys9.10 Ratings6.20 Ratings
Visitor recordings9.10 Ratings8.40 Ratings
Preview mode10.00 Ratings7.60 Ratings
Test duration calculator7.40 Ratings7.90 Ratings
Experiment scheduler6.90 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Experiment workflow and approval9.10 Ratings7.80 Ratings
Dynamic experiment activation10.00 Ratings7.50 Ratings
Client-side tests10.00 Ratings7.80 Ratings
Server-side tests8.90 Ratings7.20 Ratings
Mutually exclusive tests10.00 Ratings8.10 Ratings
Audience Segmentation & Targeting
Comparison of Audience Segmentation & Targeting features of Product A and Product B
Convert Experiences
9.9
Ratings
12% above category average
Optimizely Web Experimentation
8.2
Ratings
7% below category average
Standard visitor segmentation10.00 Ratings8.40 Ratings
Behavioral visitor segmentation9.80 Ratings7.60 Ratings
Traffic allocation control10.00 Ratings9.10 Ratings
Website personalization9.80 Ratings7.80 Ratings
Results and Analysis
Comparison of Results and Analysis features of Product A and Product B
Convert Experiences
9.4
Ratings
8% above category average
Optimizely Web Experimentation
8.3
Ratings
4% below category average
Heatmap tool9.10 Ratings9.30 Ratings
Click analytics10.00 Ratings8.80 Ratings
Scroll maps9.10 Ratings8.50 Ratings
Form fill analysis9.10 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Conversion tracking9.00 Ratings8.70 Ratings
Goal tracking9.10 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Test reporting9.90 Ratings7.90 Ratings
Results segmentation9.80 Ratings7.70 Ratings
CSV export9.20 Ratings7.90 Ratings
Experiments results dashboard10.00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Convert ExperiencesOptimizely Web Experimentation
Small Businesses
Google Content Experiments (discontinued)
Google Content Experiments (discontinued)
Score 7.3 out of 10
Convert Experiences
Convert Experiences
Score 9.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Dynamic Yield
Dynamic Yield
Score 9.0 out of 10
Dynamic Yield
Dynamic Yield
Score 9.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Dynamic Yield
Dynamic Yield
Score 9.0 out of 10
Dynamic Yield
Dynamic Yield
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Convert ExperiencesOptimizely Web Experimentation
Likelihood to Recommend
9.9
(0 ratings)
8.7
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.1
(0 ratings)
9.5
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.0
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
7.3
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
9.8
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
3.0
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
6.0
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Convert ExperiencesOptimizely Web Experimentation
Likelihood to Recommend
Definitely well suited for budget conscious companies that want a solid array of functionality but without having to pay an exorbitant amount. Great for marketing and analytics team members that need the ability to get in and set up tests w/o dev assistance. But, functionality is there for developers to get in and set up more complicated tests.
Read full review
I think it can serve the whole spectrum of experiences from people who are just getting used to web experimentation. It's really easy to pick up and use. If you're more experienced then it works well because it just gets out of the way and lets you really focus on the experimentation side of things. So yeah, strongly recommend. I think it is well suited both to small businesses and large enterprises as well. I think it's got a really low barrier to entry. It's very easy to integrate on your website and get results quickly. Likewise, if you are a big business, it's incrementally adoptable, so you can start out with one component of optimizing and you can build there and start to build in things like data CMS to augment experimentation as well. So it's got a really strong a pathway to grow your MarTech platform if you're a small company or a big company.
Read full review
Pros
  • The platform is good value for money, comparing its features and prices to some of the bigger players.
  • The tool is very flexible and can be used for simpler tests right through to much more challenging and rewarding testing but does require a more thorough knowledge of the platform.
  • Their support team is always available and always responsive, not resting until resolutions are met.
Read full review
  • The Platform contains drag-and-drop editor options for creating variations, which ease the A/B tests process, as it does not require any coding or development resources.
  • Establishing it is so simple that even a non-technical person can do it perfectly.
  • It provides real-time results and analytics with robust dashboard access through which you can quickly analyze how different variations perform. With this, your team can easily make data-driven decisions Fastly.
Read full review
Cons
  • The only thing I'm really missing is segmentation during or after testing of the results by device, new users etc., within the results page. Targeting of users based on segments is obviously possible.
  • There are a few inconsistencies in their user interface that I would have liked to see differently. This could be personal taste though.
Read full review
  • The results view is dense and difficult to package easily for leadership, and when filtering by segment it's hard to read comparative outcomes without clearing or swapping filters
  • The organization of experiments and statuses is a cluttered list and the search is limited in use - would love to see that improve with time
  • There are so many other MarTech products out there, would love to see more dedicated integrations so we don't have to invest in something like Zapier or Tray to build hacky automations
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Couldn't live without this, no other tool does precisely what we need them to do
Read full review
Because it's an incredible and essential tool for my line of work as a conversion optimization specialist. Really couldn't do my job nearly as effectively without it. It's paid for itself many times over and I feel like I'm only beginning to unlock the tools potential.
Read full review
Usability
To use the platform in the context of developing enhanced tests that stretch the platform there is as with most things a learning curve. However, if you're a casual user or have standard experiments that you wish to run you would be easily able to hit the ground running.
Read full review
Optimizely Web Experimentation's visual editor is handy for non-technical or quick iterative testing. When it comes to content changes it's as easy as going into wordpress, clicking around, and then seeing your changes live--what you see is what you get. The preview and approval process for sharing built experiments is also handy for sharing experiments across teams for QA purposes or otherwise.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
No answers on this topic
I would rate Optimizely Web Experimentation's availability as a 10 out of 10. The software is reliable and does not experience any application errors or unplanned outages. Additionally, the customer service and technical support teams are always available to help with any issues or questions.
Read full review
Performance
No answers on this topic
I would rate Optimizely Web Experimentation's performance as a 9 out of 10. Pages load quickly, reports are complete in a reasonable time frame, and the software does not slow down any other software or systems that it integrates with. Additionally, the customer service and technical support teams are always available to help with any issues or questions.
Read full review
Support Rating
I use support only in very emergency cases. The support hasn't been very helpful and suggests the problem is on my site
Read full review
They always are quick to respond, and are so friendly and helpful. They always answer the phone right away. And [they are] always willing to not only help you with your problem, but if you need ideas they have suggestions as well.
Read full review
Online Training
No answers on this topic
The tool itself is not very difficult to use so training was not very useful in my opinion. It did not also account for success events more complex than a click (which my company being ecommerce is looking to examine more than a mere click).
Read full review
Implementation Rating
No answers on this topic
The implementation through the tag management system took a bit of trial and error at first, mostly due to the asynchronous nature of the TMS. We had to manipulate the implementation to assure that the Optimizely code was written to the page at the right time to allow the experiment content load in the browser without showing any of the original content first. We also needed to make some adjustments to the TMS code to get the integration with Site Catalyst timed appropriately.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Convert was selected based on price point, feature set, and UI/UX. All three are very friendly to new testers and small to mid-market size companies. Their UI and tool workflow is the best out of all of the non-enterprise solutions that I have tried. There is some small room for improvement, but that only really affects power users or tests that require significant coding/development work to execute.
Read full review
The ability to do A/B testing in Optimizely along with the associated statistical modelling and audience segmentation means it is a much better solution than using something like Google Analytics were a lot more effort is required to identify and isolate the specific data you need to confidently make changes
Read full review
Scalability
No answers on this topic
It's incredibly flexible and adapts well to organizations of all sizes, whether you’re running a single site or managing multiple departments and platforms. The ability to deploy experiments seamlessly across different environments is a huge plus, especially for growing businesses. While it’s highly scalable, the last point would depend on the right team leveraging its full potential.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Using Convert has allowed us to make quick decisions on site edits and price changes. Seeing and sharing quick results makes our operations much more profitable.
  • Connecting the tests with Shopify has produced very valuable and timely results that we can act upon as soon as we see statistically significant results.
Read full review
  • we saved money by not implementing certain copy/design
  • we learned that customers from different states react different to a variation
  • we are slowly learning where conversion happens and where to fix the frictions
  • Testing shorter vs longer journeys increased funnel conversion in some states - we avoided implementing this nationwide
Read full review
ScreenShots

Convert Experiences Screenshots

Screenshot of goals- the conditions that can be stacked to build complex goals that can track (almost) any visitor action to determine the test outcome.Screenshot of granular targeting so only the right people view variations. 40+ conditions included.Screenshot of the API that brings Convert's capabilities to a testing ecosystem.Screenshot of experiment reports that can be shared with stakeholders and on social media.Screenshot of several advanced test types that are available, including multipage (funnel) experiments.Screenshot of full-stack experimentation that can be used to run tests anywhere that Convert code can be deployed.

Optimizely Web Experimentation Screenshots

Screenshot of AI-Powered Experimentation with Opal:

- Instant Test Ideas: Generates high-quality A/B test ideas based on any goals and audience insights.
- Smarter Experimentation: The AI can suggest impactful variations, reducing guesswork and increasing test velocity.
- More Than Just Ideas: From hypothesis generation to analyzing results, Opal helps optimize every stage of the experimentation process.Screenshot of the new Visual Editor with an AI Variation Development Agent

Create simple or advanced website changes fast without writing a line of code with our AI Development Agent.

Use natural language to build out your ideas and apply brand styles to your experiments instantly.Screenshot of Advanced Audience Targeting:

- Delivers personalized experiences by targeting users based on behaviors, attributes, and real-time conditions.
- Defines precise audience segments using first-party data, geolocation, and device type.
- Can test and optimize for different audience groups to maximize impact and engagement.Screenshot of Variation Template

Library of experience templates that you can access right within the Visual Editor. Customize these templates or create your own to easily reuse throughout your experimentation program.

- Offers pre-built templates for common test setups.
- Standardized variations and maintains brand integrity with reusable templates.
- Templates can be customized visually or tweak them with code for full flexibility.Screenshot of Web Experimentation Results Page:

- Data visualizations help interpret experiment performance.
- Displays which variations are winning with built-in statistical significance calculations.
- Results can be filtered by audience segments, events, and conversions to uncover key trends.Screenshot of the custom code editor for JavaScript & CSS changes, used to build complex tests.